Thousands of jobs at risk as British Steel threatens closure
The company said the blast furnaces were "no longer financially sustainable" due to tough market conditions, the imposition of tariffs and higher environmental costs.
British Steel chief executive Zengwei An said it was "a necessary decision given the hugely challenging circumstances the business faces".
The GMB union called it "devastating news for the people of Scunthorpe" and called on the government to do "everything possible" to secure the future of steelmaking at the site.
British Steel has been owned by Chinese firm Jingye since 2020 and the Scunthorpe site currently employs 3,500 people.
The company has been in discussions with the UK government for support for the operation but no deal has been agreed.
British Steel said it would "continue to work with the UK Government to explore options for the future of the business".
The company said it would begin "formal consultation" with its workforce and unions from today over three options.
One is the closure of the blast furnaces, steelmaking operations and Scunthorpe Rod Mill by early June 2025.
The second is the closure of the blast furnaces and steelmaking operations in September 2025.
The third is a closure of the blast furnaces and steelmaking operations at a future point beyond September 2025.
The general secretary of the Unite union, Sharon Graham, said: "This announcement of job losses is quite simply a disgrace. British Steel is guilty of trying to hold the government to ransom, while using its dedicated workforce as pawns.
"British Steel must now withdraw its job threats and work with the government and Unite on a sustainable way forward."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Challenges Trump's US Shipbuilding Dream
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China's top two shipbuilders are finalizing a merger that began in 2019, creating the world's biggest shipbuilding company. The $16 billion deal is expected to further widen China's lead over the United States, as President Donald Trump pushes to revive the nation's stagnant shipbuilding industry. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment. Why It Matters China has vaulted to the forefront of global shipbuilding over the past two decades. The country's largest state-owned shipbuilder, China State Shipbuilding (CSSC), delivered more commercial vessels by tonnage in 2024 than the entire U.S. shipbuilding industry has produced since the end of World War II, according to Washington, D.C., think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies. China's shipbuilding capacity also increasingly extends to sea power. The People's Liberation Army Navy now boasts the world's largest fleet by hull count and is producing nearly three ships for every one launched by the U.S. Navy, according to Admiral Samuel Paparo, head of the Indo-Pacific Command. What To Know This week, the CSSC is absorbing the country's second-largest shipbuilder, China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, with trading in both companies' shares suspended on Tuesday. Together, the two companies accounted for nearly 17 percent of the global market in 2024, according to data on new orders from maritime analysis firm Clarksons Research. Originally part of the same organization, the two firms were split in 1999 under Chinese Communist Party reforms aimed at introducing limited competition among state-owned enterprises. Beijing hopes the merger will reduce costs and cushion the blow of U.S. trade actions. The world's largest containership, built by Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding Group, in Rotterdam harbor, Netherlands, on August 12, 2022. The world's largest containership, built by Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding Group, in Rotterdam harbor, Netherlands, on August 12, media have hailed the deal as a step to eliminate inefficiencies, optimize resource allocation, and strengthen China's prospects in the global shipbuilding market amid geopolitical tensions and competition from competitors such as South Korea and Japan. "In recent years, the U.S. has launched crackdowns against China's shipbuilding industry, such as the so-called Section 301 action targeting China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors, and the port fee plan," said the Global Times. This Trump administration has begun phasing in new port fees on Chinese vessels, claiming unfair trade practices and state subsidies. These measures appear to be having an effect. According to global trade association the Baltic and International Maritime Council, China's share of new shipbuilding orders declined to 52 percent from 72 percent in the first half of this year. What People Are Saying Tom Shugart, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told Newsweek: "China's already massive shipbuilding capacity remains under a single, state-controlled enterprise. "That scale, coupled with the integration of military and commercial production, will remain a central enabler of China's naval expansion—and a key factor in the eroding U.S.–China maritime balance." Xu Yi, an analyst at Shanghai-based risk management firm Haitong Futures, told the South China Morning Post: "This merger marks the largest strategic restructuring in China's shipbuilding history, aimed at optimising resource allocation and enhancing competitiveness in the global market." President Donald Trump said in his March 6 address to Congress: "We used to make so many ships. We don't make them anymore very much, but we're going to make them very fast, very soon. It will have a huge impact." What Happens Next Trump has pledged to "resurrect" both commercial and military shipbuilding in the United States, lamenting that only 0.2 percent of the world's ships are built domestically compared with nearly three-quarters in China.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, China extend tariff truce by 90 days, staving off surge in duties
By Trevor Hunnicutt, Andrea Shalal and Joe Cash WASHINGTON/BEIJING (Reuters) -The United States and China have extended a tariff truce for another 90 days, staving off triple-digit duties on each other's goods as U.S. retailers get ready to ramp up inventories ahead of the critical end-of-year holiday season. U.S. President Donald Trump announced on his Truth Social platform on Monday that he had signed an executive order suspending the imposition of higher tariffs until 12:01 a.m. EST (0501 GMT) on November 10, with all other elements of the truce to remain in place. China's Commerce Ministry issued a parallel pause on extra tariffs early on Tuesday, also postponing for 90 days the addition of U.S. firms it had targeted in April to trade and investment restriction lists. "The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns," Trump's executive order stated, using the acronym for the People's Republic of China. The tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been due to expire on Tuesday at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). The extension until early November buys crucial time for the seasonal autumn surge of imports for the Christmas season, including electronics, apparel and toys at lower tariff rates. The new order prevents U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods were set to hit 125% - rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo between the two countries. It locks in place - at least for now - a 30% tariff on Chinese imports, with Chinese duties on U.S. imports at 10%. There was relief on the streets of China's capital, where officials are grappling with the challenge Trump's trade policy poses to the economy's long-standing, export-oriented growth model. "I don't think either China or the United States wants to see their relationship continue to deteriorate," said Wang Mingyue, a 39-year-old professional working in robotics. "That's why both are taking the current approach, but the game and confrontation may not be over yet - so there's still risk." Markets showed optimism for a breakthrough between the two superpowers, with Asian stocks rising and currencies mostly steady, after treading water for weeks. Trump told CNBC last week that the U.S. and China were getting very close to a trade agreement and he would meet Xi before the end of the year if a deal was struck. TRADE 'DETENTE' CONTINUED The two sides announced a truce in their trade dispute in May after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July, and U.S. negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that Trump extend the deadline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said repeatedly that the triple-digit import duties both sides slapped on each other's goods in the spring were untenable and had essentially imposed a trade embargo between the world's two largest economies. "It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire," said Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. She said Trump had likely pressed China for further concessions before agreeing to the extension. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. "What is he going to offer in exchange?" said Xu Tianchen, senior economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit in Beijing. "China says: 'you should allow us to buy more high-tech goods,' but the U.S. is reluctant." Xu said Trump's refusal to ease his 20% tariff on Chinese goods over fentanyl flows suggested both sides believed they could continue to withstand the trade shock. "If (Trump) escalates, he will struggle to gain an upper hand over China, which has many cards to play," Xu said. China's exports to the U.S. fell an annual 21.7% last month, according to the country's latest trade data, while shipments to Southeast Asia rose 16.6% over the same period as manufacturers sought to pivot to new markets and capitalise on a separate reprieve that allowed trans-shipment to the U.S. Separate U.S. data released last week showed the trade deficit with China shrank to its lowest in more than 21 years in June. Still, analysts expect the world's two largest economies to reach an agreement before long, as their deep interdependence makes pursuing alternative markets unattractive over the long term. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, said the news would give both sides more time to work through long-standing trade concerns. 'This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the U.S. and China work toward a framework deal in the fall," he said. Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gatwick passengers warned of severe August delays amid baggage screener strike
Holidaymakers flying from Gatwick Airport could face severe delays as baggage screeners prepare to strike over pay, the UK's largest union has warned. The walkout, set for later this month and covering the August bank holiday, is expected to disrupt travel for thousands of passengers. Baggage screeners will strike from August 22 to August 26 and from August 29 to September 2, Unite the Union has said. All flights out of Gatwick will face disruption during these times, the union said, warning industrial action will intensify if the dispute is not resolved. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said'ICTS has more than enough money to offer these workers a fair pay rise. Not doing so is just corporate greed. 'ICTS' Gatwick workers will receive Unite's complete backing for as long as it takes during their strikes for fair pay.' Unite has said workers, employed by ICTS, are amongst the lowest paid workers at the airport and earn just above the minimum wage. Despite this, ICTS's turnover has grown by 110 per cent since 2020, reaching £170.59 million in 2024, the union said. It made a profit before tax of £6.1 million in 2024, a 46.9 per cent increase compared to the year before. Unite regional officer Ben Davis said: 'ICTS is entirely responsible for the disruption that will be caused to Gatwick passengers during the strike action. It can well afford to put forward an acceptable pay offer and that is what needs to happen. 'Despite performing a critical role, these workers are amongst the lowest paid at the airport. Gatwick should be stepping in and pressuring ICTS to put an improved offer forward.' A spokesperson for Gatwick said the airport does not anticipate significant disruption if strikes were to go ahead. They said: 'We are working with our suppliers to avoid any impacts and we expect to operate a normal summer holiday flight schedule for our airlines and passengers on these dates. Of course, we hope ICTS and their union can reach a resolution before then.' ICTS has been contacted by The Standard for comment.
