Ex-partner of SA murder victim Steven Murphy labels killer a 'heartless pig'
Keith Yandle, 48, of Kudla, was previously found guilty by a Supreme Court jury of the murder of the 38-year-old, who was found buried at the Kudla property in April 2023.
He previously pleaded guilty to firearms offences and destroying human remains. He also pleaded guilty to the manslaughter or Mr Murphy, but that plea was not accepted by the prosecution.
Mr Murphy's ex-partner, and mother of his two sons, Danielle Rogers delivered a victim impact statement to the court on Monday.
"You destroyed his family and I want you to suffer and feel guilt and regret for what you have done to a family who did nothing to you."
Ms Rogers said the most "painful" part was having to see her "boys in pain".
"All they want is their dad back," she said.
"I can't fix the missing piece, it shatters my heart to know that I can't fix their broken heart."
Mr Murphy's mother Deb Murphy also delivered a victim impact statement to the court saying she feels "hopeless and despair" since her son's murder.
"It is hard to put my feelings and expression into words," she said.
"It's like I'm on a roller coaster and I can't get off."
Prosecutor Melissa Wilkinson told the court that on February 19, 2023, Yandle entered the shed at the back of his property "intending to kill" Mr Murphy.
"In my submission, the defendant wanted to catch Mr Murphy, he did not seek the police's assistance to deal with a trespasser, he took the law into his own hands.
"He left his house with a loaded semi-automatic rifle and he had his son attend the shed with a baseball bat.
"The defendant was ready for a confrontation in the shed and he was ready to attack in the shed.
"In my submission, it is likely that he had seen from the CCTV feed in the house that Mr Murphy had returned to his shed that night."
During Ms Wilkinson's submissions, Mr Yandle became agitated and had an outburst, before quickly being told to remain quiet by Justice Anne Bampton.
"Can you prove that? That's a lie, that's a lie," he screamed out.
Ms Wilkinson continued to tell the court that, after shooting Mr Murphy four times, Yandle watched over him as he died.
"His lack of conduct and lack of assistance supports the conclusion that the defendant was intending to kill Mr Murphy," she said.
"In my submission, the nature of his conduct was callous and showed complete disregard for Mr Murphy and his family.
"The conduct in murdering Mr Murphy, and its aftermath, was calculated, ruthless and inhumane."
She also said that if it had not been for Yandle's brother alerting police to the events of that night, it is likely Mr Murphy's body would have never been found.
Defence barrister James Marcus, for Yandle, told the court his client's lack of assistance to Mr Murphy can be "accurately captured by the words disgraceful and reprehensible", but that he hadn't entered the shed with the intent to kill.
"Ultimately this was, in terms of the actual commission of the offence of murder, a spur of the moment decision to shoot," he said.
"To suggest an overarching plan to kill him, is not the correct characterisation of what happened."
Mr Marcus said Yandle has good prospects of rehabilitation because of his lack of prior offending and the support he still has from his family.
Outside court on Monday, Mr Murphy's uncle Sean Murphy, who used to work as a corrections officer in Victoria, said he had met "some pretty vile characters" but that "up until today I didn't think anyone could disgust me much more".
"I didn't take my eyes off him (in court) because I couldn't believe that such a disgusting organism exists on the face of the earth," he said.
"He should go away for the rest of his life and die… hopefully he's an old man in jail so that he can suffer for all those years… death would be too good for him.
"He has no remorse and still no accountability for his own actions."
Yandle faces a mandatory term of life imprisonment, and will be handed a non-parole period at a sentencing hearing in July.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Pilot in fatal chopper crash gives evidence at Matt Wright trial
Matt Wright pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice, which carries a maximum penalty of seven years in prison. This is a drawing of his appearance in the NT Supreme Court in Darwin, August 2025. ( ABC News: Mary Franklin )

ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Court to correct guilty finding error in blackmail case against former MP and husband
South Australia's District Court has apologised for an error that mistakenly recorded a guilty finding of blackmail against former Labor MP Annabel Digance and her husband. The pair was previously charged with blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas after they allegedly threatened to make accusations of misconduct against him in 2020. However, those charges were withdrawn in April 2023, upon them entering an order to stay away from Mr Malinauskas. Earlier this year, Ms Digance filed a $2.3 million civil lawsuit against Mr Malinauskas claiming he spearheaded a malicious prosecution "motivated by [the premier's] own personal and political advantage". At the first hearing for the lawsuit in South Australia's Supreme Court last month, the Premier's lawyer Michael Abbott KC told the court that according to District Court documents the Digances had been found guilty of blackmail before the charges were withdrawn. However, an email — obtained by the ABC — sent by Chief Judge Michale Evans's acting judicial assistant on Friday afternoon, stated that no guilty finding was ever recorded. "There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants," the acting judicial assistant wrote. "It has come to the attention of the Chief Judge that a part of the court record in this matter is incorrect and needs to be corrected." The email — which was sent to SA Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Martin Hinton KC, as well as his department and lawyers representing Mr Malinauskas and the Digances — said the open court hearing would be held to hear the parties before the court record was corrected. In court on Tuesday, Chief Judge Evans apologised to the court for any inconvenience and said "steps will be taken" to correct the record. The Chief Judge, who referred to the transcript from the open court hearing in April 2023, confirmed no guilty finding had ever been recorded against the Digances, and instead said there had been an error. He explained that Judge Paul Muscat acted as a Magistrate and imposed the order under those powers, before Mr Hinton withdrew the blackmail charges. Barrister Geoffrey Watson SC, who is acting for Ms Digance in the civil proceedings, thanked the court for correcting the error so promptly. "I'd like to thank Your Honour, on behalf of Mrs Digance, for giving this opportunity to have this corrected. Thank you very much — that's sincere," he said. In a statement, the Court Administration Authority (CAA) said it would review "all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate". "The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter," the statement said. Ms Digance's civil proceedings against Mr Malinauskas and the state of South Australia return to the Supreme Court next month.

ABC News
33 minutes ago
- ABC News
Star Entertainment Group signs on-again, off-again takeover deal with Hong Kong partners
Besieged gaming giant Star Entertainment has agreed to give up both running and part-owning the $3.6 billion Queen's Wharf casino in Brisbane, cutting a deal to avoid financial calamity. Star told investors this morning it had finally signed an on-again, off-again deal with its controversial Hong Kong partners, one of which was once linked to organised crime figures. That deal is still subject to clearing hurdles including regulatory checks. But, if successful, ASX-listed Star will take stakes in Gold Coast hotels near its casino there. It will also get to pocket $53 million in the deal. Star, in turn, would give up assets including its 50 per cent stake in the consortium behind Queen's Wharf, as well as the Treasury car park and hotel. The move will alleviate a heavy cash flow and debt burden on Star; the consortium had required future equity payments of $212 million and a loan facility of $1.4 billion needed to be refinanced in December this year. One concern during negotiations had been whether Star would get to retain rights and fees to manage the Queen's Wharf. The deal announced on Tuesday specifies that a replacement operator — yet to be named — will come in at some stage. In giving up the operator fee, Star receives compensation of $5 million a month until June next year, scaling up to $7 million monthly by June 2028. Star could even receive a bonus payment of up to $225 million in 2030 based partly on the performance of the consortium. The deal depends on regulatory approvals. A change of ownership would require state approval, but the government has not yet indicated whether that will happen. The Hong Kong consortium partners are Chow Tai Fook (CTF) Enterprises and Far East Consortium. In 2022, the ABC established criminal associations involving CTF, which triggered a government inquiry. Finally released earlier this year, the government report found CTF had falsely and repeatedly claimed to have cut business ties with a criminal syndicate boss. The hidden ties were with junket boss Alvin Chau through a Vietnam casino venture — Chau is now serving 18 years in prison over a billion dollar fraud by his VIP gambling outfit, or 'junket', Suncity. The-then Labor government found CTF was still suitable to hold a casino licence, arguing its lack of "candour and fulsomeness" with the regulator was due to "differences in cultural and organisational expectations". Anti-gaming activists have previously said the state should rule out a takeover due to the crime links. Attorney-General Deb Frecklington's office was contacted for comment on Tuesday. Star's financial performance had been crumbling after being smashed by regulatory inquiries and increasingly tough gaming regulations. Its shares were trading higher than $4 each in 2019, but those are now wallowing around 12 cents.