
Decisive intervention needed for municipal performance — BLSA
The state of financial management in municipalities is mirrored in the level of basic service delivery all over the country.
The Auditor General's report on municipalities shows that decisive intervention is needed to improve the performance of local government performance is needed.
Busisiwe Mavuso, CEO of Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA), writes in her weekly newsletter that the financial state of our municipalities is shocking and a serious constraint on economic growth.
'Only one of the eight metros, Cape Town, received a clean audit, with Buffalo City, Tshwane, Mangaung and Nelson Mandela Bay getting qualified audits indicating material failures in their financial management.
'Johannesburg, eThekwini and Ekurhuleni received unqualified audits but with findings, indicating that the accounts are reliable but that some matters need attention. The worst opinion of an auditor, a disclaimer, means the auditor has not been able to form an opinion on the financial statements at all. Sixteen municipalities were seriously censure with a disclaimer.'
ALSO READ: 'Same story year after year': MPs unhappy as Auditor-General reveals local government audit outcomes
She says our metros are the economic hubs of our country, and it is completely unacceptable that most of them cannot get basic financial management right.
'They have budgets in the billions, such as Johannesburg, that will spend almost R90 billion this year but cannot manage that money adequately.
Public must vote to make their voice hear about municipal performance
'If management in private companies is unable to produce reliable accounts that auditors are content to sign off, shareholders would revolt. In the case of our local government, the shareholders are the public who must exercise their votes.'
Mavuso says what makes it even more galling is that the state of financial management mirrors the level of basic service delivery. She points out that Johannesburg, which most of our biggest companies call home, has been in a state of gradual decline for many years.
'Traffic lights seem to have been abandoned, local roads left to decay into unpassable tracks. President Cyril Ramaphosa, two months ago, decried the state of the city, which is meant to serve as host of the G20 later this year, promising an intervention from national government.
'Intervention is sorely needed. As the Auditor General makes clear in her report for the 2023/2024 year, the challenges are driven by a lack of financial management skills and vacancies. There simply are not enough qualified people working in local government to ensure the accounts are done properly, despite the billions at stake.'
ALSO READ: Hlabisa questions abilities of local government leaders as AG report shows no improvement in municipalities
There has been some improvement in municipal performance with less disclaimers
Mavuso says there has been evidence of improvement in some areas. The number of municipalities getting a disclaimer has fallen to 14 from 28 in the 2020-21 year, when local government elections saw new councils elected. That improvement, the Auditor General says, can be attributed to good support from provincial treasuries to assist municipalities' financial function.
However, she says that cannot be said of the metros, which the Auditor General says continued to regress since 2020-21, with three downgraded in the last year. She singled out Johannesburg and Tshwane for not budgeting adequately for infrastructure maintenance.
She also bemoaned the culture of municipalities approving unfunded budgets, expenditures that cannot be covered out of the revenue the municipalities receive. Mavuso says it should concern all South Africans that elected councillors can willingly approve spending plans for which there simply is no money. 'That is not budgeting – it is reckless spending.
'Controls over expenditure are also problematic. Johannesburg tops the list in terms of unauthorised expenditure, with R2.76 billion. Tshwane is not far behind at R2.15 billion. Beyond the numbers, the Auditor General also reviews municipalities' performance reports, which municipalities are legally required to produce to show how they are doing against their own targets.
'She says there has been no improvement since 2020-21, with only 26% meeting the Auditor General's quality standards on submission. Thanks to corrections made after submission, 52% ended up meeting standards, but that means almost half still fail to.'
ALSO READ: Questions about municipal manager's qualifications after R927 000 spent on 22 laptops – report
Auditor General's report highlights failure in municipal performance
The Auditor General's report is a very helpful spotlight on one of the drivers of service delivery failure in local government, Mavuso says.
'This is now a national priority and one of the biggest constraints on economic growth. Service delivery failure often means businesses cannot function.
'It has been given national prominence through Operation Vulindlela 2.0, the new phase of the successful unit led by the presidency that has been decisive in tackling the electricity crisis and the logistics crisis, among other reforms.
'The need for decisive intervention in municipal performance is very clear. We have to get people into municipalities who are capable of delivering on action plans that will improve the financial function.'
The Auditor General also pointed out that weak information technology, again driven by a lack of skills and controls, is a key reason for the municipal crisis and helps paint the picture of what Operation Vulindlela must contend with. Mavuso says an army of highly capable finance professionals is going to be needed.
'There is also a much-needed review underway of the 1998 white paper on local government that has the potential to overhaul policy and find new ways of supporting local government, ensuring better coordination between local, provincial and national.
'The white paper should elevate the importance of consequence management, especially where there is a lack of performance and continuous service delivery issues.'
ALSO READ: Ineffective governance at centre of municipal dysfunction – IoDSA
Investec report shows what South Africa could have been
Mavuso says she was also struck by a report from Investec last week showing how different the country would be today if we had stuck to the 4.5% growth rate we regularly achieved until 2008. 'In 2024, the economy would have been 40% bigger than it was.
'Government revenue would have been R800 billion higher than it is. Just think about that number and the huge arguments we just had about increasing VAT to raise R75 billion over the next three years. Had our economy maintained its trajectory, the government would have little debt, and there would be ample room to grow spending on public services.
'Unemployment would also be sharply lower, with a third fewer people out of work. It was a helpful reminder of how much we lost through poor policy and poor performance. Of course, there were other factors that played a role, including weaker commodity prices and Covid.
'But other countries managed to recover their growth rates with global growth averaging around 3%, while we have been stuck at 1% or less.'
Mavuso says when we think of the cost of poor municipal performance and other structural constraints on our growth, it helps to imagine how different things could be. 'Our people are condemned to live poorer lives, with many more out of jobs. Reports like the Auditor General's show us what must be done. We must be serious about doing it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Fossil fuels are still subsidised: G20 could push for the funds to be shifted to cleaner energy
As the G20 presiding nation, South Africa has an opportunity to champion issues relevant to emerging economies, says the author. Image: Independent Media As the G20 presiding nation, South Africa has an opportunity to champion issues relevant to emerging economies. One of these issues is government subsidisation of privately owned fossil fuel corporations. Fossil fuel subsidies are paid when a government covers some of the costs involved in producing fossil fuel energy. This can be done by increasing the revenue received by oil, gas or coal companies, or lowering the price paid by consumers for fossil fuel based energy. Fossil fuel subsidies may include tax breaks, low interest loans, and underpriced energy, all of which reduce costs for companies or consumers and encourage more fossil fuel use. Some subsidies are explicit: when fuel is sold below its real supply cost or when producers receive financial support from the government. Others are implicit: when fuel prices don't reflect the full environmental and health costs. For example, what the consumer pays for petrol excludes the cost of impacts like pollution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ South Africa has set four key priorities for its 2025 G20 presidency. These are: strengthening disaster resilience; keeping debt levels down; mobilising the finance needed to move to renewable energy; and setting up green industries. South Africa, as G20 president, should push for fossil fuel subsidies to be shifted into funding cleaner energy and climate adaptation. This should be paired with strong support for clean energy investments and measures to retrain fossil fuel workers for sustainable, green economy jobs. The cost of fossil fuel subsidies The G20 is made up of 19 of the world's largest economies, spanning both developed and developing nations, along with two regional blocs: the European Union and the African Union. Collectively, its members represent 85% of global gross domestic product, over 75% of international trade, and approximately two-thirds of the world's population. Developed countries are the largest historical contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. They've built their industries using fossil fuels. Globally, fossil fuel subsidies amount to $11 million every minute. Despite a commitment in 2009 to scale back subsidies, the G20 nations spent over $1 trillion on them in 2023. What South Africa can do as G20 president Ending fossil fuel subsidies is not just about removing financial support. It is about using those resources better by redirecting the money to solar, wind and other renewable technologies. As G20 president, South Africa should set up a working group or ministerial dialogue focused on subsidy reform. Forging coalitions with other emerging economies and civil society actors will build support. South Africa can help reshape the global conversation to centre on economic justice and energy security. As president it should encourage G20 members to adopt clear, actionable renewable energy transition plans that safeguard workers (like coal and oil workers) and communities who will be left worse off when fossil fuel subsidies end and their industries close down. This will ensure a just and inclusive move towards a cleaner energy future. Llewellyn Leonard Image: Social Media Llewellyn Leonard is a professor of Environmental Science, University of South article was originally published on The Conversation. BUSINESS REPORT


Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
G20 alert — the assault on information integrity is intensifying
The Group of 20 is easily dismissed as a talk shop with little substance. The gathering of ministers and heads of state of the world's richest economies is dissed for being a bloated bureaucracy, a clubby talkshop that lacks legitimacy, inclusivity and impact. It passes by the general public annually as background noise. But thanks to Donald Trump and his theatrical threats, it is well known not only in South Africa but globally that this year's G20 is being hosted by President Cyril Ramaphosa – the first time an African head of state has been handed the honour. What remains background noise are the engagements taking place weekly in the build-up to the G20 Summit in November, which is centred on three core themes: solidarity, equality and sustainability. Just take a glance at the packed G20 calendar to get an idea of the weighty agenda right now. The G20 programme encompasses 13 engagement subgroups from an array of interests, including the O20 (Oceans), C20 (Civil), W20 (Women), B20 (Business) and Y20 (Youth). The absence of Media in the formal structure is conspicuous. But no matter, the media has a window of opportunity to nudge public interest issues onto the agenda, and into key declarations, through the creation of its own M20. The M20 is a parallel, collaborative initiative operating outside the G20 tent. This year, it has been initiated by the SA National Editors' Forum, Media Monitoring Africa and other partners. Key media issues elevated during the Brazil G20 presidency in 2024 are being pursued again. Priorities are information integrity, artificial intelligence, copyright, sustainability and climate reporting. The starting blocks are already in place, emerging from the 2024 G20. The Digital Economy Working Group published a declaration that incorporates attention to the importance of digital inclusion for all, and the Brazilian government launched a Global Initiative for Information Integrity on Climate Change. There is an urgency to build on these gains, especially at a time of heightened unaccountability, counterfeit journalists, deepfakes, bullying, attacks on journalists and a daily struggle by the media to stay afloat. It is hard to keep track of the assaults on media and threats to information integrity. This week, for instance, a journalist in Ethiopia, Ahmed Awga, was given a two-year jail sentence for ' disseminating hateful information via a Facebook post he did not author'. In South Africa, the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection issued a 'fake news' alert after an analysis about the interest of Elon Musk's Starlink in South Africa was circulated on X under the false pretence that it was penned by its executive director, Joel Netshitenzhe. Also in South Africa, word broke that the Mail & Guardian, which this year celebrates its 40th anniversary of gutsy investigative journalism, is on its knees and slashing jobs to stay afloat. In the US, all remaining staff at Voice of America were expecting termination notices, 'effectively shutting down the international broadcasting network, according to Politico. Yet, against this disruptive backdrop, the first published M20 policy brief notes that the G20 programme gives less attention to information integrity this year compared with 2024. The G20 will, however, host a workshop on generative AI 'and its evolving ability to produce high-quality deepfakes at a lower cost, and the impact on information integrity, and consideration of possible recommendations'. The policy brief, which is open for comment, spells out both the potential for the G20 to make a difference, and the threat in the media space right now: 'Media engagement on the G20's interest in 'information integrity' can make a difference as to whether journalism's strength and standing can make gains – or if current troubling media trends stay as they are, or go more horribly wrong.' Right now, the outlook is bleak. The public interest media space is wilting, as the offensive against information integrity is advancing. Now is not the time to let cynicism silence a call to action. DM Janet Heard is involved in the M20 initiative. She writes in her personal capacity.


eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
AG finds troubling decline in municipal finances
JOHANNESBURG - A very small percentage of the country's municipalities (16%) achieved a clean audit. While 39% achieved unqualified audits, a significant majority of these (71 out of 99) still had issues with the quality of their financial statements, indicating underlying weaknesses in financial reporting and controls. More than half of the municipalities (117) received audit outcomes that were not clean or unqualified and, as a result, had to be assisted by the AG to provide proper statements. The AG's findings paint a picture of a municipal landscape struggling with human capital and institutional capacity issues, with the City of Cape Town serving as a beacon of good practice. The AG has expressed concern over the audit outcomes of metropolitan municipalities due to their significant financial and social impact. Metros manage 57% (R350.88 billion) of the national expenditure budget, affecting 46% (8.1 million) of households. They are central to economic activity. Auditor-General's local government report to parliament On May 28, 2025, Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke presented a briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA). The briefing focused on the audit outcomes for local government for the 2023-24 financial year, during which the AG provided a detailed overview of the current state of financial management within the country's municipalities. The AG's mission is to strengthen South Africa's democracy by promoting oversight, accountability, and good governance within the public sector through effective auditing, thereby fostering public confidence. The AG has questioned the competence of the financial officers and consultants employed by these municipalities, emphasising a lack of discipline and understanding of fundamental financial management and reporting principles among those responsible for these tasks. While the number of municipalities receiving disclaimers of audit opinion decreased from 28 to 14, the AG believes this is still unacceptable. She says there is an urgent need for further improvement to eradicate such outcomes. Compounding these concerns, seven municipalities obtained adverse audit findings, signifying that their financial statements were considered entirely unreliable. Further compounding the audit findings, 93 municipalities received qualified audit opinions, signifying inaccuracies within their financial statements. The Auditor-General noted that many municipalities are simply unable to publish credible financial statements. Maluleke says this critical inability raises serious questions about the competence of both administrative and political officeholders within these municipalities. The AG's statement points to systemic issues beyond mere oversight errors, suggesting a fundamental lack of skill and adherence to proper financial practices. This directly impacts transparency, accountability, and the ability of these municipalities to effectively manage public funds and serve their communities. Political officeholders In recognition of the fact that effective leadership significantly contributes to positive municipal outcomes, the Auditor-General is currently evaluating the performance of mayors and municipal speakers. Notably, out of 257 municipalities, only three were not audited: Mafube and Maluti a Phofong in the Free State, and Thaba Chweu in Mpumalanga. These exceptions were due to their failure to submit financial statements. A significant number of Free State municipalities are failing to submit their financial statements on time, impacting the quality of the submissions. Provincial leadership, particularly COGTA, is therefore urged to set clear policies for accepting late submissions. Among all metropolitan municipalities, only the City of Cape Town achieved a clean audit. The Auditor-General is particularly concerned about the audit outcomes of these metro municipalities, noting their critical role in managing 57% of the national expenditure budget. This directly impacts around 8.1 million households and the nation's economic activity, as these metros are its very core. Cape Town received a qualified audit, while Ekurhuleni, Johannesburg, and eThekwini obtained unqualified audits. However, Johannesburg did not provide a quality financial statement. Among the metropolitan municipalities, 50% received qualified audits, including Tshwane, Buffalo City, Mangaung, and Nelson Mandela Bay, all experiencing governance stability challenges. Buffalo City has been particularly affected, with vacancies for key positions in electricity and sanitation management persisting for 80 and 24 months, respectively. These metropolitan areas have consistently weakened their institutional arrangements. Given their resources and locations, they should not face difficulties attracting the necessary skills. Furthermore, metropolitan municipalities are failing to budget adequately for proactive infrastructure maintenance. This is despite National Treasury's recommendation that 8% of the existing infrastructure budget be allocated specifically for this purpose. Such insufficient budgeting ultimately leads to poor service delivery, requiring urgent attention from the metros. Explainer: According to the Auditor General, the following is an explanation of each type of Audit outcome: · CLEAN AUDIT OUTCOME: The financial statements are free from material misstatements (in other words, a financially unqualified audit opinion) and there are no material findings on reporting on performance objectives or non-compliance with legislation. · FINANCIALLY UNQUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION: The financial statements contain no material misstatements. Unless we express a clean audit outcome, findings have been raised on either reporting on predetermined objectives or non-compliance with legislation, or both these aspects. · QUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION: The financial statements contain material misstatements in specific amounts, or there is insufficient evidence for us to conclude that specific amounts included in the financial statements are not materially misstated. · ADVERSE AUDIT OPINION: The financial statements contain material misstatements that are not confined to specific amounts or the misstatements represent a substantial portion of the financial statements. · DISCLAIMER OF AUDIT OPINION: The auditee provided insufficient evidence in the form of documentation on which to base an audit opinion. The lack of sufficient evidence is not confined to specific amounts or represents a substantial portion of the information contained in the financial statements. by Nkateko Muloiwa