logo
Why Kings could go big-game hunting this NHL offseason: Catching up with Ken Holland

Why Kings could go big-game hunting this NHL offseason: Catching up with Ken Holland

New York Times22-05-2025

One week into the job, and there are not enough hours in the day.
Since being named general manager of the Los Angeles Kings, Ken Holland has been on the phone with fellow GMs, agents and staff — it's been a whirlwind.
And he's loved every minute of it. Boy, had he ever missed it.
'It's great being back in a GM chair,' Holland told The Athletic on Wednesday. 'I'm excited.'
Advertisement
The Hockey Hall of Famer was quick to thank Kings owner Philip Anschutz and team president Luc Robitaille for the opportunity — one that checked all the boxes for him, both professionally and personally.
A team that has a chance to win. A big market. A West Coast city that fits nicely with wife Cindi and their home in Vernon, B.C., and a life that includes four kids and 10 grandchildren.
It was the perfect package.
Now it's time to roll up his sleeves. He's hit the ground running.
One of Holland's first decisions was to reach out to Rob Blake, inviting him out for dinner to pick his brain. Not every outgoing GM would be interested in that kind of invite, but it's telling of the person that Blake is that he accepted.
'Being the classy, professional gentleman that he is, we got together for dinner for two and a half hours and talked a lot about the team and some other things,' Holland said. 'So very, very valuable for me.'
Holland has decided to keep Blake's front-office group pretty much intact, which includes wanting to keep Nelson Emerson (AGM), Glen Murray (senior director, player personnel) and Marc Bergevin (senior adviser to GM) in the fold, among others, although we'll see what happens with Bergevin on the New York Islanders GM front, where he's interviewed twice, per league sources.
'I'm going to keep everybody,' Holland said. 'They had 105 points. They've gone through a retool. It was a wonderful job by Rob Blake and all the people around him. I mean, they've made the playoffs the last four years in a row.'
Holland didn't blow up the Edmonton Oilers' front office, either, when he got there. He did bring three people in of his own.
'I am going to bring in a person on board here, someone that knows how I think, and other than that, I look forward to working with Nelson and Glen and Luc and (head coach) Jim Hiller and everyone there,' Holland said.
Advertisement
Holland wouldn't say who that person was he was bringing in, but I would be surprised if it wasn't Tyler Wright, who was with him with the Detroit Red Wings and the Oilers.
As for Bergevin, if he doesn't end up as the new Islanders GM, both sides are fine working together in L.A.
'Berg has been a general manager in Montreal,' Holland said. 'His name is floated around out there. I wouldn't hold him back. I wouldn't hold anyone back if they had a chance to become a general manager or a head coach. But if Berg is back, I've obviously got a great relationship with him. We were together on the 2016 World Cup Canadian management team. We spent a good month together, and obviously we were both GMs and he's a former Red Wings player in the 1990s when I was in the front office there.
'If Berg stays, certainly he'll be somebody that will be very important to me. Because he's been in the chair, and that experience is always valuable.'
Ironically, Holland himself met and interviewed with the Islanders this spring as part of their GM search process, although he would not comment on that.
There's also been interest over the past year from a couple of other NHL teams, wanting Holland as a senior adviser.
'I did talk to some other teams, but at the end of the day, the situation had to work for my wife and I,' he said. 'We've got four kids and we have 10 grandkids. Family is No. 1.'
In the end, the Kings' GM job called out to him for all kinds of reasons, and Cindi was obviously an important part of it.
'I spent a lot of days on the road in my life,' Holland said. 'She was home raising the kids and taking them to those school events, and I was missing birthday parties, I said to Cindi that if I had an opportunity to come back (as an NHL GM) and that if it fit for Cindi and fit for me, I would be interested in it.
Advertisement
'But at this stage of our lives, it had to be a decision that worked for the both of us.'
And again, the Kings' job was perfect in every way.
'It worked personally and professionally,' Holland.
After a year out of team management, Holland said his juices were starting to flow this past season. He never saw himself as potentially retired, but rather as unemployed. He stayed in touch with the game by taking on an advisory role with NHL Hockey Ops, which allowed him to attend GM meetings and Board of Governors meetings. He watched NHL games every night all year long.
After his mutually agreed-upon exit from the Oilers last June following a Game 7 loss in the Stanley Cup Final, Holland feels re-energized and absolutely up to trying to take the Kings to the next level.
'It's a great opportunity, a great organization,' the four-time Stanley Cup champion executive said.
Holland's hire wasn't met with unanimous praise. Some segments of the Kings' fan base wanted younger blood. A more modern vision. And you get that, for sure, from their perspective.
And like any GM, Holland hasn't batted 1.000. But if you look at where the Oilers were when he took over and where they were when he left, sometimes you miss the forest for the trees. The Oilers were a mess when he got there, despite having the best player in the world. They were a win short of winning the Cup when Holland left, the hockey culture completely overhauled in the process.
Does that mean Holland will lead the Kings to the promised land?
No one can answer that for sure. But I know he won't be afraid to swing for the fences.
You can absolutely bet he's going to be aggressive this summer trying to upgrade the Kings roster.
'It's a good team,' Holland said. 'There's good veteran leadership on the team. There's some good young kids that are on the come up. It's L.A. It's got a great history. It's a great brand. It's an entertainment capital. Hopefully I can make a few decisions and we can convince a player or two to come join us like we were able to do in Detroit and able to do in Edmonton.'
Advertisement
The Kings have the salary cap space to swing hard enough.
'I plan to be aggressive,' Holland said. 'Ownership is prepared to go to the cap. The goal is to put a competitive team on the ice and, at the right time, be aggressive to try to make the team better and more exciting. Whether that happens in the next six to seven weeks or next year at the trade deadline or next offseason … but certainly the plan is to be aggressive at the right time.'
I would be surprised if the Kings didn't enter the Mitch Marner sweepstakes, for example, if the pending unrestricted free agent is indeed available July 1. Just like I would be pretty surprised if the Kings didn't do all they could to enter a Connor McDavid frenzy if, for whatever reason, the best player in the world doesn't extend with the Oilers. (I'm not saying he won't extend. I'm just saying in case he doesn't.)
No name will be too big for Holland. He's going to be big-game hunting to get the Kings over the hump.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court Allows DOGE Access to Social Security Data
Supreme Court Allows DOGE Access to Social Security Data

Wall Street Journal

time8 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Supreme Court Allows DOGE Access to Social Security Data

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for members of the Department of Government Efficiency, a cost-cutting group once led by Elon Musk, to access sensitive Social Security Administration records. Granting an emergency request by the Trump administration, the justices lifted a lower court order that for now had barred DOGE employees or affiliates from accessing the agency's systems and directed them to delete personal information they already had gathered.

What's next for DOGE after the wild Trump-Musk breakup?
What's next for DOGE after the wild Trump-Musk breakup?

E&E News

time8 minutes ago

  • E&E News

What's next for DOGE after the wild Trump-Musk breakup?

The very public internet feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk this week has thrown the fate of Musk's 'Department of Government Efficiency' operation into question. A clash over the Trump-backed spending bill devolved Thursday, with Musk suggesting Trump ought to be impeached and the president suggesting halting government contracts for Musk's companies. Trump downplayed the significance of the pair's blowup Thursday evening, and Republicans appeared eager to ease tensions after their dispute dominated headlines. But their bitter public brawl has raised a host of questions about how the Trump-Musk relationship will change moving forward. Advertisement Some federal employees are hopeful that DOGE will lose power within the administration after its early push to slash funding and fire employees. The fracas also raises questions about whether Musk's allies who remain in the DOGE operation will stick around, or might leave — or be nudged out — sooner than they had planned. 'The girls are fighting, and I'm here for it,' said one Energy Department career official who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'This could bode well for shaking things loose at DOE,' that person said. 'Right now, there is an ironclad hold on all funding activities, and that freeze is mostly at the request of DOGE.' Asked Friday about DOGE's fate in the wake of the Trump-Musk fight, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in an email, 'The Trump administration will continue the mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse across all agencies to ensure the federal government is effectively using taxpayer dollars.' Rogers added that the passage of 'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill' and the rescissions package the White House sent to Congress are 'essential to further codifying the DOGE cuts.' EPA and the Energy and Interior departments did not respond to requests for comment about whether DOGE's stature within the administration and inside federal agencies will change in the wake of the fight. 'We were hopeful for this failure of relationships,' said an Interior Department employee who was granted anonymity because they fear retaliation. 'There is still a feeling that DOGE is heavily influencing things here,' due in part 'to contracts and agreements being scrutinized,' that person said. The public spat between Trump and Musk could give agency heads like Energy Secretary Chris Wright more leeway to make decisions independently, said a former Energy Department career staffer who was granted anonymity because they fear retribution. Musk being on the outs could also possibly make new hires and normal funding flow a little more likely, said that former staffer, who added that it's unclear whether the gutting of agency staffing and funding was due to Musk's efforts in particular. Tom Pyle, president of the conservative think tank Institute for Energy Research, said it's 'too early to tell' what the feud means for DOGE over the long term. Musk formally left his DOGE post last week, when Trump hosted a farewell event with the Tesla CEO in the Oval Office. Musk said last Friday that his exit was not the 'end of DOGE, but really the beginning.' When Trump created DOGE, he required agencies to establish their own DOGE teams. Many of the officials deployed early on by the administration have ties to Musk's companies, including SpaceX, X and xAI. Trump praised the DOGE team's work last week and said that many DOGE people would be 'staying behind' after Musk's departure. Musk contended at the time that he was leaving because his time as a temporary special government employee had come to an end, but Trump disputed that claim in one of his disparaging posts Thursday on Truth Social. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump posted. It remains to be seen whether DOGE was 'just a pet project that Donald Trump created for Elon Musk,' said Joel Payne, a Democratic strategist. The answer will become clear pretty quickly, Payne said. 'I think it's probably a pretty good bet that at a minimum it is not the high-profile effort that it was.' But even if there's a public effort to declare a truce, Payne said, 'I doubt the relationship between their collective worlds will ever be OK.' Despite the rift, Republicans and some agency employees aren't expecting an immediate or dramatic shift in DOGE's work at agencies. 'The DOGE folks that have been planted in these agencies have some pretty firm backing from the White House, and I don't think this changes that dynamic,' Pyle said. 'I think that they're still empowered to do their work, at least for now.' Sean Spicer, who served as White House press secretary during Trump's first term, said DOGE 'is much bigger than a group of staff. It has been a mentality that is now part of every department and agency.' Trump's energy and environmental Cabinet bosses — Wright, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin — were all together in Alaska this week to discuss energy issues and stayed out of the fray on social media. They have all previously praised Musk and the DOGE team's work. Nicole Cantello, president of an American Federation of Government Employees union local that represents employees in EPA's Chicago-based region, doesn't expect big changes in store for DOGE. 'We believe the spat between Trump and Musk will have no effect on the plan to dismantle the EPA,' Cantello said Friday. 'This administration has shown time and again that it is determined to put polluters first, over the health of the American people.'

DC Circuit upholds FERC decision on Mountain Valley expansion
DC Circuit upholds FERC decision on Mountain Valley expansion

E&E News

time8 minutes ago

  • E&E News

DC Circuit upholds FERC decision on Mountain Valley expansion

A federal appeals court Friday upheld a decision by federal regulators that granted developers more time to complete a natural gas pipeline expansion in Virginia and North Carolina. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 'reasonably found that [Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC] had satisfied the good cause standard in seeking an extension' for the MVP Southgate project, Senior Judge Harry Edwards wrote in an opinion for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Given that developers focused their 'efforts on securing authorization' for the main, 303-mile Mountain Valley pipeline project, 'MVP made a good faith effort to meet the original Southgate deadline,' said Edwards, a Carter appointee. Advertisement The MVP Southgate project, approved by FERC in June 2020, was originally conceived as a 75-mile extension to the mainline Mountain Valley project. That main pipeline started operating last year and connects West Virginia with southern Virginia. MVP Southgate would continue on into North Carolina.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store