logo
A Florence setting helps a mother and daughter be their truest selves in ‘The Light in the Piazza'

A Florence setting helps a mother and daughter be their truest selves in ‘The Light in the Piazza'

Boston Globe07-05-2025

On a lunch break from rehearsals,
'It's an internal tug of war between her own knowledge, practicality, and reason, and wanting to ferociously protect Clara from any potential hurt. But then her heart is saying, 'Look at her. She's a completely different human and blossoming into her truest self.' And so how can Margaret deny that?,' Greco explains. 'So it's a heart versus reason struggle, and [Margaret] is caught trying to navigate that. And this is where she realizes that suddenly Fabrizio has replaced her as Clara's lifeline.'
Advertisement
This rare revival of the musical was on the top of Greco's wish list when she took over as artistic director at the Huntington in 2022. She first saw 'The Light in the Piazza,' featuring music and lyrics by Adam Guettel and a book by Boston University alum
'[The show] is trying to get at some of the most complicated, deep pings and pangs going on inside of each of us.'
'Piazza' is the first musical Greco has ever directed, having focused on new play development for much of her career. When she arrived at the Huntington, she thought, 'What are the things I haven't done that scare the [expletive] out of me? I wanted to do a big ass musical, and this one spoke to me as a great piece of drama. And I am shaking in my boots every day. I've been directing for a long time, but this is a whole other beast.'
From left, director Loretta Greco and assistant director Alexandra Dietrich during rehearsal for "The Light in the Piazza" at the Huntington Theatre.
Josh Reynolds for The Boston Globe
The scene when Margaret senses Clara's growing feelings for Fabrizio unfolds, over tea, inside the home of Fabrizio's elegant Italian parents, Signor (William Michals) and Signora Naccarelli (Rebecca Pitcher), who are joined by their eldest son, the wayward Giuseppe (Alexander Ross), and his stylish, hot-blooded wife, Franca (Rebekah Rae Robles). The family, who own a clothing shop, are charmed by Clara and enthusiastic about the match, but unaware of Clara's disability.
Advertisement
'It's like meet-the-parents night. Margaret wants to share enough of the secret about Clara so that she can end this charade,' Greco says. 'But she sees how happy and natural Clara and Fabrizio are together. So she doesn't quite know how to do that.'
When Clara and Fabrizio first get stars in their eyes, a skeptical Margaret discourages the romance. She's always agreed with her husband, Roy, back home in North Carolina, to shield their daughter from pain and heartache, because her cognitive abilities and emotional regulation were hampered by a brain injury she suffered when she was 12. But she's privately yearned for Clara to have an independent and full life.
As Clara and Margaret get swept up in Florence's intoxicating swirl of art, history, and romance, Clara begins to discover herself and find independence, while Margaret's perspective shifts.
'There's a toggling that Margaret does. She's watching her deepest, most passionate hopes for Clara come to fruition.
But
her sole identity has been tied to being Clara's caretaker, mother, helpmate, best friend, and companion.'
Indeed, the mother-daughter story resonates for Greco in particular, as the parent of a now young-adult daughter. 'It is the plight of every mother — when your daughter starts to step into their womanhood and find their autonomy — to suddenly see your role and purpose and impact be replaced with friends, lovers, and others.'
Skinner, who has starred in musicals like 'Side Show' and 'Suffs' on Broadway, has forged a deeply personal connection with Margaret. 'I think of my grandmother constantly. I really know this person and what she's grown up with, the sort of protocol of decorum that she's learned how to go through life with.'
Advertisement
Margaret begins to grapple with the state of her own withered marriage while watching young love flourish. 'I think there's something about seeing them together that I'm sure makes her reflect on her own life,' Skinner says.
Greco says they've been looking at Clara's different way of looking at the world as a 'superpower.' 'What's refreshing is that Clara says exactly what she's feeling and thinking in real time. She has no cynicism, is full of questions, and has an appetite that is voracious.'
When she meets Fabrizio for the first time, he's drawn to 'her wonder, her curiosity, her appetite for life, and that's part of what excites and inspires him.'
The setting in Florence, considered the birthplace of the Renaissance, is key to Clara's sexual and emotional awakening. 'She's feeling for the first time that she belongs somewhere,' Martinez says. 'All the puzzle pieces are coming together and the gears are shifting. She's blossoming into the woman that neither she nor her mother nor the doctors ever knew she could be.'
For inspiration, Greco and scenic designer Andrew Boyce looked at Florentine architecture and Renaissance artwork and sculpture, but it's not a literal interpretation. 'It goes for those big, evocative feelings and big strokes of visceral impact,' Greco says.
At the center of the stage is a revolving turntable, which Greco says 'seeds' the theme of 'life's fluidity … of Florence swirling around [the characters] … and the passeggiata, the ritual of Italians to walk in a circle at sunset in the parks and the piazzas.'
Advertisement
Ultimately, Greco hopes the musical reminds audiences to embrace risk-taking and not fear uncertainty. 'We can't grow if we aren't taking risks in life,' she says. 'Reason has to flow through the heart for us to be our most balanced, truest selves, and I think that the world could use a lot more recalibration in terms of our hearts.'
'We really see Margaret grow and change,' she concludes. 'She's a woman of a certain age who has to figure out a way to let her heart win and set her most prized possession free. It's a killer!'
THE LIGHT IN THE PIAZZA
Presented by the Huntington. At Huntington Theatre, May 8-June 15. Tickets from $29. 617-266-0800,

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo 'poster boy'?
Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo 'poster boy'?

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo 'poster boy'?

NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein 's lawyer portrayed him as the falsely accused 'original sinner" of the #MeToo era, while a prosecutor told jurors at his sex crimes retrial Tuesday that the former movie mogul preyed on less-powerful women he thought would never speak up. The two sides took very different tones in their closing arguments, which are due to conclude Wednesday. Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, veered into folksy jokes and theatricality — sometimes re-enacting witnesses' behavior — as he contended that his client engaged in a 'courting game,' not crimes. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg, as direct as Aidala was discursive, urged jurors to focus on Weinstein's accusers and their days of grueling testimony. 'This was not a 'courting game,' as Mr. Aidala wants you to believe. This was not a 'transaction,'' she told jurors. 'This was never about 'fooling around.' It was about rape.' The majority-female jury is expected to start deliberations at some point Wednesday, inheriting a case that was seen as a #MeToo watershed when Weinstein was convicted five years ago. It ended up being retried, and reshaped, because an appeals court overturned the 2020 verdict. Weinstein, the former Hollywood honcho-turned-#MeToo outcast, has pleaded not guilty to raping a woman in 2013 and forcing oral sex on two others, separately, in 2006. Aidala argued that everything that happened between the ex-producer and his accusers was a consensual, if 'transactional," exchange of favors. The attorney accused prosecutors of 'trying to police the bedroom' and zeroing in on the man seen as 'the poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement.' 'They tried to do it five years ago, and now there's a redo, and they're trying to do it again,' he told jurors. His hours-long summation touched on matters from the acclaimed, Weinstein-co-produced 1994 film 'Pulp Fiction' to his own marriage and his grandmother's Italian gravy, at times playing for — and getting — laughs from jurors and Weinstein. Aidala depicted the former studio boss as a self-made New Yorker, while painting Weinstein's accusers as troubled and canny 'women with broken dreams' who plied him for movie opportunities and other perks, kept engaging with him for years and then turned on him to cash in on his #MeToo undoing. All three received compensation through legal processes separate from the criminal trial. Blumberg countered that Weinstein interpreted a sexual 'no' as a cue to 'push a little bit more, and if they still say no, just take it anyway.' She argued that his accusers stayed in friendly contact with Weinstein because they were trying to work in entertainment, and they feared their careers would be squashed if they crossed him. 'He chose people who he thought would be the perfect victims, who he could rape and keep silent,' the prosecutor said. 'He underestimated them.' Weinstein had a decades-long run as one of the movie industry's most influential people. In 2017, allegations of sexual assault and harassment tanked his career and catalyzed the #MeToo movement, which seeks accountability for sexual misconduct. He was subsequently convicted of sex crimes and sentenced to prison in New York and California. His California appeal hasn't been decided. Since the New York retrial opened April 23, prosecutors have brought in more than two dozen witnesses. The prosecution centered on Weinstein's three accusers, who each faced days of questions. In often graphic and sometimes tearful testimony, the women said the Oscar-winning producer used his showbiz stature as a hook to prey on them. Jessica Mann, who accused Weinstein of rape, was a hairstylist hoping to make it as an actor when she met him. The sexual assault accusers also were trying to build careers in entertainment: Miriam Haley was a production assistant and producer, and Kaja Sokola was a teenage model who wanted to get into acting. Prosecutors added Sokola's allegations to the case for the retrial. But some other accusers from the first trial weren't part of the second. The appeals court said it was prejudicial to include their accusations, which never resulted in charges. Weinstein, 73, decided not to testify. His attorneys presented a few witnesses to cast doubts on certain aspects of the accusers' accounts. But Weinstein's defense also relied heavily on questioning prosecution witnesses — even surprising Sokola with her own private journal — to try to undermine their credibility. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.

Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo 'poster boy'?
Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo 'poster boy'?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo 'poster boy'?

NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein 's lawyer portrayed him as the falsely accused 'original sinner" of the #MeToo era, while a prosecutor told jurors at his sex crimes retrial Tuesday that the former movie mogul preyed on less-powerful women he thought would never speak up. The two sides took very different tones in their closing arguments, which are due to conclude Wednesday. Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, veered into folksy jokes and theatricality — sometimes re-enacting witnesses' behavior — as he contended that his client engaged in a 'courting game,' not crimes. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg, as direct as Aidala was discursive, urged jurors to focus on Weinstein's accusers and their days of grueling testimony. 'This was not a 'courting game,' as Mr. Aidala wants you to believe. This was not a 'transaction,'' she told jurors. 'This was never about 'fooling around.' It was about rape.' The majority-female jury is expected to start deliberations at some point Wednesday, inheriting a case that was seen as a #MeToo watershed when Weinstein was convicted five years ago. It ended up being retried, and reshaped, because an appeals court overturned the 2020 verdict. Weinstein, the former Hollywood honcho-turned-#MeToo outcast, has pleaded not guilty to raping a woman in 2013 and forcing oral sex on two others, separately, in 2006. Aidala argued that everything that happened between the ex-producer and his accusers was a consensual, if 'transactional," exchange of favors. The attorney accused prosecutors of 'trying to police the bedroom' and zeroing in on the man seen as 'the poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement.' 'They tried to do it five years ago, and now there's a redo, and they're trying to do it again,' he told jurors. His hours-long summation touched on matters from the acclaimed, Weinstein-co-produced 1994 film 'Pulp Fiction' to his own marriage and his grandmother's Italian gravy, at times playing for — and getting — laughs from jurors and Weinstein. Aidala depicted the former studio boss as a self-made New Yorker, while painting Weinstein's accusers as troubled and canny 'women with broken dreams' who plied him for movie opportunities and other perks, kept engaging with him for years and then turned on him to cash in on his #MeToo undoing. All three received compensation through legal processes separate from the criminal trial. Blumberg countered that Weinstein interpreted a sexual 'no' as a cue to 'push a little bit more, and if they still say no, just take it anyway.' She argued that his accusers stayed in friendly contact with Weinstein because they were trying to work in entertainment, and they feared their careers would be squashed if they crossed him. 'He chose people who he thought would be the perfect victims, who he could rape and keep silent,' the prosecutor said. 'He underestimated them.' Weinstein had a decades-long run as one of the movie industry's most influential people. In 2017, allegations of sexual assault and harassment tanked his career and catalyzed the #MeToo movement, which seeks accountability for sexual misconduct. He was subsequently convicted of sex crimes and sentenced to prison in New York and California. His California appeal hasn't been decided. Since the New York retrial opened April 23, prosecutors have brought in more than two dozen witnesses. The prosecution centered on Weinstein's three accusers, who each faced days of questions. In often graphic and sometimes tearful testimony, the women said the Oscar-winning producer used his showbiz stature as a hook to prey on them. Jessica Mann, who accused Weinstein of rape, was a hairstylist hoping to make it as an actor when she met him. The sexual assault accusers also were trying to build careers in entertainment: Miriam Haley was a production assistant and producer, and Kaja Sokola was a teenage model who wanted to get into acting. Prosecutors added Sokola's allegations to the case for the retrial. But some other accusers from the first trial weren't part of the second. The appeals court said it was prejudicial to include their accusations, which never resulted in charges. Weinstein, 73, decided not to testify. His attorneys presented a few witnesses to cast doubts on certain aspects of the accusers' accounts. But Weinstein's defense also relied heavily on questioning prosecution witnesses — even surprising Sokola with her own private journal — to try to undermine their credibility. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.

French Open recap: Lorenzo Musetti avoids default after kicking ball into linesperson
French Open recap: Lorenzo Musetti avoids default after kicking ball into linesperson

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

French Open recap: Lorenzo Musetti avoids default after kicking ball into linesperson

The Athletic Welcome to the French Open briefing, where will explain the stories behind the stories on each day of the tournament. On day 10, tennis' bizarre relationship with unsportsmanlike conduct took another twist, the wind whipped up the clay on Court Philippe-Chatrier, and Roland Garros' decision to keep line judges came under scrutiny. Why did Musetti avoid being defaulted from his quarterfinal? Lorenzo Musetti is headed to the semifinals of the French Open, but he could easily be heading home. Advertisement Musetti, the occasionally feisty Italian, cruised through the first set of his quarterfinal against Frances Tiafoe on Tuesday afternoon. In the second, things started to go south. His slice backhand wasn't biting. His forehand was flying. Tiafoe had gotten used to his spins and was outplaying him. As the second set wound down, Musetti vented by kicking a ball toward the back wall of Court Philippe-Chatrier. It accidentally whacked a line judge near her shoulder. The ball wasn't moving particularly fast, but sending a ball in flight in anger and hitting anyone with it, much less a line judge, comes with a ball abuse penalty that can include being ejected from the tournament. Tennis is weird about defaults — the ultimate penalty for bad behavior, which involves automatically losing the match. Whether or not a player smacks a ball in frustration, or throws or kicks it like Musetti, the penalty more often than not is outcome-based. If the person struck is in distress, the player gets defaulted, they are allowed to continue. But per the rulebook, that should be irrelevant. 'Players shall not violently, dangerously or with anger hit, kick or throw a tennis ball while on the grounds of the tournament site except in the reasonable pursuit of a point during a match (including warm-up). Advertisement 'For purposes of this rule, abuse of balls is defined as intentionally or recklessly hitting a ball out of the enclosure of the court, hitting a ball dangerously or recklessly within the court or hitting a ball with disregard of the consequences.' The problem with the logic currently applied is that it gives players credit for being in control of something which they are not in control of. Smashing or kicking a ball into a crowd of people or an enclosed space is risky. Whether or not it hits someone with a glancing blow or square on is pure luck. On this occasion, chair umpire Timo Janzen let Musetti off with a warning. Tiafoe complained, but to no avail. Novak Djokovic was defaulted from the 2020 U.S. Open when he whacked a ball that inadvertently hit a line judge in the throat. Two years ago at Roland Garros, doubles player Miyu Kato and her partner were defaulted after Kato accidentally hit a ball kid in the neck when returning a ball to her — not even swatting it in frustration. Advertisement Kato originally received a warning, but her opponents complained and the supervisor ultimately disqualified Kato and her partner, Aldila Sutjiadi of Indonesia. The year before, Romania's Irina-Camelia Begu accidentally bounced her racket into the crowd. It hit a small child, who started crying but his parents said he was fine. She received a warning. If all this sounds a bit inconsistent, it is. Tiafoe was still annoyed with Janzen's handling of the situation an hour after the end of the match. He called the decision 'comical.' 'He did that and nothing happened,' Tiafoe said. 'Obviously it's inconsistent.' Musetti said later he was scared that he was going to get booted from the tournament. 'I did not want to harm anybody,' he said. 'There was no intention about it.' How Court Philippe-Chatrier turned into a dust bowl Sports stadiums can be weird places when it comes to wind. The air can be nearly still four stories up, but swirling about at court level. Advertisement That was Court Philippe-Chatrier on Tuesday, the second quarterfinal day for the men and the women. There were several moments during Iga Świątek's match against Elina Svitolina when the players had to stop and turn their heads away from the wind to avoid getting a mouthful of red dust. Players talk about feeling like small bugs in the cavernous stadium, which seats just 15,000. The stands slope gently outward, leaving a low broad opening at the top, while the retractable roof slides over from just one side, leaving a big opening at the top for gusts to get in. This was not as bad as 2019, when gusts measured at nearly 50 mph (and Rafael Nadal) sent Roger Federer packing in their semifinal. But it was not great. In tennis, wind direction can be just as important as its speed. Wind will make serving difficult regardless, but it has its clearest impact when it is blowing parallel to the sidelines, rather than perpendicular. At one end, players have to be wary of overhitting with the breeze at their back. On the other, they have to be mindful of how much it will hold up their shots. The player receiving a ball with wind behind it needs to react quicker; if it's slowing a ball down, their footwork needs to take them to it and adjust to any sudden changes of direction. Advertisement If air is buffeting around a stadium every which way, things get a little more chaotic. Świątek said the worst wind she has experienced was at Wimbledon, where she has problems on the grass even when it's still, but this was rough. 'In the second set, it got pretty crazy,' Świątek said. 'I never had that here, but in the first set it wasn't that bad. I think it kind of slowed down also at the end of the match.' Of course she thought that: she served three aces in the final game of her 6-1, 7-5 win. This was the day that the French Open's line-judge decision caused controversy From the start of play, it's felt inevitable that the French Open's decision to opt for line judges over electronic line calling (ELC) would come under scrutiny. Advertisement Mixed events on clay, and every other surface, use ELC, but the tournament opted against it. The France Tennis Federation (FFT) president, Gilles Moretton, said in April that this was because it trusts their industry-leading officials to do a good job, claiming last week that ELC had been shown not to be totally effective at the earlier clay events this year. The downside of no ELC was duly exposed Tuesday when at a critical moment in the quarterfinal between Aryna Sabalenka and Zheng Qinwen, a bad error from the officials could have made a major difference. With Zheng serving at 5-6, 30-30, Sabalenka hit a backhand that looked to have drifted long — so much so that Zheng stopped the point, despite there being no out call. The umpire got off her chair to inspect the mark, and backed up the line judge's call, but television replays using Hawk-Eye technology showed that the ball had actually been 7mm out. ELC has a margin of error, but it is smaller than 7mm. Given the speed at which Sabalenka's ball was traveling, it should have been relatively easy for the line judge to track, but bad errors like this are always possible with humans calling the lines. Zheng was able to hold her serve, so the incorrect call didn't have a material impact on the match, but it's an embarrassing look for the sport that such a critical call at a Grand Slam could have been botched like that. There were a couple of further wrong calls that were at least correctly overruled by the umpire. The FFT did not respond to a request for comment on the officiating errors from the match. Advertisement Later on Chatrier, Tiafoe was involved in a number of heated discussions with the umpire Janzen during his defeat to Musetti. On one occasion in the fifth set, Janzen got off his chair and incorrectly overruled an out call. The players are generally in favour of ELC, partly because while they know it's not completely infallible, there's certainty and no argument. Speaking of arguments, it's getting harder and harder to make one for relying on humans to make these decisions. How Sinner and Alcaraz have climbed the ladder Pretty much everyone who even vaguely follows tennis knows about or remembers the Rafael Nadal vs. Roger Federer Wimbledon final in 2008. Very few remember either of their paths to that final, however. Both were incredibly straightforward, with just one set dropped between them along the way. As the rounds went on, it felt as though each was trying to outdo the other and send out a little statement. Advertisement Something similar is happening here, where the top two seeds Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz are taking it in turns to showcase their title credentials in their bids to set up a meeting in Sunday's final. After Sinner eviscerated Jiří Lehečka Saturday for the loss of just three games, Alcaraz beat a much tougher opponent in Ben Shelton the following day, even if it took him four sets. Sinner then thrashed a similarly ranked opponent to Shelton in Andrey Rublev on Sunday night, losing eight games. Not to be outdone, Alcaraz only gave up five in a 6-0, 6-1, 6-4 battering of American world No. 12 Tommy Paul on Tuesday night. Sinner took two hours to beat Rublev; Alcaraz only took 94 minutes to get past Paul, who was physically hampered but would not have quelled the version of Alcaraz he played even at full fitness. The way it's been going, perhaps Sinner was watching Alcaraz's masterclass against Paul and thinking about how he could improve on it in his own quarterfinal Wednesday. Advertisement So good luck, Alexander Bublik. French Open men's draw 2025 French Open women's draw 2025 Tell us what you noticed on the tenth day… This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store