In Labour's hands, British manufacturing never stood a chance
Industrial policy was so muddled during the twilight years of a dying Tory government, that it often seemed like ministers were making it up as they went along.
Knee-jerk responses to major crises – such as the one that saw Sheffield Forgemasters nationalised when someone in Whitehall suddenly realised the £40bn programme to build the Royal Navy's next-generation nuclear missile submarines was in jeopardy –became the norm in the absence of any joined-up thinking.
The decision of Boris Johnson to scrap the industrial strategy council and replace it with the 'Build Back Better council' – one of many utterly hollow slogans the Tories desperately dreamed up as their popularity collapsed – seemed like the moment that the UK threw in the towel on any pretence of a clear industrial plan.
Remarkably, the situation has deteriorated even further under this Labour Government.
Rather than 'reigniting Britain's industrial heartlands' as Keir Starmer claimed on the basis of very little, shortly after taking power, the current Cabinet is in danger of presiding over the complete disappearance of UK manufacturing.
In the hands of clueless Labour ministers obsessed by net zero and entirely arbitrary green targets, swathes of the industrial base are vanishing before our eyes, and there is no plan to stop it.
The consequences for entire towns built on factory production, and surrounding communities, will be utterly devastating.
Since Labour won the general election, the list of major manufacturers that have raised the white flag has ballooned into a who's who of UK industry. Port Talbot's blast furnaces have closed, threatening the very existence of that region's biggest employer.
At British Steel, the situation is even more alarming – its vast Lincolnshire steelworks is now controlled by the Government, forced to step in after years of neglect by Chinese owners, yet with no discernible sign that the site has a viable future.
The closure of Grangemouth, Scotland's only remaining oil refinery, in the coming weeks, is in danger of being missed altogether – except of course by the hundreds of people employed there.
True, owner Ineos has a reputation for ruthless cost-cutting across its empire, but billionaire owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe has warned repeatedly of the existential crisis facing the chemicals industry as a result of what he describes as 'decarbonising by de-industrialisation'.
Others that failed to grab the same headlines, but whose loss to the nation's output will be no less severe, include the Olefins 'cracker' facility in Teesside. A feature of the local skyline for half a century, it reportedly stands on the brink of closure after its Saudi Arabian owners halted a multimillion-pound upgrade.
The future of the North Sea, cement, glass, paper, ceramics and other so-called foundational industries are all similarly bleak – the result of long-term neglect, complacency, short-term politics, and confused decision-making.
The idea that salvation lies in Britain's unquestioning embrace of all things net zero is the great lie of this century. Ed Miliband's 'green jobs' promise is a fantasy. Where employment is being created by clean energy projects, many thousands more are being destroyed on the altar of his fanaticism as companies buckle under the exorbitant costs of the transition.
But it's not just the renewables revolution that is at fault, the UK's energy policy has long been a complete catastrophe. Time and again, sky-high energy costs are being blamed for crushing the life out of heavy industry as production lines are shut down or entire factory complexes mothballed altogether.
The shadow of the green levy monster looms large but factory bosses also blame surging gas prices for the destruction. Throw excessive network charges into the mix and British companies are grappling with the most punishing energy bills in the world, leading to an extraordinary collapse in output.
The figures, published in The Telegraph last weekend, are truly astonishing. In the UK, industrial electricity costs have shot up by three quarters in three years and industrial gas prices have more than doubled. Meanwhile, the output of energy-intensive industries has tumbled by a third.
It is the equivalent of having not one, but both hands fastened behind the back and your shoelaces tied together. Faced with energy bills five times greater than their US counterparts and three times higher than European rivals, British industry stands little chance of competing globally.
It is therefore impossible to overstate how much there is riding on the industrial strategy this time around. Recent history from both sides of the political divide suggests there is little reason to be hopeful given the number of unconvincing iterations of industrial policy that have come before.
Yet the overwhelming message from UK manufacturers is that energy costs are a tangible problem that can be addressed.
The blizzard of Government-imposed green levies and taxes that companies must contend with, such as the climate change levy, renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs, alone leaves plenty of room for meaningful action.
The bold move would be to bring forward a planned tax on carbon intensive goods imports of cement, fertiliser, aluminium, iron and steel set for 2027, at the same time as expanding it to other key sectors such as glass and ceramics.
Fears that the tariff will push up prices for consumers cannot be overlooked but, at the same time, a policy of penalising domestic producers while goods pour in from countries that continue to pollute at will seems like self-harm on a grand scale.
There are encouraging signs that this Government is actually listening for once. Rachel Reeves told an audience at the annual CBI dinner last week: 'We know that one of the questions is how we make energy more affordable, especially for … intensive energy-using businesses where the price compared with other countries … is just too acute.'
But the time for talking is clearly over. The crisis in manufacturing means Britain's industrialists will no longer stand for ministers trying to fob them off with easy soundbites.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rudholm Group Expands RFID Production in LA to Meet Growing Garment Digitalization Demand
As the focus on U.S. manufacturing and sourcing continues amid ongoing trade turbulence, Sweden-based garment and footwear labeling and packaging provider Rudholm Group is expanding RFID production capacity at its Los Angeles facility. A 'significant investment' in L.A. will bring the factory's annual RFID production capacity to approximately 100 million pieces, or carriers. This RFID ramp up is about creating a more localized supply chain for customers across the Western Hemisphere, while also meeting the growing customer demand for digitalized garment solutions. More from Sourcing Journal Veshin Factory Taps LA's Lalaland to Scale Made-in-USA Production for Bio-Based Bags What's the Status on Digital Product Passport Implementation? True Religion Celebrates Latina Heritage with Bella Doña 'At Rudholm Group, we strive to stay ahead of market trends and exceed our customers' expectations,' said Dennis Lau, CEO of Rudholm Group. 'This expansion reflects not only our dedication to innovation but also our commitment to investing in key markets like the United States.' Explaining the expansion move, Lau told Sourcing Journal that L.A. has been a 'strategic geographic location from day one' for Rudholm, supplying large customers in the local area as well as companies across the U.S. and in markets like Central America. The capacity expansion is courtesy of new RFID production machinery that is five times faster than what the facility previously used. Another new addition is fully automated quality control for RFID, which uses a camera system to scan barcodes of the printed RFID carrier and check that the data encoded is correct. Previously, quality control would have been done manually, but Lau noted that automation hasn't changed staffing needs. 'We're not saving on any human resources, but we're just guaranteeing a much, much more secure outcome of the product,' he said. RFID—short for radio frequency identification—powers connected garments, enabling solutions like inventory tracking, smart fitting rooms and contactless checkout. It is also among the key solutions for digital product passports (DPP), which contain product life cycle details such as material origins and how it can be recycled at end of life. Through the EU's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), DPP is rolling out as a mandate for goods sold in the bloc. Preparing for this DPP demand, Rudholm Group's in-house team developed the software ShareLabel. 'The world is moving into automation and AI, and I believe that RFID is just the next logical step for most retail brands,' said Lau. 'It's a better asset control of what you have in store, what you have in the warehouse, in real time.' Rudholm Group has been working to reduce its dependance on global supply chains. Along with circumventing trade disruptions, producing in the U.S. leads to shorter lead times. The company entered the U.S. market in 2016 with a New York office, followed by the opening of the Los Angeles facility in 2020 and a Nevada printing facility for polybags and poly mailers, which opened in 2022. In addition to RFID, Rudholm's LA facility produces UPC stickers and care labels. 'Our vision is to provide more than products—we're delivering solutions that help our customers stay ahead in a rapidly evolving industry,' Lau said. 'With this expansion, we're empowering brands to harness the power of digital innovation while supporting responsible, localized production.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lance Thrailkill: How to Manage Capital Investments with ROI Focus
ALLEN, TX / / August 15, 2025 / When it comes to capital investment in manufacturing, the margin for error is slim. For Lance Thrailkill, CEO of All Metals Fabricating and co-founder of PRINT3D Technologies, every dollar spent must answer one essential question: will it deliver measurable return on investment? Leading a third-generation manufacturing business through seismic industry shifts, Thrailkill has developed a reputation for pairing cutting-edge strategy with operational realism, balancing legacy with leadership in a high-stakes environment where capital allocation can make or break long-term competitiveness. "Over the 47 years our family has owned this business, one thing's remained constant: change," Thrailkill says. "So our strategy has always been to reinvest in new equipment that can help us do more with less. Better pricing for customers, more efficiency for our team, and higher throughput overall." The ROI Framework: Capacity, Efficiency, Capability At the heart of Thrailkill's approach is a disciplined framework he refers to as the "trifecta." Any capital investment, whether in robotics, machining, or 3D printing, must satisfy at least two of three criteria to move forward. "First, does it address a capacity constraint? Second, does it improve efficiency or throughput? And third, does it offer a new capability?" While many manufacturers get stuck trying to calculate traditional ROI projections, Thrailkill believes this model is more practical, especially for custom shops like his, where variability in workload makes standard financial forecasting unreliable. "If it hits two, that's likely a green light. If it hits all three, it's a slam dunk." The Role of People in Capital Decisions Even the most well-reasoned investment can fail without team alignment. "One of the biggest mistakes I see is leadership not getting buy-in from the production floor," says Thrailkill. Rather than imposing decisions from the top down, he integrates team members into the selection process. "They're the ones who'll use the technology every day. If they don't believe in it, it's probably not going to work." Thrailkill focuses on pairing the right tools with the right people, using individual motivation and personality fit as a compass. "My role as CEO is to make sure everyone's in the right seat, with the right tools to succeed. That's what drives results." Financial Strategy Meets Long-Term Vision Beyond operations, Thrailkill takes a nuanced approach to the financial side of capital investment. He points to tax code provisions like Section 179 and bonus depreciation as helpful tools when used correctly. "You don't make a purchase just to avoid taxes. But if the investment is valid and it aligns with those incentives, it can significantly reduce the financial risk." He also uses a proactive accrual strategy to ensure that capital purchases don't destabilize annual financials. "Every month, we treat our budget as if we're going to spend on equipment by year-end. That keeps us balanced, prepared, and aligned with our investment goals." Navigating Economic Shifts by Investing with Purpose With inflation continuing to compress margins, tariffs adding unpredictability, and interest rates impacting access to capital, manufacturers are facing increasing pressure to be precise in how they invest. "We've definitely seen prices rise and financing become more difficult," he says. "But policy incentives are strong right now, and if we stay focused on ROI, there's still opportunity." He's particularly intrigued by the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in manufacturing. "Smaller shops tend to be late adopters, but AI is becoming too powerful to ignore. It's not just about robotics. It's about smarter decisions, better scheduling, and new efficiencies across the board." Whether implementing automation strategies at All Metals Fabricating or advancing 3D-printed construction through PRINT3D Technologies, Thrailkill remains committed to an investing with purpose, and with people in mind. "The best equipment in the world won't solve your problems unless you're solving them for the right reasons, and with the right team." To follow Lance Thrailkill's insights on manufacturing and capital strategy, connect with him on LinkedIn or visit his website. Media Contact: Name: Lance ThrailkillCity: Texas, United StatesEmail: lance@ SOURCE: Lance Thrailkill View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Alarming' drop in UK consumer confidence over last year – Which?
Consumer confidence in the future UK economy has plummeted over the last year, figures suggest. Confidence has tumbled by 31 points over the last year, from an average of minus nine between May and July 2024 to an average of minus 40 between May and July this year, Which?'s Consumer Insight Tracker shows. On average between this May and July, 56% of people thought the economy would get worse and just 16% thought it would get better. Which? said the figures showed a 'significant fall' to some of the lowest levels seen since early 2023, when the cost-of-living crisis was in the headlines and inflation was in double figures. Confidence in the future economy declined sharply last autumn and was particularly low between February to May, when global events such as the US tariff policy contributed to the pessimism. Confidence had recovered a little since, but remained considerably lower than 12 months ago. Pensioners have been the most pessimistic group, with their confidence in the future UK economy falling dramatically from an average of minus five between May and July last year to a current average of minus 63. Pensioners' confidence dropped dramatically in autumn last year – shortly after the Government's first announcement of scrapping the winter fuel allowance for most pensioners – and has remained low since, in spite of the Government U-turn on fuel payments. Which?'s figures suggest that financial difficulties from the height of the cost-of-living crisis are yet to return to the pre-crisis levels. In the month to July 18, an estimated 2.1 million households missed at least one essential payment such as rent or mortgage payments, utility bills, credit card or loan payments. An estimated 13.9 million households (49%) also made at least one adjustment to cover essential spending such as utility bills, housing costs, groceries, school supplies and medicines in the last month – such as cutting back on essentials, dipping into savings, selling possessions or borrowing. Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, said: 'Our research shows consumer confidence in the future of the UK economy has dropped alarmingly over the last year. 'The Government has rightly focused on growing the economy and raising living standards but in doing so, it must not overlook the importance of consumer protections in restoring confidence. 'People are sick to the teeth of having to dodge fraudsters when shopping online, watching out for rogue traders when making home improvements and needing to keep an eye out for dodgy pricing practices which mean that offers aren't as good as they first appear. 'The right consumer protections give people the confidence to spend and the Government must place these protections at the heart of its plans to grow the economy.'