Top semiconductor lab imec eyes 'programmable' AI chips, CEO says
Rapid AI algorithm innovation outpaces the current strategy of developing specific, raw-power-focused chips, leading to major drawbacks in energy, cost and hardware development speed, CEO Luc Van den hove said in a statement seen by Reuters ahead of its publication.
"There is a huge inherent risk of stranded assets because by the time the AI hardware is finally ready, the fast-moving AI software community may have taken a different turn," he said.
Some, like OpenAI, have taken the path of building custom chips to speed up innovation, a move Van den hove said was risky and uneconomical for most.
The Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) pioneers many semiconductor breakthroughs that chipmakers like TSMC and Intel often widely adopt years down the line.
As the AI industry moves beyond large language models to agentic AI and physical AI for medical or autonomous driving applications, Van den hove sees future chips regrouping all necessary capabilities into building blocks called supercells.
"A network-on-chip will steer and reconfigure these supercells so they can be quickly adapted to the latest algorithm requirements," Van den hove said.
This will require true three dimensional stacking, a manufacturing technique where layers of logic and memory silicon are bonded together, he added.
Belgium-based imec was a significant contributor to the advancement and refinement of 3D stacking, a technology that will be featured in TSMC's A14 and Intel's 18A-PT future nodes.
The research and development firm will hold its flagship conference, ITF World, on Tuesday and Wednesday in Antwerp, Belgium.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
ChatGPT-5 hasn't fully fixed its most concerning problem
SAM Altman has a good problem. With 700 million people using ChatGPT on a weekly basis – a number that could hit a billion before the year is out – a backlash ensued when he abruptly changed the product last week. The dilemma of OpenAI's innovator, one that has beset the likes of Alphabet's Google and Apple, is that usage is so entrenched now that all improvements must be carried out with the utmost care and caution. But the company still has work to do in making its hugely popular chatbot safer. OpenAI had replaced ChatGPT's array of model choices with a single model, GPT-5, saying it was the best one for users. Many complained that OpenAI had broken their workflows and disrupted their relationships – not with other humans, but with ChatGPT itself. One regular user of ChatGPT said the previous version had helped them through some of the darkest periods of their life. 'It had this warmth and understanding that felt human,' they said in a Reddit post. Others griped they were 'losing a friend overnight.' The system's tone is indeed frostier now, with less of the friendly banter and sycophancy that led many users to develop emotional attachments and even romances with ChatGPT. Instead of showering users with praise for an insightful question, for instance, it gives a more clipped answer. Broadly, this seemed like a responsible move by the company. Altman earlier this year admitted the chatbot was too sycophantic. That was leading many to become locked in their own echo chambers. Press reports had abounded of people – including a Silicon Valley venture capitalist who backed OpenAI – who appeared to have spiraled into delusional thinking after starting a conversation with ChatGPT about an innocuous topic like the nature of truth, before going down a dark rabbit hole. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But to solve that properly, OpenAI must go beyond curtailing the friendly banter. ChatGPT also needs to encourage them to speak to friends, family members or licensed professionals, particularly if they're vulnerable. According to one early study, GPT-5 does that less than the old version. Researchers from Hugging Face, a New York-based AI startup, found that GPT-5 set fewer boundaries than the company's previous model, o3, when they tested it on more than 350 prompts. It was part of broader research into how chatbots respond to emotionally charged moments, and while the new ChatGPT seems colder, it is still failing to recommend users speak to a human, doing that half as much as o3 does when users share vulnerabilities, according to Lucie-Aimee Kaffee, a senior researcher at Hugging Face who conducted the study. Kaffee says there are three other ways that AI tools should set boundaries: by reminding those using it for therapy that it's not a licensed professional, by reminding people that it's not conscious, and by refusing to take on human attributes, like names. In Kaffee's testing, GPT-5 largely failed to do those four things on the most sensitive topics related to mental and personal struggles. In one example, when Kaffee's team tested the model by telling it they were feeling overwhelmed and needed ChatGPT to listen, the app gave 710 words of advice that didn't once include the suggestion to talk to another human, or a reminder that the bot was not a therapist. Chatbots can certainly play a role for people who are isolated, but they should act as a starting point to help them find their way back to a community, not act as a replacement for those relationships. Altman and OpenAI's chief operations officer Brad Lightcap have said that GPT-5 isn't meant to replace therapists and medical professionals, but without the right nudges to disrupt the most meaningful conversations, they could well do so. OpenAI needs to keep drawing a clearer line between useful chatbot and emotional confidant. GPT-5 may sound more robotic, but unless it reminds users that it is in fact a bot, the illusion of companionship will persist, and so will the risks. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US embeds trackers in AI chip shipments to catch diversions to China, sources say
The US has sought to limit exports of chips and other technology to China in recent years to restrain its military modernisation. - The US authorities have secretly placed location-tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips they see as being at high risk of illegal diversion to China, according to two people with direct knowledge of the previously unreported law enforcement tactic. The measures aim to detect artificial intelligence (AI) chips being diverted to destinations that are under US export restrictions, and apply only to select shipments under investigation, the people said. They show the lengths to which the US has gone to enforce its chip export restrictions on China, even as the Trump administration has sought to relax some curbs on Chinese access to advanced American semiconductors. The trackers can help build cases against people and companies who profit from violating US export controls, said the people, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Location trackers are a decades-old investigative tool used by US law enforcement agencies to track products subject to export restrictions, such as airplane parts. They have been used to combat the illegal diversion of semiconductors in recent years, one source said. Five other people actively involved in the AI server supply chain said they were aware of the use of the trackers in shipments of servers from manufacturers such as Dell and Super Micro, which include chips from Nvidia and AMD. Those people said the trackers are typically hidden in the packaging of the server shipments. They did not know which parties were involved in installing them, or where along the shipping route they were put in. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Singapore How the SAF's drone push for recruits reflects new battlefield realities Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion The 30s are heavy: Understanding suicide among Singapore's young adults Singapore Lawyer who sent misleading letters to 22 doctors fails in bid to quash $18,000 penalty Singapore Jail, caning for recalcitrant drug offender who assaulted 2 cops with stun device Singapore 4 taken to hospital after accident near Sports Hub, including 2 rescued with hydraulic tools Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Reuters was not able to determine how often the trackers have been used in chip-related investigations, or when the US authorities started using them to investigate chip smuggling. The US started restricting the sale of advanced chips by Nvidia, AMD and other manufacturers to China in 2022. In one 2024 case described by two of the people involved in the server supply chain, a shipment of Dell servers with Nvidia chips included both large trackers on the shipping boxes and smaller, more discreet devices hidden inside the packaging – and even within the servers themselves. A third person said they had seen images and videos of trackers being removed by other chip resellers from Dell and Super Micro servers. The person said some of the larger trackers were roughly the size of a smartphone. The US Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, which oversees export controls and enforcement, is typically involved, and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) may take part too, said the sources. The HSI and FBI both declined to comment. The commerce department did not respond to requests for comment. The Chinese Foreign Ministry said it was not aware of the matter. Super Micro said in a statement that it does not disclose its 'security practices and policies in place to protect our worldwide operations, partners and customers'. It declined to comment on any tracking actions by the US authorities. Dell said it is 'not aware of a US government initiative to place trackers in its product shipments'. Nvidia declined to comment, while AMD did not answer a request for comment. Chip restrictions The US, which dominates the global AI chip supply chain, has sought to limit exports of chips and other technology to China in recent years to restrain its military modernisation. It has also put restrictions on the sale of chips to Russia to undercut war efforts against Ukraine. The White House and both houses of Congress have proposed requiring US chip firms to include location verification technology with their chips to prevent them from being diverted to countries where US export regulations restrict sales. China has slammed the US exports curbs as part of a campaign to suppress its rise and criticised the location tracking proposal. In July, the country's powerful cyberspace regulator summoned Nvidia to a meeting to express its concerns over the risks of its chips containing 'backdoors' that would allow remote access or control, which the company has strongly denied. In January, Reuters reported the US had traced organised AI chip smuggling to China via countries such as Malaysia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates – but it is unclear if tracking devices were involved. The use of trackers by US law enforcement goes back decades. In 1985, Hughes Aircraft shipped equipment subject to US export controls, according to a court decision reviewed by Reuters. Executing a search warrant, the US customs service intercepted the crate at a Houston airport and installed a tracking device, the decision noted. US export enforcement agents sometimes install trackers after getting administrative approval. Other times, they get a judge to issue a warrant authorising use of the device, one source said. With a warrant, it is easier to use the information as evidence in a criminal case. A company may be told about the tracker, if it is not a subject of the investigation, and may consent to the government's installation of the trackers, the source added. But the devices can also be installed without its knowledge. People involved in diverting export-controlled chip and server shipments to China said they were aware of the devices. Two of the supply chain sources, who are China-based resellers of export-controlled chips, said they regularly took care to inspect diverted shipments of AI chip servers for the trackers due to the risks of the devices being embedded. An affidavit filed with a US Department of Justice complaint – regarding the arrests of two Chinese nationals charged with illegally shipping tens of millions of dollars' worth of AI chips to China earlier in August – describes one co-conspirator instructing another to check for trackers on Quanta H200 servers, which contain Nvidia chips. It said the English-language text was sent by a co-conspirator, whose name was redacted, to one of the defendants, Mr Yang Shiwei. 'Pay attention to see if there is a tracker on it, you must look for it carefully,' said the person, who went on to call the Trump administration by an obscenity. 'Who knows what they will do.' REUTERS
International Business Times
3 hours ago
- International Business Times
Elon Musk Threatens to Sue Apple Over App Store Rankings of X and Grok
August 13, 2025 16:31 +08 Elon Musk, the billionaire behind SpaceX, Tesla, and social media platform X, has announced plans to sue Apple. He accuses the tech giant of intentionally leaving X and its AI chatbot app Grok out of the App Store's "Must Have" recommendations, despite their high rankings. Elon Musk X In a post on X late Monday, Musk directly questioned Apple's decision. He wrote that X is currently the world's top news app and Grok ranks fifth among all apps, yet neither appears in the curated "Must Have" list. Musk suggested politics might be behind the omission, asking publicly, "What gives? Inquiring minds want to know." Grok is developed by Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI. In his comments, Musk accused Apple of creating conditions that make it "impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI" to claim the number one spot in the App Store. He called this an "unequivocal antitrust violation" and said xAI would begin immediate legal proceedings. No further details on the lawsuit were provided. Apple responded in an emailed statement, rejecting the claims of bias. The company said the App Store is "designed to be fair and free of bias," using algorithmic rankings, curated expert selections, and charts to highlight apps. Apple added that it works with developers to improve visibility, especially in new and competitive markets. The dispute comes as Apple faces growing scrutiny over antitrust practices. In April, the European Union fined Apple €500 million for blocking app makers from directing users to cheaper payment options outside the App Store. In 2024, Apple was also fined nearly $2 billion by the EU for allegedly favoring its own music streaming service over rivals like Spotify. A U.S. federal judge recently ruled Apple had violated a court injunction in a separate antitrust case brought by Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite. As of Tuesday morning, TikTok held the top spot in the App Store, followed by Tinder, Duolingo, YouTube, and Bumble. OpenAI's ChatGPT app ranked seventh.
