
Do I (in the UK) need to worry about the US stock market?
A trade war with China and suggestions Donald Trump will sack the head of the Federal Reserve have weighed heavily on the US stock market. It was already reeling after the president's announcement of universal tariffs on the whole world, and, despite recovering some of its losses, remains down on the start of the year.
In the UK, you may be wondering whether any of it matters to you. The short answer is that it could – without realising it, you may have exposure to the ups and downs of US shares.
Dr Sayantan Ghosh Dastidar, a senior lecturer in economics at the University of Derby, says: 'In 2023, UK investment managers allocated only 20% of their portfolios to UK equities – a record low. By comparison, 35% was directed toward US assets.
'There has been a sharp decline in domestic allocation over the past two decades, falling from about 50%, while the allocation to US assets has nearly doubled over the past 10 years.'
Those investment managers are running funds for individuals and organisations, including money saved into UK pensions.
Dan Coatsworth, an analyst at the investment platform AJ Bell, says the popularity of investment in the US, in part driven by large technology companies, means most people's pensions will have some stake in American firms.
How could I be affected?
While you may not directly own stocks in US companies, you may have a pension or pensions with investment there.
This can be the case for both defined benefit schemes (also known as final salary schemes), which guarantee an income for life, and defined contribution schemes, where your eventual payment is based on how much you invest and how those investments perform.
For example, almost a third of the pension firm Aegon's default fund is made up of US equities. That is more than the proportion that is made up UK shares and government bonds combined. Meanwhile, Royal London's RLP governed portfolio default fund is 22% US equities – more than UK or European shares. These companies run defined contribution schemes for thousands of employers.
The largest defined benefit scheme in the UK, the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), also holds US equities.
Pension providers should be able to give you fund factsheets to show where your pension is invested, says Helen Morrissey at the investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, if you want to know the detail.
Should I be worried?
Coatsworth says the US markets are still up on where they were a decade ago. 'The S&P 500 index [one of the benchmark indexes] is down 10% year to date but still up 89% over five years and 150% ahead over 10 years,' he says.
'A long-term investor might still be sitting on big gains if they've had US exposure for a while and this year's dip is no reason to cause alarm. Financial markets regularly move up and down and history suggests that they eventually recover and move higher.'
Some defined contribution schemes will shift you away from equities to cash and bonds the closer you get to retirement, so although the default scheme may invest in the US, you may not have much money exposed to the market.
However, Zoe Alexander, of the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA), an industry body, says the recent falls may mean people who are about to retire should delay. '[It] may mean now is not the best time to begin drawing your pension or purchase an annuity. It may be a good idea to delay or reduce the amount you take out if you are able to.'
If you are a few years off retiring, advisers say there is time for the markets to recover and regain any losses.
'Though the turbulence is worrying the best thing to do is not to make any kneejerk reactions such as stopping contributions or changing investment strategies,' Morrissey says. 'These have the potential of crystallising losses, making it harder for your fund to recover when markets settle.'
Anyone with a defined benefit scheme has less cause to worry as it is up to their employer to ensure there is enough money available to pay their pension income. Some of the funds have large cash 'buffers' or surpluses in the case of problems. USS has a £9.7bn surplus, while Barclays Bank UK Retirement Fund, a defined benefit scheme, has a surplus of £1.8bn.
If you are worried about what to do, free guidance is available from the Pensions Advisory Service. Pension Wise, a government scheme set up to provide specialist guidance, gives free advice to the over-50s.
Is there anything positive from the market turmoil?
A drop in the value of the dollar means that people who are planning to go to the US for holidays may see their money stretch a little further.
But if you are going to Europe, the exchange rate may be against you.
'Movements so far might persuade some people planning a [US] trip to get at least some of their holiday spending money a bit earlier,' says Sarah Coles of Hargreaves Lansdown. 'For those travelling to Europe, the fact that money has flooded to the euro as a relative safe haven has pushed it up against the pound, which means you'll get less for your money if you're travelling to the eurozone. It's going to be even more important to shop around for the best possible exchange rate when you travel.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
35 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Rachel Reeves fails to rule out future tax rises as economy shrinks
The Chancellor has repeatedly said that the cost of Wednesday's spending review is covered by the tax rises she brought in last year, saying departments must now 'live within their means'. But economists have warned that a weakening economy and additional commitments such as reversing much of the cut to winter fuel payments mean taxes are likely to go up again in the autumn. Asked on Thursday whether she could guarantee there would be no further tax rises, Ms Reeves told LBC: 'I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours.' But she again repeated her promise that she would not need to increase taxes on the same scale as last year, when she put them up by £40 billion. And she rejected the suggestion that she was a 'Klarna Chancellor' who had announced a 'buy now, pay later' spending review. She said: 'The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I'm going to need to pay for in the future, that's just not right.' Her comments come as the Office for National Statistics reported that the economy shrank by 0.3% in April – the biggest monthly contraction since October 2023 and worse than the 0.1% fall most economists had expected. In recent days, both Ms Reeves and Number 10 have said the economy is beginning to turn a corner, allowing them to fund the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. But Thursday's worse-than-expected economic news will make it harder for Ms Reeves to balance her spending commitments with Labour's promises on tax and borrowing. The Chancellor acknowledged that the reduction in GDP was 'disappointing', and blamed 'uncertainty' caused by Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs at the start of April for much of the fall. But opposition parties have laid the blame squarely with the Government, with Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accusing Ms Reeves of 'economic vandalism'. He said: 'Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hard-working people will pay the price.' Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokeswoman, said the figures should act as 'a wake-up call for the Government which has so far refused to listen to the small businesses struggling to cope with the jobs tax' and urged ministers to pursue a 'bespoke UK-EU customs union' to compensate for the impact of US tariffs. The GDP figures come a day after the Chancellor revealed her spending plans for the coming years, including a significant increase in spending on the NHS, defence and schools. The biggest winner was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms, leading the Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice to say Britain was slowly morphing into a 'National Health State'. But that rise came at the price of real-terms cuts elsewhere, including the Home Office, the Department for Transport and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. On Thursday, Ms Reeves rejected claims that her decision on policing, which will see forces' 'spending power' increase by 2.3% above inflation each year, would mean cuts to frontline police numbers.


South Wales Guardian
36 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Rachel Reeves fails to rule out future tax rises as economy shrinks
The Chancellor has repeatedly said that the cost of Wednesday's spending review is covered by the tax rises she brought in last year, saying departments must now 'live within their means'. But economists have warned that a weakening economy and additional commitments such as reversing much of the cut to winter fuel payments mean taxes are likely to go up again in the autumn. Asked on Thursday whether she could guarantee there would be no further tax rises, Ms Reeves told LBC: 'I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours.' But she again repeated her promise that she would not need to increase taxes on the same scale as last year, when she put them up by £40 billion. And she rejected the suggestion that she was a 'Klarna Chancellor' who had announced a 'buy now, pay later' spending review. She said: 'The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I'm going to need to pay for in the future, that's just not right.' Her comments come as the Office for National Statistics reported that the economy shrank by 0.3% in April – the biggest monthly contraction since October 2023 and worse than the 0.1% fall most economists had expected. In recent days, both Ms Reeves and Number 10 have said the economy is beginning to turn a corner, allowing them to fund the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. But Thursday's worse-than-expected economic news will make it harder for Ms Reeves to balance her spending commitments with Labour's promises on tax and borrowing. The Chancellor acknowledged that the reduction in GDP was 'disappointing', and blamed 'uncertainty' caused by Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs at the start of April for much of the fall. But opposition parties have laid the blame squarely with the Government, with Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accusing Ms Reeves of 'economic vandalism'. He said: 'Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hard-working people will pay the price.' Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokeswoman, said the figures should act as 'a wake-up call for the Government which has so far refused to listen to the small businesses struggling to cope with the jobs tax' and urged ministers to pursue a 'bespoke UK-EU customs union' to compensate for the impact of US tariffs. The GDP figures come a day after the Chancellor revealed her spending plans for the coming years, including a significant increase in spending on the NHS, defence and schools. The biggest winner was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms, leading the Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice to say Britain was slowly morphing into a 'National Health State'. But that rise came at the price of real-terms cuts elsewhere, including the Home Office, the Department for Transport and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. On Thursday, Ms Reeves rejected claims that her decision on policing, which will see forces' 'spending power' increase by 2.3% above inflation each year, would mean cuts to frontline police numbers.

Rhyl Journal
36 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Rachel Reeves fails to rule out future tax rises as economy shrinks
The Chancellor has repeatedly said that the cost of Wednesday's spending review is covered by the tax rises she brought in last year, saying departments must now 'live within their means'. But economists have warned that a weakening economy and additional commitments such as reversing much of the cut to winter fuel payments mean taxes are likely to go up again in the autumn. Asked on Thursday whether she could guarantee there would be no further tax rises, Ms Reeves told LBC: 'I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours.' But she again repeated her promise that she would not need to increase taxes on the same scale as last year, when she put them up by £40 billion. And she rejected the suggestion that she was a 'Klarna Chancellor' who had announced a 'buy now, pay later' spending review. She said: 'The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I'm going to need to pay for in the future, that's just not right.' Her comments come as the Office for National Statistics reported that the economy shrank by 0.3% in April – the biggest monthly contraction since October 2023 and worse than the 0.1% fall most economists had expected. In recent days, both Ms Reeves and Number 10 have said the economy is beginning to turn a corner, allowing them to fund the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. But Thursday's worse-than-expected economic news will make it harder for Ms Reeves to balance her spending commitments with Labour's promises on tax and borrowing. The Chancellor acknowledged that the reduction in GDP was 'disappointing', and blamed 'uncertainty' caused by Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs at the start of April for much of the fall. But opposition parties have laid the blame squarely with the Government, with Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accusing Ms Reeves of 'economic vandalism'. He said: 'Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hard-working people will pay the price.' Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokeswoman, said the figures should act as 'a wake-up call for the Government which has so far refused to listen to the small businesses struggling to cope with the jobs tax' and urged ministers to pursue a 'bespoke UK-EU customs union' to compensate for the impact of US tariffs. The GDP figures come a day after the Chancellor revealed her spending plans for the coming years, including a significant increase in spending on the NHS, defence and schools. The biggest winner was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms, leading the Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice to say Britain was slowly morphing into a 'National Health State'. But that rise came at the price of real-terms cuts elsewhere, including the Home Office, the Department for Transport and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. On Thursday, Ms Reeves rejected claims that her decision on policing, which will see forces' 'spending power' increase by 2.3% above inflation each year, would mean cuts to frontline police numbers.