
Bank of England expected to leave interest rates as Middle East conflict drives up oil price
Update:
Date: 2025-06-19T06:30:04.000Z
Title: Introduction: Bank of England expected to leave interest rates on hold today
Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy.
These are challenging times for central bankers. After steering through the Covid-19 pandemic, and then the energy shock after the Russia-Ukraine war, they must now set monetary policy in the face of an unpredictable trade war, and conflict in the Middle East.
Faced with such uncertainty, the Bank of England is expected to sit on its hands today when it sets UK interest rates.
According to the money markets, there's a 96% chance that the BoE leaves rates on hold at 4.25% at noon today, and only a 4% possibility of a quarter-point cut (which would bring Bank Rate down to 4%).
Although UK inflation fell last month, to 3.4%, it remains stubbornly above the BoE's 2% target – and could push higher if the Israel-Iran conflict drives the oil price higher.
Zara Nokes, global market analyst at J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM), says UK inflation is still 'uncomfortably high', explaining:
Escalating tensions in the Middle East, and the upward pressure this is putting on oil prices, will only add to the Bank of England's concern about easing rates too quickly.
The Monetary Policy Committee will face a tougher choice when meeting again in August, given the combination of still-sticky inflation and evidence that the labour market is quite clearly cooling. A deterioration in the labour market should, in theory, put downward pressure on inflation, but until there are clear signs of this in the hard data, the Bank should be careful not to claim victory over inflation quite yet, not least because of the uncertain geopolitical climate.'
The Bank has cut rates four times in the last year, having lifted borrowing costs through 2022 and 2023 as it battled inflation. The money markets currently predict it will manage two more quarter-point cuts by the end of 2025.
Last night, America's central bank left US interest rates on hold, but also lowered its forecasts for economic growth.
Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell warned that the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump on imports would add to inflationary pressures, saying:
'Increases in tariffs this year are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity.
The effects on inflation could be short-lived, reflecting a one-time shift in the price level. It's also possible that the inflationary effects could be more persistent.'
The UK's new trade deal with the US should mean Britain is less affected by the global trade war, but as an open economy it would still feel the knock-on impact of trade disruption.
That could mean higher prices, meaning less pressure to cut rate, or lower growth, requiring lower borrowing costs to stimulate
8.30am BST: Swiss National Bank interest rate decision
9am BST: Norges Bank interest rate decision
Noon BST: Bank of England interest rate decision
Noon BST: Bank of Turkey interest rate decision
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jersey Opera House gets third interim chairperson of 2025
Jersey Opera House has appointed a new interim chairperson, in the latest chapter of a story which has seen multiple resignations since the start of Robertson, a lawyer, has stepped into the position having already served as part of the board of decision comes after Cyril Whelan announced on Wednesday he was to resign having only just succeeded another outgoing interim chairperson in Opera House's Grade II listed building in St Helier reopened after five years in May following a major £13m refurbishment scheme.


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Minister says Victorian marine lake repairs 'uneconomical'
The future of a marine lake built to mark the diamond jubilee of Queen Victoria is in doubt after the minister responsible labelled it a "diminishing requirement".Victoria Marine Lake on St Helier's waterfront was marked as needing "comprehensive work" after an inspection last year, a decade on from a £300k repair in 2014. A written question was submitted earlier this month by Deputy Inna Gardiner, who asked for details on how the pool would be maintained and kept safe in the response, Constable Andy Jehan, minister for infrastructure, said plans to improve sea defences in the area meant it would be "uneconomical to repair the marine lake". "Given the exciting plans under development for the waterfront and the need to improve shoreline management and coastal defence, it is anticipated that there will be a diminishing requirement for this feature," he well as highlighting repairs made to the lake's retaining wall in January, Constable Jehan referenced the £356,000 work done at Havre des Pas."It should be noted that there has been a considerable investment in the Havre des Pas pool wall and sluices to provide the facility for sea swimming at low tide, the function originally conceived for the marine lake."


Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Environment Secretary steps up plans to nationalise Thames Water
The Environment Secretary has said the Government is stepping up plans to temporarily nationalise Thames Water after a US rescue bid collapsed. Steve Reed confirmed to Parliament on Thursday that ministers were ready to save the struggling utility giant if necessary. A rescue would be in the form of a taxpayer-backed special administration scheme. He said: 'The company remains financially stable, but we've stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, as I've said before, including a special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' A government intervention appears increasingly likely after US private equity giant KKR abandoned a bid for the company. Thames's creditors have proposed an alternative £17bn rescue plan but it is contingent on regulators agreeing to waive historical fines. They have been pushing for ministers to intervene on the matter. Mr Reed signalled this would not happen, casting doubt over hopes of a private sector-led solution. He said: 'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment. It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company.' Taking control of Thames would pile further strain on the Government's stretched finances. A previous report estimated that a state bailout would cost the taxpayer up to £4.1bn. Thames, which has 16m customers across London and the South East, has been pushed to the brink of collapse as it struggles under the weight of £16bn in debts. Creditors have said that a 'regulatory reset' is needed to ensure the company is financially viable. A source close to the lenders said they were urging regulators 'not to reach back into history' and instead focus on Thames Water's turnaround efforts moving forward. A senior figure involved in the talks told The Telegraph last week: 'I think what it takes is the Government and the regulator coming together – it needs the Environment Department, the Treasury, and even No 10 to say, 'What's the least worst outcome here?'' Thames Water was handed a record fine of £123m in May and the company could be on the hook for more than £1bn in pollution and environmental failing penalties in future, according to creditors. The £17bn support package proposed by creditors includes writing off several billion pounds of debt and an immediate £3bn cash injection. If their deal falls apart, special administration is the most likely outcome for Thames. A spokesman for the creditors said: 'This investor group is committed to working with the Government and regulators to agree a pragmatic plan that recognises what Thames Water can realistically deliver and they expect to be held accountable for an ambitious trajectory for the company's return to compliance. 'More than £10bn would be written off to get the company back to investment grade, expected to be the largest financial loss on an infrastructure asset in British history.'