logo
Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco

Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco

Scoop2 days ago
Article – RNZ
Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting.
, Taranaki Whanganui regional correspondent
Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting in Stratford.
Council was considering a report which found councillors colluded not to make a submission on the bill and halt debate.
New Plymouth District Councillor Dinnie Moeahu – whose deputation was shunted down the agenda in December – addressed council today in front of whanau and supporters.
'What unfolded that day was absolutely disgusting and shameful. I witnessed some elected members bully their way to getting what they wanted.
'And now your conduct has been extensively investigated, documented, reviewed and condemned and made public for the world to see.'
He said what happened was not just a breach of process, but a breach of trust and the fundamental democratic and cultural responsibilities the TRC was obligated to uphold.
Moeahu said a submission prepared by TRC which expressed concern about the Treaty Principles Bill was abruptly dismissed without discussion.
'Let's not mince words that was not governance, that was cowardice hiding behind collusion.'
He said the offending councillors attempt to brush-off their actions as a miscommunication didn't wash with him.
'I was met with contempt, I was made to feel less.'
Moeahu said the TRC had statuary obligations to take the Treaty of Waitangi into account and it had partnering with Māori explicitly enshrined as a strategic priority in its long-term plan.
'This isn't a training issue. It's an absolute failure in governance. When elected members treat Treaty matters as too political or not appropriate you betray your role.'
He hoped the point of reckoning the report represented could be a turning point for the TRC.
'Leadership is a privilege you have been afforded… do better Taranaki Regional Council.'
Dinnie Moeahu's father Peter – an iwi appointee to the council's Policy and Planning Committee – also made a deputation and took aim at councillors by name.
'People who spout democracy but connive behind closed doors to suppress it.
'People like councillor (Tom) Cloke, councillor Donald McIntrye and councillor (Neil) Walker who used their privilege position to bully the regional council chair and chief executive into submission at the December 10 meeting.'
Peter Moeahu said whether the councillors adopted the report or not he would not trust them or forgive them for how they treated his son.
He called on them to withdraw from the local government elections.
'Our community deserves better, our community deserves people who are open-minded, environmentally focussed … and willing to have a meaningful and open relationship with hapū, iwi and manuwhenua.
'My recommendation? Withdraw from the ballot.'
At the closing of his deputation, the Moeahu whānau performed an impassioned haka.
Council chief executive Steve Ruru then spoke briefly to the report which he authored.
He reminded the council of its findings that the Treaty Principles Bill was relevant to TRC business and to make a submission and debate it appropriately.
'One of the big learnings coming out of this is that process issue again which is highlighted in there and obviously there are a range of recommendations made.'
Taranaki Māori Constituency councillor Bonita Bingham believed council had underestimated 'the impact of the trampling of our mana' events of December had for Māori.
'I really thank Peter and Dinnie for their kōrero today because their words expressed what many of us are feeling.
'I would like all councillors to deeply reflect on the actions and collusion and predetermination that lead to the decision on December 10.
'This was no miscommunication this was a deliberate attempt to squash our voice.'
After sitting in stoney silence Donald McIntyre was the only one of the three councillors directly under fire to speak during the meeting.
'Obviously I've upset some people with my actions and I'm sorry they feel aggrieved.'
McIntyre acknowledge that it was correct the Treaty Principles Bill submission was on the December agenda.
But he said if Dinnie Moeahu being shunted down the agenda was a problem someone should have raised it at the time.
'I have yet to see any reference of standing orders being breached and like I say if they were they weren't highlighted at the time.'
McIntyre believed the procedures used on the day were appropriate and democratic because they were all voted on in an open meeting.
'Morally we may have been better to have discussed the item that is probably something we can reflect on in the future, but I still stand by the decision we made at the time.'
McIntyre said iwi council relations had not been set back significantly 'there hasn't been a good relationship in the first instance'.
That fired up councillor Susan Hughes.
'I find it extraordinary that you are sitting here today trying to justify what wasn't in fact and never could be justified.
'You set out to exclude myself and councillor Bingham from being involved in any of this. That was the plan and that was the plan that was executed.
'You undermined the integrity of this organisation by behaving as you did.'
Council voted to adopt the report and all its recommendations with McIntyre voting against the motion.
Following the meeting, Walker said he would not be withdrawing from the local government elections in October.
'I think we're done with this. We've done our thing and we'd like to draw a conclusion over it and put it aside.'
He denied any collusion had ever occurred.
'As far as I'm concerned there was no meetings or any of those things. There was discussion at meetings like today but not meetings.'
Walker was not inclined to apologise.
'What for?'
Cloke declined to comment on whether he would pull out of the election race.
McIntyre was not standing for re-election.
He accepted councillors had colluded ahead of the December meeting.
'What's new about that? Of course we did, like I say, when we elect a chairman we collude before the meeting, is there something wrong with that.'
McIntyre made an apology of sorts.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Road user charges: AA backs shake-up but wants low admin costs
Road user charges: AA backs shake-up but wants low admin costs

RNZ News

time4 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Road user charges: AA backs shake-up but wants low admin costs

Photo: RNZ Private companies will need to keep the costs of running the government's new road user charges scheme as low as possible, the AA says. The government is inching closer to replacing petrol tax with electronic road user charges on all light vehicles, in what Transport Minister Chris Bishop calls [ the biggest shake-up of road funding in half a century]. He says it'll be fairer and will be like paying a power bill or Netflix each month and will be in place by 2027. The changes will put an end to the existing two-tier system, where petrol users pay a fuel excise duty of about 70 cents a litre at the pump, while diesel, electric and heavy vehicles pay paper-based road user charges based on distance travelled. However, Labour says the timing of the coalition's transition to a universal road user charges system risks "clobbering" motorists with more costs. AA's policy director Martin Glynn said his organisation is also worried about how much motorists would have to pay under the new scheme. He told Morning Report he was unsure if it would be more expensive. At present the minimum road user charge kicked in once a light vehicle had travelled 1000km. That was $76 and $12-$13 for an administration fee. With private providers being brought in to run the revised scheme they would need to be making money, Glynn said. "We really want to see the administration costs be as low as possible." He agreed with the Minister that with more vehicles becoming more fuel efficient, the current petrol tax penalised those with older vehicles. "It's become more unfair over time and it's going to become more unfair if we don't change." The current system of buying RUCs was "a bit clunky", he said. Those using diesel or a heavy vehicle purchased RUCs online from the NZ Transport Agency or they could go to an agent. Motorists needed to keep an eye on their odometer to ensure they stayed up to date. The other problem was the the RUC came in the mail and needed to be displayed on the dashboard. AA supported Bishop's plan to make the system fully electronic. Annual warrant of fitness checks were the main way to ensure compliance at present. "But it's fair to say it's difficult to enforce being an annual system so there's a fair degree of evasion and avoidance and that's something that will have to be addressed in the transition." Heavy vehicles already have an ERUC, a device in the trucks that monitors kilometres and location.

The people working for $10 - and less
The people working for $10 - and less

RNZ News

time5 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The people working for $10 - and less

Even with living wage employment opportunities, some only earn between $8.78 and $10.65 an hour for additional hours worked. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King New Zealand needs to rethink how the welfare system interacts with tax - and how we approach "punishing" people who are on the benefit, a prominent economist says. Ganesh Ahirao said the marginal tax rates that people were earning when they shifted off income support, or took on more work at middle incomes, were much higher than those paid by higher-income people. He looked at a number of household scenarios to illustrate the point and said even with living wage employment opportunities available, people were only earning between $8.78 and $10.65 an hour for additional hours worked. Someone on a minimum wage would earn even less. The Living Wage is currently set at $27.80 per hour. In one case, a single person whom he referred to as Manaia, with no children, no student loan and paying rent of $415 a week for a one-bedroom flat in Wellington would receive the Jobseeker Support (JS) payment alongside Winter Energy Payment (WEP) and Accommodation Supplement (ASUP) totalling in the hand $592 per week. Six hours' work at the living wage would take income to just over $700 with those supports. "But thereafter, the reduction of JobSeeker - at the gut-punching rate of 70 cents for every extra dollar earned - slows in-the-hand increases to a snail's pace. Consequently, the effective marginal tax rate (EMTR) faced by Manaia soars into 80 percent-plus stratospheric territory," Ahirao said. In another case, a sole parent of two children paying $600 a week would receive the Sole Parent (SP) payment alongside WEP, the Family Tax Credit (FTC) component of Working for Families, and ASUP totalling $1047 per week. With six hours work at the living wage, the person's income would rise to nearly $1200. "But then the reductions in support payments brutally cut in. Firstly, the SP declines by 30 cents for every extra dollar earned and then after 10 hours per week by 70 cents per extra dollar earned. The resulting EMTR of 89.2 percent is pushed to 93.3 percent (after 14 hours per week) as FTC payments begin to decline at 27 cents for every dollar of other income. Another hit (at 24 hours per week) pushes the EMTR to 95 percent, as the ASUP also begins to decline (25 cents for every dollar of other income)," Ahirao said. If the person worked 40 hours a week they would receive $352 more than if they did not work at all. Ahirao said the tax and welfare systems needed to work together. "MSD does benefits and IRD does Working for Families and student loans… they have this separation there that needs opt brought together. "Abatement rates in the welfare system are not seen by the tax system. That's one element. "We also need to think seriously about our perspective on penalising people. It's a punitive-first approach welfare system. There is a belief out there that everyone should work, should be able to go to work and should take up work whenever they can. To a degree that's ok but then it goes to those who don't work are somehow at fault and should be penalised. That is the perspective to get past." He said many people out of work were not jobless by choice. There was little encouragement to work when the benefit was clawed back so quickly, he said. "You take away 70c in the dollar - there's a perspective that if we add on to their part-time income with jobseeker they're going to get too much, it's going to be too generous so we've got to claw it back… do we want to encourage people into the workforce or penalise people for not being in the workforce? "That's the mindset we need to get over before setting any other policies. That's a big shift in our thinking across the whole political spectrum." A universal basic income could be part of the conversation, he said. "I'm comfortable saying you have aright to an adequate income and that involves an obligation to contribute in society, make yourself available for work. You don't go from there to we're going to bash you with a whole lot of sanctions. You tweak the settings to make it as attractive as possible to contribute. A carrot rather than a stick approach." Ministry of Social Development general manager of welfare system and income support Fiona Carter-Giddings said the ministry's priority was getting people into work. "Between June 2024 and June 2025, 86,000 benefits were cancelled because the person found a job. "We're pleased New Zealanders continue to move off benefit and into work, despite challenging economic circumstances. When people are employed they have a higher income and more opportunities to improve their quality of life. "Government financial assistance generally reduces as other income increases, because New Zealand's welfare system targets support to people who need it the most. This is a long-standing principle of social security. "The ideal rate at which support should reduce involves trade-offs between income adequacy, incentives to work, and maintaining appropriate costs to the taxpayer. The welfare system is designed to balance these objectives, and it is an area of ongoing debate." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Kuia devastated over use of her image on anti-Māori ward billboards
Kuia devastated over use of her image on anti-Māori ward billboards

1News

time12 hours ago

  • 1News

Kuia devastated over use of her image on anti-Māori ward billboards

A kuia has been left devastated after Hobson's Pledge used her image in a billboard campaign against Māori wards. 'I feel trampled. I did not do any of those. I did not give anyone permission to use my mug, my moko kauae.' Ellen Tamati spoke to Aukaha News about her experience. She said she was woken up in the middle of the night by her mokopuna who had spotted one of the billboards. '[My mokopuna] kept ringing and ringing to wake me up and she told me what was happening. I didn't know what she was talking about, I had no idea. I didn't realise my face was on a billboard, she just kept saying to me, 'Nan what's going on?'' Tamati's image was available for editorial use on stock image sites iStock and Shutterstock. She said she was not asked for permission for her image to be used in the campaign. ADVERTISEMENT Ellen Tamati's image on iStock (Source: Te Karere) On the billboards her image was accompanied with the headline, 'My mana doesn't need a mandate. Vote no to Māori wards' - a message that goes against her beliefs. Responding to a question on how she feels, she gestured to the moko on her chin: 'My moko kauae represents... my right side is my Te Arawa waka and my left side is my Mataatua waka, so this means more to me than what they're trying to say.' Granddaughter Anahera Parata said her nan has only every been a staunch Te Pāti Māori supporter and 'pro-Māori'. 'Even at her age she's still giving back to our iwi,' she said. Tamati said she was sad and angry, and invited the group to 'come and see me'. 'But the damage has been done. And to all those wards out there, please go and vote for our Māori wards. That's all I can say to you. Go and vote for them because we need them. We need them. I did not authorise the Hobson's Pledge to put my face up.' ADVERTISEMENT Hobson's Pledge leader Don Brash told Te Karere that they have taken down the billboards out of respect for the hurt caused to Tamati. 'We bought the photograph from a regular photography supplier and we assumed therefore that we had the rights to use it. We understand that the woman concerned is upset about that fact and we're doing our best to contact her, and of course we'll apologise for her hurt.' Glossary moko kauae - traditional Māori tattoo on a women's chin mokopuna - grandchild/ren Te Arawa waka - ancestral canoe Mataatua waka - ancestral canoe

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store