Domestic abuse 'epidemic' as one in four adults have been victims
WARNING - DISTRESSING CONTENT: New figures reveal one in four adults have been been victims of domestic abuse from the age of 16
The UK is suffering a domestic abuse 'epidemic' it has been claimed after new figures reveal one in four adults have been victims.
One in four adults in England and Wales are likely to have experienced domestic abuse, according to new research released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The figure is greater for women, at nearly one in three, while for men it is closer to one in five. The estimates taken from the age of 16 are the first to use an improved method for measuring how much domestic abuse there is among the population. A new set of questions has been added to the ONS's Crime Survey for England and Wales.
Questions about health abuse and forced marriage are now included. And they reflect recent changes in the law regarding coercive and controlling behaviour.
Reacting to the new figures, the UK's leading charity for victims of domestic abuse, Refuge, said it is now an 'epidemic' and warns they are just the 'tip of the iceberg'.
Gemma Sherrington, CEO of Refuge, a charity which opened the world's first safe house for women and children in 1971, said: 'We are in an epidemic of violence against women and girls, so sadly, the latest ONS estimates around the prevalence of domestic abuse come as no surprise.
'We welcome improvements to data collection, but these figures are likely to represent the tip of the iceberg as violence against women and girls remains severely under-reported.'
The charity said the Government must take urgent action if it is to achieve its pledge to halve violence against women and girls within the next decade. The new ONS research also includes details on economic abuse, when someone deliberately gets a person into debt or prevents them from getting a job.
The ONS now estimates that in the year to March 2024, 26.1% of adults - around one in four - had experienced domestic abuse since the age of 16, the equivalent of 12.6 million people. Under the old research this was one in five.
The new estimates suggest 30.3% of women and 21.7% of men surveyed in this period had experienced domestic abuse at some point since the age of 16, equivalent to 7.4 million and 5.1 million people respectively.
Meghan Elkin, ONS head of crime statistics, said: 'The way domestic abuse manifests is constantly changing and is difficult to measure. In developing these questions, we have listened to victims and survivors of domestic abuse alongside a range of users from charities to academics and other government departments.
'...The new approach has resulted in a higher prevalence rate as we have introduced questions to ask about types of abuse not previously covered by the crime survey, such as health abuse and forced marriage.'
Health abuse includes anything from depriving a person of food and sleep, to forcing someone to terminate pregnancy. Responding to the findings, Dame Nicole Jacobs, domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, said: 'Developing new ways to further our understanding of this terrible crime so we can put in place measures to tackle it and ensure survivors receive the support they need is absolutely vital.
'I welcome the ongoing focus on domestic abuse by the ONS, as only through knowing the full picture will we be able to rid society of it for good.'
Women's Aid said they were 'pleased' with the new questions which they helped develop which they point out does not rely on police reports.
'Women's Aid has for many years been concerned that the questions in the survey have failed to adequately capture the lived experience of victim-survivors of domestic abuse.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
30-05-2025
- ITV News
Why Gloucestershire Police will no longer be using terms like 'revenge porn'
Police in Gloucestershire say they're no longer using terms like 'revenge porn' and 'groping', in an effort to reduce victim blaming and misogyny. The force said it hopes to improve how male violence towards women and girls is communicated to the public. It's hoped the new Words Matter reporting guidelines will place responsibility on perpetrators and improve accuracy by naming the crime that has been committed. ' A problem of epidemic proportions' According to ONS statistics: One in four women has been raped or sexually assaulted since the age of 16 Six in seven rapes against women are carried out by someone they know 71,227 rapes were recorded by police in England and Wales in 2024 Charges had been brought in just 2.7% of these cases by the end of the year In 2021, Ofsted found that 9 in 10 girls and young women in schools say sexist name-calling and being sent unwanted images of a sexual nature happens to them or other girls their age. Police and Crime Commissioner for Gloucestershire Chris Nelson said: "When it comes to crimes like domestic abuse, sexual assaults and many others, it is a statistical fact that men are the main perpetrators and women the main victims. "Anyone can be abused, but the misogynistic abuse women and girls face every day has become normalised in our society. It is a problem of epidemic proportions." What changes can you expect to see? Gloucestershire Police's Violence Against Women and Girls lead, Detective Chief Superintendent Kerry Patterson, said that the new guidelines will initiate "subtle but powerful changes in the right direction". They include advice on using active language which makes it clear that the perpetrator is responsible for their actions. She explained: "Stating that a man raped a woman, rather than a woman was raped by a man, clearly puts the responsibility on the perpetrator, and goes towards ending victim blaming language in our communication with both the public and press." PCC Chris Nelson added: "Women are not 'groped' in clubs, men are sexually assaulting them. Women are not 'playing hard to get', men are raping them." The guidelines instruct to avoid euphemisms which can downplay the severity of the crime. For example, using the term "revenge porn" to describe image-based abuse implies the person affected acted in ways that necessitate revenge. Similarly, describing the rape or sexual abuse of a child with phrases like "man had sex with a 14-year-old" implies the child was able to consent. What difference will this make? Work on the Words Matter guidelines began in August 2022, and the founder of the Hollie Gazzard Trust, Nick Gazzard, was on the initial panel to advise on the project. The trust was created after 20-year-old Hollie Gazzard was murdered by an ex-partner in 2014. A spokesperson from the trust explained that "plain and clear language" was essential in showing that decisions to commit crimes against women and girls are made by the perpetrators alone. They said: "It's about recognising that the harm that can be done to a victim or surviver or their family is immense if you're not being as factual as possible." They added: "Hopefully, the media will take the lead from the way the police communication team deliver that information. "Some of these worrying attitudes that the police are referring to are really hard to change but you have to start somewhere." Temporary Chief Constable Maggie Blyth, of Gloucestershire Police and the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for Violence Against Women and Girls, said: "If the use of inappropriate language around women and girls continues, then there will not only be a decrease in trust and confidence, but more worryingly a further rise to the already increasing culture of misogyny being learnt across fast-moving platforms, especially among younger people. "And if this is allowed to continue these views and opinions may manifest into more serious threats." Co-founder and Managing Director of This Ends Now, Sydney-Anne McAllister said: "With a focus on women's safety rather than holding perpetrators to account, male violence against women and girls is generally reported on in a victim blaming and misogynistic way. "More often than not, reports also downplay the seriousness of crimes and fail to acknowledge that male violence against women and girls is a systemic issue. "We believe that when would-be perpetrators know their actions will no longer be excused through language and power structures, they will stop abusing women and girls. By changing how these crimes are communicated, we can hold perpetrators to account. The Words Matter guidelines are believed to be the first of their kind in UK police communications. You can contact their Wiltshire support line on 01225 775276 or their Devon support centre on 0345 155 1074. Other resources available include:
Metro
25-05-2025
- Metro
I've been prevented from divorcing my abusive estranged husband for 20 years
The day I filed for divorce from my husband Paul* was a momentous occasion. After over a year of mounting physical and emotional abuse, threats, and even moving countries to be rid of him, my solicitor told me there should be no reason for it not to go through. 'We can do it on grounds of adultery,' they said. And I left practically giddy with excitement. However, that was nearly 20 years ago and yet, in the eyes of the law, we're still married. Frankly I'm at a loss for what to do – I just want to be rid of him. My path first crossed with Paul's* in 2005 after we matched on a popular dating site. Online dating was practically a novelty then, no one knew the dangers in the way we do now, so I – being someone that lived in a tiny village where the opportunities for romance were few and far between – figured there was no harm in signing up. I found Paul incredibly charming but I never expected anything to come of our internet dalliance. He was in the army – deployed to a war zone at the time but lived in Germany – and I was a single mum to three kids living in the UK. So when, after a few weeks of talking, communication between us fizzled I thought nothing of it. That is until around 18 months later when he called me out of the blue. He claimed it was a wrong number, but then proceeded to remind me who he was and ask me on a date as he happened to be in the country. The date itself was relaxed, just a few drinks at the local pub, and we got on incredibly well. He gave me the sense that he was going to look after me and that was something I loved the idea of. Over the next three months things escalated quickly. Despite only seeing each other a couple more times in person there were confessions of love and being together forever and even talks of marriage. I truly believed that we were destined for one another and was ready to race up the aisle. My family, on the other hand, were not so convinced and urged me not to go through with the wedding. One in 4 women will experience domestic abuse at some point in their lives ONS research revealed that, in 2023, the police recorded a domestic abuse offence approximately every 40 seconds Yet Crime Survey for England & Wales data for the year ending March 2023 found only 18.9% of women who experienced partner abuse in the last 12 months reported the abuse to the police According to Refuge, 84% of victims in domestic abuse cases are female, with 93% of defendants being male Safe Lives reports that disabled women are twice as likely to experience domestic abuse as non-disabled women, and typically experience domestic abuse for a longer period of time before accessing support Refuge has also found that, on average, it takes seven attempts before a woman is able to leave for good. Of course, I didn't listen and at our wedding, only six of my friends and my three children attended. Even my best friend, who sat in the front row, sobbed throughout the ceremony because she was so desperately worried about me. I was determined we would prove them all wrong though. That we'd have a happy, lasting marriage for many years to come. But from that moment on, things changed. On the wedding night itself, Paul shoved and spat on me for, unknowingly and accidentally, burning his favourite T-shirt with a dropped cigarette. It was the first time I'd seen this side of him and I simply froze in shock. This man, who I'd vehemently defended to everyone saying he was a good guy, a protector, and someone I could trust, was now proving he was in fact not that guy. Of course there were times when I'd think about leaving I wanted to call my friends and family, but I couldn't face the echoes of 'we told you so' from everyone I knew. Two weeks later the kids and I moved to Germany with him and strict rules were imposed. Paul dictated how much contact the kids could have with their dads and how much I could reach out to my family. He also told me who I could and couldn't be friends with and where in town I was allowed to go and gave me a list of places to avoid. Looking back now I can see it was all part of his ploy to control every aspect of me and my life, but at the time, I told myself it was just because he cared. It was, however, harder to use that excuse when he'd get drunk and, inevitably, violent. On those occasions he'd not only tell me how I was worthless and how nobody would want me, he'd spit on me, grab me by the throat and pin me up against the living room wall. Sometimes he'd even hold a knife to my throat and tell me how he was going to kill me. Afterwards, he'd typically lock himself away in the bedroom or disappear for days. Luckily, as he was so often away, this behaviour and his sudden absence for days on end never struck the children as odd. Instead, for us, life would carry on as normal. When he'd reappear he'd either guilt me into an apology or say how much he couldn't bear to be without me. I didn't necessarily believe him, but I just wanted peace, stability. Of course there were times when I'd think about leaving – by now, I'd owned up to myself that marrying him had been my biggest mistake – but I couldn't quite bring myself to do it. He cleared out our joint bank account to leave me with nothing, yet told people I was the one who'd taken his money Paul might have been dreadful to me but he was nothing but wonderful to the children. He doted on them, took them on day trips and was always on best behaviour when they were around. Besides, I'd already dragged them to Germany, and the last thing I wanted to do was drag them anywhere else. Eventually though, that's exactly what I had to do. Just over a year into our marriage I discovered he had a secret phone and on it were the numbers and texts from multiple women, one of whom had just discovered she was pregnant. At that moment my world collapsed. Sure, things had been far from perfect, but I'd always thought the love between us, at least at one point, had been real. For the next few weeks there was a lot of shouting and crying as I confronted him about his various affairs. We then became very cold, distant to each other and our interactions were purely practical. We called the relationship quits soon after but things only got worse from there. He cleared out our joint bank account to leave me with nothing, yet told people I was the one who'd taken his money. He sold my car without me knowing, which meant I was forced to use what little funds I had to buy it back. And I presume he was behind the calls I'd get from women who'd say how 'fat and ugly' I was and how wonderful he was. Eventually, the whole thing became so exhausting that I just knew I had to get out: out of the house we'd once shared and, for my own safety, the country. By this point the threats – that no matter where I went, he'd find me and kill me – were becoming pretty constant, so I knew home wasn't an option. I had to think of somewhere else, somewhere we could disappear and be safe. I hate that Paul still has control over my life With some help from a neighbour and a lot of secrecy, I planned for our move to Northern Ireland. I changed my number, email address and did everything I could to help the kids and I have a fresh start. But sadly, he somehow got ahold of my address and the threats continued to come by post. I just hoped that, once his new baby arrived, it'd all just stop. That he'd either get bored or have less time to harass me and that we could get a divorce and go our separate ways for good. Despite my best efforts though, that didn't and, still hasn't, happened. The first solicitor I went to in 2009 seemed confident that my case was a cut and dried one. However, as Paul was still living on the army base at that time, it became difficult to prove that we had served the papers (an essential step for being granted a divorce in Northern Ireland) as it was signed for by whoever was in the post room on that day. In short, I was stuck. A few years later I tried to go through the process again – shelling out a further £310 – in hopes that, this time, he might respond. Sure enough, he claimed to have received nothing again. The only other option I had was to wait for him to leave the army so that I could file to his new address directly. But the moment he did in 2021, everything stopped. There were no more threatening phone calls or letters and while I was grateful for that, it also meant I had no idea where he lived and so couldn't file against him. I was stuck, again. Had I lived in England this divorce would have been over and done with more than 10 years ago as all I would have had to do was prove I'd tried to serve the papers. If you are experiencing domestic abuse, you are not alone. And whether you are currently coping with or have made the decision to leave, you do have options. If you are thinking about leaving, domestic abuse charity Refuge suggests starting a record of abusive incidents, which might include saving pictures or messages, or making notes of times, dates and details of incidents. The next step is to make copies of important documents such as court orders, marriage certificates, National Insurance Numbers and your driving licence. In the meantime, identify the safer areas of your home so that you know where to go if your abuser becomes aggravated. Ideally, this should be a room with a phone and a door or window to the outside. If you feel ready to leave, start by making a plan for a safe, reliable route out. If you feel safe to do so, pack an emergency bag so that you leave in a hurry if needed. You can access a local refuge, either with or without children, for as long as you need to stay. The address is confidential. The National Domestic Abuse Helpline (0808 2000 247) is open 24-hours a day and has all the details of refuges in your area. In an emergency situation, ring 999 and ask for the police. If you aren't able to talk, try the Silent Solution: after dialling 999, listen to the questions from the operator and respond by coughing or tapping your device, if possible. If prompted, press 55 to let the operator know it's an emergency – you'll be put through to the police. Read more here. Instead, Paul and I remain married even though we've not seen one another for almost 17 years. It's not like I can just go back home to get this over with either – I'm still terrified that if I did, he'd find me and make good on all those threats. I hate that Paul still has control over my life. I hate that, because he won't give me a divorce, I wasn't able to marry my partner, Chris*, before he died from terminal cancer last month. And I hate that there is nothing in law that prevents him from doing this. More Trending Something has to change. The law has to do better to support survivors. Because even though I escaped the relationship, in many ways, I'm still trapped. *Names have been changed As told to Emma Rossiter Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: My cousin sent a text that devastated me – I wish he'd called MORE: I've embraced free bleeding when I'm on my period MORE: How a herd of zebras helped me deal with child sex abuse
Powys County Times
22-05-2025
- Powys County Times
Fraud victims let down by outdated 1960s policing structure, report finds
Victims of fraud are being let down as UK policing tries to battle '21st century cyber-enabled cross-border crime' in a localised system set up in the 1960s, a report has found. Think tank the Police Foundation has called for a major overhaul of how law enforcement deals with fraud, which makes up around 40% of total crime in Britain. In the year to December 2024, there were an estimated 4.1 million incidents of fraud, up a third on the previous year, according to the annual Crime Survey for England and Wales. The Police Foundation report, published on Thursday, made a series of recommendations including setting up a UK Crime Prevention Agency and a national policing body to deal with fraud. The issue should be dealt with at a UK level alongside terrorism and serious and organised crime including economic and cyber offences, it said. It also called upon regional mayors and police and crime commissioners to take a so-called public health approach to fraud, raising awareness about how to avoid being scammed. The report concluded: 'Fraud has become the single biggest form of crime affecting people in the UK and yet our policing institutions have not caught up with the scale of that change. 'We have a 1960s local policing structure trying to fight a 21st century cyber-enabled cross-border crime. 'As a result the police are achieving limited success and victims are receiving too little by way of service.' While the report found that a lot of prevention work needs to be done outside policing, it also called for reform of how the police deal with fraud by 2030. Michael Skidmore, head of serious crime research at the Police Foundation, said: 'Fraud is a high-volume, harmful crime, often perpetrated online by sophisticated networks that operate across police force and international borders. 'In comparison, our policing response is under-resourced, under-skilled and locked into a reactive, geographically bounded policing model developed to tackle the local crime problems of the 1960s. 'We are calling for a wholesale shift to a prevention-focused response. 'We need a new national lead body with a ringfenced budget and local and regional tasking powers, greater private sector collaboration and an uplift in skills. 'The current model is simply unsustainable, given the scale, harm and sophistication of the fraud challenge we face today.' The Crime Survey for England and Wales estimates that around 14% of fraud is reported to police or the centralised Action Fraud service. A total of 1,214,639 fraud reports were made to police in the year to March 2024, of which 3,641 ended with someone being charged with a crime. Research by report sponsor Virgin Media O2 using freedom of information requests suggested that only 6% of reports to Action Fraud were passed to police forces for investigation in 2023/24. Three of the forces in England and Wales had no officers dedicated to investigating fraud, the telecoms giant found. The report also said that in March 2021 there were 866 economic crime officers in English and Welsh police forces, equal to 0.64% of the total workforce when fraud is 40% of crime. Murray Mackenzie, director of fraud prevention at Virgin Media O2, said the company had blocked fraudulent transactions worth more than £250 million in one year. He added: 'With overall fraud prosecutions falling despite a 33% jump in cases last year, the UK is failing to effectively tackle fraud, and criminals are stealing with no real prospect of ever facing justice.' The report said that of 252 police officers and staff surveyed by YouGov between March 31 and April 4, 88% disagreed that police have enough resources to tackle fraud. When the author asked one unnamed senior officer what the National Fraud Squad is, a scheme set up by the previous government, they laughed, the report said. A series of recommendations in the report also includes a call for the private sector to be pushed to share data that could prevent fraud with the police. Deputy Commissioner Nik Adams, national co-ordinator for economic and cyber crime for the City of London Police, said: 'The response to fraud has been improving. 'It is not about a badly designed system; it is about sustainably resourcing and strengthening the response to keep pace with this constantly evolving threat. 'To accelerate further fraud reductions, the wider system, especially the tech sector, need to make online platforms much more hostile to criminals.' He said that City of London Police is 'leading a national economic crime strategy to increase fraud investigators and the use of financial investigation to seize assets, including crypto currency, from criminals using specialist investigation and policing powers.'
