First indirect Hamas-Israel ceasefire talks ended inconclusively, Palestinian sources say
CAIRO — The first session of indirect Hamas-Israel ceasefire talks in Qatar ended inconclusively, two Palestinian sources familiar with the matter said early on Monday, adding that the Israeli delegation didn't have a sufficient mandate to reach an agreement with Hamas.
The talks resumed on Sunday, ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's third visit to the White House since U.S. President Donald Trump returned to power nearly six months ago.
'After the first session of indirect negotiations in Doha, the Israeli delegation is not sufficiently authorized ... to reach an agreement with Hamas, as it has no real powers,' the sources told Reuters.
Netanyahu said, before his departure to Washington, that Israeli negotiators taking part in the ceasefire talks have clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire agreement under conditions that Israel has accepted.
On Saturday evening, crowds gathered at a public square in Tel Aviv near the defense ministry headquarters to call for a ceasefire deal and the return of around 50 hostages still held in Gaza. The demonstrators waved Israeli flags, chanted and carried posters with photos of the hostages.
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Around 20 of the remaining hostages are believed to be still alive. A majority of the original hostages have been freed through diplomatic negotiations, though the Israeli military has also recovered some.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, displaced the population, mostly within Gaza, and left the territory in ruins.
Reporting by Nidal Al Mughrabi; Writing by Yomna Ehab; Editing by Lisa Shumaker, Kim Coghill and Lincoln Feast.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump can't see the forest for the trees
Opinion Drill, baby drill — and it would seem, cut, baby, cut. In addition to his ongoing tariff war, a successful budget bill that seeks to strip Medicaid and food benefits from millions, and an 'anti-immigrant' crackdown which has seen legal-status American residents arrested and imprisoned abroad with little or no recourse, U.S. President Donald Trump has also had just about enough of all the trees cluttering up his country. Trump's administration is on track to strip federal protections from 59 million acres of national forest, opening it up to logging. The Associated Press U.S. President Donald Trump This is, one supposes, part of his master plan to wean his country off of Canadian lumber, which he has stated in the past the U.S. does not need. According to The Guardian, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced the move at a meeting of the Western Governors' Association in Santa Fe, N.M. During that meeting, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum described Trump's plans to use more homegrown resources for manufacturing purposes. The meeting follows an executive order issued in March. The environmental implications of this are obvious. In a time where the backlash of our changing climate is affecting people across the world, cutting down more carbon-capturing trees in the name of manufacturing and profit is a backward move, plain and simple. Trump's administration has made gestures toward there being some environmental benefit to more logging — claiming that, since the restrictions prevent any roads from being built through millions of acres of forest, it is more difficult to combat wildfires. But this argument must contend with the reality that, according to the U.S. National Park Service, nearly 85 per cent of wildfires in the U.S. are caused by humans — who must be accessing those forests from a nearby road. It comes as no surprise that the Trump administration's rationale is faulty. Trump and his cabinet make these kind of arguments because they must, not because they believe in them. The real reason Trump is gung-ho to cut down millions of acres of forest is as simple as it is petty: he doesn't want to have to pay the sticker price on another country's lumber, and he's willing to jeopardize the long-term ecological health of his own country out of spite. The consequences will not be limited to fewer trees and hotter temperatures. According to environmental groups in the U.S., such as the Sierra Club and Earthjustice, point out that logging activities pose a risk to drinking water supplies, and destroy the habitats for wildlife across the United States. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. And this is far from the only environmentally unfriendly action he has taken — as of May, Trump had taken more than 140 actions to strip away rules protecting air and water quality. Depending on what part of the world you live in, American hostility and belligerence toward others might be nothing new. But it's difficult to conceive of any other point where an American president, by his actions, seemed so plainly hostile to both the international community and his own citizens. Between his militaristic posturing in Iran, his treatment of millions of poor and marginalized Americans or legal immigrants, and his disdain for environmental concerns, he is a unique problem for the global community. It does not seem unfair to say he is hostile to the long-term well-being of the human race in general. However much trade relationships might seem important to America's international partners and allies — yes, including Canada — it is time to speak up about the many, many reckless and galling move this administration is making. And it's time to play hardball to force a change of course in the U.S., to limit the scope of the damage Trump intends to do.
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial
BOSTON (AP) — A federal bench trial begins Monday over a lawsuit that challenges a Trump administration campaign of arresting and deporting faculty and students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations and other political activities. The lawsuit, filed by several university associations against President Donald Trump and members of his administration, would be one of the first to go to trial. Plaintiffs want U.S. District Judge William Young to rule the policy violates the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act, a law governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations.
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Trump and Netanyahu may take a victory lap on Iran, but the Gaza war looms over their meeting
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump might look to take a victory lap on Monday after their recent joint strikes on Iran, hailed by both as an unmitigated success. But as they meet for the third time this year, the outwardly triumphant visit will be dogged by Israel's 21-month war against Hamas in Gaza and questions over how hard Trump will push for an end to the conflict.
