Minister Fisher and AFN National Chief reaffirm partnership to support First Nations Veterans
VANCOUVER, BC, Feb. 7, 2025 /CNW/ - First Nations Veterans have proudly served Canada in times of war and peace, yet many continue to face systemic barriers when accessing the benefits and recognition they deserve. Today, the Honourable Darren Fisher, Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence, reaffirmed Canada's shared commitment to First Nation Veterans and their families by working in partnership with the Assembly First Nations (AFN).
Alongside National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak of the Assembly of First Nation and Chairman Percy Joe of the AFN Veterans' Council, Minister Fisher reaffirmed this shared commitment through an updated and co-developed Letter of Understanding (LOU). This renewed partnership builds on previous efforts to address long-standing systemic barriers to accessing Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) programs and services.
The renewed agreement outlines four priority areas:
To ensure meaningful inclusion of First Nations culture in AFN and VAC-led commemorative ceremonies and events
To document and share the history of those who served
To provide culturally-appropriate supports to Veterans
To address barriers to access VAC programs and services
This renewed partnership builds on the progress made in collaboration with the AFN and strengthens VAC's commitment to working alongside the AFN and its Veterans Council on key initiatives. As part of Canada's ongoing efforts toward Reconciliation, this partnership takes meaningful action to ensure First Nations Veterans receive the recognition and support they deserve.
Quotes
'First Nations Veterans have served Canada with courage and dedication, but too many still face barriers in getting the support and honour they deserve. We've made progress, and this renewed partnership is another step forward. By working alongside the Assembly of First Nations and the AFN Veterans Council, we're making sure First Nations culture is reflected in commemoration, Veterans' history is preserved, and support is easier to access.'
The Honourable Darren Fisher, Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence
'First Nations Veterans have made significant contributions in service to Canada, yet for too long, their history and experiences have been overlooked, and access to support has been a challenge. This renewed Letter of Understanding is an important step in making sure First Nations Veterans and their families receive the recognition, services, and culturally relevant supports they deserve. We look forward to continuing to work together to remove barriers, improve access, and ensure that First Nations Veterans are supported.'
National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, Assembly of First Nations
'We are proud to continue our journey in supporting Veterans, citizens, and communities. While there is still much work ahead, we have made strong progress and look forward to building a meaningful and positive partnership.'
Percy Joe, Chairperson, First Nations Veterans Council
Quick facts
The first LOU was signed back in 2023 and laid the groundwork for stronger engagement, outreach, and commemoration. Since then, VAC and the AFN have worked together to expand outreach to First Nations Veterans, engage more First Nations communities in remembrance and tell more stories of First Nations people's military service.
The AFN is a national advocacy organization that works to advance the collective aspirations of First Nations individuals and communities across Canada on matters of national or international nature and concern.
The AFN Veterans Council represents all First Nations Veterans within Canada and the United States, as well as First Nations Veterans within the RCMP, the Department of National Defence and First Nations Peacekeeper societies. They have been mandated through Resolution 02/2020 to engage VAC to advance reconciliation and healing.
In 2023, VAC established the Indigenous Veterans Engagement Team (IVET) which provides dedicated guidance and information on how to best meet the needs of, and engage with, Indigenous Veterans through training, access to information and resources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
15 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Why Doug Ford's controversial law to fast-track development is focused on the Ring of Fire
The story In the beginning, when it was still called Kawana 'bi 'kag, no one imagined that the 5,000 square kilometres near James Bay might one day save Canada from economic warfare launched by an American president named Donald Trump. There's nothing like an existential crisis, it seems, to focus a country's attention on unearthing billions of dollars worth of critical minerals. Amid First Nations protests and legal challenges, Premier Doug Ford passed Bill 5, creating sweeping new powers to fast-track development and in the north, that means brushing past years of delay on the land now known as the Ring of Fire. It holds what the world craves: nickel, chromite (for chromium), cobalt and more, all needed for global security or green energy. And all often in short supply, threatening economic devastation from supply chain disruption. Ford wants jobs for Ontarians. Prime Minister Mark Carney needs economic prosperity independent of America and its mercurial president. Now, nearly 20 years after the minerals were first discovered, the Ring of Fire may be entering its prime time. Although, as First Nations leaders recently observed, Trump will be out of office long before the mining roads are built, so why the 'unconstitutional' rush? Here is an explainer on the remote north, a place of conundrums. The earth You may ask, what makes these minerals critical? In short, the digital and green economies of the future — including massive new infrastructure needed to support artificial intelligence — will not exist without them. 'There is no energy transition without critical minerals: no batteries, no electric cars, no wind turbines and no solar panels,' a federal minerals strategy once said. Depending on market fluctuations, minerals hold immense value. The Democratic Republic of Congo provides 70 per cent of the world's cobalt. Indonesia supplies 40 per cent of nickel. And China is the largest processor of minerals, a dominance that has, on occasion, led to disruptive trade practices and price swings, according to a recent Public Policy Forum report. Deposits locked under the Ring of Fire include: Nickel: It is used in the production of stainless steel and is increasingly valued in advanced technologies, particularly in batteries for electric vehicles. Cobalt: Considered essential for the production of military equipment, it is used to produce superalloys used to make jet engines, missiles and submarines. Copper: Used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar power panels, and battery energy storage systems, it is also considered essential for the creation of data centres that will support artificial intelligence. Chromite: This is the ore from which chromium is extracted. Chromium is essential to the manufacture of stainless steel. Platinum: A metal that plays a vital role in autocatalysts, which reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicle tailpipes. Palladium: A 'platinum group element,' it is used in electronics and in vehicle emission reductions. The timeline As modern mining lore has it, speculators in the Hudson Bay lowlands discovered its chromite in 2007. Depending on the loquaciousness of the storyteller, one or several prospectors were Johnny Cash fans and so inspired, quickly named the lands around their discovery the Ring of Fire, launching years of environmental assessments, ownership changes and new mining claims. The Ring of Fire was included in Ontario's 2010 speech from the throne and in the ensuing years, premiers Dalton McGuinty and Kathleen Wynne raved over its potential, although Sudbury already mines critical minerals. And in 2018, along came Doug Ford. Running for the premier's job, he promised to build roads to the untouched minerals, which were in a distant region of the province accessible only by airplanes or (melting) ice highways. 'If I have to hop on a bulldozer myself, we're going to start building roads to the Ring of Fire,' Ford tweeted. This did not impress the First Nations who make Kawana 'bi 'kag their home. Today, seven years and two elections later, with no roads built, Trump's antics inspired new laws rushed through the Ontario legislature and the House of Commons: Ford's Bill 5, the 'Protect Ontario by Unleashing the Economy Act' and Carney's Bill C-5, the 'One Canadian Economy Act.' Before Carney met with First Nations leaders on July 17, he promised 'Indigenous equity and full participation' in Canada's new economy. When the meeting ended, the chiefs' were not convinced. The constitutionality of both laws faces a legal challenge by nine First Nations chiefs, who called Ontario's law a massive overreach that gives the government unlimited development powers across the province. As one said, Ontarians should be worried. The request for an injunction, the chiefs' lawyer said, will likely be heard within a year. The miners In the world of prospecting, ownership is known to change hands. Australia-based Wyloo acquired Noront in 2022 and with it, the Ring of Fire's 'Eagle's Nest' project. While Juno Corp. appears to have the most mining claims in the region, Wyloo says its development progress is the most advanced, in terms of passing government hurdles. Wyloo's footprint, its corporate documents say, will cover just one square kilometre. Instead of an open pit, Eagle's Nest will be vertical, plunging 1,600 metres into the ground, with below-surface space to store tailings, the leftover materials. The company's current projections say it will annually produce 15,000 tonnes of nickel, 6,000 tonnes of copper, 70,000 ounces of palladium, 22,000 ounces of platinum and 340 tonnes of cobalt. And as for the fragile peatlands across the region? Wyloo's mine, its document says, will mainly be built on 'uplands' and not the low-lying peatlands. But there is a different threat: road construction. The ecosystem The Ring of Fire is rich with watery peatlands, a fragile, living entity of decaying plant matter that traps carbon equal to many decades of greenhouse gas emissions. And yet the earth here also holds minerals needed to build the energy-saving solar panels and electric cars of the future. This is an environmental predicament. If new mining roads disturb the peatlands by as little as three per cent, Wildlands League's Anna Baggio says data shows that the equivalent of 62 million tonnes of carbon dioxide would be released. Climate change is already threatening peatlands, from nearby wildfires to melting permafrost. So it was not surprising to see 'peatland' cited 113 times in a 2025 draft environmental assessment for a proposal by Marten Falls First Nations to build and maintain an all-season access road. Marten Falls chief says the road would connect the remote community to health supports and economic opportunities. A separate proposal would link a series of new roads to the Ring of Fire mines. Last week, Marten Falls First Nation said it held a joint ceremony with Webequie First Nation, (which is has filed a proposal to build another road) and together, took down a ceremonial teepee erected last year. It symbolized, the Marten Falls news release said, the 'joint and mutually respectful process required between the First Nations and development proponents.' First Nation communities on the Treaty 9 land have expressed concern about environmental risk, noting the age-old relationship between peatlands, water systems and wildlife. But much like Marten Falls, many also say they want development — and a seat at the decision-makers' table. Ford's Bill 5, some say, killed the opportunity for government discussions, forcing protests or legal action. Eabametoong Chief Solomon Atlookan leads one of many First Nations communities in the region. In June, Atlookan wrote a letter to Ford and Carney, warning their new laws could leave governments tied up in court challenges or worse, create dangerous confrontations on the land. 'Cranking up the legislative bulldozer,' Atlookan wrote, 'will not yield positive outcomes.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Carney tells Inuit leaders his new major projects law ‘fully respects treaty rights'
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney told Inuit leaders that his government's major projects bill 'fully respects treaty rights' a week after several Indigenous leaders left a recent meeting with him in a state of frustration , saying their treaties were being undermined. On Thursday, Carney was taking part in a meeting of the Inuit-Crown Partnership Committee, co-hosted by the president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami Natan Obed, in Inuvik, NWT, to discuss Bill C-5, known as the One Canadian Economy Act. In his opening remarks, the prime minister said he wanted to make 'absolutely clear' in the context of this forum on what the legislation could do and what it doesn't do. 'I want to be clear, up front, that the act fully respects treaty rights, including modern treaties, the modern treaties with Inuit treaty organizations. It fully respects treaty-based environmental assessment processes,' he said. 'In fact, those will be essential for anything that we move forward,' he added. Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations Rebecca Alty added: 'At the end of the day, treaties are above this law. They have to be respected, and that's always been the case with this bill.' According to the government of Canada's website, treaties are agreements made between the Crown, Indigenous groups that define rights and obligations. They include historic treaties and modern treaties, also called comprehensive land claim agreements. Treaties are enshrined in section 35 of the Constitution Act. In 2021, the Liberal government passed legislation to make sure all federal laws are consistent with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which relates to treaty rights. Assembly of First Nations (AFN) National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak had raised some alarm bells about C-5 before it was tabled and passed in June, saying that the proposed bill suggested 'a serious threat' to the exercise of treaty rights by First Nations. The legislation, which was fast-tracked in Parliament to become law in late June, gives Carney's cabinet the authority to designate projects, such as pipelines, ports and highways, in the 'national interest' and speed up the federal approvals process. In response to criticism from Indigenous leaders who said they had not been properly consulted on the bill, Carney announced he would be holding three summits. A first meeting with First Nations was held last week in Gatineau. Carney met with Inuit leaders in Inuvik on Thursday and he is set to meet with Métis leaders sometime in August. After last week's meeting, Alberta First Nations chiefs held a press conference to reaffirm their opposition to the legislation which they said does not respect treaty rights. 'This bill aims to include First Nations in a unified economy, but in reality, it undermines treaty and inherent rights by assimilating us into a system that did not create consent,' said Vernon Watchmaker, chief of Kehewin Cree Nation. 'A few invited voices do not speak to the treaty relationship of the diverse nations across Turtle Island (Canada),' he added. Chief Sheldon Sunshine, of Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation, took issue with the government's plan for an Indigenous advisory council which will be a part of the major projects office that will move projects ahead. Carney has said the office will be up and running by Labour Day. Sunshine said the proposed council, which will include First Nations, Inuit and Métis representatives, is a 'colonial construct' and 'not grounded in treaty relationships.' 'Its existence and operation undercut our treaty rights by placing our futures in the hands of an unelected body and reports to the Prime Minister's Office, not to our people,' he said. 'It is used to divide and dilute Indigenous voices, creating the appearance of inclusion while excluding those who assert inherent and treaty-based jurisdictions.' In a recent interview with National Post, Deliah Bernard, former Indigenous affairs adviser to prime minister Justin Trudeau, said there is 'no one-size-fits-all approach to what consent should and could look like' with Indigenous groups. 'There are going to be regional disparities. There are going to be regional priorities. There are going to be circumstances that impact a community in one subsection of the country that necessarily may not impact in the same way… different parts of the country.' 'That's why the principle of consultation and consent is so crucial and so critical,' said Bernard, now co-founder of the Indigenous affairs agency Roots Strategies. Carney underscored last week that his government was only at the starting point of a much longer consultation process that would have to unfold with individual communities. He also promised to put $40 million towards ensuring Indigenous leadership is involved in further discussions, including on the question of which projects should be fast-tracked. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty pointed to how having Indigenous participation was part of the criteria for determining which projects would make the cut, referring to comments made by Carney directly to First Nations chiefs last week. 'The likelihood of these projects advancing or being completed without Indigenous people at the table… to me, sounded like zero,' Gull-Masty said. While in Inuvik, Carney also announced the appointment of a new Arctic ambassador. Virginia Mearns, an Inuit leader based in Iqaluit who held senior positions in the government of Nunavut, will start her mandate effective September 15. In this role, Mearns will focus 'on reinforcing Canada's Arctic engagements with like-minded partners and multilateral forums, bolstering Arctic sovereignty Arctic sovereignty, and advancing opportunities for security and growth' according to Carney's office. — With additional reporting from Stephanie Taylor. National Post calevesque@ Carney pitches major project powers to skeptical First Nations as advancing 'Indigenous economic growth' AFN national chief says fast-tracked projects bill should come with plan for infrastructure for reserves Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here.
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
UN court opinion on climate change could boost scrutiny of major projects: expert
OTTAWA - A warning from the United Nations' top court that failing to address climate change could violate international law could lead to greater public scrutiny of major projects in Canada, one expert says. The International Court of Justice opinion, released Wednesday, said everyone is entitled to a habitable planet. The non-binding opinion applies to all countries and paves the way for legal actions. Those actions could include states challenging other states before the International Court of Justice, lawsuits and legal instruments like investment agreements that have to conform with international law. Sabaa Khan, the David Suzuki Foundation's climate director, said the court explicitly stated that any move to expand the fossil fuel industry could be seen as a breach of international legal obligations. 'For a country like Canada that has had historically high emissions, that has the means necessary to accelerate its decarbonization, I think that it's clear more than ever that our government really has to eliminate any sort of public support of fossil fuels,' she said. 'I think there's going to be much greater public scrutiny when it comes to nation-building projects.' The Liberal government has passed controversial legislation granting cabinet the power to fast-track major projects it deems to be in the national interest, and is set to open its major projects office by Labour Day. Projects qualifying for accelerated approval could include ports, railways, mining projects and pipelines. Governments have been encouraging First Nations leaders to support such projects through loan guarantees and promises of financial incentives. But many First Nations leaders fear their ways of life could be irreparably harmed if governments evade environmental standards. Many Indigenous leaders have also argued elements of the law could be used to undermine their rights. Khan said she expects the court opinion will affect the work being done on major projects. 'There's no way to look at this without seeing clearly that investment in fossil fuels is a breach of human rights law,' she said. 'I think that it lays down a legal foundation that can really create that certainty for investors where if you start funding or you continue funding fossil fuel developments, then you are at risk of being held responsible.' Khan said Bill C-5 states that approved major projects have to meet Canada's climate change objectives. She said the government will have to take the court opinion into consideration. 'If it doesn't, then it could open up just more legal challenges to the way that law now is being implemented,' Khan said, adding that Canada should be investing in things like renewable energy and interprovincial electricity grids. Khan said that while the opinion is non-binding, it has a 'very strong interpretive power.' Supreme Court of Canada decisions often cite advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice, she said. Fraser Thomson, a lawyer at Ecojustice, said International Court of Justice advisory opinions are viewed as authoritative interpretations of international law around the world and have influenced court decisions in Canada. 'Canadian courts at every level have to look to these opinions when they are faced with interpreting what is international law and how it impacts Canadian domestic law,' he said. Thomson said it's reasonable to assume the court opinion will open the door to more climate litigation in Canada. 'All governments are now on notice that they cannot continue to put our future at risk,' he said, adding that Canada could be asking for legal trouble if it decides to build more pipelines. Keean Nembhard, a spokesperson for the office of Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin, said the government recognizes the 'crucial role' Canada plays in contributing to the global fight against climate change and remains committed to that work. The court opinion also said that some countries or individuals suffering from the effects of climate change could be eligible for compensation. The judges acknowledged that financial compensation might be difficult to calculate. The case was led by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and backed by more than 130 countries. All UN member states are parties to the court. — With files from Alessia Passafiume, Dylan Robertson and The Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
