Arkansas moves to ban 'junk food' from SNAP program: 'Definition of crazy'
Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced a plan to restrict the types of food that can be purchased with food stamps, becoming one of the first governors to seek federal permission to ban items like soda and candy from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
At a news conference at the Arkansas Capitol Tuesday, Sanders said her administration had submitted a waiver request to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) that would prohibit the use of SNAP benefits for soft drinks, artificially sweetened candy and snacks made with flour, while expanding eligible items to include hot rotisserie chicken, which is currently excluded.
"Right now you can use food stamps to buy a soft drink or a candy bar from a gas station, but you can't use them to buy an Arkansas-raised hot rotisserie chicken from a grocery store," Sanders said. "That's the definition of crazy."
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins praised Sanders' move in a statement to Fox News Digital.
"Gov. Sanders is confronting childhood disease head on, and it starts with what families consume," Rollins said. "Today's waiver announcement is a welcome one, and I look forward to moving through the approval process swiftly. I encourage more states across the nation to follow the bold lead of states like Arkansas as we Make America Healthy Again."KENNEDY APPLAUDS 'VISIONARY' INDIANA GOVERNOR'S MAHA EXECUTIVE ORDERS
The waiver request is part of the Trump administration's "Make America Healthy Again" or MAHA agenda, which seeks to address chronic disease and healthcare costs by reforming federal nutrition programs.
"We finally have a president who, along with Secretary Rollins, has put a laser focus on solving America's chronic disease epidemic," Sanders said. "Reforming food stamps is a great place to start."
Trump's policies on food and health are taking the spotlight in his second administration, with a shift toward state-driven solutions focused on prevention rather than treatment. The MAHA initiative is led in part by Rollins and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who also appeared Tuesday at a similar SNAP reform announcement in Indiana.
Speaking in Arkansas, Rollins praised the state's leadership.
"What we are doing here today is affirming the value of federalism in all aspects of governance," she said. "No federal bureaucrat can understand the needs of Arkansas families better than their own governor."
Rollins added that SNAP reform was a key issue for Trump.
"This is one of the things he campaigned on, and this is what the American people voted for," she said.
Sanders said the program, originally designed to fight hunger, has been twisted by outdated regulations and perverse incentives.
"One third of our state has diabetes or is prediabetic," she said. "We're paying for it on the front end and the back end."
The waiver would affect nearly 350,000 Arkansas residents enrolled in SNAP and is scheduled to take effect in July 2026 if approved. According to Sanders, 23% of SNAP spending, or $27 billion per year, is used on soft drinks, candy and desserts, while the state spends $300 million annually treating chronic illness through Medicaid.WHOLE MILK SHOULD BE BACK AT SCHOOLS, EXPERTS SAY: 'NUTRITION SCIENCE HAS EVOLVED'
"This is not about taking anything away," she said. "It's simply saying that taxpayers are no longer going to cover the cost of junk food like candy and soft drinks." Rollins praised Arkansas's SNAP reform plan as a bold step toward improving public health, calling Sanders "courageous" for addressing childhood disease through nutrition.
"We are working to realign USDA and every taxpayer dollar around what is the best and most effective spend," Rollins said.
Arkansas Department of Human Services Secretary Kristi Putnam noted that the same state agency running SNAP also manages Medicaid.
"In one program, we've subsidized foods that we know make people less healthy. In the other, we're devoting significant resources to treating the same conditions brought on by unhealthy food," she said. "This makes no sense."
Critics, including the Food Research and Action Center, have argued the restrictions are punitive and unsupported by data. Trade groups representing beverage and candy manufacturers have also criticized the move. As reported by The Associated Press, American Beverage accused officials of "choosing to be the food police," while the National Confectioners Association called the plan "misguided."
Sanders addressed concerns about food costs, noting her administration's work to eliminate the state grocery tax.
"I think you'd be hard-pressed to say that you're gonna be better off having purchased a pack of Skittles and that your hunger is gonna be satisfied after that purchase," she said.
Rollins stressed that funding levels for SNAP would not change. "It just opens up the opportunity to buy better and more healthy food moving forward," she said.
The Arkansas waiver request was formally submitted Tuesday and includes a 30-day public comment period. The USDA and the governor's office are expected to begin coordination on implementation details this week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
What Makes a Food Ultraprocessed? The FDA Is About to Weigh In.
The federal government plans to develop a new definition of ultraprocessed foods, a wide-ranging group of snacks, meals and drinks that have become a cornerstone of the American diet. Nutrition researchers generally define ultraprocessed foods as industrially manufactured products that include ingredients you wouldn't find in your own kitchen, like high-fructose corn syrup or hydrogenated oils. The products also often contain artificial flavors, sweeteners and emulsifiers that make them appealing to consumers and can give them a longer shelf life. In crafting its own definition, the government could examine the chemicals and additives put in foods, the number of ingredients in a product or its overall nutritional content. That description could then be used to shape school lunch policy, regulate the foods available through federal services like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or make recommendations about limiting ultraprocessed food consumption in the U.S. dietary guidelines. The Food and Drug Administration, which is leading the effort in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other agencies, plans to seek public comment before setting a definition in the coming months. Dr. Marty Makary, the commissioner of the F. D.A., said he expected the definition would encourage companies to label foods as 'non-ultraprocessed' to entice customers, similar to how food manufacturers market their products as being free from added sugars. 'We do not see ultraprocessed foods as foods to be banned,' he said. 'We see them as foods to be defined so that markets can compete based on health.' The idea that consumers may go out of their way to avoid these items reflects growing concerns about the potential harms of ultraprocessed foods, which include many breakfast cereals, instant noodles, protein bars, meal-replacement shakes, flavored yogurts, hot dogs and more. Scientists have increasingly linked ultraprocessed foods to poor health outcomes, such as Type 2 diabetes, heart issues, some types of cancers and gastrointestinal issues. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
Top RFK Jr. aide attacks US health system while running company that promotes wellness alternatives
Calley Means has built a following within the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement by railing against the failings of the U.S. health system, often pinning the blame on one issue: corruption. Means, a top aide to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was hired as a White House adviser in March. He has used that perch to attack the nation's leading physician groups, federal agencies and government scientists, claiming they only protect their own interests in the nation's $4.9 trillion-a-year industry. In recent interviews, speeches and podcasts he has called the American Medical Association 'a pharma lobbying group,' labeled the Food and Drug Administration 'a sock puppet of industry,' and said federal health scientists have 'overseen a record of utter failure.' Means, however, has his own financial stake in the sprawling health system. He's the co-founder of an online platform, Truemed, that offers dietary supplements, herbal remedies and other wellness products. Some of the vendors featured on Truemed's website are supporters of Kennedy's MAHA movement, which downplays the benefits of prescription drugs, vaccines and other rigorously tested medical products. Kennedy has pledged to run the Department of Health and Human Services with 'radical transparency,' but Means has never had to publicly disclose his own financial details or where exactly they intersect with the policies he's advancing. 'It reeks of hypocrisy,' said Dr. Reshma Ramachandran, a health researcher at Yale University. 'In effect, he is representing another industry that is touting nonregulated products and using his platform within the government to financially benefit himself.' In a written statement, Means said his government work has not dealt with matters affecting Truemed and has focused on issues like reforming nutrition programs and pressuring companies to phase out food dyes. 'Pursuing these large-scale MAHA goals to make America healthy has been the sole focus in my government work,' Means said. Truemed helps users take tax-free money out of their health savings accounts, or HSAs, to spend on things that wouldn't normally qualify as medical expenses, such as exercise equipment, meal delivery services and homeopathic remedies — mixtures of plants and minerals based on a centuries-old theory of medicine that's not supported by modern science. The business model caught the attention of the IRS last year, which issued an alert: 'Beware of companies misrepresenting nutrition, wellness and general health expenses as medical care.' Truemed co-founder and CEO, Justin Mares, said in a statement the company is 'in full alignment' with IRS guidelines. 'Truemed enables patients to work with providers to use medical funds for root cause interventions like exercise and vitamin D to reverse disease under current law,' Mares said. The full extent of Means' potential conflicts — including his personal investments— are unclear because of his status as a special government employee. Unlike presidential appointees and other senior officials, special government employees are temporary staffers who do not have to leave companies or sell investments that could be impacted by their work. Also, their financial disclosure forms are shielded from public release. 'It's a big problem,' says Richard Painter, a former White House ethics lawyer under George W. Bush now at the University of Minnesota. Painter and other experts have raised alarms over a whirlwind of Trump administration actions to dismantle the government's public integrity guardrails. Still, part-time government employees are subject to the same law that bars all federal staffers from working on issues that could directly benefit their finances. When such cases arise, they must recuse themselves or risk criminal penalties. Means regularly opines on matters before HHS, including rethinking the use of drugs for depression, weight loss, diabetes and other conditions. Recently he's been promoting a new government report that calls for scaling back prescription medications in favor of exercise, dietary changes and other alternatives. 'If we rely less on our medical system, less on drugs, it necessitates the spiritual, cultural conversation about what we're doing to our children's bodies,' Means said in a recent podcast appearance. Experts note that government ethics rules are intended to both prevent financial conflict violations, but also the appearance of such conflicts that might undermine public trust in government. 'If I were running the ethics office over at HHS, I sure as heck wouldn't want anybody going around giving interviews and speeches about government matters that could have an effect on their own financial interests,' Painter said. Means' rapid rise reflects the seeming contradictions within the MAHA movement itself, which urges followers to distrust both big corporations and the government agencies which regulate them. Means rails against big pharma and food conglomerates, two industries that he says he spent years working for as a consultant in Washington. Means has no medical training. A graduate of Harvard Business School, he previously ran a bridal gown startup with his wife. On Wednesday, he's scheduled to be the keynote speaker at FDA's annual science forum, according to a copy of the program shared with The Associated Press. He traces his passion for health care reform to the death of his mother from pancreatic cancer in 2021. Shortly thereafter, Means and his sister, Dr. Casey Means, took psychedelics together and had 'a mind-blowing, life-changing experience,' which led them to co-author a wellness book, launch separate health startups and begin appearing on podcasts. Casey Means was recently nominated to be surgeon general and has faced scrutiny over her qualifications, including an unfinished medical residency. Asked about her nomination, President Donald Trump said: 'Bobby thought she was fantastic,' adding that he did not know her. Meanwhile, her brother has stepped up his rhetoric for the MAHA agenda, recently declaring that Kennedy has 'a spiritual mandate to reform our broken system.' While promoting the administration's accomplishments, Means does not shy away from plugging his own brand or those of his business partners. When asked to offer health advice to listeners of a sports podcast, Outkick The Show, in April, Means said: 'Read our book, 'Good Energy.'' He also recommended blood tests sold by Function Health, which provides subscription-based testing for $500 annually. The company was cofounded by Dr. Mark Hyman, a friend of Kennedy and an investor in Truemed, which also offers Hyman's supplements through its platform. Casey Means is also an investor in Hyman's company. 'If you're sick, most likely you have some kind of nutrient deficiency, some kind of biomarker that you can actually then target with your diet and your supplements,' Calley Means said. Like dietary supplements, the marketing claims on laboratory tests sold by Hyman are not approved by the FDA. The agency has warned for years about the accuracy of such tests and tried to start regulating them under President Joe Biden. Experts say MAHA entrepreneurs like Hyman are following a playbook common to the wellness industry: Identify a health concern, market a test to diagnose it and then sell supplements or other remedies to treat it. 'It ends up favoring these products and services that rest on flimsy grounds, at the expense of products that have actually survived a rigorous FDA approval process,' said Dr. Peter Lurie, a former FDA official who is now president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Many of the items sold via Truemed, including sweat tents, cold plunge tanks and light therapy lamps, wouldn't typically qualify as medical expenses under rules for HSAs, tax-free accounts created by Congress to manage medical costs. The IRS generally states that HSA purchases must help diagnose, cure, treat, mitigate or prevent disease. Truemed allows users to request a 'letter of medical necessity' from a doctor, stating that the product in question could have medical value for them. Like other telehealth services, there's usually no real-time communication with the patient. The physician reviews a 'simple survey solution,' filled out by the Truemed user, according to the company's website. Industry representatives say customers should be careful. 'You need to be prepared to defend your spending habits under audit,' said Kevin McKechnie, head of the American Bankers Association's HSA council. 'Companies are popping up suggesting they can help you manage that process and maybe they can — so the debate continues.' Americans have an estimated $147 billion in HSA accounts, a potential windfall for companies like Truemed that collects fees for transactions made using their platforms. Means sees an even bigger opportunity — routing federal funds out of government programs and into more HSAs. 'The point of our company is to steer medical dollars into flexible spending,' Means told fitness celebrity Jillian Michaels, on her podcast last year. 'I want to get that $4.5 trillion of Medicare, Medicaid, everything into a flexible account.' Means' pitch for expanding HSAs echoes two decades of Republican talking points on the accounts, which were created in 2003 to encourage Americans in high-deductible plans to be judicious with their health dollars. But HSAs have not brought down spending, economists say. They are disproportionately used by the wealthiest Americans, who have more income to fund them and a bigger incentive to lower their tax rate. Americans who earn more than $1 million annually are the group most likely to make regular HSA contributions, according to an analysis by the nonprofit Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. More than half Americans with HSAs have balances less than $500. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' would further expand HSA purchases, making gym memberships and other fitness expenses eligible for tax-free spending. That provision alone is expected to cost the government $10 billion in revenue. 'These are really just tax breaks in the guise of health policy that overwhelmingly benefit people with high incomes,' said Gideon Lukens, a former White House budget official during the Obama and Trump administrations, now with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Expanding HSA eligibility was listed as a goal for a coalition of MAHA entrepreneurs and Truemed partners, founded by Means, which lobbied Congress last year, according to the group's website. Means said in a statement that the group focused only on broad topics like 'health care incentives and patient choice — but did not lobby for specific bills.' In total, the HSA expansions in Trump's bill are projected to cost the federal government $180 billion over the next 10 years. As HSAs expand to include more disparate products and services, Lukens says the U.S. government will have fewer dollars to expand medical coverage through programs like Medicaid. 'We have a limited amount of federal resources and the question is whether we want to spend that on health and wellness products that may or may not be helpful for wealthy people,' Lukens said.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PBM lobby sues Arkansas over law requiring drug middlemen to sell pharmacies
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. The main lobby representing pharmacy benefit managers is suing Arkansas in a bid to stop the state's law preventing the drug middlemen from owning pharmacies. The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association's lawsuit filed Monday in a federal court argues that Arkansas' law — the first of its kind — is unconstitutional and would result in pharmacies closing and medications becoming more difficult for Arkansans to access. It's the latest legal challenge from the PBM industry as it hustles to halt the law and set a precedent that might dissuade other states from passing similar legislation. Arkansas' legislation, called Act 624, is meant to protect local community pharmacies from larger, more diversified chains by requiring companies that own both PBMs and pharmacies to shutter their operations in the state. When signing Act 624 in April, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the law was necessary to curb anticompetitive behavior among major PBMs that threatens Arkansas' independent pharmacies. However, PBMs — powerful middlemen that shape interactions and payments between drugmakers, payers and pharmacies — decried the law, arguing it eliminates a significant source of efficiency in the pharmacy supply chain by forcing them to sell off their brick-and-mortar stores and halt mail-order pharmacy operations in the state. The policy would unfairly benefit Arkansas-owned pharmacies at their expense, major PBMs said. Now, the PCMA — which represents 20 PBMs, including the so-called 'Big Three' that control an outsized share of the market — is taking to the courts in an attempt to stop the law before it kicks in at the start of 2026. Arkansas' law will cause roughly 40 PBM-owned pharmacies to close, along with eliminating home delivery options and jeopardizing access to specialty drugs for patients managing complex conditions, according to the PCMA's complaint. Act 624 will also lead to job losses and reduce market competition, which could cause costs to to rise for patients and their payers, the association argues. 'We will continue to fight to protect patients' access to health care and educate policymakers and stakeholders about the severe consequences of harmful legislation threatening patient access to pharmacy services,' the PCMA said in an emailed statement. The lobby's lawsuit argues that Act 624 violates the Constitution's Dormant Commerce clause and Privileges and Immunities clause by penalizing out-of-state operators to protect local businesses. The law also violates the Bill of Attainder clause, which forbids states from enacting punishments — in this case, revoking an actor's permit to conduct business — without a court proceeding, according to the complaint. The complaint makes similar legal arguments as prior lawsuits filed against Arkansas' law by CVS and Cigna, which operate two of the largest PBMs in the country: Caremark and Express Scripts, respectively. 'PCMA does not bring this suit because Act 624 is bad policy, although it very certainly is. Rather PCMA brings this suit because Act 624 is as clear an example of unconstitutional state legislation as the Court is likely ever to see,' the complaint reads. The PCMA's suit, which was filed in Arkansas' eastern district against the state's pharmacy board, seeks a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the law while the lawsuit proceeds. Navitus Health Solutions is also a plaintiff in the suit. The Wisconsin-based PBM, which operates on a pass-through model — meaning it makes money only through administrative fees and not by retaining rebates — is not a member of the PCMA. The outcome of the suits could have significant ramifications for the PBM industry, as other states considering similar legislation could be deterred or spurred on by the court's eventual decision. Bills with similar provisions were recently introduced in Vermont, Texas and New York. States are stepping into a gap left by Congress as lawmakers scramble to make prescription drugs more affordable. Despite numerous proposals to rein in controversial PBM business practices over the past few years — including a bill that would force PBMs to sell pharmacy businesses nationwide — Congress has yet to pass significant federal reform. However, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Washington have expressed anger over PBMs' business practices in recent hearings. And, the GOP megabill currently being considered by the Senate includes some PBM provisions, including banning spread pricing in Medicaid, preventing PBMs from being paid based on a drug's list price and requiring more transparency about PBMs' business practices. Recommended Reading CVS, Cigna sue Arkansas to overturn new PBM law
