DMK hails SC's stay on ED probe in TASMAC case
Speaking to reporters at the DMK headquarters, Anna Arivalayam, party organising secretary R. S. Bharathi said, "The Supreme Court's ruling exposed the Centre's attempt to weaponise the ED to malign the Tamil Nadu government."
"The BJP cannot digest the DMK's consistent electoral victories in Tamil Nadu. That is why they are using the ED to defame our regime," Bharathi said.
Bharathi pointed out that around 44 First Information Reports (FIRs) had been filed in connection with TASMAC, the state-run liquor distribution body.
"Yet, only a few selectively chosen FIRs were used by the ED to conduct raids. This shows that the intention was not to investigate but to create a negative perception about the DMK," he said.
Referring to the Supreme Court's observations, Bharathi claimed the Apex Court had criticised the ED for functioning like a "blackmailing institution" in several parts of the country.
"The court's order is not just a relief for Tamil Nadu, but also a strong message against the arbitrary actions of the ED," he added.
He further asserted that the verdict is a legal endorsement of the DMK government's stand and legal efforts against the ED's overreach.
"The court has dealt a hammer blow to the ED's politically motivated actions. This is a significant win for federalism and democracy," Bharathi said.
The Supreme Court, earlier in the day, had stayed the ED's probe into alleged money laundering involving TASMAC, questioning the agency's jurisdiction and motives.
The judgment has sparked sharp political reactions, with the DMK framing it as a triumph against "authoritarian interference" by the Centre.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Order that undermines humanity
On August 11, the Supreme Court of India ordered the mass removal of dogs from the streets of the national capital region to control what was felt to be a rising dog menace. Nothing unites the city more than what the dogs do. From Lutyens Delhi to Pari Chawk and to the Galleria market in Gurugram, there have been loud voices against the order. The dog and Delhi share a spiritual connect. The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu case over dog bites in national capital, directed that no stray canines will be released back.(Pixabay/Representative) At the centre of Delhi's humane, secular and decentralised culture, stands the 2023 ABC notification. It deletes the metaphor of 'stray' or awara and assigns ownership (community-owned) to all dogs and a habitat (streets) under section 7(2). The Order in contravention to this pre-existing legislation relegates the dog to the title of 'stray', not owned by anyone so they can be condemned to shelters. The Court is so shaken by the number of dog bites and rabies data that it neither authenticated it nor reason out through Audi alteram partem but quickly affixed it in a realm of human versus dog debate. In the process, a landmark judgement made by a previous Supreme Court Bench of Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice Sanjay Karol on May 9, 2024 is also rubbished as non-workable. One would wonder on how a judgement can generalise a temporary behavioural aberration of a species as sufficient reason to uproot it en masse from its natural habitat. Such generalisations are dangerous precedents for governance. Those of us working on dog cases at the trial courts have found that most anti-rabies vaccines are often administered by quacks sitting outside doctor's clinic. They ensure their earning by provoking fear against dogs amongst people. Detailed investigations at these courts have clearly shown the absence of rabies and serious dog bite among most people. Most dog bite cases are also shown as rabies cases. The plight of dog feeders has completely gone unheard. They have responsibly held spaces within a decentralised implementation mentioned in the 2023 ABC Rules. It also turns out to be the most cost-effective solution since the State being a parens patriae remains responsible for deworming, immunisation and sterilisation [u/s8(2)]. The ABC Rules u/s 3(1) also ensure quality as the animal welfare organisation ought to have obtained a Certificate of Project Recognition by the Board for Animal Birth Control on the basis of its requisite training, expertise, infrastructure and human resources. For an effective implementation of ABC, a monitoring committee is constituted u/s 9, which would meet once a month to take measures for controlling dog population, rabies and man-animal conflict. The Bench never attempted to delve into the sad reality that every local authority from the ward councillor upwards, is not really interested in ABC. The economics of shifting all dogs to the shelters is mind-boggling. A mass removal of dogs from streets would create irretrievable ecological harm. Monkeys, rats and dogs balance each other, to remove one is to strengthen the other. The judgement goes on to say that the dogs should suffer no harm, cruelty or injury but with minimal manpower and already overstuffed shelters, these dogs would have arbitrary and anarchic journey, alien masters and no health records. Untrained and whimsical wage earners as pickup boys, would not be segregating feeding mothers, sick and older dogs and puppies, so harm, injury, cruelty and death is inevitable. Those stronger ones who survive will struggle for existence and may escape from shelters as aggressive biting dogs. The shift to shelter homes is not only unethical but also bad economics. To construct one makeshift shelter for 200-300 dogs, one acre of land is required at a cost to about ₹5 crores and a year in construction time. Then to keep it well supplied every month, ₹500 a dog per day is needed for food, medical and manpower expenses. If Delhi-NCR has 10 lakh dogs in a rough estimate, the municipal authorities would need at least 4,000 acres of land, around ₹17,000 crore as initial funds and a stupendous amount as running cost of shelters. The shift to shelters may also not reduce street dogs. The ethnographic map of NCR is littered with lal dora villages which have never been a subject of any administrative concern for municipal authorities whether its disaster management, encroachment, fire safety or illegal businesses. Since lack of awareness is high in these areas, most dogs picked up from here (if picked up) would be lost or if they remain, they would soon re-fill the empty colonies of adjoining areas from where the dogs have been removed. In all circumstances, even 50% of removal is impossible despite putting the dogs through unnecessary pain and torture. In the end, the question that remains to be answered is whether dogs are a menace. We would recognise that mounds of garbage, potholed roads, city flooding, blocked drains, overflowing sewers, drugs addiction and deathly noise pollution are a menace. We need to take a step back and look at this whole issue with science as our guide. This article is authored by Amita Singh, former professor, Law & Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
West Bengal: 100 ‘tainted' teachers apply for fresh recruitment process, rejected
Applications of 100 teachers, who were marked 'tainted' for the way they got their jobs in state-run schools before those were invalidated by the Supreme Court, were rejected by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) for the fresh recruitment process, an official said on Wednesday. They were among the 25,753 teachers and non-teaching staff whose appointments were terminated on April 3 by the Supreme Court, which termed their selection process conducted in 2016 'vitiated'. A total of 1,803 teachers were marked 'tainted' after it was ascertained how they got their jobs, and these 100 were among them. 'These 100 teachers had applied for the upcoming State Level Selection Test (SLST) 2025 on the WBSSC website. They were not allowed to download their admit cards. This was done in accordance with the Supreme Court order,' the official said. The SLST is slated to be held on September 7 and 14 for 35,726 assistant teacher posts in state-aided secondary and higher secondary schools, he said. About 5.8 lakh provisional admit cards were issued for the exam, he added. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court dismissed the West Bengal government's plea seeking review of its April 3 verdict, which invalidated the appointments of 25,753 teachers and staffers in the state-run and aided schools.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Justice Sudershan Reddy, a man of the masses, says Speaker Appavu
Justifying the DMK's decision to support joint Opposition parties' Vice-Presidential candidate Sudershan Reddy, a 'man of the masses', Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker M. Appavu has slammed the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance for reposing its faith in a 'RSS man', who has done nothing good for Tamil Nadu and the Tamils even though he is from this State. After garlanding the statue of freedom fighter Ondieervan at the memorial in Palayamkottai on Wednesday, Mr. Appavu said, Justice Reddy had passed a judgment that the governments, while taking back the lands assigned to the poor after a period, should ensure the disbursal of all compensation applicable to other patta lands, including compensation for structures if any created on the land. His judgment also paved way for the constitution of Special Investigation Team to retrieve the black money stashed in foreign banks. When Ambani brothers fought over winning the rights for oil and gas exploration in Krishna Godhavari Basin, Justice Sudershan Reddy's judgment stopped their attempt by giving the rights to Oil and Natural Gas Commission, a public sector undertaking. His ruling in 2010 on this issue led to Mukesh Ambani paying a hefty fine a couple of years ago. On the question of supporting Mr. Radhakrishnan, a Tamilian, the Speaker wondered if the BJP leaders from Tamil Nadu, including Union Minister L. Murugan and party's State president Nainar Nagenthiran had done anything good for the State and the Tamils. 'Will Mr. Radhakrishnan, if elected, take any effective step to permanently end the frequent attacks on the Tamil fishermen by the SriLankan navy? What did Mr. Murugan and Mr. Nainar Nagenthiran do to get Tamil Nadu's share of ₹2,151 crore under the Samagra Siksha Abhiyan from the Union Government?,' Mr. Appavu asked. On the Bill introduced in the Parliament on Wednesday by Home Minister Amit Shah empowering the Governors to sack Chief Ministers and the Ministers if they were held on serious charges and kept in custody for 30 days, the Speaker replied that it was nothing but ploy by the BJP government at the Centre to crush political opponents troubling the Union Government.
