NGT seeks Tamil Nadu government's report on plastic nurdle spill from sunken ship as debris reaches Dhanushkodi
The Southern Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has directed the Tamil Nadu government to file a report on the clean-up operation done after plastic nurdles from a cargo ship that sunk off the Kochi coast reached as far as Dhanushkodi.
The NGT Principal Bench has already taken cognizance of the matter that involves the Liberia-flagged vessel MSC Elsa 3, which sank roughly 38 nautical miles southwest of Kochi.
The ship was carrying more than 600 containers, including cargo filled with tiny plastic pellets known as nurdles. It was also carrying hazardous materials, such as calcium carbide and oil, which could affect the marine and coastal environment and the biodiversity and water quality of the area.
On Tuesday, the Bench, comprising Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana and expert member Satyagopal Korlapati, questioned State counsel about the steps taken in response. 'The nurdles have floated till Dhanushkodi. What actions have been taken so far,' Justice Sathyanarayana asked.
The Bench also took note of the June 9 internal container explosion on a Singapore-flagged cargo ship going from Colombo to Mumbai. The Bench expressed concern over the possibility of oil leakage and debris dispersal.
The State government has been directed to file a detailed response outlining the immediate measures taken to manage the nurdle spill and prevent further ecological damage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Preventive detention must not act as a substitute for criminal prosecution or bail: SC judgment
The Supreme Court has held that the extraordinary measure of preventive detention must not be used as a substitute for criminal prosecution or to bypass orders of bail. A Vacation Bench headed by Justice Sanjay Karol observed that preventive detention 'should not be resorted to when ordinary criminal law provides sufficient means to address the apprehensions leading to the detention order'. The Bench referred to judicial precedents from the apex court which had held that the law of preventive detention should not be used 'merely to clip the wings of an accused who is involved in a criminal prosecution'. Great care must be taken before detaining a person who is out on bail, it added. 'When a person is enlarged on bail by a competent criminal court, great caution should be exercised in scrutinising the validity of an order of preventive detention which is based on the very same charge which is to be tried by the criminal court,' the judgment said. The judgment came in an appeal against a September 2024 order of the Kerala High Court, which had upheld a Palakkad District Magistrate's direction to detain a man under the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. His wife had appealed to the Supreme Court after the High Court refused to intervene in favour of the man, who was described as a 'notorious goonda of the district' and a moneylender. 'The provision for preventive detention is an extraordinary power in the hands of the State that must be used sparingly. It curtails the liberty of an individual in anticipation of the commission of further offence(s), and therefore, must not be used in the ordinary course of nature,' Justice Karol, who authored the verdict, observed. Preventive detention is recognised in the Constitution under Article 22(3)(b). 'The power of preventive detention is an exception to Article 21 and, therefore, must be applied as such, as an exception to the main rule and only in rare cases,' Justice Karol cautioned. Allowing the wife's appeal to quash the preventive detention order, the Supreme Court said the detention order in question did not ascribe any reason as to how the actions of the detenu were against the public order of the State. 'Given the extraordinary nature of the power of preventive detention, no reasons are assigned by the detaining authority as to why and how the actions of the detenu warrant the exercise of such an exceptional power,' the apex court explained.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Cargo ship fire: coastal vigil continues amid salvage operations
The Coastal police and the Marine Enforcement Squad are continuing heightened vigil and patrolling off the Malabar coast, as the search and recovery operations for the hazardous containers that fell into the sea from MV Wan Hai 503 — the Singapore-flagged vessel that caught fire nearly 88 nautical miles off Kerala's Beypore coast on June 9 — are yet to be completed. District Collector Snehil Kumar Singh, who also serves as the Chairman of the District Disaster Management Authority, has urged coastal residents to remain alert for hazardous containers and to immediately report any suspicious wreckage or objects by dialling the helpline 112. He advised maintaining a distance of at least 200 metres from such objects if spotted. Members of the Coastal police and Marine Enforcement Squad said heightened patrols would continue until the ongoing salvage operations for the cargo ship were completed. They added that the Fisheries department had already secured the cooperation of fishermen and allied workers in coastal areas to support the surveillance efforts. The Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute and the Kerala State Pollution Control Board recently collected marine water samples from various coastal locations for further analysis. Fisheries department sources said the results would be available soon providing a clearer picture of the accident's impact on marine resources. The Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA) sources said the situation remained sensitive to weather and operational factors, even though the vessel was structurally afloat following improved fire containment measures. They also noted that forecasts issued by the India Meteorological department indicated strong westerlies, heavy rainfall, and rough sea conditions over Kerala, Mahe, and Lakshadweep between Saturday (June 14, 2025) and Monday (June 16, 2025), with wind speeds reaching up to 50–60 kmph. The vessel, carrying 1,754 containers, departed from Colombo to Mumbai on June 7. Of these, 143 were reportedly loaded with potentially hazardous chemicals. Preliminary reports confirmed that 24 containers fell into the sea within hours of the massive fire breaking out. While rescue teams managed to save 18 crew members, four remain missing. KSDMA sources said the search for them is ongoing with the support of various rescue agencies.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court issues notice to Karnataka seeking response on ‘Thug Life' ban
NEW DELHI The Supreme Court on Friday sought the State of Karnataka to respond to a petition seeking to ensure the safe and unimpeded screening of Kamal Haasan's Tamil movie Thug Life in the State. A Vacation Bench headed by Justice PK Mishra was also asked by petitioner, M. Mahesh Reddy, represented by advocate Athenam Velan, to take action against elements who have issued threats and incited violence against theatres and the makers of the film. Issuing notice to the States, the court scheduled the case on Tuesday. The Bench recorded Mr. Velan's submission that a duly CBFC-certified Tamil feature film was not allowed to be screened in theatres in Karnataka. 'The so-called ban under threat of violence stems not from any lawful process but from a deliberate campaign of terror, including explicit threat of arson against cinema halls, incitement of large-scale violence targeting linguistic minorities,' Mr. Velan argued. Earlier this week, the petitioner, a Bengaluru resident, had sought urgent listing, saying 'fringe elements' were threatening arson against theatres which screen the film. Mr. Velan had said the move to appeal the apex court was necessitated by the fact that the Karnataka High Court had 'distressingly appeared to prioritise appeasement' in proceedings seeking the judicial protection of the fundamental right to free speech and expression. 'Instead of a clear directive to the State to stop the illegal threats and protect a certified film's exhibition – fundamental to restoring law and order – the discussion reportedly focused on whether Mr. Kamal Haasan should apologise to the very fringe elements intimidating him and threatening public order. This effective endorsement of coercive censorship by suggesting compromise with perpetrators makes the High Court pathway currently ineffective for securing justice, compelling this urgent appeal in the Supreme Court as the ultimate guardian of the Constitution,' the petition had submitted. The petition has questioned the Karnataka government's 'flagrant failure' to maintain law and order in the State and protect constitutional freedoms. It said the 'unconstitutional extra-judicial ban' in Karnataka stems not from any lawful process but from a deliberate campaign of terror and a chilling call for a repeat of past anti-Tamil riots. 'This serious situation occurs within a disturbing societal context where chauvinistic elements have targeted linguistic minorities such as Hindi speakers in Bengaluru with impunity, fostering a climate of fear that now directly threatens constitutional order over this film…,' the petition has highlighted.
