Super fund took more than 500 days to approve death benefit for grieving widow, Asic says
An unnamed superannuation fund took more than 500 days to approve a death benefit payment to an Indigenous woman grieving the loss of her husband and ignored her concerns about financial hardship and a confusing claims process.
The 'distressing' case has been highlighted by the financial regulator as one of many 'poor industry practices' by funds that have had 'devastating impacts' on members experiencing 'deep grief, vulnerability, frustration and genuine suffering'.
A 'landmark' report released by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) on Monday has made 34 recommendations to overhaul the superannuation sector. The report investigated the conduct of 10 trustees, which are responsible for 38% of all member benefits in Australia.
Asic chair, Joe Longo, said the report 'identified a range of issues including excessive delays, poor customer service, and ineffective claims handling procedures'. He called on the industry to 'take ownership of the problems and flex their muscle to fix the failings'.
'At the heart of this issue is leadership that doesn't have a grip on the fund's data, systems and processes – and ultimately it is the customers who suffer for it,' Longo said.
'This kind of disconnect is unacceptable in any area of corporate Australia, but in the superannuation sector it is particularly serious, because super affects everyone from the boardroom to the living room.'
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
A death benefit is the amount of superannuation a person has remaining in their account after they die. This can be transferred to a family member to ensure bills and expenses can be covered. This payment may also include life insurance payments.
The review of 10 superannuation funds comes after Asic lodged federal court proceedings alleging Cbus failed to process more than 10,000 claims for death and disability payments within 90 days. More than 6,000 members were forced to wait more than 12 months for payments. Cbus has apologised and promised to overhaul its processes.
The 10 reviewed funds include Australian Retirement Trust, Avanteos (Colonial First State), Brighter Super, Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation, Hesta, Hostplus, NM Super (AMP), Nulis (MLC), Rest and UniSuper. The report found some funds had performed better than others, but all needed to improve.
The review found communication with First Nations claimant was 'often not culturally sensitive' and that their death benefits often took longer to deliver.
The report highlighted the case of a First Nations woman who lodged a claim for a death benefit after her husband died. He had a death benefit of around $100,000. According to Asic, she repeatedly told an unnamed fund she was suffering financial distress and struggling to navigate the claims process.
'The trustee did not respond to the wife's concerns about financial hardship,' the Asic report said.
The woman had already raised concerns about lacking 'standard identification documents for her deceased husband'. Asic allege the fund 'took more than a year to offer the wife alternative identification options'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'The trustee finally decided to pay the wife after more than 500 days,' the report said. 'However, as of the date we collected the claim file, the wife still had not received payment.'
Asic commissioner Simone Constant said 'grieving Australians should not have to suffer further stress because of the failure of superannuation trustees to approach claims in a timely, clear, and respectful manner'.
'Many of the complaints we read were distressing. We saw deep grief, vulnerability, frustration and genuine suffering,' Constant said.
'The money from a death benefit can make a huge difference and each day a trustee delays that payment causes real harm to families. Trustees need to do better.'
The 10 superannuation funds examined by Asic are yet to respond to the regulator's findings but have previously outlined measures to improve their performance.
In November, several of the funds mentioned in the Asic report said they had overhauled their internal processes to improve customer outcomes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Afterpay and Zip Pay changes for millions of Australians: What you need to know
Aussies who use Buy Now, Pay Later providers could see their credit scores take a hit, as the Albanese government cracks down on products like Afterpay and Zip. BNPL products require a buyer to pay off a debt in four equal instalments. But if a customer is late paying off the debt, they incur hefty late fees which can be much more punishing than credit card interest rates. From Tuesday, BNPL products will be subject to the same rules as credit cards - required to hold a credit license and comply with credit laws regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Aussies might also start to see missed or late repayments to BNPL providers appearing on their credit reports, affecting their ability to get a loan or mortgage. BNPL providers will also be required to complete mandatory credit checks about a customer's financial situation, similar to a credit card application, under the new legislation introduced by the federal government in June 2024. It follows concern that some customers were borrowing more than they were able to pay back, with BNPL providers accused of acting like credit card companies without being subject to the same rules. 'Some BNPL providers will report additional information, such as repayments, on consumers' credit reports,' Elsa Markula, CEO of the Australian Retail Credit Association (ARCA), said. 'However, BNPL providers such as Afterpay will report credit checks only.' Ms Markula added that BNPL was now the third most used credit product in Australia, behind credit cards and home loans. 'But too few people understand how it affects their credit profile, especially young Australians. 'Under the new rules, your BNPL behaviour could directly impact your credit score and your future ability to get a loan, a credit card, or even a mortgage.' She urged Aussies to repay their BNPL loans on time to stop their credit reports from receiving a blow. 'While not all BNPL providers report payment history, where this information is reported it is the most important factor for building or protecting your credit score. 'Check your credit reports from all three major credit reporting bodies to ensure your information is accurate.' The new rules come as some Aussies rely increasingly on BNPL because they have maxed out their credit cards. After paying their mortgage and other household bills, consumers were turning to apps like Afterpay to pay for their groceries and petrol, financial counsellor Claire Tacon told Daily Mail Australia.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Australia regulator trials faster IPO process as listings hit decade low
SYDNEY, June 10 (Reuters) - Australia's securities regulator said on Tuesday it would trial changes to speed up initial public offerings that are at a decade low by implementing recommendations from earlier reviews and allowing faster access for retail investors. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said the changes could shave as much as one week off the typical 20-week IPO process and reduce deal execution risk. The trial will begin on Tuesday and last for two years, the regulator said. "Creating a more streamlined IPO process underscores our commitment to ensuring our public markets remain attractive to companies and investors," ASIC Chairman Joe Longo said in a statement. Longo said the funds raised through IPOs were at the lowest level in more than a decade, with only A$4.2 billion ($2.74 billion) raised last year compared to A$22.9 billion in 2014. ASIC's new measures come just days after Virgin Australia ( opens new tab launched a closely watched A$685 million IPO that attracted strong investor demand. ASIC said the changes applied to companies seeking to list on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) ( opens new tab through "fast-track" status, with a projected market capitalisation above A$100 million and no ASX-imposed escrow. Most Australian IPOs are carried out through a front-end book-building process, which means the price is set and investor bids are taken ahead of the prospectus being reviewed and approved by Australian regulators. ASIC and the ASX have been under pressure to speed up the IPO vetting process, to reduce the time investors are exposed to market fluctuations while a prospectus is under review. Under the planned changes, companies would be able to submit a confidential prospectus or product disclosure statement at least 14 days before formal lodgement for ASIC review. ASIC said it would also adopt a "no action" position allowing eligible companies to begin accepting retail investor applications during the standard seven-day exposure period. Typically, retail investor orders are taken after the prospectus becomes public following the regulator's reviews. The trial was also a part of a broader review of regulatory settings around IPOs, ASIC said. "While we do not see regulatory settings as the silver bullet, we have received lots of ideas and are considering further regulatory adjustments to support a strong and well-functioning market," Longo said. ($1 = 1.5354 Australian dollars)
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive
Imagine you have $3m in super and have just retired, only to hear that Labor plans to hit you with a new tax. Or perhaps you're worried (dream?) that at some point in the near or distant future you might cross that multi-million-dollar savings threshold. Either way, you might be wondering whether the government's proposal to whack an extra 15% tax on earnings on balances over $3m is going to put a major crimp in your retirement plans. Breathe easy, your annual trips to Europe are safe, as are your smashed avocado brekkies. According to Guardian Australia's analysis, a wealthy Australian retiring with $3m in super today would pay an extra $2,355 in tax. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email And that's from annual retirement income of more than $170,000, based on an estimate from Asic's MoneySmart retirement calculator. In other words, the tax represents barely 1% of your income. If that doesn't make you feel better, then remember that the median full-time salary in Australia is $88,400, according to the ABS, and $72,590 across all employees. So you are making nearly twice the median full-time salary – and those suckers are paying income tax! Well, consider this: The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia reckons that a single person with a paltry $595,000 in savings can generate a 'comfortable' lifestyle in retirement with $51,807 in income a year. You're making more than three times as much, even after paying Labor's damned extra tax! What's that? You only have $800,000 in savings? Gosh, how sad. (If it makes you feel any better, that's still four times the median super balance among 65-69 year-olds, according to the ATO). Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Don't worry, though, you won't be paying the proposed extra 15% tax - remember it only starts kicking in on balances over $3m. And anyway, you can still live pretty well on $67,000 a year, tax-free. That all sounds OK for the small-fry with $3m in super. But what about the serious savers with $5m? How much extra tax will they have to suffer in the name of making the super system 'fairer'? Bad news. They could be paying something like an extra $25,000 in tax under the proposed policy, if they earn the average 7.5% annual return in the year. The good news is that they'll still have nearly $270,000 left over to … wait, can a single retiree even spend that much in a year?
