What Business Is Watching in Negotiations Over Big Policy Bill
Andrew here. We're focused on the scramble to salvage Republicans' major policy bill and how it could affect business and the economy. We've also got more on the New York mayoral race moves by business leaders and reporting by Danielle Kaye on the financial health of Saks Global.
A.I. is also on our minds. Check out some fun excerpts from an interview with Patrick Collison, the co-founder of Stripe, conducted by my colleagues Kevin Roose and Casey Newton of The Times's 'Hard Fork' podcast. And Sarah Kessler finds out how the C.E.O. of Twilio uses A.I.
ministration — are making it harder to salvage the legislation, which corporate America is closely watching, in time.
Here are the latest big changes:
The Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan official who is reviewing whether the legislation complies with the chamber's budget rules, rejected a provision that would limit states' ability to get more federal Medicaid funds. (For the wonkily minded, they relate to a 'provider tax' loophole that nearly all states use.) Critics of the bill say it could lead to the shuttering of many rural hospitals.
The administration directed lawmakers to remove the so-called revenge tax, which would have raised taxes for many companies based in countries that impose a global minimum tax or additional taxes on American tech giants. Business lobbyists have argued that it would chill international investment in America. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had reached international agreements exempting U.S. companies from the global minimum tax.
The Senate parliamentarian also asked lawmakers to rework a 10-year moratorium on the enforcement of state laws regulating artificial intelligence, according to Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat of Washington and the ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee.
Here's a running list of other provisions the parliamentarian has rejected. Still unaddressed: the tax changes at the core of the legislation.
Trump is turning up the heat on lawmakers. The White House held an event on Thursday to rally support for the legislation, at which the president praised the 'hundreds of things' to like about the bill.
Trump has also been calling up individual senators, according to Punchbowl News.
Whether or when that happens is unclear, however. Republican leaders are seeking to salvage many of the provisions with wording tweaks. (They've already done so with proposed cuts in federal funding for food assistance programs.) But Senator John Thune, the majority leader, has said that the chamber won't override the parliamentarian's rulings.
Meanwhile, lawmakers still disagree on key provisions like caps on deductions for state and local taxes. And it's unclear whether House Republicans will approve whatever the Senate decides on.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 minutes ago
- Politico
Megabill delay 'possible,' Johnson says
Democrats say the Senate's rules keeper has nixed several tax provisions from Republicans' domestic policy megabill, including a special carveout for religious schools from a proposed hike in a college endowment tax. A separate break for private and religious schools was also dropped, as were regulations pertaining to guns. Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is also said to be objecting to a section in the sprawling tax, energy, immigration and defense bill aimed at reducing improper payments of the Earned Income Tax Credit, a wage supplement for the working poor. She also struck plans to up penalties for leaking private taxpayer information — a provision inspired by the leak of President Donald Trump's and other wealthy people's tax information to the news media. The deleted items are relatively small, especially compared to the health provisions MacDonough has struck in recent days that have forced Republicans to scramble to shore up the package. But the provisions nevertheless helped win support for the overall plan from individual lawmakers. Dropping a proposed charitable credit benefiting religious schools could save Republicans money. Still on deck, Democrats said, are their challenges to parts of the bill addressing a tax incentive program for economically struggling areas called Opportunity Zones; a section related to foreign entities claiming a clean energy production tax credit; provisions aimed at preventing undocumented workers from claiming refundable tax credits; and a new savings vehicle for children, dubbed Trump accounts. MacDonough has also not yet considered a Democratic bid to kill Republican plans to use a so-called current policy baseline to measure the cost of their tax package, said Sen. Ron Wyden , the ranking Democrat on the Finance Committee, in a statement. The announcement comes as part of a so-called Byrd Bath, a process by which MacDonough goes through lawmakers' legislation, provision by provision, to ensure it abides by the Senate's strict rules about what may be included in the so-called reconciliation bill. They're supposed to be exclusively focused on budgetary matters, though, because they are filibuster-proof, lawmakers frequently try to include other provisions as well. The decisions about which items fail sometimes leave lawmakers scrambling to rewrite them so they'll conform. MacDonough does not comment publicly on her determinations, and it's unclear whether the provisions could still be salvaged if they are rewritten. A spokesperson for Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It's generally easier to include tax provisions in reconciliation bills, because they are so closely tied to revenues, than legislative language dealing with other subjects.
Vox
23 minutes ago
- Vox
The Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision isn't as devastating as you think
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett and former Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy talk with President Donald Trump as he arrives to address to a joint session of Congress on March 4, Friday, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in Trump v. CASA, a case challenging President Donald Trump's attempt to strip many Americans of citizenship. The Court handed Trump a narrow victory along party lines, with all six Republicans in the majority and all three Democrats dissenting. The 14th Amendment provides that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States' are citizens, with one narrow exception that does not arise in CASA, so Trump's executive order trying to strip many babies born in the US of their citizenship is clearly and unambiguously unconstitutional. Multiple lower courts have all reached this same conclusion. SCOTUS, Explained Get the latest developments on the US Supreme Court from senior correspondent Ian Millhiser. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. There are three important takeaways from the CASA opinion: 1) It's not actually about birthright citizenship The specific issue was whether all the lower courts that struck down the Trump anti-citizenship order may issue a 'nationwide injunction,' which would block that order everywhere in the country, or whether they must issue a more narrow injunction that only blocked it in certain states, or for certain families. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion concludes that a nationwide injunction is not allowed…sort of. Much of the opinion is about why nationwide injunctions should be impermissible, but a key section suggests that, in this case, one might actually be okay. Specifically, Barrett says that courts may issue injunctions that are broad enough to ensure that a victorious plaintiff receives 'complete relief.' This matters because several of the plaintiffs in this case are blue states that object to Trump's attempt to cancel many Americans' citizenship. And they argued that it would be unworkable if birthright citizenship was the rule in some states, but not others. As Barrett summarizes their arguments, 'children often move across state lines or are born outside their parents' State of residence.' Thus, a ''patchwork injunction' would prove unworkable, because it would require [the states] to track and verify the immigration status of the parents of every child, along with the birth State of every child for whom they provide certain federally funded benefits.' In any event, Barrett does not ultimately say whether she finds this argument persuasive, instead concluding that 'the lower courts should determine whether a narrower injunction is appropriate' in future proceedings. So the holding of CASA seems to be that universal injunctions should be rare, but they are permissible in some cases, including, possibly, this case. 2) The arguments against universal injunctions are serious During the Biden administration, MAGA-aligned federal judges in Texas routinely handed down nationwide injunctions on highly dubious grounds. Indeed, this practice so frustrated Biden's Justice Department that, even after Trump won the 2024 election, Biden's solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar, filed a brief asking the justices to limit their use. The best argument against these broad orders is that they place too much power in individual judges, and in plaintiffs who can often shape which judge hears their case. As Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a 2020 opinion, 'there are currently more than 1,000 active and senior district court judges.'In a world with nationwide injunctions, plaintiffs can shop around for the one judge in America who is most likely to be sympathetic to their cause, and potentially secure a court order that no other judge would hand down. The most immediate beneficiary of Friday's decision is Trump, who will now get some relief from nationwide injunctions. And it's notable that the Republican-controlled Supreme Court waited until a Republican was in the White House before cracking down. Nevertheless, the decision in CASA should also benefit future Democratic administrations, assuming that the GOP-controlled Court applies it fairly to presidents of both parties. 3) This decision does not mean that Trump will succeed in killing birthright citizenship As mentioned above, Barrett leaves the door open to a nationwide injunction in this very case. She also suggests that opponents of Trump's anti-citizenship order can bring a class action and obtain relief very similar to a nationwide injunction, although plaintiffs seeking to bring class actions must clear additional procedural bars.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
David H. Rosmarin brings a founder-focused approach to anxiety at TechCrunch All Stage
Startups demand constant decision-making, pressure-filled pivots, and bring big emotional swings. It's no wonder anxiety shows up at every stage. But what if it didn't have to be a liability? At TechCrunch All Stage 2025 on July 15 at Boston's SoWa Power Station, Dr. David H. Rosmarin, clinical psychologist, author, and Harvard Medical School professor, will lead a refreshingly honest roundtable session that challenges how founders think about fear and pressure. His roundtable, 'Thriving with Anxiety: How Startup Founders Can Turn Fear, Pressure, and Self-Doubt into Their Greatest Advantage.'. This session isn't about 'overcoming' anxiety. It's about using it as a strategic advantage. As founder of the Center for Anxiety and a nationally recognized mental health expert, Rosmarin has worked with executives, entrepreneurs, and high-performance teams across industries. In this session, he'll guide attendees through a stigma-free, deeply practical conversation on how to turn anxiety into fuel, not friction. Expect takeaways on: With coverage in outlets like The New York Times, WSJ, GMA, and Rosmarin's work has reached millions. Now he's bringing it directly to startup leaders. If you're building under pressure (and who isn't?), this session will change how you how to channel your anxiety into your greatest advantage, and many other takeaways from a whole day packed with sessions with scaling experts at TC All Stage. Register now before prices go up at the door. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
