'Kuki-Zo Council Not Legitimate, Can't Operate In Our Areas': Zomi Council
A Zomi tribes' organisation in Manipur's Churachandpur has told the recently formed Kuki-Zo Council (KZC) not to operate in areas where the Zomi tribes are in majority.
The Zomi Council (ZC) on Tuesday said it does not recognise the legitimacy of the term "Kuki-Zo".
"It has learnt that certain authorities in the central government have invited a particular civil society organisation from the Manipur hills to surreptitiously discuss the issue of reopening national highways for free access," the Zomi Council said in the statement.
"Any discussion in this regard must involve the participation of the Zomi Council and its affiliated bodies, without which any arrangement would be considered obsolete and untenable," the influential body of the Zomi tribes said.
The Zomi Council said it had already in May 2024 rejected the use of the words "Kuki-Zo" as a legitimate identity. The new grouping "Kuki-Zo" started appearing in the press after the Manipur violence broke out in May 2023.
The Zomi Council said "any organisation bearing the name Kuki-Zo Council stands rejected and is unwelcome in all Zomi-inhabited areas, particularly within Churachandpur district and Lamka township."
It told the KZC to set up its office only in areas where they are accepted.
The Zomi Council will always stand with its nine constituent tribes and shall continue to work tirelessly to safeguard their security, dignity and well-being, the Zomi tribes' organisation said.
In August 2024, three MLAs from among the 10 who had been demanding a separate administration carved out of Manipur had clarified they want their own tribes to be called by their correct names, instead of being associated only with the term "Kuki-Zo".
The three MLAs said the term "Kuki-Zo" was not adequate to refer to their own tribes. The three MLAs from the Hmar, Paite, and Vaiphei tribes were LM Khaute, Ngursanglur Sanate, and Vungzagin Valte.
"... I would like to reaffirm that the most suitable and inclusive term to describe our community in the media, social media and so on is 'Kuki-Zomi-Hmar... I cannot accept anything that excludes 'Zomi' and any other term that describes our identity in such press statements," Mr Khaute said in a statement.
Mr Sanate said he will not endorse any platform, organisation or statement that excludes the term "Hmar" tribe.
The third MLA, Mr Valte, in a strongly worded statement said it has become "pivotal" for him to declare that he is from the Paite tribe belonging to the Zomi community, that Zomi is an accepted nomenclature as it reflects the "true historical, culture, and social identity of our people."
The three MLAs' statements came days after a section of the Thadou tribes represented by the Manipur-based Thadou Students' Association (TSA) formed a global platform to look into critical issues facing the community, particularly in Manipur.
The TSA has said Thadou is a distinct tribe and people with their own distinct identity, language and culture.
"... At some point other people may have called Thadous with different names... that does not change the fact that we are Thadou and we should be called Thadou respectfully," the TSA said in a statement in August 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
8 hours ago
- The Wire
‘Manipur Violence Was Not Spontaneous, But Planned and Ethnically Targeted': PUCL Report
New Delhi: The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) on August 20 released the Independent People's Tribunal on the Ongoing Ethnic Conflict in Manipur at the Press Club of India, New Delhi. The 694-page report, authored under the chairmanship of former Supreme Court judge Justice Kurian Joseph, delivers the conclusion: 'The violence which erupted on May 3, 2023, was not spontaneous but planned, ethnically targeted, and facilitated by state failures.' Wide representation The Tribunal was set up by PUCL in 2024 with a jury of eminent figures chosen deliberately from outside Manipur to ensure neutrality. Alongside Justice Kurian Joseph, the jury included Justice K. Kannan, Justice Anjana Prakash, former bureaucrats M.G. Devasahayam and Swaraj Bir Singh, academics such as Uma Chakravarti and Virginius Xaxa, human rights defenders like Manjula Pradeep and Henri Tiphagne, and journalist-author Aakar Patel. Over 150 survivors gave oral testimony, while thousands more submitted accounts in writing or through group discussions. 'The voices we heard,' the jury wrote, 'paint a picture of systemic impunity and targeted brutality.' The report records that more than 60,000 internally displaced people 'remain in camps with no end in sight, even after 27 months of violence.' Fault lines and flashpoints The report identified long-standing ethnic divisions, socio-political marginalisation, and land disputes as the soil in which the violence was sown. These were aggravated by 'systematic hate campaigns and political rhetoric' that amplified mistrust between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities. A major trigger was the March 27, 2023 order of the Manipur high court recommending Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for the Meiteis. The directive sparked fears among tribal groups – particularly Kukis and Nagas - that their constitutional protections would be eroded, the report said. 'The judgment acted as a catalyst,' the report noted, 'setting off state-wide protests on May 3, which quickly descended into targeted violence.' The report also dismantled two dominant narratives: that Kukis were 'illegal immigrants' from Myanmar, and that they were driving poppy cultivation. 'Both claims were found to be exaggerated and politically weaponised,' the report said, 'serving to demonise the community.' Brutality and complicity Survivor testimonies provided some of the report's most searing insights, "We saw killings, mutilations, disrobing of women, and sexual violence on a large scale". Women testified that police often failed to help them, and in some instances, 'handed them over to mobs.' Hate propaganda played a central role. 'Social media was flooded with incendiary content, while partisan print media coverage deepened divisions,' the report stated. One survivor told the jury: 'We knew the violence was coming; the government did nothing to stop it.' The collapse of relief measures worsened suffering. Camps lacked basic sanitation, food, and medical facilities. Hospitals were attacked, staff fled, and patients were denied treatment on communal lines. The report noted 'serious mental health consequences – trauma, PTSD, and depression – with no institutional interventions in place.' Collapse of constitutional mechanisms The report's findings on law and order were particularly severe – 'FIRs were selectively filed, investigations delayed, and security forces accused of active complicity.' It criticised the state government for failing to create impartial Special Investigation Teams. Even interventions by the Supreme Court were described as inadequate. 'The Gita Mittal Committee and limited CBI probes were narrow in scope, poorly resourced, and lacked follow-up,' the report observed. Both state and central governments were indicted for 'enabling impunity and worsening ethnic divides.' Recommendations for justice and peace The report further outlined a comprehensive roadmap to restore accountability and rebuild trust in Manipur. It called for a permanent bench of the high court in the hill districts to ensure equal access to justice and the creation of an independent Special Investigation Team to probe thousands of pending cases, including those involving security forces. It urged strict prosecution of hate speech and propaganda that fuelled the violence, while also advocating a restorative justice framework with reparations, acknowledgment of harm, and survivor reintegration. Strengthened relief measures and sustained community dialogue were stressed as essential to healing deep ethnic divides. 'The people of Manipur deserve more than piecemeal measures,' the report declared. 'Without a systemic response, peace cannot return.' Justice Kurian Joseph told The Wire: 'Justice and accountability are non-negotiable if democracy and peace are to return to the state.' A warning for the future Two years since Manipur was engulfed in violence, the report's findings remain bleak. Survivors have consistently testified that 'the state either allowed the violence to happen or actively enabled it.' The report ends with a stark warning: 'if accountability is not enforced and impunity allowed to persist, Manipur could become a dangerous precedent; a template for future instances of state complicity in ethnic violence.' This article went live on August twenty-first, two thousand twenty five, at fifty minutes past three in the afternoon.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Manipur violence was not spontaneous, but planned, ethnically targeted and facilitated by state failures: report
Apart from historical factors such as ethnic divisions, socio-political marginalisation and land disputes, what led to escalation of feelings of mistrust and enmity between the warring Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities were the systematic hate campaign played out through digital media and statements made by the political leadership in the prelude to the conflict, said Independent People's Tribunal's report on the ongoing ethnic conflict in Manipur, which was released in Delhi on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). The report also highlighted that the violence was not spontaneous, but planned, ethnically targeted and facilitated by state failures. The tribunal, constituted by the People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) in 2024, was chaired by Kurian Joseph, former judge, Supreme Court, also had members who were former High Court judges, ex-IAS officers, ex-IPS officers, advocates, authors, professors, journalists, human rights activists, among others. In its 694-page report, the jury stressed that more than 60,000 internally displaced people still remain in camps in Manipur with no end in sight. High Court directive The tribunal said the Manipur High Court's March 27, 2023 directive, recommending Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for Meiteis served as a vital trigger, as it was perceived by the tribal groups, including the Kuki-Zo groups and the Nagas, as a threat to their constitutional protections. This in turn sparked protests across all tribal districts, leading to a major protest programme on May 3, 2023 in all the hill districts. While by and large the protests ended peacefully, violence erupted in a few places, which soon engulfed the whole State. Another contending narrative was the involvement of Kukis in poppy cultivation, in line with the then Chief Minister Biren Singh's 'war on drugs', which translated into popular propaganda against Kukis, the report stated. After meeting people from all walks of life, including the survivors and victims in different districts of Manipur, including Bishnupur, Churachandpur, Imphal East, Imphal West, Kakching, Kangpokpi, Senapati followed by sittings in Delhi, the tribunal recorded the testimonies of the survivors, which, it says present a stark picture of the failure of the state authorities and institutions to protect them, leaving them to fend for themselves. The tribunal also notes the failure of the Central government to fulfil its constitutional responsibility to ensure that Manipur remained under the regime of both rule of law and the Constitution. The overwhelming evidence placed before the tribunal lays bare the gruesome and systemic nature of the violence, the role of the radical groups, the failure of state institutions and the immense humanitarian fallout that followed, it said. The report also attributed a significant role to the media in the conflict, which actively shaped public perception and escalated tensions. While the print media was partisan and lacked investigative rigour, digital channels and social media were used to spread unverified and inflammatory content. From poor arrangements in camps to dismal healthcare, the tribunal's report painted a poor picture of relief and rehabilitation in violence-hit Manipur. The tribunal suggested that India's judiciary, Parliament and civil society must come forward to reclaim their duty and ensure that Manipur does not become a template for future impunity. It also demanded a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the conflict and emphasised that lasting peace in Manipur requires structural changes, community dialogue, legal accountability and sustained moral leadership.
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Assam job panel to drop controversial question on Manipur crisis
GUWAHATI The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) has decided to 'drop/delete/cancel' a Manipur-related controversial question in an examination conducted on August 8 to recruit agricultural development officers. In a letter to APSC Chairperson Debaraj Upadhaya on August 17, the Meitei Heritage Society (MHS) stated that question no 95 in the exam paper was malicious, disturbing, and misleading. The question was on the conflict between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities and the role of Arambai Tenggol and Meitei Leepun, two radical groups. 'Such a one-sided portrayal is unbecoming of a Public Service Commission, whose mandate is to recruit public servants committed to fairness, impartiality, and service to the nation without prejudice,' the MHS said. The MHS expressed serious concern for 'selectively targeting one community while ignoring publicly available data on the role of Chin-Kuki militants and their civil society organisations'. It cited reports by the National Investigation Agency, Central Bureau of Investigation, and a Supreme Court-appointed committee to make a point. 'Such misrepresentation not only tarnishes the image of a community but also undermines the credibility of the Commission,' the Meitei group said, requesting the APSC to issue a clarification acknowledging the biased nature of the question and declare the objectionable question null and void, ensuring it is not used for evaluation purposes. 'After considering our representation, the APSC informed us today (Tuesday) that it has decided to drop/delete/cancel question number 95,' an MHS spokesperson said.
