Hundreds march through central London to express solidarity with Palestine
Hundreds of demonstrators have marched through central London to mark Al Quds Day, a global event held each year to express solidarity with Palestine.
Protesters gathered at Marble Arch on Sunday afternoon before marching down Oxford Street towards Portland Place, where a static rally was held near the BBC's Broadcasting House.
Flags and banners were held in the air during the march and chants were heard.
A number of people spoke to the crowd at Marble Arch.
A group of Orthodox Jews also joined the protest, many holding banners, and an Israel flag was burned.
Hadia Saad, 55, said that in the 1980s she would come to march against apartheid, adding: 'This to me is the same thing.'
She said: 'For me it's very important to be seen to be speaking out for the Palestinian people as it seems that our Government doesn't.
'I've written to my MP, I've written to councillors and they come back with the same thing, 'Israel has the right to defend itself' – defend itself from people who are homeless and starving.'
Luba Majed, 42, said: 'I think it's inhumane what they're doing, even if you take all the politics aside.
'I wouldn't want any country or any race or any nationality be eliminated.'
Meanwhile, dozens of people joined a counter-protest, organised by pro-Israeli group Stop The Hate, which took place at the same time at Oxford Circus.
The counter-protesters waved flags and banners, and chanted.
Scores of police officers separated the two groups at Oxford Circus.
Conditions were imposed on both protests to minimise public disruption, the Metropolitan Police said.
The pro-Palestine rally has been criticised in the past after participants flew flags of the Lebanese militant Hezbollah group and brandished signs with allegedly antisemitic messages.
Last year during the annual Al Quds Day demonstration, 10 people were arrested, the Metropolitan Police said at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sadiq Khan urges Rachel Reeves to give more cash to London in spending review
Sir Sadiq Khan has urged Rachel Reeves to give London more funding in this week's spending review, suggesting she is not willing to give the capital any money for transport projects. The London mayor has fought for support for several transport requests, as well as the power to introduce a tourist levy. He has also called for a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. But sources close to Sir Sadiq now say it would be 'unacceptable' if London is not given the required money to carry out the projects. In a rare attack on the Labour government, they warned the chancellor now to return to the 'anti-London agenda' pursued by Conservative governments. A City Hall source told The Independent: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.' The source said a 'return to the damaging anti-London approach of the last government would harm London's vital public services and jobs and growth across the country'. They added that the way to support the rest of the UK is not to level down London, adding that 'when London does well, the whole country does well'. Concerns in City Hall are centred on the fear London will not receive any of the £113 billion in infrastructure spending unlocked by the chancellor 's changes to her fiscal rules. The mayor's main priorities ahead of the spending review included the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) being extended to Thamesmead and the extension of the Bakerloo underground line. Ms Reeves has openly discussed prioritising spending outside of London and the south east in her spending review, altering the Treasury's investment rulebook to free up cash for the North and Midlands. The chancellor has already unveiled more than £15 billion of spending pledges for mayoral authorities in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit systems in West Yorkshire. And she has said Britain 'cannot rely on a handful of places forging ahead of the rest of the country'. The investment drive comes after Ms Reeves promised to review the government's Green Book, which is used to judge the costs and benefits of projects, to 'provide objective, transparent advice on public investment across the country, including outside London and the south east'. The Treasury was asked to comment. The row between City Hall and Ms Reeves comes as every Whitehall department has signed off on the spending review plans bar the Home Office, which is locked in last-minute negotiations over its budget. While the chancellor is expected to announce above-inflation increases in the policing budget when she sets out her spending plans for the next three years on Wednesday, she is also set to push through a squeeze on other areas of the Home Office's budget. Downing Street has now become involved in the talks as they come down to the wire. Last week, Ms Reeves acknowledged she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner, with the NHS expected to receive a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Meanwhile, day-to-day funding for schools is expected to increase by £4.5 billion by 2028-9 compared with the 2025-6 core budget, which was published in the spring statement. Elsewhere, the Government has committed to spend 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3 per cent over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Six dead after ‘Israeli forces and allies fired at crowd near Gaza aid site'
Palestinians say Israeli forces and allied local gunmen fired toward a crowd heading to an Israeli and US supported food distribution centre in the Gaza Strip. Gaza's Health Ministry said six people were killed in the reported attack early on Monday. The gunmen appeared to be allied with the Israeli military, operating in close proximity to troops and retreating into an Israeli military zone in the southern city of Rafah after the crowd hurled stones at them, witnesses said. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Israel recently acknowledged supporting local armed groups opposed to Hamas. – The latest in a string of shootings It was the latest in a number of shootings that have killed at least 127 people and wounded hundreds since the rollout of a new food distribution system, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Israel and the US say the new system is designed to circumvent Hamas, but it has been rejected by the UN and major aid groups. Experts have meanwhile warned that Israel's blockade and its ongoing military campaign have put Gaza at risk of famine. Palestinians say Israeli forces have repeatedly fired toward crowds heading to the food centres since they opened last month. In previous instances, the Israeli military has said it fired warning shots at people who approached its forces near the centres, which are in military zones off limits to independent media. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Israeli and US supported private contractor running the sites, says there has been no violence in or around the centres themselves. But GHF repeatedly warns would-be food recipients that stepping off the road designated by the military for people to reach the centres represents 'a great danger'. It paused delivery at its three distribution sites last week to hold discussions with the military about improving safety on the routes. GHF closed the Rafah site on Monday due to the 'chaos of the crowds', according to a Facebook site associated with the group. A GHF spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. – Shots fired from the 'dangerous zone' Heba Joda, who was in the crowd Monday, said gunfire broke out at a roundabout where previous shootings have occurred, around a kilometre (half a mile) from the aid site. She said the shots came from the 'dangerous zone' where Israeli troops and their allies are stationed. She said she saw men from a local militia led by Yasser Abu Shabab trying to organise the crowds into lines on the road. When people pushed forward, the gunmen opened fire. People then hurled stones at them, forcing them to withdraw toward the Israeli positions, she said. The Abu Shabab group, which calls itself the Popular Forces, says it is guarding the surroundings of the GHF centres in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting UN aid trucks. GHF has said it does not work with the Abu Shabab group. Hussein Shamimi, who was also in the crowd, said his 14-year-old cousin was among those killed. 'There was an ambush… the Israelis from one side and Abu Shabab from another,' he said. Mohamed Kabaga, a Palestinian displaced from northern Gaza, said he saw masked men firing toward the crowds after trying to organise them. 'They fired at us directly,' he said while being treated at Nasser Hospital, in the nearby city of Khan Younis. He had been shot in the neck, as were three other people seen by an Associated Press journalist at the hospital. Mr Kabaga said he saw around 50 masked men with 4×4 vehicles in the area around the roundabout, close to Israeli military lines. 'We didn't receive anything,' he said. 'They shot us.' Nasser Hospital said several men had been shot in the upper body, including some in the head. Zaher al-Waheidi, head of the Health Ministry's records department, said six people were killed and more than 99 wounded, some of them at another GHF centre in central Gaza. – The 20-month war rages on The war began when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel on October 7 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. They are still holding 55 hostages, more than half of them believed to be dead, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed over 54,900 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up most of the dead. It does not say how many of those killed were civilians or combatants. The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza, displaced some 90% of the population and left the territory almost completely reliant on international aid. Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. Israel says it will continue the war until all the captives are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed and sent into exile. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that even then, Israel will maintain open-ended control over Gaza and facilitate what he refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of its population to other countries, a plan rejected by most of the international community, including the Palestinians, who view it as a blueprint for their forcible expulsion.
Belfast Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Gerry Adams wanted to ‘put manners' on the BBC – but growing up the greatness of this TV was overwhelming
The BBC is 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', but nobody calls it that except Gerry Adams. Again and again, very deliberately, as he savours his triumph in the recent libel action against 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', he gives it the full official title — almost as if the 'British' part has connotations of inherent badness. He claims that his purpose in taking the action was to 'put manners' on this British Broadcasting Corporation. There were even suggestions — later denied — that the BBC would consider blocking the transmission of its programmes in the Republic of Ireland, rather than risk further exposure to the country's atrocious libel laws.
