
Tether, Galaxy, Ledn Dominate Centralized Crypto Lending As DeFi Claims A Bigger Share Of The $37 Billion Market
It wasn't long ago that crypto lending looked like the industry's most radioactive ruin. BlockFi, Celsius, Voyager, Genesis, once industry's leaders, imploded in the great 2022-2023 washout, wiping out $25 billion in loans and much of the sector's credibility.
Now, a new report from Galaxy Digital suggests a partial resurrection is underway, led by a familiar cast of survivors. Tether, Galaxy and Ledn have emerged as the dominant players in centralized finance (CeFi) lending, holding a combined $9.9 billion in outstanding loans at the end of 2024. That's nearly 90% of the CeFi market, according to Galaxy's research associate Zack Pokorny.
Crypto lending exists for many of the same reasons as traditional borrowing. Traders borrow to short tokens or increase leverage, long-term holders unlock liquidity without selling, businesses take loans to fund operations, and lenders earn passive yield on idle assets.
Today, the total crypto lending market stands at $36.5 billion, still 43% below its $64.4 billion peak in late 2021. But the composition of that market is shifting fast. DeFi platforms now account for 63% of crypto borrowing (excluding crypto-backed stablecoins), nearly double their share during the last bull run.
Crypto lending is climbing back, with DeFi apps leading recent growth.
Galaxy Research
At its height in late 2021-early 2022, centralized crypto lending was dominated by Genesis, Celsius, and BlockFi, which together controlled 76% of the market. Then came the crash: falling token prices, sloppy risk management and toxic collateral triggered an industry-wide credit unwind. By Q1 2023, CeFi's total loan book had collapsed to $6.4 billion. It has since grown back to $11.2 billion, a 73% rebound, but is still down two-thirds from its peak.
A new trio has filled the void:
Together, they control 89% of what remains of centralized crypto lending and 27% of the overall crypto lending market when including crypto-backed stablecoins.
While institutional lenders like Galaxy and Ledn fought to stay afloat, DeFi protocols quietly expanded their market share. Platforms like Aave and Compound, governed by code, require borrowers to post more collateral than they borrow, thus eliminating much of the credit risk that crippled CeFi.
At the bear market bottom in Q4 2022, DeFi borrowing had dropped to just $1.8 billion. It's since surged more than tenfold to $19.1 billion across 20 platforms on 12 blockchains. Ethereum remains the primary blockchain for DeFi lending, with $33.9 billion in assets deposited as of March 2025. Lending, in fact, remains the largest use case for decentralized finance.
Crypto-backed stablecoins like the $7 billion USDS and the $5 billion Ethena USDe—the third- and fourth-largest stablecoins after Tether and Circle's USDC—add complexity. In the case of USDS, users lock their crypto (for example, ether) into a smart contract as collateral, which then issues stablecoins. To minimize default risk, the value of the collateral must exceed the value of the issued tokens. USDe, by contrast, relies on a delta-hedging strategy, pairing crypto collateral with short positions in derivatives markets to maintain its $1 peg. Galaxy notes there may be some double-counting between centralized and decentralized loan books, as institutional lenders often use these and other DeFi protocols to originate loans for their clients.
'The rate for borrowing against bitcoin, is now hovering anywhere from 5.5%-7%. That's down from what we've seen over the last few months. It suggests a lot of people are sitting on the sidelines while the tariff wars play out, but the lending market is still in a relatively strong position today,' says Sid Powell, CEO and cofounder of Maple Finance, an institutional lender with a loan book of over $300 million that operates on the blockchain. 'I think a lot is riding on whether the 10-year-yield comes under control a bit, and if the Fed will start seeing some inflation reduction and an improvement in employment numbers. Then we'll see a rate cut, and that will be beneficial for crypto asset prices.'
Winds have already been shifting in favor of a broader institutional reentry. In July, Cantor Fitzgerald, the primary custodian of Tether's collateral, announced plans to launch a $2 billion bitcoin financing business to provide leverage to bitcoin holders (U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is Cantor's former chairman and CEO. Though he has agreed to divest his interest in the company to comply with U.S. government ethics rules, the reins now belong to his sons). And in January, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rescinded Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121, easing restrictions on how publicly traded companies treat client-held crypto assets. That move removed a major roadblock for banks and institutions to participate in crypto custody and lending. U.S.-listed bitcoin ETFs have also opened new doors. As Galaxy notes, the entrance of prime brokers offering lending and leverage on these products is already expanding the market.
'[Cantor's launch] will set an interesting trend, because bitcoin is a very liquid asset that trades 24/7 around the world. It's much more liquid and transparent than conventional fixed income, while paying a yield that's comparable to an investment-grade bond. A lot of large institutions are holding bitcoin, and being able to turn that into a fixed income-style product where they can earn yield is very attractive,' adds Powell. 'We, among others, are looking at how we can package and tokenize that asset for institutional consumption.
Maple recently launched a product in partnership with Core, the creator of a yield-bearing bitcoin token, that lets institutions earn yield on their bitcoin in kind. 'We've already seen $50 million in inflows in under two months,' Powell says. 'I'm interested in whether that becomes something of a Trojan horse for institutions to do more on-chain.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Investors Open Up About $200K Losses to Million-Dollar Mistakes — What Their Stories Teach About Market Psychology
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. When Reddit user mickeyhusti asked the crypto community a simple question—'How much have you lost?'—the flood of responses painted a stark picture of the current market's brutal reality. From six-figure portfolio wipeouts to million-dollar mistakes, the thread became an impromptu therapy session for investors grappling with substantial losses in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins. The original poster set the tone by revealing their own $200,000 decline from peak portfolio value, expressing shock at Bitcoin's recent dumps and calling Ethereum's performance 'brutal.' What followed was a mix of financial confessions, investment philosophies, and coping mechanisms that reveal deeper truths about crypto market psychology. Don't Miss: Trade crypto futures on Plus500 with up to $200 in bonuses — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – unlock the power of alternative investments including a Crypto IRA within your retirement account. The losses shared ranged from the sobering to the catastrophic. One trader revealed losing nearly everything: 'Started with $90,000, reached $120,000, and now my portfolio is $400... futures...' Another investor reported being down $100,000 'so far,' while a startup employee with no salary shared their panic over a $120,000 loss. Perhaps most dramatic was the investor claiming '$4 years and 10 million USD' in losses, though the community's response suggested skepticism about such extreme figures. These aren't just numbers—they represent real financial stress, with one commenter noting they'd lost 'about 30k and my mental health.' The human cost becomes particularly clear when investors mention working without salaries or facing relationship strain due to investment decisions. Despite the substantial paper losses, a dominant theme emerged around the concept of unrealized versus realized losses. 'Nothing. Haven't sold a dime,' became a rallying cry, with many investors maintaining that losses only become real when positions are closed. This philosophy reflects a deeper investment discipline that separates long-term holders from panic sellers. As one decade-long investor put it: 'Haven't sold so nothing. Been stacking over a decade. Just DCA and enjoy the ride.' The strategy appears to have merit for those with sufficient time horizons. Several investors reported significant gains over longer periods, with one claiming to be 'up 250% (6 figures)' despite daily volatility, and another maintaining they're 'still up 130k' after investing in XRP. Trending: New to crypto? Get up to $400 in rewards for successfully completing short educational courses and making your first qualifying trade on Coinbase. A clear pattern emerged distinguishing Bitcoin performance from alternative cryptocurrencies. Many investors attributed their losses specifically to 'altcoins,' with several transitioning to Bitcoin-only strategies after disappointing experiences with other tokens. 'After dozens of hours here and there, I walked away from alts up a few thousand... It's just not worth the effort and stress,' explained one investor who became a 'Bitcoin maxi.' Another reported earning 'close to 40%' by simply buying $25 worth of Bitcoin weekly. This divergence reflects Bitcoin's relative strength compared to many altcoins, which have failed to recover to previous highs even as Bitcoin reached new records. Ethereum, despite being the second-largest cryptocurrency, remains at September 2022 price levels according to community observations. The discussion revealed growing concerns about crypto's relationship with traditional economic cycles and political events. Several investors expressed worry about how cryptocurrencies might perform during a prolonged recession, questioning the asset class's role as a hedge against traditional finance. Political developments, particularly around the Trump administration and potential tariff policies, emerged as significant concerns. Some investors directly blamed political uncertainty for portfolio declines, while others worried about policy impacts on the broader crypto ecosystem. 'Today feels very much different,' noted one investor. 'Crypto is already a mainstream speculative asset. Has less and less to do with anarchy and financial independence.' The thread illuminated crucial differences between successful and struggling crypto investors. Those reporting gains typically exhibited several common characteristics: Disciplined approach: Regular dollar-cost averaging rather than lump-sum investments at peaks Time horizon: Multi-year investment perspectives rather than short-term speculationRisk management: Only investing money they could afford to lose Emotional control: Avoiding frequent portfolio checking and panic decisions Conversely, those reporting significant losses often described: Investing money needed for short-term expenses Heavy use of leverage and futures trading Emotional decision-making during market volatility Concentration in speculative altcoins rather than established cryptocurrencies Perhaps most revealing were the various ways investors coped with substantial losses. Humor emerged as a common defense mechanism, with jokes about losing body parts, relationships, and sanity alongside financial assets. Others adopted philosophical approaches, viewing losses as tuition for investment education or accepting volatility as inherent to the asset class. 'You know, or at least you SHOULD KNOW, if you speculate on anything's future valuation, it's just that: a SPECULATION,' one commenter emphasized. Some investors completely disconnected from daily price movements, with one stating they're 'not checking my portfolio for many, many years.'The Reddit confessions offer several crucial insights for both crypto and traditional investors: Position sizing matters: The most distressed investors typically had oversized positions relative to their financial capacity. Those who invested only what they could afford to lose showed greater emotional stability. Time horizon discipline: Long-term holders consistently outperformed those making frequent trading decisions, regardless of their technical analysis skills. Asset allocation within crypto: Bitcoin's relative strength compared to altcoins suggests that diversification within crypto may not provide the intended risk reduction. Market cycle awareness: Understanding that crypto markets operate in cycles helps investors maintain perspective during downturns, though past performance doesn't guarantee future results. This community discussion occurs against a backdrop of increasing crypto mainstream adoption, regulatory clarity, and institutional investment. Yet the individual stories remind us that behind market statistics are real people making real financial decisions with real consequences. The thread also highlighted how crypto investment has evolved from early adopter speculation to mainstream asset allocation, bringing both opportunities and risks to a broader population of investors. For investors currently facing significant crypto losses, the community discussion suggests several potential approaches: Reassess position sizes and risk tolerance Consider the difference between speculation and long-term investment Evaluate the role of crypto within overall portfolio allocation Focus on risk management rather than return maximization Seek professional financial advice for significant positions The raw honesty of these investor confessions provides valuable perspective on crypto market psychology and the very human experience of financial volatility. Whether the current downturn represents a temporary setback or a more fundamental shift remains to be seen, but the lessons about investment discipline and emotional management remain universally applicable. Read Next: Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can invest with $1,000 at just $0.30/share. This article Crypto Investors Open Up About $200K Losses to Million-Dollar Mistakes — What Their Stories Teach About Market Psychology originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
What Is Layer 2? Your Guide To Blockchain Scaling And Faster Crypto Transactions
During periods of high-usage, the 'Layer 1' Ethereum blockchain can become slow and expensive. The ... More industry has created a number of Layer 2 solutions to address this. While blockchain technology promises transparency and decentralization, practical issues such as slow transaction speeds and high fees have made it challenging to meet the needs of everyday users. Whether you're trading tokens, minting NFTs or engaging with decentralized apps, the experience often falls short of the seamless and efficient interactions people expect from modern digital platforms. On public blockchains such as Ethereum, periods of heavy demand still push transaction fees into the dollars and delay settlement for minutes—an experience that certainly falls short of mainstream expectations. To close that gap, developers have turned to Layer 2 (L2) scaling solutions: purpose-built networks that execute transactions off the main Ethereum chain, compress the results into cryptographic proofs, and post those proofs back to Layer 1 for immutable finality. The approach combines the security of a battle-tested base layer with the speed and cost efficiency required for mass-market applications—an architecture that now safeguards roughly $36 billion across thousands of decentralized apps. What Is A Layer 2 Solution? A Layer 2 solution is any protocol that executes transactions off the base blockchain (Layer 1) while ultimately relying on that Layer 1 for security and final settlement. Think of it as a mall parking garage: shoppers still enter the main building (Ethereum), but the actual traffic is redirected to multi-storey ramps built next door, preventing gridlock at the front door. Most L2s fall into two camps: rollups (Optimistic or Zero-Knowledge) and state channels/validium hybrids. Other recognized Layer 2 solutions include nested blockchains and sidechains. While all L2s aim to enhance scalability, their methods for inheriting Layer 1 security and managing data availability vary, and some, like Validiums, introduce additional trust assumptions regarding data availability. All share the same north star: compress data, cut fees and leave heavy-duty security to Ethereum's battle-tested consensus. How Does Layer 2 Work? An L2 batches hundreds, or even thousands of user transactions, creates a cryptographic proof of the new state, and submits that lightweight proof to Layer 1. Optimistic rollups (e.g., Optimism and Arbitrum) assume the batch is valid unless challenged within a dispute window. Fraud proofs keep operators honest. ZK-rollups (e.g., zkSync Era or Polygon zkEVM) generate succinct validity proofs up-front, so withdrawals finalize in minutes rather than days. Either way, the result is a 10-100× throughput boost because only the proof, not every transaction detail, touches the L1. How Does Layer 2 Differ From Layer 1? Layer 2 solutions differ significantly from Layer 1 in several key aspects. In terms of throughput, Layer 1 processes around 15 to 20 transactions per second (TPS), while Layer 2 dramatically boosts this capacity, with rollups achieving over 1,000 TPS and solutions like Polygon potentially reaching up to 65,000 TPS. Transaction fees also show a stark contrast; Layer 1 fees typically range from $0.25 to $0.50 on average but can spike to $20-$60 in times of high network congestion. On the other hand, Layer 2 fees are often below $0.05, with some solutions reducing costs to as little as $0.0196, post-Dencun upgrade. Regarding security, Layer 1 relies on its native Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, whereas Layer 2 inherits security directly from Layer 1 through cryptographic proofs. Data availability also diverges in approach, with Layer 1 storing data entirely on-chain, while Layer 2 integrates on-chain proofs with minimal data requirements. Finally, their use cases reflect their technical capabilities. Layer 1 is typically reserved for high-value decentralized finance (DeFi) applications and settlement processes, while Layer 2 excels in high-volume scenarios like payments and gaming due to its enhanced scalability and lower costs. Benefits Of Layer 2 For Crypto Users Lower fees are the headline benefit of L2s, but several second-order benefits matter just as much: Popular Layer 2 Solutions How Layer 2 Improves Ethereum Ethereum's March 2024 Dencun upgrade introduced blob space (EIP-4844), a cheap data lane expressly for rollups. Blobs lowered average L2 transaction fees by roughly 90%, catalyzing the migration of everyday payments and micro-trades off-chain. By shifting order-routing, AMM swaps, and NFT orders to L2 while anchoring security to L1, Ethereum keeps its decentralization ethos intact yet gains Visa-scale throughput—a feat that pure L1 scaling alone couldn't handle. Use Cases For Layer 2 Technology Security Considerations Of Layer 2 Networks Although L2 networks provide a number of benefits over L1 in terms of cost and speed, there's no such thing as a free lunch in crypto security: Users should generally be looking for L2s with open-sourced node software, decentralized proposers and permissionless fraud-proof systems scheduled on the roadmap. Challenges Facing Layer 2 Adoption The L2 user experience still remains a bit unintuitive: bridging ETH, switching RPCs, and wrapping gas tokens still confuse newcomers. Wallet standards like EIP-4337 (account abstraction) and gas-sponsored transactions help, but widespread education is needed. Regulators also eye cross-chain bridges as potential money-laundering chokepoints, which may impose compliance overhead on sequencer operators in 2026 and beyond. The Future Of Layer 2 And Web3 The industry increasingly treats Ethereum as a settlement layer, a Supreme Court for finality, while thousands of L2 'city-states' handle day-to-day commerce. Optimism's Superchain will soon enable atomic cross-rollup calls, and ZK-proof hardware acceleration promises sub-cent fees. Whether one mega-rollup dominates or a mesh of specialized L2s persists, the direction is clear: scale out, not up. Bottom Line Layer 2 scaling solutions have moved from academic whitepapers to production rails powering millions of daily transactions. By batching computation off-chain and posting cryptographic receipts on-chain, they deliver faster, cheaper and greener crypto experiences without abandoning Ethereum's security guarantees. Expect L2s—not yet another monolithic Layer 1—to carry Web3 toward mass adoption. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What Is Layer 2? Layer 2 is a secondary network that processes transactions off the main blockchain while anchoring final settlement back to it for security. What's The Difference Between Layer 1 And Layer 2? Layer 1 handles base consensus and data availability; Layer 2 executes bulk transactions and periodically submits proofs to Layer 1, achieving higher throughput and lower fees. Can I Use My Ethereum Wallet On Layer 2 Networks? Yes. Most L2s are EVM-compatible, so Metamask and hardware wallets work once you add the network RPC or connect via WalletConnect. What Is The Best Layer 2 Solution Right Now? 'Best' depends on priorities: Base leads in TVL, Optimism's Superchain dominates transaction share, and ZK-rollups like zkSync offer near-instant finality with strong cryptographic guarantees.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Solana Overtake Ethereum by 2026?
There are a few areas where Solana is outperforming Ethereum significantly. That's leading some investors to wonder if it could one day be the bigger chain. The next 18 months or so might be a critical period for this matchup to play out. 10 stocks we like better than Solana › Every bull market has its David-and-Goliath subplot. In crypto right now, Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) is the nimble rising star that's aiming to take the crown from the heavyweight champion, Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH). The prize is becoming the smart contract platform that mainstream capital chooses to use first. Both coins have surged in the past three years, though Solana's gain has been faster, sparking talk of a coming "flippening," where its market value might eclipse Ethereum's. Is the chatter just noise, or is there a signal here that investors should heed? Crypto users and investors tend to be an impatient bunch. Effectively, that means that when they're evaluating a new chain, its speed comes first. In that vein, independent benchmarks show that Solana consistently pushes thousands of real user transactions per second (TPS), and also that it can burst beyond 50,000 TPS when stressed with a high volume of load. In contrast, Ethereum's base layer still confirms a block every 12 to 13 seconds, limiting it to double‑digit values of TPS before needing to try to shunt users to costlier Layer 2 (L2) chains, which often require different tooling to interact with. Velocity attracts users. In September 2024, Solana logged 3.2 million daily active wallet addresses versus Ethereum's 410,000. The same pattern holds this year, with the numbers hardly changed. Per DeFiLlama, a crypto data aggregator, Solana handled $2.2 billion of decentralized crypto exchange (DEX) volume in the last 24 hours as measured in the afternoon of June 24. That's almost on par with Ethereum's $2.5 billion, despite Ethereum commanding nearly four times the total value locked (TVL) on its chain. The takeaway here is that new capital is likely to flow to where it can transact the fastest, and Solana is punching in the same weight class as Ethereum despite its significantly smaller size. Revenue data tell the same story. Between June 23 and June 24, Ethereum generated about $1.3 million in chain revenue and $2 million in decentralized application (dApp) revenue. Solana brought in $121,000 in chain revenue and and nearly $4 million in app revenue. In other words, Solana's apps are already earning roughly double what Ethereum's do, while its market cap is only about 25% as large. The metric of profitability per dollar of network value is thus working significantly in Solana's favor. The market cap gap also is narrowing. Ethereum's market capitalization hovers near $291 billion, while Solana's sits at about $77 billion. To outrank Ethereum today, Solana would need a roughly 280% price increase. That sounds steep, yet Solana has posted gains of that magnitude in shorter stretches before. Despite Solana's significant gains, Ethereum is hardly standing still. Its latest upgrade package, Pectra, went live on May 7, bundling 11 improvement proposals that expand block space, streamline wallet user experience, and raise the staking caps. Average gas (user) fees are now down since the update, though transaction speeds are roughly the same as before. The upgrade thus blunts Solana's cost advantage and potentially buys Ethereum time to work on its speed. Beyond the performance of its core tech, Ethereum's moat is its developer community. It still commands the largest pool of app developers and liquidity in crypto finance, though Solana added more new developers than Ethereum in 2024. Those network effects buy Ethereum even more breathing room to iterate and copy useful features that competitors debut. And the capital on its chain is likely to be at least a bit sticky. So could SOL really tack on 280% in six quarters to flip Ethereum? It might, if macro liquidity surges, and if it wins against its rival in key growth segments like artificial intelligence (AI), decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN), and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. Barring that confluence of factors, a flippening is vastly more plausible in the 2029‑2030 window than it is within the next couple of years. For long‑term investors, the right approach is straightforward. Solana offers higher growth potential at the cost of higher execution risk. Ethereum offers a sturdier, slower‑growing base that is still innovating and could still offer substantial returns. Holding both coins would hedge the unknowns, but if you're forced to pick one horse for outperformance over the next five years, Solana looks like the better bet. Before you buy stock in Solana, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Solana wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Ethereum and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ethereum and Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Solana Overtake Ethereum by 2026? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data