
Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco
Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting.
, Taranaki Whanganui regional correspondent
Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting in Stratford.
Council was considering a report which found councillors colluded not to make a submission on the bill and halt debate.
New Plymouth District Councillor Dinnie Moeahu – whose deputation was shunted down the agenda in December – addressed council today in front of whanau and supporters.
'What unfolded that day was absolutely disgusting and shameful. I witnessed some elected members bully their way to getting what they wanted.
'And now your conduct has been extensively investigated, documented, reviewed and condemned and made public for the world to see.'
He said what happened was not just a breach of process, but a breach of trust and the fundamental democratic and cultural responsibilities the TRC was obligated to uphold.
Moeahu said a submission prepared by TRC which expressed concern about the Treaty Principles Bill was abruptly dismissed without discussion.
'Let's not mince words that was not governance, that was cowardice hiding behind collusion.'
He said the offending councillors attempt to brush-off their actions as a miscommunication didn't wash with him.
'I was met with contempt, I was made to feel less.'
Moeahu said the TRC had statuary obligations to take the Treaty of Waitangi into account and it had partnering with Māori explicitly enshrined as a strategic priority in its long-term plan.
'This isn't a training issue. It's an absolute failure in governance. When elected members treat Treaty matters as too political or not appropriate you betray your role.'
He hoped the point of reckoning the report represented could be a turning point for the TRC.
'Leadership is a privilege you have been afforded… do better Taranaki Regional Council.'
Dinnie Moeahu's father Peter – an iwi appointee to the council's Policy and Planning Committee – also made a deputation and took aim at councillors by name.
'People who spout democracy but connive behind closed doors to suppress it.
'People like councillor (Tom) Cloke, councillor Donald McIntrye and councillor (Neil) Walker who used their privilege position to bully the regional council chair and chief executive into submission at the December 10 meeting.'
Peter Moeahu said whether the councillors adopted the report or not he would not trust them or forgive them for how they treated his son.
He called on them to withdraw from the local government elections.
'Our community deserves better, our community deserves people who are open-minded, environmentally focussed … and willing to have a meaningful and open relationship with hapū, iwi and manuwhenua.
'My recommendation? Withdraw from the ballot.'
At the closing of his deputation, the Moeahu whānau performed an impassioned haka.
Council chief executive Steve Ruru then spoke briefly to the report which he authored.
He reminded the council of its findings that the Treaty Principles Bill was relevant to TRC business and to make a submission and debate it appropriately.
'One of the big learnings coming out of this is that process issue again which is highlighted in there and obviously there are a range of recommendations made.'
Taranaki Māori Constituency councillor Bonita Bingham believed council had underestimated 'the impact of the trampling of our mana' events of December had for Māori.
'I really thank Peter and Dinnie for their kōrero today because their words expressed what many of us are feeling.
'I would like all councillors to deeply reflect on the actions and collusion and predetermination that lead to the decision on December 10.
'This was no miscommunication this was a deliberate attempt to squash our voice.'
After sitting in stoney silence Donald McIntyre was the only one of the three councillors directly under fire to speak during the meeting.
'Obviously I've upset some people with my actions and I'm sorry they feel aggrieved.'
McIntyre acknowledge that it was correct the Treaty Principles Bill submission was on the December agenda.
But he said if Dinnie Moeahu being shunted down the agenda was a problem someone should have raised it at the time.
'I have yet to see any reference of standing orders being breached and like I say if they were they weren't highlighted at the time.'
McIntyre believed the procedures used on the day were appropriate and democratic because they were all voted on in an open meeting.
'Morally we may have been better to have discussed the item that is probably something we can reflect on in the future, but I still stand by the decision we made at the time.'
McIntyre said iwi council relations had not been set back significantly 'there hasn't been a good relationship in the first instance'.
That fired up councillor Susan Hughes.
'I find it extraordinary that you are sitting here today trying to justify what wasn't in fact and never could be justified.
'You set out to exclude myself and councillor Bingham from being involved in any of this. That was the plan and that was the plan that was executed.
'You undermined the integrity of this organisation by behaving as you did.'
Council voted to adopt the report and all its recommendations with McIntyre voting against the motion.
Following the meeting, Walker said he would not be withdrawing from the local government elections in October.
'I think we're done with this. We've done our thing and we'd like to draw a conclusion over it and put it aside.'
He denied any collusion had ever occurred.
'As far as I'm concerned there was no meetings or any of those things. There was discussion at meetings like today but not meetings.'
Walker was not inclined to apologise.
'What for?'
Cloke declined to comment on whether he would pull out of the election race.
McIntyre was not standing for re-election.
He accepted councillors had colluded ahead of the December meeting.
'What's new about that? Of course we did, like I say, when we elect a chairman we collude before the meeting, is there something wrong with that.'
McIntyre made an apology of sorts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Previous govt spent too much during Covid: Treasury
By Giles Dexter of RNZ The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4% of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35% of the costs of the response. A further 18% came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. 'Dangers of excessive spending' - Willis Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. Labour has been approached for comment.


Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
EJ Barrett Stands For Council To Fight 'The Cost Of Neglect' And Defend Local Democracy
Press Release – EJ Barrett In response to growing calls from candidates proposing exorbitant cuts to council spending, EJ Barrett has announced their campaign for the KaitakeNgmotu Ward in the 2025 New Plymouth District Council election, with a clear message: 'We … In response to growing calls from candidates proposing exorbitant cuts to council spending, EJ Barrett has announced their campaign for the Kaitake–Ngāmotu Ward in the 2025 New Plymouth District Council election, with a clear message: 'We can't afford the cost of neglect.' EJ brings professional experience in budgeting and finance, dispute resolution, facilitation of learning across all ages, communications, the arts, and a strong track record of working alongside young people, disabled communities, and families doing it tough. 'I'm running because our libraries, our housing, and our community spaces are on the line,' says EJ. 'There are people running on platforms to cut costs with no real plan or policies. But slashing support doesn't save money, it shifts the burden to families, social services, and future ratepayers. The cost of neglect is paid by everyone.' 'As someone who survived a lack of access to care, I can tell you for certain, the cost of care now is cheaper than the cost of crisis later.' As part of their campaign, EJ Barrett is calling for: Save Our Libraries: -Protection of public libraries, as safe, accessible resource hubs for all ages. House The People: -Affordable housing solutions, through lower barriers for community housing providers and urban subdivisions. -Build where the infrastructure already exists to reduce pressure on rates. Connected Communities: -Investment in accessible urbanisation to avoid long-term costs caused by underfunding social infrastructure EJ supports the retention of Māori wards, to ensure our democracy stays fair and representative. 'Our democracy is strongest when everyone has a seat at the table, not just the loudest or wealthiest voices,' says EJ. 'What's at stake isn't just funding. It's the future of a fair, livable, and connected district.' With a campaign slogan of 'Libraries. Homes. Communities.', EJ Barrett is inviting voters to stand up for the things that make Ngāmotu a great place to live, before we lose them to short-term thinking and political point-scoring.


Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Ex-Mayor Barbara Arnott Backs Māori Wards
Press Release – For Wards Hawke's Bay For Wards Hawke's Bay is a community coalition supporting fair, democratic representation and Mori wards, says co-ordinator Neill Gordon. Former Napier mayor Barbara Arnott has come out in support of Māori wards ahead of a referendum being held with the local body election. In a short video recorded for For Wards Hawke's Bay, Arnott, current chair of Napier's Art Deco Trust, says Māori wards work and are 'common sense'. Napier has had only three Māori councillors in 150 years. The wards being introduced in Napier for the first time this year will see 2 councillors elected by voters on the Māori electoral roll and 9 councillors elected by general roll voters. Anyone can stand as a candidate in a Māori ward. The system mirrors the Māori seats in Parliament. For Wards Hawke's Bay is a community coalition supporting fair, democratic representation and Māori wards, says co-ordinator Neill Gordon. 'People know how wards work. There's a Taradale ward to ensure that community's voice is heard, there are rural wards in Hastings to make sure the bigger urban populations don't drown out the rural voice and Māori wards are no different. 'The facts are clear. When you've had only three Māori councillors in Napier in 150 years, just four in Central Hawke's Bay and a handful in Hastings it's obvious there's a gaping hole in our democracy. 'And we're all missing out because, as councils with existing Māori wards have found, you get better community engagement and better decisions for everyone when there are Māori voices at the table. 'Māori wards have been a positive solution. By bringing in Māori culture, knowledge and ways of life, councils have become a better reflection of our communities and our shared concerns. Māori ward councillors have helped harness our collective strength by weaving our communities together so our councils can make better, long-term decisions that benefit all of us, and the places we love. 'No matter who we are or where we come from, most of us want a future where people and the environment are well cared for. 'But some people and groups are trying to divide us, and divert us from these concerns that matter to so many of us. At times, this division has meant our councils are not able to make the best decisions for our long term, ones that put care for people and our environment first.' In Napier, after a five-month consultation period in 2021 with residents on this matter, council received 1300 submissions. Although over half submitted against Māori wards, 95 per cent of those on the Māori roll submitted in favour. All those who spoke to their submissions over the two-day hearings were in favour of Māori wards. On 20 October 2021, Napier City Council resolved to introduce Māori Wards for the 2025 local body elections. The vote was carried 11 votes in favour with one abstention and with strong and resounding support voiced by councillors. The current Government passed legislation on 30 July 2024 requiring local authorities to hold a binding poll if they want to establish Māori wards. Following a two-week consultation, on 5 September 2024 Council voted to reaffirm its decision to introduce Māori wards at the 2025 local election. This confirms that Napier residents on the Māori roll will vote for two Māori ward candidates at the 2025 election. In line with new Government legislation, the matter will be settled by the community in a binding poll to be held during the 2025 election. The poll will ask the community whether we should keep Māori wards beyond the 2025-2028 triennium. If the community's answer is no, then Māori wards will be removed from the 2028 election. If the community's answer is yes, then Māori wards will remain at least until the 2031 local government election. Barbara Arnott QSO served as the 18th mayor of Napier between 2001 and 2013, and was the first female mayor of the city. She is on the board of trustees for the Hawke's Bay Power Consumers Trust.