logo
Families of Bengali migrants deported to Bangladesh stare at endless uncertainty

Families of Bengali migrants deported to Bangladesh stare at endless uncertainty

Time of India3 days ago
Sixty-something Bhodu Sheikh sat on the porch of his ramshackle hut in Dorjee Para, a settlement tucked away in one corner of Paikar village in the Muslim-majority Murarai assembly constituency of West Bengal's Birbhum district, with a blank look in his eyes.
More than the rickety body that shrank further during the cough bouts from his debilitating asthma, Bhodu's overt signs of resignation to fate seemed expedited by his total ignorance of the current whereabouts of his daughter, Sonali, and five-year-old grandson Sabir, who along with his son-in law, Danesh, were picked up by Delhi Police from the Bengali Basti in Sector 26, Rohini, last month and pushed to Bangladesh.
They were deported following orders from the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO), Delhi police had said.
The family, Bhodu said, lived in Delhi for nearly 25 years, where Danesh worked as a ragpicker and waste collector. They were targeted, among hundreds of other basti dwellers, because they spoke Bangla and were most vulnerable to being branded as 'Bangladeshis', he alleged.
"I was born in this village," Bhodu claimed, "and so was my daughter. My grandson was born in Delhi".
Live Events
Sonali's brother, Suraj Sheikh, alleged that they paid a lawyer Rs 30,000 after he promised to get his sister and her family released, only to learn later that they had been sent to Bangladesh.
"We came home for the Qurbani Eid festival, but now we are too frightened to go back," Suraj's wife, Seema, chipped in.
To support his claim that his sister is now in some unknown location in Bangladesh, Suraj played a Facebook video, the authenticity of which PTI could not independently verify, where Sonali and her family, along with three others, and plead with folded hands for help.
About a kilometre away in Fakirpara in Paikar, a fledgling rural hamlet that comes alive every Tuesday on account of a cattle trading market that sits there, 30-year-old Amir Khan had a similar story to share.
Amir alleged that his sister, Sweety Bibi and her two sons, Qurban Sheikh (16) and Imam Dewan (6), were detained by Delhi Police from the same neighbourhood as Sonali and then deported to Bangladesh on June 27.
"My sister worked as a domestic help in that area. She was living in Delhi since she was 12 and wasn't at home when police raided, so they took her elder son instead. When she reached the police station looking for Qurban, they arrested her as well. She furnished Aadhaar cards as proof of their permanent address in Birbhum, which the police dismissed," Amir said.
"She had Qurban's birth certificate at home but she couldn't produce it since a devastating fire at the shanty barely days before the raids began had destroyed documents. We, however, have Imam's document here," Amir said, holding up the state health department certificate, which states that Imam was born at the Murarai rural hospital on January 1, 2020.
In the purported Facebook video, Sweety alleged that the police beat them up and coerced them into medical examinations and biometric tests before transporting them to Bangladesh.
"We haven't heard from them for nearly a month now. We have no idea where they are and how they are living through this in an unknown land," said Mahida Bibi, Sweety's mother, her voice trembling.
She claimed Sweety was born at the very house where she stood that once belonged to her grandmother.
"We will fight against this till the very end, both politically and legally," said Samirul Islam, TMC Rajya Sabha MP and a local from Murarai, while marching with his party supremo Mamata Banerjee in her 'Bhasha Andolan' protest rally in Bolpur against alleged 'linguistic terror' unleashed on migrant Bengalis by the saffron camp.
In a post on X, Islam published photographs of what he claimed were land documents of Sweety's maternal and paternal grandfathers and Sonali's paternal great grandfather - all dated between 1950s, to the 1970s.
"Anyone in the BJP who can actually read them will understand that these women are far more Indian than the loudmouth BJP touts slandering them," he wrote.
The IIT, Delhi postgraduate informed PTI that he awaited results of the legal battles on the issue pending before the high courts of Calcutta and Delhi. "We will move the Supreme Court, if required," he said.
Islam maintained that not just Muslims, but migrant backward class Hindus, like the Namashudra Matuas and Rajbanshis, are also being subjected to similar harassments of detention and
deportation
.
In the Jharkhand bordering village of Kahinagar, Ataul Sheikh (16) and his neighbour, Marjan (17), narrated their ordeal of being held at an Odisha government detention camp earlier this month.
"We had gone to Jharsuguda to work as masons in a construction project. On July 8, police came knocking on our doors at 1 a.m. We were first taken to the local police station and then moved to a room at a local college hostel where I was confined for four days," said Ataul, adding that his brother Satabul, too, was held.
Marjan, who was detained for two additional days, claimed he saw some 250 migrant workers, all Bengali-speaking, locked up in the camp.
"Do only Bangladeshis speak Bengali? Doesn't a significant number of Indians speak that language?" asked Chandni Bibi, Marjan's sister-in law. "By that logic, every Bengali-speaking citizen in Kolkata should also be arrested. It seems we must learn to speak in English now," she quipped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Arya Samaj marriages are under the scanner of courts
Why Arya Samaj marriages are under the scanner of courts

Indian Express

time2 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Why Arya Samaj marriages are under the scanner of courts

Also by Vineet Bhalla The Allahabad High Court last week directed the Uttar Pradesh government to investigate how 'fake Arya Samaj Societies' that solemnise marriages without verifying the age of the bride and the groom, and in violation of the state's anti-conversion law, 'have flourished throughout the State'. While hearing a case in which a Muslim man is accused of kidnapping, forcibly marrying, and committing statutory rape on a minor Hindu girl, Justice Prashant Kumar said that many marriages in the state, including those officiated by the Arya Samaj, bypass mandatory procedures under the UP anti-conversion law and marriage registration rules. The accused had claimed to have got married at an Arya Samaj temple. The Allahabad HC's directives are the latest in a series of judicial orders that have called for a scrutiny of marriages solemnised by the Arya Samaj. Such weddings are granted legal sanction under the 88-year-old Arya Marriage Validation Act. The Arya Samaj was formally established by Swami Dayanand Saraswati in 1875 as a Hindu revivalist movement. It gained prominence in northern India, especially Punjab (including present-day Pakistan), in the late 19th century. Among other things, the Arya Samaj made the very first attempts to convert persons from other faiths or ideologies to its version of Vedic, monotheistic Hinduism through a process it called 'shuddhi' (purification). One of the ways it facilitated this was by having a progressive view of inter-caste and even interfaith marriages. In effect, till the Special Marriage Act, 1954 came into force, the Arya Samaj provided the only way for a Hindu to marry out of caste or religion and to still retain their caste. In 1937, the Arya Marriage Validation Act was passed to 'remove doubts' and recognise the validity of Arya Samaj marriages. These weddings take place as per a specific set of Hindu rituals, but only require the bride and groom to be of marriageable age and declare themselves to be Arya Samajis — regardless of their caste or religion. The 1937 law states: 'Notwithstanding any provision of Hindu Law, usage or custom to the contrary, no marriage contracted whether before or after the commencement of this Act between two persons being at the time of the marriage Arya Samajists shall be invalid or shall be deemed over to have been invalid by reason only of the fact that the parties at any time belonged to different castes or different sub-castes of Hindus or that either or both of the parties at any time before the marriage belonged to a religion other than Hinduism.' The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — which covers not just Hindus but also Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs — recognises Arya Samaj marriages. Those belonging to other religions simply need to convert to Hinduism before the wedding. However, several Arya Samaj organisations complete this conversion ritual expeditiously. This means that Arya Samaj weddings are fast, often not taking more than a couple of hours. This, along with the ease of paperwork and relaxed requirements, make Arya Samaj weddings popular among eloping or runaway couples, who often belong to different castes or religions. Interfaith couples also have the option to marry under the SMA, which allows marriage without the couple having to give up their faith. However, under the SMA, couples must give a 30-day public notice before they marry, leaving them vulnerable to harassment from their families or the authorities. A petition on whether Arya Samaj marriages must comply with the requirements of the Special Marriage Act has been pending before the Supreme Court since 2022. However, since a number of BJP-ruled states have passed stringent anti-conversion laws over the last 10 years, several HCs have raised questions on the validity of Arya Samaj marriages. This is because the anti-conversion laws bar alternative legal processes for marriage involving religious conversion. For instance, in Uttar Pradesh, Section 6 of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 renders void any marriage that is preceded by an unlawful or procedurally non-compliant religious conversion. Sections 8 and 9 of the law require both a pre-conversion declaration 60 days before marriage and a post-conversion declaration within a specified timeframe to the district magistrate. The law also mandates an inquiry to verify the voluntariness and legality of the conversion process. Section 12 of the Act places the burden of proof on an accused to demonstrate that their spouse's consent for conversion was not obtained illegally. The default legal assumption, thus, is that marriages through conversion are illegal and non-consensual. This puts Arya Samaj marriages at odds with the UP anti-conversion law. The shuddhi performed before most interfaith Arya Samaj marriages does not comply with the onerous process for conversion prescribed in the anti-conversion law. Courts have, over the last few years, expressed concern over the mass-scale solemnisation of marriages by Arya Samaj organisations without sticking to lawful conversion practices or verifying marriage eligibility conditions. The Allahabad HC and Madhya Pradesh HC have ordered police investigations into instances where these organisations allegedly married minors using forged documents, and facilitated conversions without following procedures mandated by the anti-conversion laws of these states. In 2022, the Supreme Court orally observed that the Arya Samaj has 'no business' issuing marriage certificates, while the Delhi High Court last year directed an Arya Samaj temple to use verified witnesses to ensure that marriages performed by the temple were genuine. Justice Kumar referred to one such judgment by the Allahabad HC from May in his order on Thursday. He observed that the marriage between the Muslim man and the Hindu girl would be invalid because the girl was a minor and the man did not convert as per the UP anti-conversion law.

Before demanding citizenship proof from Kargil veteran's family, mob barged into another Muslim home
Before demanding citizenship proof from Kargil veteran's family, mob barged into another Muslim home

Scroll.in

time32 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Before demanding citizenship proof from Kargil veteran's family, mob barged into another Muslim home

On the night of July 26, a mob of Hindutva sympathisers forcibly entered the home of a Kargil war veteran's family in Pune's Chandan Nagar, accused his family of being Bangladeshi and demanded to see documents proving that they were Indian. Hours before, the same mob had similarly harassed another Muslim family who lived three houses away. In both instances, the mob was accompanied by police officials. As outrage over the incident grew, the police filed a first information report against seven Bajrang Dal workers who had raided the homes. 'In the garb of looking for illegal migrants, Muslims are being harassed,' said Shamshad Sheikh, whose uncle fought in the Kargil War. Sheikh and his family members were among those forced to go to the police station in the middle of the night with their documents. 'Several from our family served in the army, but we have been harassed to prove our nationality,' Sheikh said. So far, 16 people have been named in a first information report, Chandan Nagar Police Inspector Seema Dhakne told Scroll. Pradeep Jagannath Dhumal, the police hawaldar at the police station who is the main complainant, said that the initial FIR named seven people. 'All of them are Bajrang Dal members,' Dhumal told Scroll over the phone. Dhakne admitted to Scroll that the police had not carried out any background checks on the two Muslim families before they accompanied the Bajrang Dal workers to 'question' them. Vigilantes on the prowl Last Saturday night, Mohammed Salman had just retired to bed when there was a long banging on the ground-floor rented apartment in Chandan Nagar that he shared with his brother's family. Salman runs a hair-cutting salon in Pune. 'When my brother opened the door, several men came inside. They were chanting Jai Shri Ram,' he said. 'They said 'Aadhaar card nikalo, PAN card nikalo, kahan se aaye ho?'' Take out your Aadhar card, PAN card; where have you come from? Salman has lived in Chandan Nagar for six years. 'Before this we lived in another part of the city,' he said. 'My brother has lived in Pune for 17 years.' Salman said that a man dressed in plain clothes said he was from the police and asked them if any other Muslims lived in the neighbourhood. 'We were scared and told them about the Sheikh family,' said Salman. 'The Sheikhs are our neighbours in Pratapgarh' in Uttar Pradesh. The Hindutva workers and the accompanying police called Salman's landlord, who lived on the upper floor, to show identity proof. When contacted, the landlord refused to comment. A family of soldiers The mob then went next door into Sheikh's home. 'There were about 60 to 70 of them,' Shamshad Sheikh told Scroll. 'They went into our bedrooms, abused women and threatened children.' Sheikh, runs a transport business and lives in the residential locality. His extended family of 30, including his four brothers, live in the three adjoining houses. Sheikh's uncle Hakiumuddin served in the Indian Army and fought in the Kargil War. Hakimuddin currently lives in Pratapgarh. Hakimuddin's uncle – Sheikh's great-uncle – was also an Indian Army war veteran: he fought in the 1965 war against Pakistan and later in 1971. Several members of the family have served in the Indian army. Sheikh said five to seven men kept barging into the house while the rest stood outside and called them 'Bangladeshis'. 'We showed them our Aadhaar card, our PAN card,' he said. 'But they said the documents were fake.' Sheikh said that people in the mob identified themselves as Bajrang Dal members. The mob forced Sheikh's family to go to the Chandan Nagar police station. 'One person identified himself as a policeman,' said Sheikh. 'He was in plain clothes. He said the women and children could stay behind.' Sheikh, his brothers, uncle and their sons, and their neighbours Salman and his brother took their identification documents to the Chandan Nagar police station and waited there till 2.30 am. 'The police inspector told us to come again by 11 am the next day,' said Sheikh. 'She said that if we didn't come, we would be declared as Bangladeshis.' Chandan Nagar Police Inspector Dhakne refuted the allegation that she had threatened to declare the Sheikh family as Bangladeshis. 'I just asked them to return and submit their documents the next day,' Dhakne told Scroll. The family returned to the police station with their documents the next day. 'After that nobody harassed us,' said Sheikh. Policemen in plainclothes were with the mob, alleged the families, which the police later confirmed. 'The tip' Dhakne said that the Bajrang Dal told the police that some men from Assam were living in the area. She said the police team went directly to the spot with Bajrang Dal members without making any other inquiries. 'We suspected them to be Bangladeshis,' she said. 'If we get a tip, we will visit the spot. Some of our officers from the detection team wore civil clothes.' Dhakne added: 'We ask the suspects to show identification proof, details of native village, the local police station and we verify their details and leave them. The same protocol was carried out in this case.' In the initial FIR against the Hindutva mob, the police invoked sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanahita for unlawful assembly, disobeying public servants and creating public nuisance. But outrage grew over the harassment of a Kargil war veteran's family. The 26th anniversary of the Kargil War was marked across India on the same day – July 26. The police have added more stringent charges under Section 115 for causing voluntary hurt, Section 329 for criminal trespass, Section 353 for circulating false information and Section 299 for outraging religious feelings. Deputy commissioner of Police Somay Munde did not respond to calls or messages from Scroll. Officials from the Mumbai police told Scroll that they usually check the call data records of suspects to see if any phone calls have been made or received from Bangladesh before detaining people for questioning. However, Dhakne said they 'did not verify call records'. 'Police complicit' Milind Champanerkar, general secretary of People's Union for Civil Liberties, said it was a worrying pattern that 'even the police is complicit in anti-Muslim agenda'. 'About three months ago a Muslim salon owner was assaulted in Pune's Kothrud area because of his faith,' said Champanerkar. 'But the police did nothing, did not detain or arrest anyone.' Champanerkar said the police are dutybound to safeguard citizens. 'How can the police allow the Bajrang Dal to take the lead?' he asked, pointing out that no one from the outfit had been arrested so far for intruding into the homes of others. Firoz Khan, who runs a charitable organisation and is a member of the Republican Party of India in Pune, said communal incidents have increased lately. 'And all this is happening with complete knowledge of the police,' he said.

Delhi police files supplementary chargesheet against Delhi minister Kapil Mishra in MCC violation case
Delhi police files supplementary chargesheet against Delhi minister Kapil Mishra in MCC violation case

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Delhi police files supplementary chargesheet against Delhi minister Kapil Mishra in MCC violation case

The Delhi Police on Friday filed an additional supplementary charge sheet against Delhi Law Minister Kapil Mishra in a case of alleged Model Code of Conduct violation. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Vaibhav Chaurasia took the supplementary charge sheet on record. The copy of the charge sheet is supplied to the counsel for the accused. Mattar is now listed on August 8 for a further hearing. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category This matter is at the stage of arguements on framing of charges. On the last hearing, the Delhi police had filed a reply received from X, along with the additional supplementary charge sheet. The court was informed that the investigation related to the X post is completed. On May 27, the court had rapped Delhi police over inadequate investigation in a matter related to a tweet that Mishra allegedly posted. On March 7, the sessions court had dismissed the revision filed by Mishra against the summons issued to him. He had challenged the Cognisance and Summoning order of the trial court. An appeal is now pending before the High Court. Live Events The trial court had taken Cognisance of the charge sheet in an alleged violation of the Model Code of Conduct in 2020. It is alleged that Kapil Mishra had made a statement in January 2020 when the model code of conduct was in force. "The word 'Pakistan' is very skillfully weaved by the revisionist in his alleged statements to spew hatred, careless to communal polarisation that may ensue in the election campaign, only to garner votes," the court had said while dismissing the revision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store