Opinion: Is Tennis Broken? Unpacking the corruption allegations, and how the sport may change

Los Angeles Times

06-05-2025

Although accusations of corruption are certainly not new in the world of global sports — encompassing several notable incidents like the landmark 2015 FIFA World Cup case, and the 'BountyGate' scandal in the National Football League — it's not often that you hear a players' association call their respective league a 'cartel.'
On March 18th, 2024 , the relatively new Professional Tennis Players Association filed a lawsuit against the ATP Tour, WTA tour, the International Tennis Federation, and the International Tennis Integrity Agency, alleging that these governing bodies have violated players' rights through a rigged, restrictive economic system that keeps their earnings low.
The lawsuit specifically claims that players have been forced into 'grueling schedules, capped earnings, abusive and invasive investigations and discipline, and have limited control over their own careers and brands,' due to 'a cartel of tour organizers and tournament operators.'
In this article, we'll unpack the serious allegations rattling some of the largest tennis organizations on the planet, and discuss whether or not tennis truly is broken and in need of change.
One of the most controversial arguments within the lawsuit is that the governing bodies overseeing Tennis' largest tournaments – those being the U.S. Open, the French Open, the Australian Open, and Wimbledon – have in fact conspired to 'fix' player earnings. The lawsuit claims that these Tours and governing bodies restrict prize money, take player's NIL rights without proper compensation, and restrict players from earning income off the court.
In response, the WTA Tour and ATP Tour both released statements promising to defend against the case: with the WGA calling it 'baseless,' 'regrettable,' and 'misguided,' and claiming to have 'committed to a $400 million increase in player compensation' in prior years.
The lengthy antitrust suit also focuses heavily on the ranking system , claiming that the system forces players to compete only in specific tournaments under the threat of fines for competing in outside competition. Other allegations include the claim that the governing bodies routinely put player health and safety at risk, forcing the players to compete in extreme heat or late into the night, as well as the claim that the International Tennis Integrity Agency is subjecting players to intrusive personal searches and lengthy interrogations within their anti-doping policies.
Ultimately, the players behind this lawsuit claim to be fighting against not only the exploitation of players, but the competitive disadvantages ingrained in the current Tennis system itself.
' There is a complete and utter lack of competition that exists in professional tennis, and we believe by filing these actions, we will ultimately inject the kind of competition that will be fair to the players, to the fans and actually to the people (who) operate the system,' said lawyer Jim Quinn for the PTPA.
Although it's far too early to know where this lawsuit will end up, the allegations raised within the suit offer a glimpse of major restructuring efforts that could occur in the future, if the sport truly is 'broken,' as claimed by Ahmad Nassar, PTPA executive director.
If tennis is restructured as a result of this lawsuit, the sport's next era should begi n with a reformation of governance and leadership within the ATP, WTA, and ITF, with a goal to create a more unified, player-centric approach to decision making.
This includes restructuring prize money distribution to allow more flexibility and competition among tournaments, and revising the player ranking system to give players more freedom to compete without penalty. Improving player welfare would also be key by ensuring that tennis organizations provide sufficient mental health resources and support for players.
Additionally, establishing a stronger role for the PTPA in decision-making processes could provide athletes with a voice in governance and allow for collective bargaining on contracts, prize money, and benefits. It would increase opportunities for players to have a say in the policies that affect their careers, from tournament scheduling to contract negotiations. Reforming anti-doping and anti-corruption measures to ensure fairness, as well as fostering a culture of fairness and respect for all players, would also be crucial if the lawsuit forces action.
Ultimately, these shocking allegations of corruption point to a future where substantial reforms are necessary to restore fairness within the sport — since the alleged risks of the current system may alienate both fans and players alike.
As we wait to see how the PTPA's fight concludes, it's important to imagine what the future of the sport will look like, and consider whether tennis can ever fully escape these allegations of unfair competition and exploitation. Related