
We're furious after developers said they are going to reduce the height of our 6ft privacy fence – we're fighting back
Bellway wants to reduce the height of the barrier surrounding part of the Ingleby Manor estate in Ingleby Barwick, North Yorkshire, which presently prevents entry to the land beyond it.
The developers also say it was always in their plans to trim the fence height from 1.8m to just 0.45m, although residents claim this would expose them to anti-social behaviour.
Other locals have also slammed the plans, saying they are worried about young children being able to access a pond - which is connected with the estate on the land.
They argue that they haven't been properly consulted on the project, and some even say they may have not bought their homes in the first places if they knew what they did now.
The boundary fence was constructed initially to keep the development secure during the building of a number of homes, which was completed in 2021.
One resident living in on Breton Drive, which backs into the fence, said the new barrier would be "absolutely tiny" if trimmed.
She claimed that there had been "loads of problems" in the woods behind the fence, saying that children were taking drugs and drinking alcohol in the covered area.
The resident, who did not want to be named, even alleged that women had been attacked beyond the fencing, reports TeesideLive.
She also explained that young children would no longer be protected from the pond, which fills up during the winter months.
The local added: "It's really stressing people out, properties will be completely exposed, but Bellway won't move on it.'
She also claimed that "none" of the residents would have bought their homes if they had known the fence would eventually be trimmed down.
Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door
The distressed local continued: "If the fence comes down we are not going to feel safe living here. We have tried to resolve this [with Bellway], but are just not getting anywhere."
Another homeowner on the street claimed her family were not informed that the fence was going to be changed in any way when they purchased the property five years ago.
On top of this, they said Bellway had not notified or consulted them about the cutting of the fence height - with them only finding out when two people from Bellway knocked on her family's door.
Echoing other residents, she also claimed there had been "anti-social behaviour, burglaries, and fly-tipping" nearby, and she fears the fence's trimming would put their family's safety at risk.
Bellway claimed in a statement that the original planning conditions meant the height of the fencing would have to be reduced - in order for public right of way access to be facilitated via footpaths from the estate.
The company explained that the current fence had been installed in order to prevent "unauthorised access" during construction.
However, while it understood the concerns of some residents, it said it has to adhere to the plans - otherwise it could risk enforcement action.
Our picturesque countryside views are ruined by 6ft tall 'Great Wall of China' fence next door… so we got our revenge
By Douglas Simpson
FURIOUS villagers have succeeded in having a 6ft tall fence, that was blocking beauty spot views, torn down.
Residents hit out at their local council for building the large "out of place" steel structure.
The massive 200 meter long, 6ft tall, spiked steel fence was built by Monmouthshire County Council in Clydach, Wales.
Residents were given no notice that the fence was to be erected at a cost of £40,000.
Furious with the hideous construction locals campaigned to have the fence removed.
It blocked beauty spot views of the Brecon Beacons National Park leaving local residents infuriated and demanding it be taken down.
Furious locals could see the fence on the hillside from their back gardens and said it failed to blend in.
A heated council meeting in April saw residents fume at the local council with one branding it "disgusting."
County council officials have now agreed to take down the fence, forking out an additional £20,000 for its removal.
Made of steel spikes, locals blasted the fence as "disgusting" and said it was "absolutely hideous."
A spokesman said a landscape plan for the site, used on customer marketing materials and shared with house buyers, showed three footpath entrances from roads next to the boundary.
However, residents have disputed this, claiming these designs were absent in other previously produced plans.
At these given points, the height of the fence is set to be reduced from 1.8 metres to just 0.45 metres.
Stockton West MP Matt Vickers has joined in the fight, calling on Bellway to retain the fence at its current height.
His office said that a number of residents had reached out to him, asking for the fence to remain unchaged.
While some homeowners who oppose the change have been in touch with Stockton Council, the authority said it was not in any discussions with Bellway - adding the fence was not subject to any planning conditions.
Correspondence between residents and the local council seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service said the row was a 'civil matter' between homeowners and the developer, and it had no power to intervene.
1
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
Kenny Noye's Brinks-Mat fame 'not right' says ex-police officer
The former detective superintendent who put murderer Kenneth Noye behind bars says he is uncomfortable with the criminal's new-found "mini celebrity" played a pivotal role in the Brinks-Mat heist in 1983 - one of Britain's biggest robberies in which £26m worth of gold, diamonds and cash was has received recent notoriety after being portrayed by actor Jack Lowden in BBC series The Gold - which dramatises the Nick Biddiss, responsible for securing a murder conviction against Noye in 2000, said it is not right that people are shaking the hand of a killer just because of his fame. Noye's crimes In 1985, two years after Brinks-Mat, undercover policeman John Fordham was stabbed to death in the grounds of Noye's was cleared of the killing on the grounds of self defence but imprisoned for 14 years in 1986 for conspiring to handle gold and evade VAT was released after eight years but stabbed 21-year-old Stephen Cameron to death in an attack at the Swanley interchange of the M25 in was jailed in 2000 and released in 2019. "Stabbings at this time were very rare, but nowadays they seem to be very frequent," said Mr Biddiss."This was a road rage incident, a young couple, a stabbing, in broad daylight."Mr Cameron's fiancée saw her partner being killed in the attack by Noye."My view is this, if you're convicted of murder, don't forget murder's pre-meditated, the only way you should be coming out is in a box," said Mr Biddiss. "But some of these judges don't live in the real world, they go home in space rockets because they don't live on this planet."According to recent media reports, Noye, 78, has been seen enjoying his renewed fame around Sevenoaks, near to where he lives."I don't feel comfortable with it, especially when you think this man is a violent criminal," said Mr Biddiss."Why is Kenny Noye being lionised by people in West Kingsdown and Sevenoaks, shaking his hand, going around in effect being a mini celebrity? It's not right."The Ministry of Justice previously said Noye is on licence for the rest of his life and could return to prison if he fails to comply with his a quarter of a century on, Mr Biddiss says he still regularly thinks about the "senseless" murder of Mr Cameron.


Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling women runners
Undercover police officers have started a new campaign to crack down on men catcalling female runners - by posing as joggers themselves. Surrey Police sent two officers out running at rush hour to show the scale of harassment that women are facing. 'These behaviours may not be criminal offences in themselves, but they need to be addressed,' a spokesman for the force said about the patrols. The campaign, however, has been criticised by free speech activists who said the police should be focusing on enforcing existing laws. A spokesperson for the Free Speech Union said the tactic amounted to 'bizarre social-psychology experiments'. It comes as reporters from the news outlet LBC joined officers on patrol during the evening rush hour in Reigate, Surrey. During the operation, plain clothes police officers, who were dressed in athletic jogging gear, headed to areas identified as 'harassment hotspots'. Meanwhile, specialist units waited nearby to intervene at the first sign of abuse. According to LBC, the two female undercover cops were 'targeted within minutes' by a man in a large truck who 'honked at them and made gestures out the window'. Inspector John Vale said: 'One of our officers was honked at within ten minutes — then another vehicle slowed down, beeping and making gestures just 30 seconds later - that's how frequent it is. 'Someone slowing down, staring, shouting - even if it's not always criminal - it can have a huge impact on people's everyday lives and stops women from doing something as simple as going for a run. 'We have to ask: is that person going to escalate? Are they a sexual offender? We want to manage that risk early.' PC Abby Hayward, one of the police officers who posed as a jogger, said that catcalling is something many women are subjected to every day. She said that the behaviour was 'so common' and that it needed to be addressed. Surrey Police said that since they launched the 'Jog On' campaign four weeks ago, 18 arrests have been made for various offences including sexual assault and theft. Inspector Vale added: 'We know that this kind of harassment is significantly under reported thanks to a study carried out by Surrey County Council this year, which revealed that of 450 female residents surveyed, 49 per cent never reported. 'To date, we have made a number of interventions following reports of harassment of our plain clothes runners. 'In these cases, it was deemed appropriate to provide education around anti-social behaviour. 'For repeat offenders or where the behaviour is more serious, we will robustly pursue all criminal justice outcomes. 'We recognise this is a significant worry for women and girls, and we'll continue to patrol running routes throughout Redhill.' He continued: 'This type of harassment isn't just being experienced by communities in Reigate and Banstead, but communities across the whole of Surrey, and it's unacceptable. 'We have female officers and staff members who have been the subject to such behaviour when off duty. 'The message I would like to impart to perpetrators is this; your actions will not be tolerated. 'Please reflect and ask yourself 'is this how you would treat or want your partner, mother, sister to be treated?' 'The next time you see a female jogger, just think, they could be a police officer with colleagues nearby ready to stop you. Your behaviour is not welcome in Surrey.'


Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Essex council asks High Court to remove migrants from hotel
An Essex council has asked the High Court to stop migrants being housed at a hotel, following weeks of protests. Epping Forest District Council applied on Tuesday for an interim High Court injunction to prevent the Bell Hotel being used to accommodate asylum seekers. The council is requesting that the ban take effect 14 days after the injunction is approved. It is citing "the clear risk of further escalating community tensions" and calls for the present situation "to be brought under control" urgently. The council is also requesting a declaration that using the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers is not the same as using it as a regular hotel, and therefore is not permitted under planning rules. "The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago," said Cllr Chris Whitbread, leader of Epping Forest District Council. "So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel." Cllr Whitbread pointed out there are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel, and that the use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers could further escalate community tensions that are "already at a high", as well as "the risk of irreparable harm to the local community". "This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen," he said. Weeks of protests Demonstrations began on 13 July after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. An Ethiopian man, who had only recently arrived on a small boat, has been charged with three counts of sexual assault of a girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. 2:54 Essex Police recently implemented dispersal orders before some protests, allowing officers to order anyone suspected of causing anti-social behaviour to leave the area. The force said 25 people have been arrested in connection with the protests, and a total of 16 people have now been charged. 'Unprecedented' levels of disruption Epping Forest council said it has resorted to this latest action due to the "unprecedented levels of protest and disruption" in the community. The protests have placed the police "under severe pressure", as additional police officers had to be drafted in from other forces, it said. At a recent council meeting in July 2025, Epping Forest councillors voted unanimously to call on the Home Office to "immediately" close the Bell Hotel. They also called for the phased closure of the Phoenix Hotel in North Weald, which is also providing temporary accommodation for asylum seekers. "We are doing this on behalf of our local community. We are a small district council. We have tried to help the Home Office see the situation cannot go on, but central government is not listening," Cllr Whitbread said. "We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice. It is now up to the judge," he added.