Armenian PM make bizarre vow to 'prove' something about his penis
The prime minister of Armenia has vowed to prove his faith by dropping his trousers to the head of the church.
Nikol Pashinyan was challenged to 'prove' his member is uncircumcised in a bitter feud played out over social media.
An Armenian priest accused Pashinyan of being snipped on Monday, implying he was not Christian in the deeply religious west Asian country.
The priest, Father Zareh Ashuryan, said: 'I believe that our Apostolic Holy Church must immediately cleanse itself of those false 'believers' who are traitors to the nation, have dishonoured the memory of their ancestors, broken the vow of baptism, and replaced the seal of the Holy Cross with the sign of circumcision'.
This enraged the country's leader, who shot back with a fiery Facebook post on Tuesday, suggesting he'd be willing to show his penis to the Church's supreme leader Karekin II.
He addressed Karekin II by his birth name Ktrij Nersisyan, saying he was 'ready to accept Ktrij Nersisyan and his spokesperson [father Ashuryan] and prove the opposite' about being circumcised.
Pashinyan also shot back at the church's leader, asking: 'And let him finally answer the question of whether he has broken his vow of celibacy or not. Does he have a child or not?'
The extraordinary war of words comes as tensions rocket between Armenia's PM and the powerful clergy.
In late May, Pashinyan claimed that churches had become 'storerooms' and that priests were breaking their celibacy vows, according to OC Media.
The Armenian Church responded, saying Pashinyan's language was 'unbecoming of a statesman'.
They added: 'Political motives drive this anti-Church and represent an attempt to erode the standing of the Armenian Church and its clergy.' More Trending
On Wednesday, Pashinyan posted saying law enforcement had prevented a large and sinister plan by the 'criminal oligarchic clergy' to 'destabilise the Republic'.
Pashinyan has been Prime Minister of Armenia since 2018 as head of the Civil Contract party.
The party gained over 50% of the vote in 2021 election but faced allegations of fraud from the opposition.
Karekin II served as a bishop and Archbishop before being elected the supreme head of the Armenian Apostolic Church since 1999.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: 'Burglar' gets stuck in chimney trying to rescue his trapped dog
MORE: Inside New York's 'Pigeon Fest' where impersonators battle for title
MORE: Man 'urinates on $10,000 worth of Spam and sausages forcing them to be tossed'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Church of England praying for peace but preparing for war
The Bishop to the Armed Forces has said the Church wants to 'take seriously' the potential challenges ahead, warning that it does not want to be caught short in a similar way to the lack of preparedness there was for the pandemic. The Church's parliament – officially known as the General Synod – will hear from a senior military figure when it meets next month. Brigadier Jaish Mahan, a Christian who served in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Iraq and Afghanistan, will address Synod members on the current global climate and the challenges for the UK, as well as speaking of his own experience in the military. A Synod paper states: 'While a conflict directly involving the UK is not an immediate risk, given the very serious impact such a conflict would have on every person in the country, we must be prepared.' Reverend Hugh Nelson, Bishop of St Germans and Bishop to the Armed Forces, said he had been hearing from military personnel for the past two years 'rising concern about the threat of very, very serious conflict, including conflict that involves the UK'. During a briefing with reporters on Thursday, he referenced the Government's national security strategy, published earlier this week, which warned the UK must actively prepare for a 'wartime scenario' on British soil 'for the first time in many years'. Ministers said the UK now finds itself in 'an era in which we face confrontation with those who are threatening our security'. Mr Nelson said: 'As a Church, we want to take seriously those challenges, both to do everything that we can to pray for and work for and advocate for peace, because the kingdom of God is a kingdom of justice and peace, and to face the reality and to put in place, or at least to begin to have conversations towards plans about how the Church might need to respond and to be if there were to be a serious conflict. 'We do not want to be in the situation that we were all in – Church and wider society – pre-pandemic, when those that knew things said there will one day be a pandemic, and none of us had done anything in preparation for that. So we want to take that seriously.' Legislative changes are due to be brought before Synod, which would allow Armed Forces chaplains, when operating in their roles, to minister under an Archbishops' licence without also having to hold diocesan PTO (permission to officiate). The current rules add a serious administrative burden and make it more difficult for chaplains to deploy within the UK at the pace required by their roles, a Synod paper states. Mr Nelson described this as a 'tidying up exercise to enable chaplains to get on and to do what they need to do without having to go through quite a lot of administrative and bureaucratic steps in order to have permission to do that in any particular place'. While he declined to go so far as to say the work was putting the Church on a war footing, he noted that consideration is being given to how religious leaders acted in previous wartime scenarios. He said: 'We're encouraging the Church to pray for peace and to prepare for, or to begin to do some thinking and some work around, what it might mean for us to be a Church in a time of conflict. 'We have looked back at some of the ways in which senior Church leadership – archbishops and bishops – led, the things that they said, particularly in the Second World War.' Resources, including around working with schools on issues of peace, war and conflict, and practical suggestions for making churches hospitable and welcoming to Armed Forces personnel and their families, are expected to be published shortly after Synod. Across the Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force, there are almost 200 Church of England chaplains, serving as both regulars and reservists. The Church said its chaplains 'have provided spiritual, moral and pastoral care to military personnel and their families for more than 150 years and remain a highly valued part of the Armed Forces, often witnessing to Jesus Christ in complex and difficult contexts.'
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Church of England praying for peace but preparing for war
The Bishop to the Armed Forces has said the Church wants to 'take seriously' the potential challenges ahead, warning that it does not want to be caught short in a similar way to the lack of preparedness there was for the pandemic. The Church's parliament – officially known as the General Synod – will hear from a senior military figure when it meets next month. Brigadier Jaish Mahan, a Christian who served in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Iraq and Afghanistan, will address Synod members on the current global climate and the challenges for the UK, as well as speaking of his own experience in the military. A Synod paper states: 'While a conflict directly involving the UK is not an immediate risk, given the very serious impact such a conflict would have on every person in the country, we must be prepared.' Reverend Hugh Nelson, Bishop of St Germans and Bishop to the Armed Forces, said he had been hearing from military personnel for the past two years 'rising concern about the threat of very, very serious conflict, including conflict that involves the UK'. During a briefing with reporters on Thursday, he referenced the Government's national security strategy, published earlier this week, which warned the UK must actively prepare for a 'wartime scenario' on British soil 'for the first time in many years'. Ministers said the UK now finds itself in 'an era in which we face confrontation with those who are threatening our security'. Mr Nelson said: 'As a Church, we want to take seriously those challenges, both to do everything that we can to pray for and work for and advocate for peace, because the kingdom of God is a kingdom of justice and peace, and to face the reality and to put in place, or at least to begin to have conversations towards plans about how the Church might need to respond and to be if there were to be a serious conflict. 'We do not want to be in the situation that we were all in – Church and wider society – pre-pandemic, when those that knew things said there will one day be a pandemic, and none of us had done anything in preparation for that. So we want to take that seriously.' Legislative changes are due to be brought before Synod, which would allow Armed Forces chaplains, when operating in their roles, to minister under an Archbishops' licence without also having to hold diocesan PTO (permission to officiate). The current rules add a serious administrative burden and make it more difficult for chaplains to deploy within the UK at the pace required by their roles, a Synod paper states. Mr Nelson described this as a 'tidying up exercise to enable chaplains to get on and to do what they need to do without having to go through quite a lot of administrative and bureaucratic steps in order to have permission to do that in any particular place'. While he declined to go so far as to say the work was putting the Church on a war footing, he noted that consideration is being given to how religious leaders acted in previous wartime scenarios. He said: 'We're encouraging the Church to pray for peace and to prepare for, or to begin to do some thinking and some work around, what it might mean for us to be a Church in a time of conflict. 'We have looked back at some of the ways in which senior Church leadership – archbishops and bishops – led, the things that they said, particularly in the Second World War.' Resources, including around working with schools on issues of peace, war and conflict, and practical suggestions for making churches hospitable and welcoming to Armed Forces personnel and their families, are expected to be published shortly after Synod. Across the Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force, there are almost 200 Church of England chaplains, serving as both regulars and reservists. The Church said its chaplains 'have provided spiritual, moral and pastoral care to military personnel and their families for more than 150 years and remain a highly valued part of the Armed Forces, often witnessing to Jesus Christ in complex and difficult contexts.'
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Labour's welfare rebels will regret their revolt
A Labour government facing a rebellion over welfare reform is something of a dog-bites-man story – Labour never finds this issue easy. But the nature of the current rebellion tells us something novel and revealing, not about the policy, but about the modern Member of Parliament. Yes, principle and policy matter here, but what's really driving dissent on Labour's backbenches is not ideology, but geography. Or more precisely, constituency geography. Many of the Labour MPs likely to defy the leadership on welfare cuts are not old lags or even rebels by temperament. Many are new to Westminster, elected in the 2024 landslide that gave Labour power. And their rebellion is not really born of Corbynite nostalgia or factional muscle-flexing. Instead, it reflects the simple, brutal truth that the job of an MP has changed – and changed profoundly. These MPs were elected with a tacit remit: represent us, not the leadership Simply, MPs no longer exercise their judgement on behalf of their voters in the best interest of constituency and country. Instead they dance to the tune sung by the loudest voices in their seats. Edmund Burke? Never heard of him. We are all populists now. Many of these new MPs sit on slim majorities. Many are in places where Labour has not historically been strong, or where voters lent their support on the basis of 'give the other lot a chance'. That makes these MPs cautious. They are not ideological crusaders; they are political caretakers, aware that even a modest swing could turf them out in 2029. Many of these MPs were chosen as candidates not by party bosses but by local constituency Labour parties, many of which imposed strict requirements for candidates to have strong local links. In practice, that meant selecting people who would be constituency champions first and parliamentary representatives second. They were elected with a tacit remit: represent us, not the leadership. Do what the voters say, not what the whips want. In years past, an MP could take a tough vote in Westminster, spend the weekend lying low and hope to ride out any local discomfort. Not anymore. Constituents can now express outrage with astonishing speed and reach. One vote in the House of Commons can trigger a hundred angry emails before teatime. MPs talk of inboxes flooded daily with demands, complaints, even threats – each message carrying the implicit warning: 'Ignore me and I'll tell everyone I know.' Some backbenchers report receiving upwards of a hundred emails a day. Each one feels urgent. Each one, potentially, a vote lost. And with social media serving as a megaphone for grievance, the stakes are high. One unanswered constituent email is no longer just a minor oversight – it's a potential Facebook post shared across local groups, a TikTok rant that ends with 'this is why I'm never voting Labour again'. All of which makes the politics of welfare reform exceedingly difficult. The government's proposals are, in broad terms, sensible: a modest tightening of fiscal policy aimed at curbing long-term spending. But to the newly elected MP from a marginal seat, they look like a live grenade. Cut benefits? Even just slow their growth? Cue a tidal wave of local outrage. The real story of this rebellion is not about ideology or principle or even the Starmer team's party management. It is about how the role of an MP has shifted from legislator to local caseworker, from party loyalist to localist public servant in the most literal sense. This new hyper-local, hyper-responsive model of representation is noble in theory but toxic to good governance. It makes every hard national decision a political minefield of potential local explosions. And yet, there is a deeper irony here – one that deserves attention. The very MPs who are blocking welfare reform to keep their local voters happy may well be ensuring those same voters end up unhappier in the long run. Britain's ever-growing welfare bill already threatens the state's ability to deliver the other public goods people value most. This is a country that spends over £100 billion a year just servicing its debt, that cannot fully defend itself against foreign threats, where local councils are sliding into bankruptcy trying – unsuccessfully – to care for the elderly and educate children with special needs. The more the welfare bill expands, the more it crowds out spending on those vital functions. The very things that voters prize – local health, local schools, local services – are being slowly strangled by a welfare-fuelled fiscal burden that no government dares challenge. And so the new tribunes of the people, by blocking reform today, are sowing the seeds of tomorrow's grievances. Their voters will come knocking again. And this time, the complaint won't be about one email unanswered or even some welfare cuts – it'll be about a state that cannot answer their needs at all.
