logo
Senate business committee considers renewable energy regulation bill

Senate business committee considers renewable energy regulation bill

Yahoo27-03-2025
This story is supported by the Pulitzer Center and is part of the 'Texas Energy Crossroads' project, a partnership between The Hill and Nexstar Texas stations examining the oil and gas industry and the politics surrounding it following President Trump's second inauguration.
AUSTIN (KXAN) – Senators on the Business and Commerce Committee will discuss Thursday the merits of a bill that could place additional fees, permitting rules and regulatory requirements on new utility-scale solar and wind generation projects in Texas.
Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, authored Senate Bill 819. She has described the law as protection for landowners, the environment and 'the right thing to do for Texas.'
Explore: Texas Energy Crossroads
Kolkhorst filed similar legislation in 2023 without success. Critics of the measure back then said legislation would hamper the growth of renewables at a time when Texas is experiencing significant population and power demand growth.
Texas is the nationwide leader in renewable energy production, according to federal and state data. At 2 p.m. on March 26, over half the energy generated in the state came from solar and wind power, records from the Electric Reliability Council of Texas show.
From Kolkhorst's perspective, that's not necessarily a badge of honor.
'We're number one in wind, number one in solar; I'm not sure that's something to brag about,' she told KXAN in February.
Kolkhorst's bill would require notice of applications and a public meeting on new wind and solar projects over 10 megawatts, which is enough to power about 2,500 homes during peak use, according to ERCOT. The law would also require Public Utility Commission permitting and environmental impact reviews by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
Fees would be put in a 'renewable energy generation facility cleanup fund.' Wind turbines would have to be set back at least 3,000 feet from neighboring property lines, unless a neighbor agreed to a waiver. Solar arrays would need to be at least 100 feet from next-door property lines and 200 feet from habitable structures.
The new permitting rules would not apply to projects existing before Sept. 1, 2025, unless they increased power output by 5 megawatts, or 'materially' changed the placement of the generation facilities, according to the bill.
As political winds shift, Austin braces for renewable energy impact
Nine additional senators have signed onto the bill as authors. All of them are Republicans except one, Juan 'Chuy' Hinojosa, a South Texas Democrat.
Kolkhorst's latest renewable regulation bill comes at a time of keen focus on such projects by President Donald Trump.
On his first day in office, Trump singled out wind power in an executive order that paused new leases for wind projects on federal lands and waters. Speaking at his inauguration, Trump stated 'we're not going to do the wind thing. Wind – big ugly windmills.'
And, in February, Trump created a National Energy Dominance Council that would focus on expanding 'all forms of reliable and affordable energy production.' The executive order establishing the council lists nearly a dozen of the country's 'amazing national assets,' including oil, natural gas, uranium, coal, biofuels, flowing water, geothermal heat and more.
Solar and wind didn't make the cut.
Kolkhorst said she agrees with Trump's moratorium on new federal wind projects. As a senator with a district that stretches to the Texas coast, Kolkhorst said she doesn't want to 'see them out in our bays and estuaries, these big windmills.'
Texas' leadership has fostered renewable energy production for decades. In 2010, former Gov. Rick Perry – who would later serve as U.S. Secretary of Energy in Trump's first term – touted Texas as the country's largest renewable producer and praised forward-thinking Texas legislation that paved the way for renewable energy to blossom.
In April 2024, Gov. Abbott also championed the state's wind energy production as the overarching 'all-of-the-above energy strategy.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Fed governor Cook 'must resign' as pressure campaign on central bank continues
Trump says Fed governor Cook 'must resign' as pressure campaign on central bank continues

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says Fed governor Cook 'must resign' as pressure campaign on central bank continues

President Trump on Wednesday called on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign as the public pressure on the central bank continues to build. "Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social Wednesday morning with a link to a Bloomberg report on a letter sent by Federal Housing Finance Agency head Bill Pulte urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Cook over a pair of mortgages. Pulte wrote in a letter dated Aug. 15 that Cook, 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud under the criminal statute.' The President's call for Cook to resign comes as public pressure on the Fed continues amid ongonig changes on the Fed's Board of Governors. Last week, Trump nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to the Fed board to fill a seat left empty by Adriana Kugler, who stepped down from the board on Aug. 8. Should Cook also step down, Trump would have the opportunity to nominate another Fed governor. The search for a replacement for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whose term leading the central bank ends in May 2026, also continues in the background with Trump last week saying the field of possible replacements for Powell was "down to 3 or 4" candidates. Trump has repeatedly called on Powell to cut rates more aggressively, coining the nickname "Too Late" for the Fed chair. Trump first appointed Powell to the role in 2017; President Biden renominated Powell as Fed chair in 2021. Powell is also a member of the Fed's Board of Governors, with his term set to expire in 2028; it isn't clear whether Powell will also vacate that post when his term as Fed chair ends next year. Reporting from CNBC, however, suggested up to 11 names are under consideration for Powell's role, including Jefferies chief market strategist David Zervos, who told CNBC Wednesday that the Fed has "never been independent." The mounting discussion around Fed independence and political pressure currently being levied at the central bank comes ahead of the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, which is set to feature Powell's key policy speech of the year on Friday morning. Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

'South Park' spoofs Trump's DC crackdown in new clip: Watch
'South Park' spoofs Trump's DC crackdown in new clip: Watch

USA Today

time16 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'South Park' spoofs Trump's DC crackdown in new clip: Watch

"South Park" is keeping its focus on President Donald Trump. The Comedy Central series has released a preview for its next episode, indicating the show will spoof Trump's law enforcement crackdown in Washington, D.C. The clip shows the recurring character Towelie, a talking towel who originated in a 2001 episode, arriving on a bus to the nation's capital, only to find it's swarming with troops and military tanks. "This seems like the perfect place for a towel," he says as a tank passes by the street outside of the White House. Earlier this month, Trump deployed hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in what he described as a crackdown on rampant crime. Mayor Muriel Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims, saying that the capital is "not experiencing a crime spike." The "South Park" episode, which is set to air on Wednesday, Aug. 20, is titled "Sickofancy," and the synopsis simply reads, "Towelie goes to Washington, D.C." The show has recently been nabbing strong ratings and drawing heat from the White House, with a season that has featured unusually pointed criticism of Trump and his administration. After uproar, 'South Park' pummels Trump again and hits at JD Vance, Kristi Noem It started in the Season 27 premiere, "Sermon on the 'Mount," which depicted Trump as a thin-skinned bully who is the lover of Satan. The episode also mocked Trump by showing a live-action version of him removing all of his clothes as part of a public service announcement. JD Vance reacts to brutal parody in latest 'South Park' episode White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers slammed "South Park" in a statement provided to USA TODAY on July 24, saying the show "hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention." But the show doubled down in the following episode, "Got a Nut," which featured more Trump jokes. The president was again shown as Satan's lover and, as part of a spoof of the ABC series "Fantasy Island," was depicted physically and verbally abusing Vice President JD Vance. Vance issued a succinct response to his depiction, writing on X, "Well, I've finally made it." The episode "Got a Nut" additionally spoofed Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, showing her repeatedly shooting dogs. It also mocked her appearance by having her face slide off and move around by itself like a horror film. Noem fired back on "The Glenn Beck Program" podcast on Aug. 7, saying that "it's so lazy to make fun of women for how they look." Contributing: Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Phillip M. Bailey and Anna Kaufman, USA TODAY

President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

Chicago Tribune

time16 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

SAN FRANCISCO — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store