Couple welcome 'world's oldest baby' born from embryo frozen 31 years ago
Lindsey Pierce, 35 and her husband Tim, 34, welcomed baby Thaddeus on July 26 after adopting the embryo.
The couple from Ohio in the US had struggled to conceive for almost eight years when Lindsey became pregnant with Thaddeus.
The embryo was one of four created in 31 years ago when Linda Archerd, now 62, and her husband underwent in vitro fertilisation (IVF) after they also had problems conceiving.
Out of the four, one led to the birth of their daughter, who is now 30.
The other three embryos remained frozen in case the couple wanted more children.
Linda said: 'I called them my three little hopes. I always wanted another baby desperately.'
She and her husband, however, divorced and although Linda got custody of the embryos she never used them.
When she reached menopause she decided to put them up for adoption with Snowflakes, a Christian embryo adoption organisation.
'I always thought it was the right thing to do,' she said.
As they had been frozen for such a long period of time, they were put undera programme called Open Hearts, a 'hard to place' scheme for embryos that are less likely to result in a healthy birth.
Several years later Lindsey and Tim signed up for the scheme and were given Linda's embryo, which led to a successful pregnancy.
Lindsey told MIT Technology Review: 'We are in awe that we have this precious baby.'
She described the actual birth as 'rough' but said she and Thaddeus are doing well.
'We didn't go into it thinking we would break any records,' she added. 'We just wanted to have a baby.'
IVF stands for 'in vitro fertilization,' a Latin phrase meaning ''n glass fertilization.'
Unlike natural conception, where fertilization occurs within the body, IVF brings together eggs and sperm outside the body in a laboratory dish to achieve fertilization.
The resulting embryo(s) are then transferred into the uterus, where they will hopefully implant and grow, leading to pregnancy.
IVF was initially designed to help women with blocked or damaged fallopian tubes, but its now used to treat a range of fertility issues.
Women under 35 have an average live birth rate per IVF cycle of about 40-45%.
Success rates decrease significantly with increasing age, especially after age 40.
Advancements such as embryo selection, time-lapse imaging, and genetic testing have improved outcomes.
The first successful birth through IVF took place in 1978, when Louise Brown was born in Oldham, Greater Manchester.
Lindsey said the whole experience was 'surreal' and 'hard to even believe'.
Linda, meanwhile, said she was struck by how much Thaddeus resembles her own child as an infant.
'The first thing that I noticed when Lindsey sent me his pictures is how much he looks like my daughter when she was a baby,' she said.
Before Thaddeus's birth, the oldest embryos to lead to successful births were twins born from 30-year-old embryos in Oregon in 2022. More Trending
However, cases such as these are rare as few organisations will take old embryos, due to the higher risk of failing.
The facility that helped the Pierces conceive, Rejoice Fertility Clinic, was set up by reformed Presbyterian Dr John Gordon, to cut down the number of embryos held in storage.
He said: 'Every embryo deserves a chance at life and the only embryo that cannot result in a healthy baby is the embryo not given the opportunity to be transferred into a patient.'
It's believed millions of embryos leftover from IVF procedures are being kept in freezers around the world.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: 'Panama Playlists' leak exposes JD Vance's favourite boy bands
MORE: Trump tearing down parts of White House to build £150,000,000 ballroom
MORE: Infant dies in hot car after being left by dad who 'forgot about him'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Trump dubbed himself the ‘father of IVF' on the campaign trail. But his pledge to mandate insurance cover has disappeared
Donald Trump's vow to expand in vitro fertilization (IVF) access to millions of Americans is on hold, with White House officials backing away from plans to require Obamacare health plans to include the service as an essential health benefit, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The Post reported that White House officials have privately moved away from the prospect of pushing for legislation to address the issue despite it being one of Trump's signature campaign promises, citing two persons with knowledge of internal discussions in Trumpworld. A senior administration official also acknowledged to the newspaper that changing Obamacare to force insurers to cover new services would require congressional action, not an executive order. The president has governed largely by executive fiat in his second term as he grapples with a closely-divded Congress and an unruly GOP majority in the House of Representatives. He's used those executive orders to dismantle whole parts of the federal government, including USAID and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The president even tried to take an axe to the Department of Education, though that battle is still being waged in the courts. The Supreme Court recently cleared the way for Trump to cut roughly a quarter of the agency's staff. But many of Trump's campaign promises lie outside of his ability to influence via the hiring or firing of people and redirection of agency resources or agendas. In 2024, he laid out no direct path for his goal to expand IVF access, only telling voters that insurance companies would be forced to cover it. Still, he proclaimed himself the 'father of IVF' at at Fox News town hall, and promised during an NBC News interview: 'We are going to be, under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment. We're going to be mandating that the insurance company pay.' At the time, there was little to no acknowledgment of the fact that many if not most conservatives still oppose the Affordable Care Act and the same healthcare exchanges which Trump was now promising to utilize as he sought to use the power of the federal government to expand healthcare coverage. Now, with the passage of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' without any provisions expanding IVF access, and with the prospect of further policy gains before the midterms growing dimmer, it's unclear when the White House would have another chance to press the issue in Congress. In February, the president signed an executive order directing his advisers to 'submit to the President a list of policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment.' It's been crickets on the issue since then. In 2024, many of Trump's critics and the media pointed out that the policy would essentially amount to a reversal or at the very least coming in sharp contrast to the first Trump administration's efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which ended in failure, and a contradiction of the conservative view that government should not exercise that level of control over Americans' health care decisions. The president's promise thrilled his party's natalists, embodied by Vice President JD Vance and an army of right-wing immigration hawks who fear the changing American demographics brought on as a result of falling birth rates and high levels of migration. It also wowed some of his Democratic and left-leaning critics, who see the policy as a means of furthering their goal of expanding access to healthcare for poorer Americans. For Vance, the issue of declining U.S. birth rates predates his MAGA heel-turn. In 2019, he told a gathering of conservatives in Washington: 'Our people aren't having enough children to replace themselves. That should bother us.' 'We want babies not just because they are economically useful. We want more babies because children are good. And we believe children are good, because we are not sociopaths,' the future vice president added at the time. Two years later, he'd tell a right-leaning podcast: 'I think we have to go to war against the anti-child ideology that exists in our country.' During the 2024 campaign, those views emerged again as Vance attacked Democrats as 'childless cat ladies' and leaned heavily into attacking the left for supposedly being anti-family. Progressives fought back, pointing to efforts to expand the child tax credit and other benefits that aid young families under Joe Biden and other Democratic administrations, including the passage of Barack Obama's signature law: the Affordable Care Act.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
White House backs away from IVF coverage mandate despite Trump's campaign pledge, Washington Post reports
Aug 3 (Reuters) - The White House has no current plans to mandate insurance coverage for IVF, despite President Donald Trump's campaign promise to expand access to fertility treatments, The Washington post reported on Saturday. Reuters could not immediately verify this report.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Couples using IVF to conceive may be more successful during the summer, research suggests
Couples using IVF to have a baby may be more successful during the summer, research suggests. A study involving 1,100 women undergoing fertility treatment suggests a pregnancy may be up to twice as likely when the weather is sunnier and warmer. Even in spring, the pregnancy rate was 75 per cent higher than during the colder months, scientists found. They suggest that higher levels of vitamin D – the so-called 'sunshine vitamin' – may improve hormonal balance and boost fertility naturally. The pregnancy rate particularly soared when the weather outside was a balmy 26 to 30 Celsius, which suggested patients having IVF 'may benefit from treatments conducted in this temperature range', the researchers said. They suggest fertility clinics could use their results to schedule more patients for treatment during the spring and summer – which they say would help boost success rates. 'Our findings suggest that season and temperature play a significant role in influencing the success rates of clinical pregnancies, and suggest that summer treatment may optimise IVF outcomes,' the team wrote in the International Journal of Biometeorology. The study was conducted on patients attending a fertility clinic at the Reproductive Hospital of Guangxi in China between June 2021 and October 2023. All were having IVF for the first time, and using fresh – rather than frozen – embryos. Those having treatment in the spring were 75 per cent more likely to get pregnant, and those in the summer were 53 per cent more likely to be successful. However, among those women having IVF using a process known as the 'long protocol' – which is standard in the UK and involves using drugs to suppress natural hormone production before stimulating the ovaries to produce more eggs – the pregnancy rate was twice as high during the summer months. Similar findings have also been reported in other studies. The researchers, from the hospital, said it was not clear why there appeared to be such a marked difference but suggested vitamin D levels could be a factor. The vitamin is naturally produced in the body in response to sunlight and the NHS recommends everyone in the UK takes a vitamin D supplement during the winter months. A deficiency of vitamin D is linked to a range of chronic conditions such as osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis and heart disease. The researchers said that while the impacts of season and temperature on pregnancy were 'not fully understood', more research was needed to clarify the role of vitamin D on pregnancy outcomes.
