Butler brothers secure stay on order restricting them from acting as company directors
In a judgment published last month, Ms Justice Nessa Cahill found Colum and Ciaran Butler failed to prove they acted responsibly in the operation of one of their companies, Downtul Ltd, which leased a premises at St Stephen's Green, Dublin, that operated as a Starbucks.
Advertisement
Downtul was placed in voluntary liquidation in November 2022.
The judge granted a declaration sought by Downtul liquidator Patrick O'Connell restricting the brothers from acting as company directors or secretaries for five years unless the company meets certain requirements set out in the Companies Act 2014.
Such an order means that, for the Butler brothers to act as directors of a company during that five-year period, that company must have share capital of at least €100,000 paid up by shareholders – or €500,000 in the case of a public limited company.
The judge had found that the brothers did discharge the burden of showing they acted honestly in the operation of Downtul.
Advertisement
Lawyers for the Butlers on Tuesday successfully applied for a stay on the order, after submitting that their clients would require time to get their affairs in order.
Brian McGuckian told the court his instructions were to seek a stay on the order for six months for two reasons.
He said he was firstly seeking the stay to allow the Butlers time to organise their affairs, noting that Ciaran is the director of 134 companies, while Colum is the director of over 170 companies.
Mr McGuckian said there was a general practice of the court affording directors time to organise their affairs in the context of an order of this kind.
Advertisement
He said he was also seeking a stay pending a possible appeal being brought against the High Court decision.
Padraic Lyons SC, for the receiver, said there was an obvious distinction between the granting of a stay pending an appeal, and a stay to allow the directors to get their affairs in order.
His side had received no correspondence on a potential appeal, and there were no draft grounds of appeal before the court. It was a matter for the directors to put before the court arguable grounds for appeal, he said.
Ireland
Jury views CCTV footage of Tom Niland hours before...
Read More
Mr Lyons agreed there should be a stay granted to allow the directors to organise their affairs but submitted that six months was an excessive amount of time.
Ms Justice Nessa Cahill said she would grant a stay of four months to allow the Butlers to organise their affairs.
She said she was not granting the stay pending a possible appeal, but noted the granted stay will be the same terms had she acceded to the application for a stay pending appeal.
It was a matter for the respondents if they wished to bring an applicant to appeal, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The rapid rise of Luckin coffee: is this the end of the Starbucks supremacy?
Name: Luckin. Age: Seven – it was founded in October 2017. Appearance: 20,000 locations and counting. Locations doing what? Serving coffee. It's a giant coffee chain. Oh yeah? If it's so giant, how come I've never heard of it? Because it started in China. Isn't China better known for tea? Yes, but they have drunk a lot more coffee since Starbucks opened its first outlets there in 1999. Luckin overtook Starbucks as China's biggest coffee chain in 2023. If Chinese people want Chinese coffee, so be it. It's a big world. Luckin knows that, which is why it has just opened up two outlets in New York City, on Starbucks' doorstep. It's aiming for global domination? It certainly looks like it. 'This is just the beginning,' Luckin posted on Instagram. 'NYC, we're here.' But why would I go to Luckin when I can go to Starbucks? For a largely frictionless technological experience. It has an app-based ordering system, no cashiers and hardly any seats. You just grab your latte and go. Is the coffee any better? If you really cared about coffee, you wouldn't go to either of these places. But Starbucks is home of the caramel macchiato, the pumpkin spice latte … Luckin is known for bestsellers like the coconut latte, the velvet latte and apple fizzy americano. Apple what? That's apple juice, fizzy water and coffee, over ice. What is Starbucks doing to fend off the Luckin threat? It is closing a bunch of stores. A bold strategy, if a little counterintuitive. The company plans to phase out its 90 or so 'mobile-order-only' locations in the US, to concentrate on 'community coffee houses' and a more personal customer experience. So it's going in the exact opposite direction to Luckin. It seems so. It has plans to refurbish existing locations, and it is going back to writing your name on the cup. A warm, friendly, welcoming atmosphere versus zero human interaction? I'm torn. If it helps you make up your mind, Luckin is also engaging in furious promotional discounting, selling $1.99 coffees in a city where a $6 cappuccino is not uncommon. Starbucks is doomed. That's a little premature. Luckin reported $4.7bn in sales last year, compared with $36.2bn net revenue for Starbucks. Still, a remarkable rise for the Chinese upstart. All the more remarkable after a 2020 false accounting scandal caused its stock price to collapse, driving the company into bankruptcy in the US. It emerged from bankruptcy in 2022, having replaced its top brass and received huge cash injections from a private equity firm. Do say: 'Good morning, young barista. One of your legendary handcrafted flat whites, please.' Don't say: 'You know what I miss? Vending machines.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Why Starbucks is getting rid of mobile-order and pick-up only stores
Starbucks is discontinuing its mobile-order and pick-up only stores, deeming them 'overly transactional' and lacking 'warmth'. This change will affect 80 to 90 locations across the US, with some potentially being converted into seated stores. The move is part of a broader operational overhaul led by CEO Brian Niccol, who aims to foster more customer-friendly environments and improve service. Starbucks plans to invest over $500 million in staffing for its US company-operated stores and is developing a new 'coffeehouse of the future' prototype featuring 32 seats and a drive-through. These strategic adjustments follow six consecutive quarters of sales decline for Starbucks, despite the CEO expressing optimism about the company's recovery.
BreakingNews.ie
9 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Classic Hits radio fails to prevent rival from using brand name GHR
The High Court has refused an injunction preventing a rival broadcaster to the Classic Hits Radio station owners from using the brand name "GHR". Choice Broadcasting Ltd, which is part of a group behind Radio Nova and Sunshine 106.8, owns Classic Hits Radio. The overall parent is Bay Broadcasting Ltd and it has been broadcasting as "Ireland's Classic Hits Radio" for the last three years. Advertisement GHR is a brand name by Bauer Audio Ireland Ltd, part of the 150-year-old Germany-headquartered Bauer family company, which manages a portfolio of eight FM radio stations in Ireland including Today FM, Newstalk, 98FM, Spin 1038, Spin South West, Cork's Red FM, iRadio and Beat. Along with GHR, Bauer also owns the brands 'Greatest Hits Radio', both of which it launched in the United Kingdom in 2019. Bauer says these are part of its brands to its more contemporary 'Hits Radio Network' radio service. The GHR Network of stations in the UK have a combined weekly reach of 7.1 million listeners and includes over 50 local and regional radio stations. On June 20th, Choice obtained an interim injunction preventing Bauer using the name 'Greatest Hits Radio' on the Failte DAB+ multiplex and any other delivery platform that is available in the Republic of Ireland. Choice claimed Greatest Hits Radio would infringe the plaintiff's trademark, 'Classic Hits'. Advertisement When the case returned to court a few days later, Bauer said it would not seek to contest the injunction but would instead seek an early hearing of the entire matter. It also said, instead of Greatest Hits Radio, it intended to trade using the initials 'GHR', both in its announcements and jingles on the radio station, and in its logo and advertising until the trial of the action. Choice objected, and there followed a hearing of the issue of extending the injunction to cover the use of GHR, which was strongly contested by each side. On Wednesday, Mr Justice Brian Cregan ruled the terms of the injunction do not include the initials 'GHR'. Advertisement He found Choice had not made out a fair issue to be tried that the initials 'GHR' amounted to passing off its brand or that there was a fair issue to be tried in relation to alleged infringement of trademark. Entertainment Today FM announce Oasis ticket giveaway and launch... Read More Even if it had, the balance of justice would have been in favour of refusing the application to extend the injunction to 'GHR', he said. The judge also said that even if he had found in favour of Choice in relation to fair issue and balance of convenience, he would have considered its (Choice's) undertaking that it could pay damages if it lost the case not to be sufficient on its own. This was in circumstances where the evidence showed Choice is "balance sheet insolvent" and has created a charge over all of its assets, he said. He would therefore have concluded that a fortified undertaking as to damages from Choice's parent company was required. He said he would hear the parties later in relation to the fortified damages undertaking.
