Norway parliament orders restart to frontier oil and gas exploration licensing
OSLO, May 6 (Reuters) - The Norwegian parliament on Tuesday ordered the Labour minority government to launch a new frontier areas oil and gas exploration licensing round, setting the stage for increased oil drilling.
Norway became Europe's largest supplier of natural gas following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, providing about 30% of all gas imports to the European Union.
here.
The motion which was initially tabled by the opposition Conservatives, garnered majority support after it was backed by the opposition Centre Party, which quit the government in January.
The original proposal calling the government to launch a new licensing round in the first-half of this year was amended at the Centre Party's request to postpone it until the next year.
The Labour government, however, could start preparations for the launch this year.
The two former partners agreed in 2022 to postpone frontier area licensing rounds until the end of this year in exchange for a smaller opposition Socialist Left party backing a budget.
While Norway stopped awarding ocean blocks for oil and gas drilling in frontier areas, such as in the eastern part of the Barents Sea, it continued to conduct annual licensing rounds in more mature areas.
Last year, Norway exported a record amount of natural gas to Europe and volumes are expected to stay near this level in the coming years.
The output, however, is expected to fall sharply after 2030. Finding and developing more resources could slow down the expected decline.
The Conservatives said more exploration was needed for Norway to remain a stable energy supplier to Europe for a long time.
"If the European Union is to succeed in becoming more independent of Russian gas, Norway should continue to contribute," they said in the draft proposal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chelsea talking to Milan over France keeper Maignan
Chelsea are in talks with AC Milan over signing France goalkeeper Mike Italian club value Maignan at about £25m but the Blues do not want to meet Milan's asking price and are in talks about a lower 29-year-old has been a regular for Milan since joining on a five-year contract from Lille in has also been first choice for France since Hugo Lloris retired from international football in January have told BBC Sport that Maignan would be interested in a move to Stamford have struggled to find a long-term option in goal since buying Kepa Arrizabalaga in 2018 for £71m, which remains the world-record fee for a years later they signed Edouard Mendy, who left for Al-Ahli in 2023, while Kepa has spent the past two seasons on loan at Real Madrid and then the past two years Chelsea have also signed Robert Sanchez, Djordje Petrovic and Filip Jorgensen but the club appear unconvinced by all spent last season on loan at Strasbourg while Sanchez and Jorgensen had spells in the Chelsea first team.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
JP Magnier handed €50,000 in 'brown' envelopes to estate agent in land sale, court hears
The High Court has heard that billionaire bloodstock magnate John Magnier's son, JP, handed over two "brown" envelopes containing a total of €50,000 in cash to an estate agent involved in a failed €15 million property deal which were delivered to the beneficiaries of the estate as a show of "appreciation". The court also heard that a solicitor involved in the proposed conveyance of Barne Estate, Co Tipperary, the subject of a legal action by John Magnier - who alleges a €15 million deal was reneged upon by the vendors - has told the High Court that an agreement was in place between the parties before an exclusivity document was signed. Advertisement Joseph Fitzpatrick, of Smithwick Solicitors, was giving evidence in the hearing on Thursday and told counsel for the Barne Estate that he secured an exclusivity agreement signed by both sides to run from August 31st to September 22nd after hands were allegedly shaken on the deal. Lawyers acting for Mr Magnier, founder of the world-famous Coolmore Stud, have claimed before the High Court that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract. Mr Magnier's proceedings claim that Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell the land at the higher price of €22.25 million to Mr Regan, the founder of the New York building firm JT Magen. Mr Magnier – along with his adult children - wants to enforce the alleged deal. Advertisement The Magnier side says the deal was struck at an August 22, 2023, kitchen meeting at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. They also claim an exclusivity agreement that was in effect from August 31 to September 30 stipulated that the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Advertisement Mr Regan is not a party to the case. Mr Magnier's son, JP, told Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that his father asked him to get €50,000 in cash on September 8, 2023, and to put it into two envelopes to be given to the Thomson-Moores. He said the money was an "appreciation" for letting the Magnier side onto the Barne land, for their loyalty in honouring the deal and because they were allegedly "cash strapped". JP Magnier said he put the money into two envelopes and gave it to the estate agent at Barne Estate for them to be passed on to the Thomson-Moores. Advertisement On September 11, 2023, however, he said the estate agent met with JP Magnier and "pushed" the envelopes in his direction, saying that the Thomson-Moores were concerned that their farm manager may have seen the original transaction. Niall F Buckley SC, for the Barne side, asked what colour the envelopes were and was told by JP Magnier that they were brown. Mr Buckley put it to JP Magnier that the envelopes were to keep the Thomson-Moores "sweet", as John Magnier was concerned they were going to pull out of the deal. JP Magnier said his father never said that to him. "I take it you didn't ask for a receipt?" asked Mr Buckley. JP Magnier replied: "No." Advertisement "Doesn't that say it all," remarked Mr Buckley. "Knowing what you did about my clients' family circumstances and the need for them to provide for their child and given the vast amount of land you have, did it ever occur to you to let this one go?" "It wouldn't be my call," said JP Magnier. Mr Fitzpatrick told Martin Hayden SC, for the Barne Estate, that the exclusivity agreement was not to further any negotiation but to keep the "status quo" of the alleged sale agreement in order to further the preparation and receipt of the contracts. "Exclusivity was not for negotiations going forward but to facilitate the contract," said Mr Fitzpatrick. Ireland Supreme Court decision on compensation over power... Read More Mr Fitzpatrick said Mr Magnier had deposited €15 million in the Smithwicks' client account before any purported contract was signed in order to "show good faith". However, a week before the exclusivity agreement expired, the Thomson-Moores said they were taking tax advice, he said. "We invited them to a meeting and that was refused, then the extension of the exclusivity was refused. It was clear they had no intention of signing with us and were running down the clock," said Mr Fitzpatrick. The case continues in two weeks' time before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Wise goes to the US. Will its founder's supercharged voting rights follow?
Back in 2021, the arrival on the London stock market of Wise, a rapidly expanding money transfer company, generated a feelgood factor at a useful moment. It came a month after overhyped Deliveroo flopped on debut. And, since Wise was a pure fintech business, as opposed to a pizza delivery outfit with an app, there was reason to think the UK might be getting its act together in the sector that politicians swoon over. Shoreditch's finest, and its Estonian founders, would show the way in UK fintech. Wise sported a £9bn valuation. Now the company wants to switch its primary listing to New York in search of a wider pool of investors, more active trading in its shares and 'a potential pathway to inclusion in major US [stock market] indices'. A secondary listing will be retained in London, but we know what usually happens. Nine-tenths of the share trading gravitates to the primary location. The obligatory description on these occasions – 'a fresh blow for London' – applies. Wise, with revenues of £1.2bn and underlying pre-tax profits of £282m, is a bad one to see succumb to the temptations of New York. Rachel Reeves may take note. The chancellor is cajoling UK pension funds to shove cash into private markets (at a moment when even private equity insiders worry that the golden years for returns could be over) but it is the public markets that are more in need of love and affection from No 11. She won't do it (almost certainly), but the first step would be to cut the UK's uncompetitive 0.5% rate of stamp duty on share purchases. There is plenty of evidence that a reduction would pay for itself in increased trading. Yet let's not overlook a weirdness about Wise's move – and an unanswered question. The oddness is that the company, now so keen on getting into a US index, never tried to enter a UK one. At flotation, its dual-class share structure meant it could not be included in FTSE indices. Why not now join the grown-ups? With a £12bn valuation these days, Wise would rank halfway up the Footsie. It would be a big fish. The danger in having the main listing in New York is that the firm will be a relative minnow in a tech pond populated by the trillion-dollar likes of Nvidia. But that's a risk its founder, Kristo Käärmann, is clearly prepared to take in pursuit of greater US visibility for 'major US growth opportunities'. Or perhaps the dual voting structure is a bigger part of the story. Wise's statement described the US listing as having 'a structure that aligns with US market practices including those of our US-listed tech peers, which we believe allows us to remain laser-focused on delivering our mission'. That sounds suspiciously like a reference to the enhanced voting rights that now allow Käärmann to own 18% of the shares but have 50% of the votes. Such unequal arrangements cause little fuss in the US, but they remain controversial in the UK, even if they are now allowed for index-inclusion purposes after a change in the rules a couple of years ago. A key point about Käärmann's supercharged rights, however, is that they are due to expire next summer under a 'sunset clause' agreed at listing. Wise could, if it wished, ask its UK shareholders for an extension but that may cause a row in itself – a sunset is meant to mean what it says. Perhaps the company thinks it is easier to wrap continued enhanced rights into a package where the main element is the change of main listing. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Käärmann offered zero clarity on whether he wants to keep his supercharged rights. 'It depends on the structure we are going to land on,' he said, adding that all would be clear in the formal circular later this month. Curious. London's acceptance of dual rights – but, critically, only with a five-year sunset clause – was meant to be a way to entice UK tech founders to list in London. It was a pointless change if it just encourages them to leave when the sun is about to set.
