India's digital infrastructure development 'game-changer': Databricks CEO Ghodsi
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
India's digital infrastructure development has been a "game-changer", putting the country ahead of most other nations, Databricks CEO and Co-founder Ali Ghodsi has said.At a press conference here on Wednesday at the Databricks Data + AI Summit 2025, Ghodsi said that India is "on the upswing" at a time when recession is a concern in several other regions and nations."What has happened in the last decade, where they've built a lot of digital infrastructure in India, is a game-changer. We don't have that even here, in other countries. India is now ahead on digital infrastructure compared to most other countries in the world," Ghodsi said in response to a question by PTI on India.This "of course, makes it much easier to innovate" in data and AI, he said.Ghodsi added that Databricks is very excited to partner with new companies in the field of AI as well as with "companies that have been around a long time" such as "the Tatas of the world that we're partnering with as well.""It's a gigantic market and with the pivots that are happening in strategy around the world, India is becoming more important. So very excited... it's like (there are) just opportunities in India, and it seems there are no troubles on the horizon. Fingers crossed," he said.Responding to a question on the situation with immigrants in the US and its impact on the company's hiring initiative, Ghodsi said he has lived in nine countries and "I think this (US) still is one of the best countries for immigrants to come here even today."He pointed out that 20-30 years ago, it was more common for an IIT topper in India to want to come to the US in search for career opportunities.He, however, noted that this has changed in the last 5-10 years."You stay in India, stay in Bangalore, get a really high-paying job there. You have your family there, you have the culture there. Why move to the United States? That's already been happening for many, many, many years. So (the) trend is already kind of happening."Noting that this is now the reality, Ghodsi said the company now hires talent in India."We're doubling down on Bangalore. We hired a huge engineering team. We target the IITs," he said, mentioning an instance where the company was hiring four people and had 700 people from the IITs apply in Bangalore. "That's a great market for us."In response to another question, he said that the company is heavily investing in India and other Asian markets like South Korea and Japan."We're also investing a lot in India, which is also doing really, really great. So like Asia in general is a big market opportunity. We're investing ahead of the game there," he said.Adding that the company is "so bullish" on what's happening in Asia, he said that the region can move faster on data and AI.Asserting that Asia does not have the same restrictions, and data and AI are not as tightly regulated as in Europe and America, he said, "So that just makes it amazing for us data and AI geeks, so we're very excited."He further underlined that Asia is high on his mind when undertaking financial planning for Databricks.Ghodsi said he tells his team to "go even more aggressive. More in India, More in Korea, more in Japan every year."So that is our strategy, and we're going to continue doing that. It's growing very fast. It's a much more diverse and bigger continent and more people, unlike Europe which is a little bit more homogeneous. Asia is really very different," he said.Databricks, a Data and AI company, is headquartered in San Francisco, with offices around the globe. The company announced a USD 100 million investment in global data and AI education , aimed at closing the industry-wide talent gap and preparing the next generation of data and AI engineers, data analysts and data scientists.The Databricks Data + AI Summit 2025 is a global event bringing together thousands of data practitioners, leaders and visionaries from more than 160 countries to explore the convergence of data and AI.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Markets watch: Asian stocks rise; crude gains as US-China tariff truce lifts sentiment
Representative image Asian stocks mostly gained on Tuesday, with Japan's Nikkei 225 (.N225) hitting a record high, after US President Donald Trump extended a tariff truce with China for another 90 days — a move that eased trade tensions between the world's two largest economies and steadied oil prices. The extension, announced Monday, staves off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods and removes one immediate risk for global markets. According to news agency Reuters, the truce had been largely expected by investors, who have also been buoyed in recent weeks by resilient US corporate earnings and prospects of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. Japan's Nikkei was last up 2 per cent as markets reopened after a long weekend, lifted by tech shares and tracking global gains. Australia's benchmark index (.AXJO) also hit a record high ahead of a central bank policy meeting widely expected to deliver a 25-basis-point rate cut, with another possible by November. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS) was slightly higher, while China's blue-chip CSI300 (.CSI300) was flat and Hong Kong's Hang Seng (.HSI) dipped 0.1 per cent in early trade. 'The US-China tariff truce extension preserves the status quo for now, so no immediate implications for investment markets,' Shane Oliver, chief economist and head of investment strategy at AMP in Sydney, was quoted as saying by Reuters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This is What Your Fingers Say About Your Personality Tips and Tricks Undo Oil prices also edged up as the trade extension eased concerns that escalating tariffs would weaken global economic growth and crimp fuel demand. Brent crude futures rose 26 cents, or 0.39 per cent, to $66.89 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained 22 cents, or 0.34 per cent, to $64.18, according to Reuters. Investors are also watching the August 15 meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, aimed at negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine. 'Any peace deal between Russia and Ukraine would end the risk of disruption to Russian oil that has been hovering over the market,' ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes wrote in a note, cited by Reuters. Attention in financial markets will now shift to US consumer price inflation data due later Tuesday. Economists polled by Reuters expect July's core CPI to rise 0.3 per cent month-on-month, faster than June's 0.2 per cent pace. 'CPI will be a key test for market tone. Softer data could give small-caps a lift, but for now, mega-caps remain firmly in control,' said Marc Velan, head of investments at Lucerne Investment Management. Money markets, according to Bloomberg, are pricing in more than two Fed rate cuts by December, with about a 90 per cent probability of a quarter-point reduction next month. However, an upside surprise in inflation could temper those expectations. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Will the rules-based international order survive the Trump presidency?
Recent observations on the rules-based international order have suggested that this system of interlocking governance institutions that emerged since the end of World War II, known to some as Pax Americana, might survive or thrive despite the onslaught of political and economic confrontations foisted on the world by U.S. President Donald Trump. The real question is not about its survivability per se, but rather the extent to which it might mutate under pressure from Washington's coercive policy prescriptions inflicted upon developing and emerging economies, particularly across the Asian region. A few definitional remarks are in order at this point. Firstly, the rules-based international order, a liberal paradigm seen as a remedy to the devastation wreaked by the two World Wars, was brought into existence by the U.S. This was made possible by the U.S. pushing ahead with the Marshall Plan to rebuild war-torn Europe, returning it to a minimum threshold of economic advancement and political stability that would enable the continent to support the global narrative of a unipolar world as envisioned by Washington. Thereafter, a broad set of 'norms and institutions that govern international relations as well as broad patterns of power distribution and economic flows across the world, most of it backstopped by American power and leadership' came into force, including the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (as well as the 'Washington consensus' that they implied), and a variety of related organisations. All these institutions existed to put guardrails in place for international politics — in other words these organisations were used as leverage to limit the regional and global ambitions of any potential rival to the aforementioned unipolar balance of power. The triumphs of Pax Americana The argument made by some who see the continuation of the rules-based international order even through the turbulence of the Trump years is that throughout the history of Asia's development, the U.S. has displayed the very same bullying tactics around the region that curbed and shaped the growth trajectory of Asian powerhouse economies. For example, Sandeep Bhardwaj argues that during the post-War years, when Japanese cloth imports of the U.S. outsold American domestic product, the U.S. in 1955 compelled Japan to agree to a voluntary export restriction that capped the latter's share of the U.S. market. However, the U.S. has equally nurtured the quality of openness within the rules-based order, allowing room for Asian and Latin American economies to periodically assert themselves and play a larger role within limited spaces, thus introducing the necessary element of system flexibility that has helped it endure despite a series of economic and political shocks over the past half century. Examples cited of such openness within Pax Americana include the U.S. and developed nations encouraging developing countries to join the United Nations umbrella of institutions; getting China to join the WTO in 2001 after going slow on global concerns about Beijing's human rights violations; supporting Japan's entry to the G-7 in 1973; strongly backing the entry of China, India, Indonesia, Japan, and Saudi Arabia into the G20; establishing the UN Millennium Development Goals to backstop the financing of industrialisation in emerging economies; and structural adjustment loans from the IMF. These loans, however, were a double edged sword, offering a financial lifeline for Asian countries while benefitting U.S. trade policy by forcing the opening up of these markets. The extent of U.S.' power There is no denying that the rules-based international order is far from an authoritarian hierarchy of forced policy prescriptions and expected political genuflection of so-called subordinate Asian nations. Yet, it is fair to ask whether such a warped balance of power in favour of the U.S. could ever emerge, given the Asian trajectory of rapid economic growth built on global trading and capital systems, the collective social emancipation of people, the propagation of individual and institutional liberty, and the growing state capacity for meaningful regional action and collaboration. If the sense of agency and autonomous power of Asian nation-states is overlooked, then it leads to a false sense of U.S. munificence in 'bestowing' openness and flexibility upon the rules-based order. In reality, the U.S., for all its economic heft and technological prowess had no choice but to find its own place within this complex matrix of competing nations worldwide, each strong in specific economic sectors, but perhaps less so in other areas. Within this more reasoned paradigm of the global political economy, which neither denies the unipolarity of the present moment nor overstates the U.S.'s ability to impose its hegemonic ambitions on other nations in today's multi-alliance, interconnected and interdependent framework of international engagement, it becomes clear that damage done to the rules-based liberal international order under the second Trump administration will transform the order to the point of it resembling a new order entirely. Ironically, at the heart of this act of reshaping the rules-based liberal international order, are not so much the consequences of what the U.S. is inflicting upon Asian nations but rather its abrupt pulling of the rug from under the heels of Europe by undermining the ideological cause and financial prospects of NATO and leaving the continent exposed to the risk of ever-increasing depredations of Russia. Similarly, the resoluteness with which Mr. Trump has tied his administration to the whims and fancies of the genocidal and warmongering causes of Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu will rewrite the playbook for everyone. This will impact the rulers of Saudi Arabia and Türkiye, rethinking regional political dynamics, as much as it will aspiring college students from India seeking admissions in countries other than the U.S. in the wake of compulsory social media scrutiny as a condition of visa issuance. A new order Yes, the silhouettes of the old rules-based liberal international order will continue to fall upon the new arrangements that the world will find itself forced to confront by the end of the second Trump term. However, there can be no denying that it will indeed be a new order built on the rise of bilateral agreements in place of broader regional ones. The newer order will feature the widespread use of economic sanctions to penalise political opponents across the globe in contravention of WTO norms; ever-growing skirmishes and limited wars; a reliance on drones and AI to settle territorial and other disputes; as well as a steady, catastrophic dismembering of global institutions fostering cooperation, reducing transactions costs and speaking up for human rights and standards of international engagement more broadly. Pax Americana may well give rise to the next phase of its own evolution, Flux Americana.
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump meets with Intel CEO after demanding he resign
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he had a "very interesting" meeting with the chief of US chip maker Intel, just days after calling for his resignation. Mr. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he met with Lip-Bu Tan along with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent. "The meeting was a very interesting one," Mr. Trump said in the post. "His success and rise is an amazing story." Mr. Trump added that members of his cabinet are going to spend time with Mr. Tan and bring the president "suggestions" next week. "Mr. Tan had the honor of meeting with President Trump for a candid and constructive discussion on Intel's commitment to strengthening US technology and manufacturing leadership," the company said in a posted statement. Intel added that it looks "forward to working closely with him and his Administration as we restore this great American company." Mr. Trump demanded last week that the recently-hired boss of Intel resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem," Mr. Trump posted on Truth Social last Thursday. Mr. Tan released a statement at the time saying that the company was engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised and ensure officials "have the facts." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In a statement, Mr. Tan said there has been "a lot of misinformation circulating" about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Mr. Tan said. The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at struggling Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. Intel's niche has been chips used in traditional computing processes, which are steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution.
