Armenian PM make bizarre vow to 'prove' something about his penis
Nikol Pashinyan was challenged to 'prove' his member is uncircumcised in a bitter feud played out over social media.
An Armenian priest accused Pashinyan of being snipped on Monday, implying he was not Christian in the deeply religious west Asian country.
The priest, Father Zareh Ashuryan, said: 'I believe that our Apostolic Holy Church must immediately cleanse itself of those false 'believers' who are traitors to the nation, have dishonoured the memory of their ancestors, broken the vow of baptism, and replaced the seal of the Holy Cross with the sign of circumcision'.
This enraged the country's leader, who shot back with a fiery Facebook post on Tuesday, suggesting he'd be willing to show his penis to the Church's supreme leader Karekin II.
He addressed Karekin II by his birth name Ktrij Nersisyan, saying he was 'ready to accept Ktrij Nersisyan and his spokesperson [father Ashuryan] and prove the opposite' about being circumcised.
Pashinyan also shot back at the church's leader, asking: 'And let him finally answer the question of whether he has broken his vow of celibacy or not. Does he have a child or not?'
The extraordinary war of words comes as tensions rocket between Armenia's PM and the powerful clergy.
In late May, Pashinyan claimed that churches had become 'storerooms' and that priests were breaking their celibacy vows, according to OC Media.
The Armenian Church responded, saying Pashinyan's language was 'unbecoming of a statesman'.
They added: 'Political motives drive this anti-Church and represent an attempt to erode the standing of the Armenian Church and its clergy.' More Trending
On Wednesday, Pashinyan posted saying law enforcement had prevented a large and sinister plan by the 'criminal oligarchic clergy' to 'destabilise the Republic'.
Pashinyan has been Prime Minister of Armenia since 2018 as head of the Civil Contract party.
The party gained over 50% of the vote in 2021 election but faced allegations of fraud from the opposition.
Karekin II served as a bishop and Archbishop before being elected the supreme head of the Armenian Apostolic Church since 1999.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: 'Burglar' gets stuck in chimney trying to rescue his trapped dog
MORE: Inside New York's 'Pigeon Fest' where impersonators battle for title
MORE: Man 'urinates on $10,000 worth of Spam and sausages forcing them to be tossed'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Arts venues that want to ban ideas they don't like forfeit any claim to public funds. Defund them. Let them close...
When it announced its ban on Kate Forbes, which it now says isn't a ban, Summerhall Arts promised 'robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again'. The happening in question was an on-stage chinwag with the Deputy First Minister during the Edinburgh Fringe. Summerhall explained that it was concerned about 'attracting those who share Kate Forbes's views'. I thought the Edinburgh Fringe was nothing but people who share Forbes's views, but Summerhall was not talking about the Highlands MSP's support for the national impoverishment plan more commonly known as 'independence'. No, they were referring to her gender-critical views. Summerhall said: 'We do not believe LGBTQ + rights, nor their existence, is up for debate.' It cited concerns for 'the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences' and said 'a designated relaxed space' would be available for anyone affected. Anyone affected by Kate Forbes? Are we talking about the same Kate Forbes? 5ft 2in? Likes the Bible? So young she makes Ross Greer look middle-aged? It's hard to imagine a functioning adult who would require a safe space to protect them from Forbes. Summerhall was going on like it was hosting Hannibal Lecter rather than the most senior woman in Scottish politics. This is the sort of fankle you get into when you believe, or pretend to believe, that political speech – and mainstream political speech at that – is violence and oppression and literally genocide. There are people who feared Scotland would become McGilead if Forbes, a practising Christian, was elected First Minister, who also think women should be shunned for wilful disbelief in the doctrine of self-identification. That is what this is ultimately about: heresy. Forbes does not accept that the material reality of sex is transformed by the assertion of an invisible inner essence called gender identity. For that, anathema is pronounced upon her and she is to be excommunicated from polite society. Kate Forbes is not the fundamentalist here. One would have thought even that clanjamfrie of self-regarding midwits, the Edinburgh arts world, would have learned its lesson from the Joanna Cherry incident. Two years ago, the Stand Comedy Club tried to cancel a Fringe event featuring the former Nationalist MP, blaming staff disquiet over her views on women's sex-based rights. Cherry, an advocate of some standing, gently suggested the club seek some legal advice since what it was proposing amounted to unlawful discrimination. The Stand duly consulted a Rumpole or two, only to be told Cherry was right. The ferret not only reversed but did so while reading a grovelling letter of apology. Talk of cowards who would rather placate crybully censors than stand up for free expression brings us inevitably to Amina Shah, the chief executive of the National Library of Scotland (NLS). NLS was originally intending to include The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht in its 'Dear Library' exhibition. Edited by journalist Susan Dalgety and civil service insider Lucy Hunter Blackburn, it's a collection of essays penned by the women who fought against Nicola Sturgeon's Gender Recognition Reform Bill. The authors include people with sharply contrasting political views. If you want the definitive, behind-the-scenes account of what the Scottish Government tried to do and how they were stopped, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht is it. I heartily recommend it. Amina Shah seems less enamoured. Upon learning the book would be part of the exhibition, some LGBT+ activists on the NLS staff allegedly demanded it be removed as it contained 'hate speech' and its display would pose 'severe harm' to library employees. We have library employees in Scotland who are afraid books might hurt them. Every day, it becomes less and less baffling that we burned so many witches in this country. Rather than suggest these people seek help, or at least alternative employment, Shah dropped the book from the exhibition. It's not so much that Scotland's chief librarian caved into censors, it's that she did so with a book whose authors risked everything rather than shut up when they were told to. You can't always judge a book by its cover, but when the cover reads 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht', you can probably judge the authors. They kicked up a fuss – rightly so – and Shah has been hit with criticism and, it is said, a donor boycott. That these women were bolshie is commendable but what matters above all else is that they were right. The most powerful people in every sector of public life, enterprise, academia and the arts insisted they were wrong, and not just wrong but cruel, and not just cruel but bigoted. Their meetings were disrupted, their events cancelled, their jobs threatened, and their reputations tarnished on social media. They were exaggerating and misrepresenting. They didn't understand the law and should be disregarded. But they were right. The Supreme Court ruling in favour of For Women Scotland didn't make them right, it merely confirmed they had been all along. I happen to broadly agree with the book's authors, but even if I didn't – and especially if I didn't – I would want to learn exactly what they believe, and how they went about turning those beliefs into one of the most successful political campaigns in modern British history. Instead, there is a pronounced incuriosity, not only an intolerance towards ideas but a total indifference. Ideas are interactive; that's the point of them. One idea meets another and you take the best from both to form an even better idea. Not any more. Now, there are good ideas and bad ideas, and the bad ideas should not be considered. In fact they must be suppressed, because they have the power to harm and to corrupt. Orthodoxy is back, baby. Only it's no longer forbidding clerics or moral crusaders demanding filthy, dirty books be put on high shelves, it's people who imagine themselves to be enlightened and rational and liberal. For dark comedy, nothing at the Fringe can compete with the spectacle of social progressives inadvertently forming a Mary Whitehouse tribute act. Summerhall Arts relies heavily, and the National Library almost exclusively, on taxpayer subvention. Arts funding can be controversial. Some think it subsidises the cultural pursuits of affluent and otherwise privileged people. The search for truth, beauty and humanity should not belong to any one class or sector. It is the hallmark of a liberal society, a society in which liberty is used not only for transient gratification but to better understand the human, the ideal and the transcendental. Unfortunately, our cultural sector seems to be overrun with leaders who believe themselves already in possession of the truth, and uninterested, if not instinctively opposed, to the exploration of other ideas. An arts sector so ideologically prescriptive that it will not countenance wrongthink in its venues or on its bookshelves is one that has forfeited any claim to public funds. Institutions like Summerhall Arts and the National Library of Scotland should not benefit from the spoils of liberal society while having at its load-bearing walls with doctrinal sledgehammers. Defund them, let them close, and invest in new institutions that value free minds and free expression.
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
Reform UK bans local branches from organising events on WhatsApp
Reform UK has banned its local branches from organising political events on WhatsApp amid fears of infiltration from the far right. Rules handed down to local affiliates last month, seen by The Times, will force branch officers to sign non-disclosure agreements and prevent them from opening their own bank accounts. It hands sweeping powers to the national party to override the rules and suspend members. Sources familiar with the rules said the strict approach was needed to prevent potential entryism from the far right. The branch rules were initially published in December under Zia Yusuf, then party chairman, who had been brought in to professionalise the party's operation. However, a tightened version, including the restrictions on social media use, was published last month. It added that branch officers 'are not permitted to use social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook, etc, to communicate party and branch operations and activities to members and/or supporters'. Communications should instead be limited to email and to branch meetings, it said. Zia Yusuf, the former chairman of Reform UK TOLGA AKMEN/EPA Despite the apparent ban on Facebook, there appear to be dozens of groups for local Reform branches actively operating on the platform. The previous version of the rules said the party could suspend or expel members if they brought Reform into disrepute 'by association with, or membership of, any organisation which the board has declared to be incompatible with membership of the party'. However, in the updated version of the document, the threat of suspension or expulsion has been expanded to include 'association with any individual … whether public or private'. Reform has previously suspended candidates for saying they used to be members of the fascist British National Party, but has stopped short of suspending those who have reshared material or appeared at rallies led by Tommy Robinson, the far-right activist. Reform has set up more than 450 branches and at the most recent local elections had more candidates standing for office than any other party. Reform sources said the rules act as an 'insurance policy' against any threat posed by the former Reform MP Rupert Lowe IMAGEPLOTTER/ALAMY Dissent against Farage's party from the right has been led by Rupert Lowe, the former Reform MP who was suspended amid bullying allegations, which he denies. Lowe has set up Restore Britain, which he has called a 'movement' rather than a political party. Reform sources said that while there did not seem to be an immediate threat from Lowe to attempt a takeover of local branches, the rules act as an 'insurance policy'. Farage has previously said he has done 'more than anyone else to defeat the far right in Britain' and told The Sunday Times to 'wait till what comes after me' if he cannot represent young men in politics. Many of the Reform branch rules are unprecedented for a major political party, including mandated non-disclosure agreements for officers. The document also differs from other parties by setting a three-year term limit for branch chairs and limiting how many elected councillors can run the local branch. Luke Akehurst, Labour MP and a member of the party's national executive committee, said: 'These very draconian rules show far more central command control than any of the existing mainstream British political parties. 'This degree of control freakery over minutiae of local organising suggests a fundamentally undemocratic mindset, a lack of appreciation of need for local variation according to circumstances, and a complete lack of trust in their grassroots membership by the party HQ.' Unusually, Reform also holds a list of approved speakers at events held by local branches. The rules state that only 'only speakers on the 'approved event speakers list' are eligible to give talks or hold question-and-answer sessions at branch events … and deviation may result in disciplinary action'.
Metro
16 hours ago
- Metro
Starmer to join Zelensky at the White House for a meeting with Donald Trump
Sir Keir Starmer will join Volodymyr Zelensky and other top European leaders in Washington for talks with Donald Trump tomorrow. The Prime Minister 'stands ready to support this next phase of further talks and will reaffirm that his backing for Ukraine will continue for as long as it takes', Downing Street said. It comes after the US president met with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, for a high-risk meeting in Alaska on Friday. After literally giving the Russian president the red carpet treatment, Trump split from European allies by backing Putin's Ukraine peace agreement. Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ Or you can submit your videos and pictures here. For more stories like this, check our news page. Follow on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here. MORE: The secret letter Melania wrote Putin MORE: Putin's 'shaky' legs after Trump summit reignite health conspiracy theories MORE: Revealed: What Trump said to Putin that the cameras didn't catch
