Two men charged after elderly women die following care home car crash
Highcliffe Care Home in Witherwack, Sunderland, had to be evacuated following the serious collision, which caused structural damage to the building at around 9.40pm on Wednesday.
Northumbria Police said two residents of the care home, a woman in her 90s and a woman in her 80s, died on Thursday, after the crash.
On Friday evening, the force said two men, both aged 21, had been charged with a number of offences in connection with the reports, as it continues to investigate the deaths.
Sam Asgari-Tabar, of Stratford Road, Sunderland, has been charged with robbery and kidnap.
He has also been charged with causing serious injury by dangerous driving in relation to one of the care home residents who remains in hospital.
Reece Parish, of Fordham Road, Sunderland, has been charged with robbery and kidnap.
Northumbria Police said eight other residents were taken to hospital in the aftermath with injuries not believed to be life-threatening, with one still in hospital by Friday evening.
Officers had been following a BMW that was reported stolen from an address in Fenham, Newcastle, at around 9.20pm on Wednesday.
Police were authorised to pursue the vehicle, which crashed into the care home around five minutes later.
It is alleged that a woman involved in a proposed sale was inside the vehicle when it was driven off before being forcibly removed a short time later, police said.
She was left shaken but uninjured by the incident, the force added.
Following the police pursuit, a mandatory referral has been made to the Independent Office for Police Conduct, officers said.
A metal barrier has been put up outside the damaged care home, which appeared to be deserted two days after the crash, the residents having been moved to alternative accommodation.
Large cracks in the brickwork were visible around the crash site and debris had spilled out on to the garden.
The latest CQC report into the home, from 2021, said it looked after a maximum of 60 residents, including people with dementia.
In a separate matter, Parish has also been charged with violent disorder in connection with the events in Sunderland city centre on August 2 last year.
Both men are due to appear at Newcastle Magistrates' Court on Saturday.
A force spokesman said: 'With two men now charged, we would remind people to avoid speculation both online and in our communities as this could impact the ongoing court case.
'Our investigation into the deaths of two care home residents continues.'
On Friday, a spokeswoman for Avery Healthcare, which runs the care home, said: 'We are deeply saddened by the incident at our home in Sunderland and our thoughts are with all those affected.
'We are committed to supporting our residents, their families, and our dedicated staff during this incredibly difficult time.
'We are immensely grateful for the compassion and professionalism our teams have shown and continue to show.
'As this remains part of an active police investigation, we are unable to comment further at this stage.'
Anyone with concerns or information is asked to send Northumbria Police a direct message on social media or use live chat and report forms on the force's website.
Alternatively, they can call 101 and quote reference: NP-20250709-1225.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Terrorist who confessed to masterminding 7/7 London bombings AND 9/11 'could be walking the streets of Britain in days'
A 'despicable' terrorist who confessed to his role in 9/11 and the July 7 bombings is set to be freed from prison within days despite officials declaring him a 'risk to national security'. Haroon Aswat, 50, could be released from a secure hospital unit in the UK without a full risk assessment due to his mental health treatment. He was jailed in 2015 in the US for 20 years having admitted trying to start a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Aswat was visited by a British psychiatrist in America before he was deported back to Britain in 2022 where he declared: 'I'm a terrorist.' Now newly-surfaced US court documents show Aswat also confessed to being a 'mastermind behind the [9/11] attacks and a 2005 attack in the UK', The Sun has reported. In addition to his connection to the 7/7 London terror bombings, which killed 52 people, Aswat has also threatened to kill Jews, Christians and certain groups of Muslims. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said he feared Aswat's return to the streets of Britain and said: 'He should never experience freedom again.' Despite officials admitting their concern and the High Court's Mr Justice Robert Jay previously saying there was 'evidence of an ongoing risk', Aswat will only be subject to a notification order upon his release. It means Aswat must continually notify the police about certain information and keep them up-to-date. These details include his address, foreign travel details and vehicle registration. Earlier this year Mr Justice Jay concluded: 'These were very serious offences and there is evidence of ongoing risk. 'A risk assessment in relation to terrorist offending is always inherently uncertain and in the present case is compounded by the mental instability of the defendant. 'Overall, I am satisfied for the reasons that I have given that a notification order should be made in all the circumstances of this case. 'A psychiatrist has deemed his treatment as being effective and his release from detention is expected in the relatively near future, with the understanding being that he will return to his family in Yorkshire.' He added: 'No formal terrorist risk assessment has been carried out since the defendant's return here. The circumstances of his detention have precluded that. 'However, on the basis of the material which is available the defendant has been assessed by various police officers — including the senior officer dealing with this case — that he remains a risk to national security.' A document from the US District Court, which has been released for the first time, described Aswat as a terrorist and foot soldier of al-Qaeda, and revealed he openly admitted to his involvement in terrorist activities. 'In March 2017 the defendant stated, 'if you think I am a terrorist, I don't shy away from my responsibility' and also stated he was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and a 2005 terrorist attack in the UK.' The papers show that Aswat revealed his associations with Osama bin Laden and that he had spent time training in al-Queda camps in Afghanistan just months before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which claimed more than 3,000 lives. His name was also found on a ledger discovered in a house in Pakistan where Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the 'architect' of 9/11, had been staying. Other activities included helping hate preacher Abu Hamza establish a US terror camp in 1999, staying at a house in Pakistan in 2002 - where he met two of the 7/7 bombers - and possessing a terror manual and alleged bomb materials. Police also traced 20 calls made by the 7/7 bombers to a phone connected to Aswat. Det Chief Supt Gareth Rees, head of operations for the Met's SO15 Counter Terrorism Command, said of Aswat in a witness statement: 'Based on my experience, this is conduct which gives me grave concerns about the risk which the defendant poses to the UK's national security and to the public.' A report compiled by Dr Richard Taylor, who travelled to America in the summer of 2022, found Aswat still posed a risk to the public. The report states that in 2017 Aswat made remarks to prison staff in support of Al Qaeda and threatened violence towards them. In 2022 he sent letters which made demands and death threats, seemingly motivated by a terrorist ideology. Dr Taylor concluded that he openly endorsed an extremist ideology, but there was no evidence that Aswat was mentally ill. However he had had limited opportunity to address the extremist mindset and showed traits of glibness, superficial charm, charisma, intelligence and elements of manipulativeness and narcissism. Even when mentally stable he continued to express violent, extremist Islamic ideology, Dr Taylor found. The diagnosis showed a schizoaffective disorder with symptoms showing unpredictable and aggressive behaviour. Dr Taylor did not complete a full terrorist risk assessment, but identified 15 of the 22 relevant factors in the government's extreme risk guidance. He concluded: 'There remains the risk of Islamic violent extremism motivated targeted terrorist offending behaviour given his threats to kill Jews, Christians and certain groups of Muslims. 'There is also a risk of him influencing other vulnerable individuals, as when he is in an abnormal mental state his religious extremist rhetoric is amplified by mental illness.' A senior police officer, Detective Inspector Karen Bradley, who was involved in the case, concluded that Aswat remains a risk to national security. Aswat was born and grew up in Yorkshire but moved to Wood Green in north London where he fell under the spell of hate preacher Abu Hamza - and together they planned a terror training camp in Oregon with Aswat moving to Seattle to organise it. He also spent time in Afghanistan and in Pakistan - where he met and associated with fellow Yorkshire terror sympathiser Mohammed Sidique Khan and his accomplice Shehzad Tanweer. They would go on to carry out the deadly 7/7 bombings in London which killed 52 people on underground trains and a bus in July 2005. Aswat served most of his sentence in America and was deported back to the UK in December 2022. He is currently detained at Bethlem Royal Hospital in Bromley, south east London. A Government spokesman said: 'Protecting our national security is the very first priority of this government and if any individual poses a threat to that security, the police and intelligence services have a range of powers they can apply to deal with that threat. 'We will always do whatever is necessary inside the law to protect the public from any risk posed by former terrorist offenders or people of terrorist concern.'
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How Britain's most upmarket cocaine ring was smashed: Wealthy clients, drugs of 'mind-blowing' quality, impeccable service... all run by a mild-mannered antiques dealer
Their cocaine was the best in the City, their delivery times unparalleled and their customer relations attentive and deferential. It was no wonder they called themselves the Top Gear gang. Clients ranged from lawyers and traders to insurers and recruitment specialists – almost 10,000 of them, all expecting high-end service and mind-blowing quality. Everyone who was anyone in the Square Mile knew the number of the Top Gear phone line – also called City Gear. It had been operating under the police radar since 2014, shifting millions of pounds worth of Class A drugs to well-off customers. Detectives say the men behind the operation provided a middle class service to a largely middle class clientele – until it came crashing down thanks to an ingenious investigation by the City of London police. The mild-mannered and bookish head of the Top Gear gang, 57-year-old antiques trader Nathan Samuels, has now been jailed for nine years at Inner London Crown Court. Four of his fast delivery couriers – including a black cabbie – received prison sentences ranging from two years suspended to four years and three months in jail. All had pleaded guilty to a string of cocaine supplying offences. Last week, Samuels' son, Matthew, 33, was imprisoned for three and a half years for his part in the operation. 'We'd never seen anything like it – it was the longest-running and one of the biggest drug lines the City had ever known,' says lead Detective Constable Matt Cooper from the force's Serious Organised Crime team. 'It sold 80 per cent pure cocaine – when the norm was about 50 per cent – and promised to get drugs to customers in less than 30 minutes. And if a client complained about a slow delivery, they'd receive an apology.' Meticulously compiled ledgers seized by the police when the gang members were arrested in 2023 showed that in any given week they were selling up to £16,400 worth of cocaine, almost exclusively in the City. At the head of the operation was the most unlikely of crime bosses – a man with no criminal record at all. Nathan Samuels, a father of four and grandfather of two, lived in an £800-a month four storey council house in Cornwall Road, a stone's throw from Waterloo Station, and had an interest in London books and artwork. He had a business selling antiques, jewellery and watches, and owned a company – Samsite Ltd – which specialised in renting spaces outside train stations and subletting them to fast food takeaway trucks. These included sites outside Waterloo and Southwark stations which were brought to their knees during the Covid pandemic as customers dwindled to almost nothing – and police believe this downturn could have focused Samuels' attention on the drugs business. City police's investigation ran from March 2022 to October 2023 and during that period detectives established that the key phones in the operation had been in use since 2014. But such devices – whose contacts are a list ready-made drugs businesses – can change hands for large sums of money. It is thought Samuels' Covid difficulties could have driven him to buying one. 'He ran the business like a taxi cab office,' says Detective Sergeant Darren Norman, who oversaw the case. 'They called their wraps of cocaine "tickets", so a customer would ring or message the Top Gear line and tell Samuels they wanted so many tickets delivered to a particular location or postcode. Samuels was able to track all his couriers using their phones, and would choose the nearest one to the customer. That's why it was so fast.' Because the cocaine was so pure, it was only sold in half-gram wraps at one for £50, two for £90, three for £140 and five for £200. Couriers, who were paid £300 a day plus bonuses for good sales, were encouraged to be customer-friendly and smart. As added perks, any congestion charge fees, parking tickets and car hire expenses were covered. Samuels would hire up to six couriers a day, each expected to make between 50 and 75 sales. Deliveries took place from 10am to midnight. One of the couriers, Michael Redgrave, 56, who lived on the same street as Samuels, used his black cab to make deliveries. A cabbie for 23 years, he told police he was making up to £500 a day from his taxi business, and a further £300 for drug drop-offs. A father of four and grandfather of one, detectives say he used some of the money to take his family on lavish holidays. He was also the proud owner of a purebred British bulldog. 'During 30 years as a police officer, I've never come across a London cabbie we've caught dealing drugs,' says DS Norman. 'They're usually honest individuals who take pride in all the work they've put in to do The Knowledge. But he made the decision to deliver drugs – and it was almost the perfect crime. Nobody would think twice about a person getting into a cab, being driven off and then getting out farther down the road with cocaine in their pocket.' The Top Gear operation began to unravel when, in February 2022, another courier, Gary Miller, 36, from Islington, was caught making a cocaine delivery. As detectives examined his phone records, they were able to begin a huge and meticulous cross-referencing operation that led to customers, fellow couriers – and, eventually, to gang boss Samuels. The investigation was groundbreaking because police were able to close down the most sophisticated cocaine operation on their patch – and elicit guilty pleas – without carrying out any large-scale seizures. In fact, the drugs they found were almost exclusively recovered from customers during the arrests of couriers who had just delivered to them. The cross-referencing of calls and delivery locations enabled the police to begin making arrests without having to catch the couriers in possession of drugs. Samuels' son Matthew, a personal trainer and father of one, also a director of Samsite Ltd, was arrested with no drugs on him. Unlike the other gang members, he did not reply 'no comment' to every question during interview. Instead, he made risible excuses to Detectives Cooper and Norman. 'We asked why there were so many references on his phone to "Charlie", which is slang for cocaine, and "Henry", short for Henry VIII – which, in drugs circles, refers to an eighth of an ounce of cannabis, which he had a sideline selling,' says DS Norman. 'He insisted that Charlie and Henry were friends of his. And he kept that up right up until court when he changed his plea to guilty for supplying cannabis.' He pleaded not guilty to the cocaine charges, but was later found guilty. Also found with no drugs – but entering guilty pleas – were couriers Aaron Bretao, 43, from Clerkenwell, and Martin Gupta, 35, from Barnet. They were arrested in May 2023. Gupta, who had previous convictions for actual bodily harm, assault, and being drunk and disorderly, was caught empty-handed but he had been witnessed making two drug deals before his arrest. Driving a moped, delivering drugs had been his full-time job for around three years. Police say he had been overheard boasting to friends that he was making up to £3,000 a week. He spent much of it on holidays to destinations such as Cape Verde and Morocco with his wife and stepdaughter. After the arrests of Miller (who was given 45 months in prison at an earlier hearing), Gupta and Bretao, Nathan Samuels feared the police would be coming for him next and handed over three drug phones for safekeeping to another gang member, Josh Atherton, 24, a former carpenter. But detectives had already linked him to the operation. When they raided his home in Hemingford Road, Islington, two days after detaining Gupta, Atherton had none of the vital phones on him – but DS Norman found them during a search of nearby gardens. 'He had thrown them there, but once DS Norman had sniffed them out, you could say the net had closed on Samuels,' says DC Cooper. 'Two of those phones had numbers used for the Top Gear drug lines – and inside those handsets we found the contact details of more than 9,700 customers.' Police also recovered ledgers at Atherton's home detailing the gang's incomings and outgoings. They reinforced the case against Nathan Samuels. Samuels and son were arrested simultaneously a week later, on July 12 2023. Again, no drugs were found, yet guilty pleas were forthcoming because of the airtight nature of the communications evidence against them. 'Nathan Samuels wasn't like Pablo Escobar, sitting on piles of coke,' says DS Norman. 'We found no drugs at all. He was calm and mild-mannered. But after the arrests of the other gang members, he had probably been expecting us.' Officers did not discover the source of the Top Gear gang's supply of drugs, but it may not be a coincidence that Nathan's nephew, Harry Hicks-Samuels, 28, was jailed in November 2022 for conspiracy to import cocaine. He had been caught as a result of a National Crime Agency operation after French police cracked a secret messaging system called EncroChat which had been widely used by international criminals who wrongly thought its sophisticated encryption was foolproof. Again, it may not be a coincidence that Hicks-Samuels, like his uncle, ran a business selling watches, an enterprise that turned out to be a front for his cocaine operation. No Top Gear customers have faced criminal charges, but all those caught after buying drugs in the moments before the couriers were arrested were given cautions for possession. Their evidence helped bring down the organised crime group. However, the top 2,000 most prolific customers were subsequently given a jolt as strong as anything the Top Gear gang ever sold them. They were sent a text message by the City of London police that would have had hearts racing. 'Significant police activity has highlighted that this number has been used to contact the "City Gear" drug line, a number involved in the supply of Class A drugs,' it read. 'Drug misuse can affect your employment. Drug possession is still illegal and can lead to your arrest. Convictions for drug misuse can affect your right to travel to certain countries.' It then advised them to seek help at the City and Hackney Recovery Service provided by Turning Point – helpfully including the drug charity's website, .
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
City trader husband who was left with just £325,000 of his heiress ex's £61.5MILLION fortune wins divorce appeal after 'gender bias' claim
A financial trader who complained of ' gender prejudice' when being handed only £325,000 of his ex-wife's £60m-plus family fortune has won his divorce appeal after she hid how much she was worth. Wealthy heiress Jenny Helliwell engaged in 'fraudulent' behaviour by not declaring almost £48m of her £66m personal fortune whilst making a prenuptial agreement, appeal judges ruled. Simon Entwistle's 'painful' divorce from Ms Helliwell culminated with an award in his favour of just £400,000, instead of the £2.5 million he had originally claimed. That sum was reduced to £325,000 after a deduction for Ms Helliwell's costs after a divorce judge said the three-year marriage did not entitle him to maintain a lavish lifestyle once the relationship ended. Given that his own costs were £450,000, the award left Mr Entwistle £125,000 out of pocket - a scenario that his barrister argued would not have materialised were their roles reversed. Following a lavish £500,000 wedding in Paris in August 2019, Mr Entwistle 'enjoyed the trappings of being married into a family of exceptional wealth,' living in a £4.5 million villa in Dubai gifted to Ms Helliwell by her father, affluent businessman Neil Helliwell. But their relationship hit the rocks and they split just three years after their wedding, with Ms Helliwell - the daughter of wealthy Dubai-based British businessman Neil Helliwell - getting lawyers to order her then husband out of the family home with 48 hours' notice in August 2022. The pair, both 42, then went to court over money with Mr Entwistle, originally from Bolton, asking for £2.5m from his interior designer ex-wife's personal fortune, estimated at over £60m. But he was left with just a tiny 0.5 per cent share of the pot after the judge upheld a pre-nuptial agreement the pair had signed promising they would each keep their own assets in the event of a split. Appealing that ruling, Mr Entwistle said he was a victim of 'gender prejudice' and that the prenup had been invalidated by Ms Helliwell having failed to disclose assets worth almost £48m - amounting to 73 per cent of her wealth - on documents when he signed it. Now Lady Justice King has ruled that the nondisclosure by the heiress amounted to 'fraudulent' behaviour which had invalidated the pre-nup. She allowed Mr Entwistle's appeal and sent the case back to the divorce courts, ordering it to be recalculated as if the pre-nuptial agreement did not exist. 'Wilful or fraudulent breach of that agreement such that the disclosure made bears no resemblance to the true wealth of a capable of being material non-disclosure, as it deprives the other party of the information that they have agreed is necessary in order for them to decide whether to agree to a pre-nuptial agreement,' she said. 'Since the husband in the instant case was deliberately deprived of information which it had been agreed that he should have, in my judgment, the agreement cannot stand.' After the original hearing, High Court judge Mr Justice Francis found that the husband's personal assets were worth around £850,000, including a flat in Salford where he had lived with his first wife before moving to Dubai. Ms Helliwell, by contrast, was worth around £66m, with her wealthy dad having gifted her valuable assets and put some of his business interests in her name. Helliwell had offered him first £500,000, then £800,000, to avoid a court battle, but he had refused, holding out for £2.5m. 'The parties went through this painful litigation and the husband is actually worse off now than he would have been if he never brought a claim in the first place, which is tragic for everybody,' the judge commented. But he declined to hand the husband any more money, calling his budget of needs 'aspirational,' including an 'astonishing' claim for £36,000 a year for flights and £26,000 a year 'on a meal plan just for himself'. 'He said to me, "I can't even cook an omelette." Well, my answer to that is, "Learn." It is not difficult,' said the judge. 'You do not have to be a master chef to learn how to eat reasonably well.' He added: 'Being married to a rich person for three years does not suddenly catapult you into a right to live like that after the relationship has ended.' Challenging the judge's ruling at the Court of Appeal, Deborah Bangay KC, for Mr Entwistle, said: 'The judge was warned against gender prejudice, but failed to heed that warning. 'Had the positions been reversed, it is very unlikely that he would have, so ungenerously assessed the needs of a wife after a six-year relationship.' She also argued that the pre-nuptial agreement, which had been key to the husband's low award, was invalidated by Ms Helliwell's failure to disclose her full wealth, stating that she was worth about £18m rather than her full £66m fortune. Lady Justice King, giving her ruling, made no finding on the gender prejudice argument but said that in the pre-nup, the wife disclosed £18,206,735 of assets, including multi-million pound property portfolios in Dubai and France. 'The wife, however, failed to include £47,878,800 of assets owned by her,' she added. This included almost £40m worth of business assets, £8m worth of beachfront land in Dubai and a £1,649,000 house in Wimbledon, lived in by her mother. 'The husband and wife entered into the agreement on the day they married, July 12, 2019,' she said. 'Upon divorce, each party would retain their own separate property and split any jointly owned property as to 50 per cent each. 'At the heart of the dispute is whether the wife's undoubted failure to disclose the majority of her substantial wealth should have the consequence that the agreement should not be upheld by the court. 'In the present case, the non-disclosure of the majority of her assets by the wife was undoubtedly deliberate.'
