Russia sentences election watchdog Grigory Melkonyants to 5 years in prison
May 14 (UPI) -- A Russian court on Wednesday sentenced well-known election watchdog Grigory Melkonyants to five years in prison after it found him guilty of allegedly working for a so-called "undesirable" organization.
"Don't worry, I'm not despairing," Melkonyants was quoted telling supporters after the sentence was handed down by Moscow's Basmanny District Court in a latest blow to free speech in Russian President Vladimir Putin's regime.
"You shouldn't despair either!" he reportedly stated.
Melkonyants, who has been in custody since his August 2023 arrest, co-founded Russia's most respected and prominent election monitoring group which in 2013 was designated as a "foreign agent" by Russian authorities.
The charge stems from alleged ties to the European Network of Election Monitoring Organizations, which was declared "undesirable" by the Russian state in 2021.
Melkonyants has denied the allegations.
Three years later, Golos -- which means "vote" in Russian -- was liquidated as a non-governmental organization but despite court orders, continued to publish reports on Russia's local and national elections, which international experts contend were not free or fair.
"Grigory Melkonyants has committed no crime," Marie Struthers, Amnesty International's director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, said Wednesday in a statement in calling for his "unconditional" release.
Struthers says his only "offense" was "defending the right to free and fair elections," and that Russian authorities "instigated this criminal case in order to silence one of the country's most respected election observers."
The election monitoring group was long-accused by Russian officials of multiple violations and for allegedly being tainted by money it received from the U.S.-based National Endowment for Democracy and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
"Golos gave rise to a massive election monitoring movement in Russia in 2011, then the protests began which gave Putin quite a scare," according to Leonid Volkov, a close associate of late Russian political opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
"So many years have passed, and he still seeks revenge," he wrote on social media.
Melkonyants expressed worry for the group's 3,000 election monitors during Russia's 2011 elections as it came under fire while Putin, then prime minister, was ultimately re-elected to succeed then-President Dmitry Medvedev for another term.
Meanwhile, the Britain-headquartered Amnesty International considers him a "prisoner of conscience" who was prosecuted and imprisoned solely for peaceful activism.
"The international community cannot remain silent," Amnesty's Struthers added Wednesday.
"Neither on this appalling verdict nor on the outrageous assault on civic space that is taking place in Russia."
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia bombards Ukraine with 7 missiles and 315 drones overnight: 284 targets downed
Since the evening of 9 June, Russian forces have attacked Ukraine with 322 air targets, 284 of which were successfully intercepted. Source: Ukrainian Air Force on Telegram Quote from the Air Force: "As of 09:00, air defence forces have intercepted 284 enemy air attack weapons, 220 of which were shot down by fire weapons and 64 disappeared from radar." Details: Russia used 315 Shahed-type strike UAVs, various types of decoy drones, two KN-23 ballistic missiles, and five Iskander-K cruise missiles in the attack last night. Kyiv was the main target. It is noted that the air defence units shot down two KN-23 ballistic missiles and five Iskander-K cruise missiles. Moreover, they shot down 213 UAVs with fire weapons, and 64 more disappeared from radar/were suppressed by electronic warfare. "Enemy air strikes were recorded in 11 locations, with debris from downed UAVs found in 16 locations," the Air Force reported. The air attack was repelled by the Ukrainian defence forces' aircraft, anti-aircraft missile forces, electronic warfare units, unmanned systems units and mobile fire Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Teenager injured in Russian attack on Sumy on 3 June dies
A teenager injured in a Russian strike on the city of Sumy on 3 June has died in hospital, bringing the death toll from that attack to six. Source: Oleh Hryhorov, Head of Sumy Oblast Military Administration, on Telegram Quote: "A 17-year-old boy who was injured in the enemy attack on Sumy on 3 June has died in hospital. Doctors fought for his life for almost a week." Details: Hryhorov added that the death toll from that Russian attack had increased to six people. Background: On 3 June, Russian forces struck central Sumy using a long-range multiple launch rocket system (MLRS). Initially, three people were reported killed and 25 injured, including three children and three adults in a serious condition. Later, the death toll rose to five. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Labour's hands, British manufacturing never stood a chance
The delay of the UK's long-awaited industrial strategy should hardly come as a shock. This country's approach to such matters has long been confused. At times, it has been utterly non-existent. Industrial policy was so muddled during the twilight years of a dying Tory government, that it often seemed like ministers were making it up as they went along. Knee-jerk responses to major crises – such as the one that saw Sheffield Forgemasters nationalised when someone in Whitehall suddenly realised the £40bn programme to build the Royal Navy's next-generation nuclear missile submarines was in jeopardy –became the norm in the absence of any joined-up thinking. The decision of Boris Johnson to scrap the industrial strategy council and replace it with the 'Build Back Better council' – one of many utterly hollow slogans the Tories desperately dreamed up as their popularity collapsed – seemed like the moment that the UK threw in the towel on any pretence of a clear industrial plan. Remarkably, the situation has deteriorated even further under this Labour Government. Rather than 'reigniting Britain's industrial heartlands' as Keir Starmer claimed on the basis of very little, shortly after taking power, the current Cabinet is in danger of presiding over the complete disappearance of UK manufacturing. In the hands of clueless Labour ministers obsessed by net zero and entirely arbitrary green targets, swathes of the industrial base are vanishing before our eyes, and there is no plan to stop it. The consequences for entire towns built on factory production, and surrounding communities, will be utterly devastating. Since Labour won the general election, the list of major manufacturers that have raised the white flag has ballooned into a who's who of UK industry. Port Talbot's blast furnaces have closed, threatening the very existence of that region's biggest employer. At British Steel, the situation is even more alarming – its vast Lincolnshire steelworks is now controlled by the Government, forced to step in after years of neglect by Chinese owners, yet with no discernible sign that the site has a viable future. The closure of Grangemouth, Scotland's only remaining oil refinery, in the coming weeks, is in danger of being missed altogether – except of course by the hundreds of people employed there. True, owner Ineos has a reputation for ruthless cost-cutting across its empire, but billionaire owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe has warned repeatedly of the existential crisis facing the chemicals industry as a result of what he describes as 'decarbonising by de-industrialisation'. Others that failed to grab the same headlines, but whose loss to the nation's output will be no less severe, include the Olefins 'cracker' facility in Teesside. A feature of the local skyline for half a century, it reportedly stands on the brink of closure after its Saudi Arabian owners halted a multimillion-pound upgrade. The future of the North Sea, cement, glass, paper, ceramics and other so-called foundational industries are all similarly bleak – the result of long-term neglect, complacency, short-term politics, and confused decision-making. The idea that salvation lies in Britain's unquestioning embrace of all things net zero is the great lie of this century. Ed Miliband's 'green jobs' promise is a fantasy. Where employment is being created by clean energy projects, many thousands more are being destroyed on the altar of his fanaticism as companies buckle under the exorbitant costs of the transition. But it's not just the renewables revolution that is at fault, the UK's energy policy has long been a complete catastrophe. Time and again, sky-high energy costs are being blamed for crushing the life out of heavy industry as production lines are shut down or entire factory complexes mothballed altogether. The shadow of the green levy monster looms large but factory bosses also blame surging gas prices for the destruction. Throw excessive network charges into the mix and British companies are grappling with the most punishing energy bills in the world, leading to an extraordinary collapse in output. The figures, published in The Telegraph last weekend, are truly astonishing. In the UK, industrial electricity costs have shot up by three quarters in three years and industrial gas prices have more than doubled. Meanwhile, the output of energy-intensive industries has tumbled by a third. It is the equivalent of having not one, but both hands fastened behind the back and your shoelaces tied together. Faced with energy bills five times greater than their US counterparts and three times higher than European rivals, British industry stands little chance of competing globally. It is therefore impossible to overstate how much there is riding on the industrial strategy this time around. Recent history from both sides of the political divide suggests there is little reason to be hopeful given the number of unconvincing iterations of industrial policy that have come before. Yet the overwhelming message from UK manufacturers is that energy costs are a tangible problem that can be addressed. The blizzard of Government-imposed green levies and taxes that companies must contend with, such as the climate change levy, renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs, alone leaves plenty of room for meaningful action. The bold move would be to bring forward a planned tax on carbon intensive goods imports of cement, fertiliser, aluminium, iron and steel set for 2027, at the same time as expanding it to other key sectors such as glass and ceramics. Fears that the tariff will push up prices for consumers cannot be overlooked but, at the same time, a policy of penalising domestic producers while goods pour in from countries that continue to pollute at will seems like self-harm on a grand scale. There are encouraging signs that this Government is actually listening for once. Rachel Reeves told an audience at the annual CBI dinner last week: 'We know that one of the questions is how we make energy more affordable, especially for … intensive energy-using businesses where the price compared with other countries … is just too acute.' But the time for talking is clearly over. The crisis in manufacturing means Britain's industrialists will no longer stand for ministers trying to fob them off with easy soundbites. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
