South Australian premier declares algal bloom catastrophe a ‘natural disaster' in defiance of federal Labor
Speaking to the ABC's News Breakfast program, Peter Malinauskas warned 'politicians can do themselves a disservice when they get caught up in technicalities'.
The federal environment minister, Murray Watt, announced a $14m assistance package on Monday but stopped short of declaring the crisis a natural disaster because he said it did not meet the relevant definitions under the federal natural disaster framework.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'From the South Australian government's perspective, I want to be really clear about this. This is a natural disaster … I think politicians can do themselves a disservice when they get caught up in technicalities,' Malinauskas said.
'This is a natural disaster and should be acknowledged as such.
'There are over 400 different species of marine life that have been killed off or have had deaths as a result of this algal bloom.'
Malinauskas said he used the words natural disaster 'quite deliberately' but that the disaster differed from other emergencies, such as bushfires, that Australians were familiar with.
'This is so entirely unprecedented we don't really know how it's going to play out over coming weeks and months ahead,' he said.
Watt visited South Australia on Monday to view the effects of the toxic algal bloom that has littered the state's beaches with masses of dead fish, rays, sharks, dolphins and other marine life.
It followed pressure from the South Australian community for the federal government to offer immediate support for affected places and businesses.
On Monday night, Anthony Albanese said federal funding had been timed 'appropriately' given the event was unfolding 'primarily in state waters'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'Events do occur in our environment,' the prime minister told ABC's 7.30. 'What is important is that there be a response. We're responding, giving support to the South Australian government.'
The Greens' environment spokesperson and South Australia-based senator Sarah Hanson-Young said on Monday the funding was welcome but 'nowhere near what will be needed' to support communities dealing with the catastrophe.
Hanson-Young said the criteria used to declare natural disasters under the national framework should be examined.
As parliament returns, Hanson-Young also said she would push for an inquiry into the disaster to examine issues including the federal and state government responses to the event.
'South Australians have been crying out for weeks and months for federal action on this, so I'm glad to see the federal environment minister finally get to South Australia,' Hanson-Young told the ABC's Afternoon Briefing on Monday.
She said: '$14m is good but nowhere near what will be needed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week under Australian-first laws
Victorians could soon have a legal right to work from home two days a week, under proposed Australian-first laws to be introduced to parliament by the state Labor government in 2026. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, will use Labor's state conference on Saturday to announce the proposal, which, if passed by parliament, would make the state the first in the country to legislate the right to work remotely. Allan will tell party faithful if a job can reasonably be done from home, employees would have the legal right to do so for at least two days a week. The law would apply to both public and private sector workers, though how it would be enforced and other specifics were not outlined ahead of her speech. In a statement, the premier said that working from home was popular, it saved families money, cut congestion and allowed greater workforce participation, particularly among women with children, carers and people with a disability. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Work from home works for families and it's good for the economy,' Allan said. 'Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit.' The announcement sets the stage for a political fight in the lead-up to the November 2026 state election, given the Coalition opposition has previously signalled plans to return the public service to the office full-time. The shadow treasurer, James Newbury, told the Herald Sun in February that the government 'should be requiring public servants to work from the office' but stopped short of confirming whether the Coalition would enforce a mandate. The issue was also a flashpoint at the recent federal election, with Peter Dutton forced mid-campaign to reverse a policy to restrict work from home arrangements for public servants due to public backlash. Allan's statement said consultation on the legislation would be led by the Department of Premier and Cabinet and would cover the types of businesses and the size of businesses that would be included, as well as the definition of remote work and who was able to do it. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion It stressed the consultation process 'won't determine whether working from home should be a right' as that position had already been decided. Instead, it would focus on 'the appropriate laws to reflect it'. It said 'several legislative options were available'. Allan will be left to rally the room of 600 Victorian Labor delegates, with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, unable to attend as he will be at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory. It will mean the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, will be the most senior party figure at the two-day event and placed in an uncomfortable position as delegates vote on a review of the Aukus submarine deal he has strongly backed. Other urgency resolutions up for debate include a call for the federal government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and impose sanctions on Israel, rejection of the Allan government's proposed protest laws – described as 'anti-democratic and regressive' – and for all 44 public housing tower sites slated for redevelopment to remain in public hands.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Freedom Flotilla activists say they were ‘brutalised psychologically' by Israeli military after aid boat boarded
Two Australian activists have claimed they were 'brutalised psychologically' by the Israeli military, strip-searched and shackled, after their Freedom Flotilla boat was intercepted. Journalist Tania Safi and activist Robert Martin were detained while onboard the Handala, which was seeking to deliver aid to Gaza as part of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. After their arrest alongside 19 other activists on Sunday, the pair were transported to Israel and spent days in Israeli custody, where they allege they were manhandled and treated like criminals. The Handala was carrying 21 civilians representing 12 countries - including the UK - with parliamentarians, lawyers, journalists, environmentalists, and other human rights defenders among them. It was carrying aid including baby formula, nappies, food, and medicine for the Gaza strip, where a starvation crisis has prompted international outcry after dozens of Palestinians died from hunger-related causes in recent weeks. Experts, the UN, and other countries say Israeli blockades caused the crisis. The Israeli government says Hamas is at fault and has accused the Palestinian militants of stealing food from aid trucks. The two Australian activists landed back in Sydney on Friday morning, where they spoke to reporters about their ordeal. Ms Safi said at least 30 IDF members boarded Handala when it was intercepted, and claimed all were armed, some with four guns. 'They knocked me in the leg with one of their machine guns,' Ms Safi said of the moment around 30 IDF soldiers boarded the Handala after it was intercepted, speaking to The Guardian. After being taken to the port of Ashdod south of Tel Aviv, the group was taken to interrogation rooms. Ms Safi supported earlier allegations by the group that Chris Smalls, the former president of the Amazon Labour Union who was onboard the Handala, was physically assaulted by IDF troops. 'Chris was pinned down by seven or eight men,' she told the outlet. 'When I asked about him they came into the room and dragged me out by my arms, I'm still bruised from it. 'They pulled me out and threw me down on the floor, they made me take off all my clothes, they strip-searched me right there, made me squat up and down … they treated us like we were criminals.' Ms Safi, who said she witnessed 'the soullessness and the cruelty and brutality' of Israeli detention, added that soldiers would 'handcuff me and grab the handcuffs and just throw me against the wall'. She said the military tried to get the Handala activists to sign documents which said they had entered Israel illegally, which Ms Safi says is 'not true… we were taken completely against our will and brutalised psychologically in every way'. Mr Martin alleged he was not allowed any of the medication that he required, nor was he allowed to make any phone calls to loved ones and 'anybody else' - despite the Australian government demanding to Israel that they were allowed to do so. They were eventually transported to Jordan, where they were assisted by the Australian embassy and taken to hospital, he added. The Handala incident came nearly two months after the Madleen, a Freedom Flotilla with Swedish activist Greta Thunberg on board, was intercepted by the Israeli army on 9 June. The IDF has been contacted for comment. In a statement on X after the boat was seized, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said the military had prevented the boat from 'illegally entering the maritime zone of the coast of Gaza'. It added: 'The vessel is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. All passengers are safe. Unauthorized attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts.' Regarding the alleged assault on Mr Smalls, the Israeli foreign ministry told The Guardian on Thursday: 'Contrary to the claims made, the passenger violently resisted. This was a planned provocation intended to create media attention.'
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Adani promised Australia billions from its Carmichael mine but it hasn't paid a cent in tax. How did we get here?
It was entirely foreseeable, and has resulted in billions of dollars in forgone revenue for Australia. But just how did policymakers fail to extract a single cent in company tax from Adani's Carmichael coalmine, even though it opened during the start of a commodity price boom? To understand how it came about, you must first rewind to 2010, a period that coincided with a sharp escalation in the climate wars that would eventually tear through the political corridors of Canberra. Against that backdrop, the Indian conglomerate proposed a coalmine to extract up to 60m tonnes per year, for 150 years, making it one of the world's biggest. It would also open up the untapped Galilee Basin, ushering in a new period of resources prosperity, especially for central Queensland. The economic promise was enticing. At its peak, such an operation would create more than 10,000 full-time jobs, according to an Adani consultant's report published in 2013. The then head of Adani mining, Jeyakumar Janakaraj, said the Australian operations would deliver $22bn in taxes and royalties to be invested 'right back into frontline services'. The '10,000 jobs [and] $22bn in royalties and taxes' pledge became a mantra that was even featured in Adani TV advertisements. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It would be a win-win for the state and federal governments – royalties would flow to the state and company tax to the commonwealth – both of which needed to issue approvals. The Carmichael emissions would, of course, be colossal, producing 4.7bn tonnes of CO2-equivalent over its lifetime, once the mine, its operations and the burning of its coal were taken into account, according to analysis by the Australia Institute at the time. Annual emissions would be double the average produced by Tokyo, and three times that of New Delhi. The ensuing battle between environmentalists and the coalminer divided communities; but Adani's jobs and economic benefit pledge seemed irresistible – until it changed. In 2015, conservationists went to the Queensland land court, seeking a recommendation that Adani's applications for an environmental approval and mining lease for Carmichael be refused. The research director at the Australia Institute, Rod Campbell, says 'Adani's lawyers realised that the 10,000 jobs claim was unsupportable, so they bit the bullet'. Campbell, who provided economic analysis for the proceedings opposing Adani, says the coalminer changed consultants and argued in court for a more modest jobs claim 'but otherwise sang the praises of the mine'. The new economic models brought the expected job numbers down to fewer than 1,500. By 2015, the anticipated tonnes coming out of the mine had also reduced, from 60m a year to 40m; it would later reduce to 10m. But the projected corporate tax take still appeared strong, with the project forecast to generate about $400m a year under the new forecasts. Adani's modelling was broadly accepted by the court, even though critics pointed out it didn't account for tax minimisation strategies. By 2017, Adani's bid for a subsidised commonwealth loan was unravelling, and global banks were concerned about the economics and reputational damage of funding the new coal project. The mine's supporters doubled down, led by industry groups including the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), which called on policymakers to back the project. The MCA chief executive, Tania Constable, said in 2018 the Queensland and Australian economies would benefit from thousands of new regional jobs. 'And through mining taxes and royalties, the Carmichael mine will generate billions of dollars for taxpayers over decades to fund nurses, teachers, police, hospitals, roads and other services and infrastructure for Queensland families and communities,' Constable said. The MCA was contacted for comment. Adani would go on to finance the project itself, although it would be a smaller project than it had envisaged, given the lack of external funding. 'The coal will be sold to customers in the Asia-Pacific region at index adjusted pricing, which means all taxes and royalties will be paid here in Australia,' Adani said in late 2021, after assembling its first shipment of thermal coal at the port. The Indian conglomerate couldn't have timed the project any better. In late 2021, prices for energy commodities had started to surge in line with the rising tension between Russia and Ukraine. Coal prices then spiked to record highs after the Russian invasion in early 2022. In its first few months of operation, Adani's mine generated more than $32.5m in revenue, according to accounts lodged with the regulator. But it recorded an operating loss after costs, leading to zero tax payable. This pattern would repeat, even as revenue increased. In the 2025 reporting period, it earned $1.27bn in revenue, but once again recorded a paper loss, as various related-party transactions and interest payments erased profits. Tim Buckley, a former investment banker and the director of Climate Energy Finance, describes Adani's finances as an 'extremely complex, opaque corporate structure'. Jason Ward, the principal analyst at the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, says the volume of related-party transactions is 'pretty unprecedented' and that it is set up to never pay tax. 'Every page of their financials is like, 'bing, bing, warning bells going off',' says Ward. Adani has paid royalties – payments made to governments to extract state-owned minerals – with a $78.6m payment in the 2025 accounts, and $83.5m in 2024. Its most recent accounts list just 84 direct employees at the mine, however it uses a mining services provider to hire other workers. A spokesperson for Adani's Australian mining business, which is branded Bravus Mining and Resources, says Adani has invested more than $2.5bn into Australia's economy. 'Today, more than 1,200 Queenslanders are employed at the Carmichael mine in full-time operational roles to produce high-quality thermal coal for the export market,' the Bravus spokesperson says. 'Developing nations in the Asia-Pacific region use coal from the Carmichael mine alongside renewables to provide reliable and affordable energy solutions that help reduce poverty and power growth.' While there is no suggestion Adani has acted illegally, several politicians have expressed frustration that a large resources company can pay less company tax than a low-paid worker pays in income tax. The independent senator David Pocock said on X: 'Why on earth do successive [governments] keep allowing giant multinational companies to reap super profits from the sale of our resources without paying tax?' Independent MP Zali Steggall says Adani is a 'cautionary tale', and that policymakers should reform the approvals process to place conditions on miners to meet their stated promises. She says companies invariably overstate project benefits which 'magically disappear once the operations commence, especially when you're talking about foreign-owned corporations'. 'Time and time again, we see state and federal ministers and governments approve projects on flimsy assurances that don't come true,' says Steggall. 'It's time there was proper accountability for Australian resources so that we stop giving it away in the manner we are at the moment.' Jonathan Barrett is Guardian Australia's business editor
