logo
Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus forges ahead in ‘moment of deep uncertainty' for country

Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus forges ahead in ‘moment of deep uncertainty' for country

Yahoo19-03-2025

Ohio State Rep. Munira Abdullahi, D-Columbus, speaks during a press conference celebrating Women's History Month and laying out legislative priorities for the Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus, of which she serves as chair. (Screenshot photo courtesy of The Ohio Channel)
In celebrating Women's History Month, the Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus is recognizing those that came before them, and preparing themselves to continue to fight for issues that are still there after decades, like wage disparities and reproductive rights.
'We stand in a moment of deep uncertainty in our country,' said caucus chair state Rep. Munira Abdullahi, D-Columbus. 'We see the fear in our communities, in the voices of our neighbors, in the policies being signed into law federally and right here in the Statehouse that tell us over and over again that our rights, our dignity and our futures are not a priority for those in power.'
Using legislation targeting access to affordable health care, political engagement, domestic violence and child care, among others, the women of the caucus are planning to look forward and change strategies as they sit in what Abdullahi acknowledged as 'a superminority.'
But the challenge to be heard in a legislature with a Republican stronghold on both chambers isn't a deterrent to building the Ohio they want to see, the legislators said.
'We will build a world where no woman, no person, fears for their safety in their home, in their workplace or in their community,' Abdullahi said during a press conference Tuesday with the caucus. 'And we will build movements that will outlast any speaker, any president or administration, or any attempts to erase our power.'
Democrats are planning 'listening tours' in districts across the state to hear from constituents, and bring with them information about the legislation they want to see passed.
'This race is not a sprint, it's a marathon,' said state Rep. Meredith Lawson-Rowe, D-Reynoldsburg.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The legislators listed several measures they are leading this General Assembly, including state Rep. Anita Somani's House Bill 128, which seeks to codify reproductive rights in the same way that the constitutional amendment passed in 2023 established reproductive rights like abortion and fertility treatments in the Ohio Constitution. The bill also aims to repeal state laws that sponsors say conflict with the amendment.
'When women are able to plan when and if they have children, they are able to achieve higher levels of education and as a result, higher financial security,' said Somani, D-Dublin.
State Rep. Rachel Baker, D-Cincinnati, touted her bipartisan legislation with Republican state Rep. Cindy Abrams, House Bill 141, which looks to improve prescribed pediatric extended care centers for families of children with 'medical complexities.'
With House Bill 60, sponsored by Democratic Rep. Latyna Humphrey and Republican Rep. Josh Williams, the legislators hope to see the use of campaign funds for child care expenses become state law.
Lawson-Rowe plans to reintroduce the an equal pay act to prohibit sex-based wage disparities and bar retaliation in the workplace for speaking about pay, and state Reps. Crystal Lett, D-Columbus, and Tristan Rader, D-Lakewood, are heading up House Bill 136, to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.
Part of their motivation and hope for this new General Assembly is new strategies to see the bills pass, even in a Republican supermajority, through bipartisanship and compromise.
'My tactic this GA … is to find folks across the aisle, maybe tweak a few things, maybe change messaging,' Abdullahi said. 'It takes a couple of conversations and maybe negotiating, but we are looking towards different tactics to make these bills pass.'
But the legislators don't see the priority legislation they've presented as difficult measures to garner Republican (or independent) support.
'Everything we've talked about today, from child care to reproductive care to equal pay, is not a partisan issue,' Somani said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump sends troops to Los Angeles after immigration crackdown protests: What to know
Trump sends troops to Los Angeles after immigration crackdown protests: What to know

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump sends troops to Los Angeles after immigration crackdown protests: What to know

President Trump authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops, following days of protests against immigration enforcement actions in the Los Angeles area. The rare move bypassed the consent of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and has garnered criticism from local Democrats who warned the move could further inflame tensions. The federalizing of the California National Guard also has prompted some legal questions about the extent of the president's authority. Here's what to know about the troop deployment: The protests began Friday in downtown Los Angeles. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested immigrants in LA's Fashion District, as well as in a Home Depot parking lot and other locations. On Saturday, the protests spread to other areas, including Compton and Paramount, a predominantly Latino city south of LA. As word spread of another possible ICE raid at a Home Depot in Paramount, protesters descended upon a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office. Federal authorities, however, later said that no action was planned for that location. Federal authorities said the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the Los Angeles area rose to more than 100 — not including the arrests that took place during the protests. The president took notice this weekend of the rowdy demonstrations, which included instances of vandalized cars and property in the greater Los Angeles areas. He dared local authorities to respond more forcefully, noting the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) had not initially been involved in responding to the protests. The LAPD also confirmed it was not involved. Trump said Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) were to blame for the unrest that began as a result of ICE raids. 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Trump on Saturday announced he authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard soldiers. By Sunday afternoon, about 300 troops were stationed in three locations in the greater Los Angeles area. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the move is a result of 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations' in recent days. Trump said Sunday that he directed relevant Cabinet officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots.' Hegseth said Sunday morning that Marines were ready to be deployed to Los Angeles if needed. A statement from U.S. Northern Command on Sunday indicated that approximately 500 U.S. Marines are 'in a prepared to deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support the [Defense Department's] protection of federal property and personnel efforts.' Democrats across the country have sharply pushed back against the administration's move to federalize the National Guard. Newsom and Bass have been particularly forceful in pushing back against the administration's efforts. Newsom warned the federal response is 'inflammatory' and said deploying soldiers 'will erode public trust.' 'LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice,' Newsom wrote in a Saturday X post. 'We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need.' Newsom's office on Sunday sent a letter to Hegseth's office asking him to rescind the order deploying armed forces into the city. He also vowed to sue the Trump administration for bypassing his consent in federalizing the California National Guard. Bass urged protesters to remain peaceful but slammed the troop deployment as a 'chaotic escalation' amid rising tensions. 'What we're seeing in our city is chaos provoked by the Trump Administration,' Bass said in a message to Los Angeles residents late Sunday. 'When you raid Home Depots and workplaces, when you tear parents and children apart, and when you run armored caravans through our streets, you cause fear and panic,' she added. 'And deployment of federalized troops on the heels of raids is a chaotic escalation.' All 23 Democratic governors issued a statement Sunday afternoon slamming Trump's decision to federalize California's National Guard by using a law that hasn't been used in decades, arguing it was both unnecessary and escalatory. Former Vice President Kamala Harris also criticized the deployment of troops in her home city of Los Angeles, calling it a 'dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos.' 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' she added. 'Fear of a community demanding dignity and due process.' She also stressed her support for peaceful protests, saying, 'I continue to support the millions of Americans who are standing up to protect our most fundamental rights and freedoms.' The federalization of the California National Guard represents a rare and legally murky step that bypassed Newsom's consent. The last time the federal government mobilized National Guard members without the consent of a governor was in 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there. The National Guard is relatively limited in its scope, since members are deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the downtown Los Angeles detention center where much of the unrest was centered. The military is generally barred from carrying out domestic law enforcement duties. Declaring the Insurrection Act is seen as a potential path around those restrictions. Trump did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act during a gaggle with reporters before boarding Air Force One on Sunday, but he suggested the current protests against immigration raids had not yet risen to the level of an insurrection. Shortly after the gaggle, Trump issued a statement on Truth Social claiming that 'violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations.' The Associated Press contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge
Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Trump administration argued Monday that charges should not be dropped against a Wisconsin judge who was indicted for allegedly helping a man who is in the country evade U.S. immigration agents seeking to arrest him in her courthouse. Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice urged a federal judge to reject a motion filed by Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan seeking to dismiss the charges against her, saying doing so would be 'unprecedented" and allow judges to be above the law. Dugan faces a July 21 trial in the case that escalated a clash between Trump's administration and opponents over the Republican president's sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump critics contend that Dugan's arrest went too far and that the administration is trying to make an example out of her to discourage judicial opposition to the crackdown. The accusations against Dugan Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country illegally. She could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts. Her attorneys say she's innocent. They filed a motion last month to dismiss the case, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. They also maintain that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Trump administration response Justice Department attorneys responded in a court filing Monday, saying dismissing the charges against the judge on the grounds that she is immune would be unprecedented and would ignore 'well-established law that has long permitted judges to be prosecuted for crimes they commit.' 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' Justice Department attorneys argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan's attorney, Craig Mastantuono, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. In her motion to dismiss, Dugan argued that her conduct amounted to directing people's movement in and around her courtroom, and that she enjoys legal immunity for official acts she performs as a judge. She also accused the federal government of violating Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Dugan's case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge, who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed. The case background According to prosecutors, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz illegally reentered the U.S. after being deported in 2013. He was charged in March with misdemeanor domestic violence in Milwaukee County and was in Dugan's courtroom for a hearing in that case on April 18. Dugan's clerk alerted her that immigration agents were in the courthouse looking to arrest Flores-Ruiz, prosecutors allege in court documents. According to an affidavit, Dugan became visibly angry at the agents' arrival and called the situation 'absurd.' After discussing the warrant for Flores-Ruiz's arrest with the agents, Dugan demanded that they speak with the chief judge and led them away from the courtroom. She then returned to the courtroom, was heard saying something to the effect of 'wait, come with me,' and then showed Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a back door, the affidavit says. The immigration agents eventually detained Flores-Ruiz outside the building following a foot chase. Dugan, 66, was arrested by the FBI on April 25 at the courthouse. A grand jury indicted Dugan on May 13 and she pleaded not guilty on May 15. Dugan defense fund A legal defense fund created by Dugan supporters to help pay for her high-profile defense attorneys has raised more than $137,000 in three weeks from more than 2,800 donors. Her legal team includes former U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic and former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement. Both were appointed by Republican presidents. She has also hired prominent attorneys in Milwaukee and Madison. 'This is an impressive show of support for the defense fund, highlighting that the public believes in protecting a fair and independent judiciary,' former Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske, the fund's trustee, said Monday. 'The fund will continue to raise grassroots donations and uphold strict guidelines to ensure transparency and accountability.' Dugan is not required to list the donor names until she submits her annual financial disclosure form, which is due in April. Numerous people are prohibited from donating, including Milwaukee County residents; attorneys who practice in the county; lobbyists; judges; parties with pending matters before any Milwaukee County judge; and county employees.

DHS fires back at Democrats for 'beyond the pale' rhetoric as ICE agents face wave of violent threats
DHS fires back at Democrats for 'beyond the pale' rhetoric as ICE agents face wave of violent threats

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DHS fires back at Democrats for 'beyond the pale' rhetoric as ICE agents face wave of violent threats

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is continuing to call on Democrats to tone down the rhetoric against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents as riots not only persisted in Los Angeles Sunday night, but agents continue to face threats of doxxing and violence. The department has taken issue with not only California leaders but also House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a Saturday statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens." Acting Ice Director Calls Mayor Wu's Neo-nazi Comparison 'Disgusting' Amid Increase In Agent Assaults "Make no mistake, Democrat politicians like Hakeem Jeffries, Mayor Wu of Boston, Tim Walz, and Mayor Bass of Los Angeles are contributing to the surge in assaults of our ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE," McLaughlin stated. "From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi Gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." The department says there's been a 413% increase in assaults against ICE agents, which comes as the riots in Los Angeles are centered against the presence of the agency in the city. Wu and Jeffries recently faced criticism for their comments on ICE agents masking while conducting sweeps to conceal their identity for safety reasons."Every single ICE agent who is engaged in this aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that," Jeffries said on Capitol Hill. Read On The Fox News App "This is America. This is not the Soviet Union," he added, saying identification is needed to comply with the law and have proper "transparency." "We're not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will of course be identified." Wu was slammed for comments where she drew a tie between ICE and neo-Nazi group Nationalist Social Club-131 for the masking decision, which DHS called "sickening," according to the Boston Herald. Federal Officials Slam Democrats For 'Dangerous' Rhetoric As Ice Agents Face Violent Mobs In La, Nyc "I don't know of any police department that routinely wears masks," Wu said. "We know that there are other groups that routinely wear masks. NSC-131 routinely wears masks." Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who was the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2024, also controversially drew a comparison to the Nazis in May. Click Here For More Immigration Coverage "I'm gonna start with the flashing red light — Donald Trump's modern-day Gestapo is scooping folks up off the streets," Walz claimed at a University of Minnesota law school commencement speech. "They're in unmarked vans, wearing masks, being shipped off to foreign torture dungeons. No chance to mount a defense. Not even a chance to kiss a loved one goodbye. Just grabbed up by masked agents, shoved into those vans, and disappeared." In California, the anti-ICE riots triggered an order from President Donald Trump to deploy to the National Guard, which Newsom is expected to take legal action against. Newsom repeatedly has said that the Trump administration has instigated the situation "to manufacture chaos and violence," and has said that those who are committing "violent acts" will face legal repercussions and are playing into the president's hands. Ice Official Puts Politicians On Blast, Demanding They 'Stop Putting My People In Danger' "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel," Newsom stated Friday. "Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called on residents not to "engage in violence and chaos" and to not "give the administration what they want," Sunday in an X post, but faced scrutiny for Friday comments saying that "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city." When Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom's office about DHS' comments, they sent a link to a post in which Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons credited Newsom for complying with ICE detainers for those already behind bars. Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Wu, Bass, Walz and Jeffries and did not receive article source: DHS fires back at Democrats for 'beyond the pale' rhetoric as ICE agents face wave of violent threats

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store