logo
Netanyahu meets security officials as Israel considers full Gaza takeover

Netanyahu meets security officials as Israel considers full Gaza takeover

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met senior security officials to finalise a new strategy for the 22-month war in Gaza, his office said on Tuesday, with media reporting he favoured a complete military takeover of the Strip.
Despite intense international pressure for a ceasefire to ease hunger and appalling conditions in the besieged Palestinian enclave, efforts to mediate a truce between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas have collapsed.
Eight more people died of starvation or malnutrition in the past 24 hours, Gaza's health ministry said, while another 79 died in the latest Israeli firing.
The prime minister's office said in statement that Netanyahu had held a 'limited security discussion' lasting about three hours during which military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir 'presented the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza'.
An Israeli official had earlier told Reuters that Defence Minister Israel Katz and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Netanyahu, would also attend the meeting to decide on a strategy to take to cabinet this week.
Israel's Channel 12, citing an official from Netanyahu's office, had said the prime minister was leaning towards taking control of the entire territory. That would reverse a 2005 decision to withdraw from Gaza, while retaining control over its borders, a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there.
It was unclear, however, whether Netanyahu was foreseeing a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing Israeli hostages. The prime minister's office declined to comment on the Channel 12 report.
'It is still necessary to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel,' Netanyahu told new recruits at a military base. 'We are not giving up on any of these missions.'
On Saturday, Hamas released a video of Evyatar David, one of 50 hostages still held in Gaza, appearing emaciated in what seemed to be an underground tunnel. The images shocked Israelis and sparked international condemnation.
Throughout the war, there has been sustained international pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, of whom Israeli officials estimate 20 are still alive. Most hostages have been released during ceasefires following diplomatic negotiations. Israel broke the last ceasefire.
PRESSURE TACTIC?
A Palestinian official said the suggestion of a full takeover of Gaza may be a tactic to pressure Hamas into concessions, while the Palestinian Foreign Ministry urged foreign nations to take heed of the reports.
'The ministry urges countries and the international community to treat these leaks with utmost seriousness and to intervene urgently to prevent their implementation, whether these leaks are meant to exert pressure, test international reactions, or are genuine and serious,' it said.
Israel's coalition government, the most right-wing and religiously conservative in its history, includes far-right politicians who advocate the annexation of both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland.
Nearly two years of fighting in Gaza has strained the military, which has a small standing army and has had to repeatedly mobilise reservists. It has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel fully occupying Gaza.
In a sign of differences between some members of Israel's ruling coalition and the military, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir on X challenged military head Zamir to state he would comply with government directives even if a decision was made to take all of Gaza.
The statement from Netanyahu's office said the Israeli Defence Forces were 'prepared to implement any decision that will be made by the Political-Security Cabinet'.
HUNGER
The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and capturing 251 hostages.
Israel's military response has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people – mostly civilians – according to Palestinian health authorities.
Israel's campaign has forced nearly all of Gaza's more than 2 million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine.
Some 188 Palestinians, including 94 children, have died from hunger since the war began, according to Gaza authorities.
An Israeli security official, in a briefing to reporters, acknowledged there may be hunger in some parts of Gaza but rejected reports of famine or starvation.
On Tuesday, Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive.
Palestinians living in the last quarter of territory where Israel has not yet taken military control – via ground incursions or orders for civilians to leave – said any new push would be catastrophic.
'If the tanks pushed through, where would we go, into the sea? This will be like a death sentence to the entire population,' said Abu Jehad, a Gaza wood merchant.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why India singled out for extra sanctions over buying Russian oil? Trump answers
Why India singled out for extra sanctions over buying Russian oil? Trump answers

Hindustan Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why India singled out for extra sanctions over buying Russian oil? Trump answers

US President Donald Trump on Thursday said a lot more secondary sanctions are upcoming, after he was asked why only India was singled out for penalties over doing business with Russia. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C.(REUTERS) During a press conference at the White House, Trump was asked about India's response to him doubling its tariffs to 50 per cent on Wednesday. New Delhi had pointed that the US was imposing additional tariffs on India for "actions that several other countries are also taking". Responding to the question, Trump said, "It's only been 8 hours. So let's see what happens. You're going to see a lot going to see so much secondary sanctions." Plans for more tariffs on China? Trump was also asked specifically about China, another country that does business with Russia, and whether he plans to hike tariffs on that country as well. Trump responded, "Could happen. Depends on how we do. Could happen." Earlier on Tuesday, Trump's own party leader Nikki Haley had urged against a "pass to China" as she backed India and called the country a strong ally for the United States. "India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India," she wrote on X. Trump doubles down on tariff attack On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order, imposing additional 25 per cent tariffs on all Indian goods entering the US, on top of the 25 per cent duties announced last week. In his earlier tariff announcement for India, Trump had threatened penalties for the country, citing its purchase of energy and military equipment from Russia. The additional 25% will take effect on August 27, and would put Indian exporters at a significant disadvantage compared to countries like Bangladesh, Indonesia and Vietnam – which face tariffs of between 19% and 20%. India slammed Trump's latest move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". It had earlier accused the US and the European Union of unfairly targeting New Delhi for its trade with Russia.

‘Could happen': Trump on imposing more tariff on China, similar to India over Russian oil import
‘Could happen': Trump on imposing more tariff on China, similar to India over Russian oil import

Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Could happen': Trump on imposing more tariff on China, similar to India over Russian oil import

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that he could impose further tariffs on China and some other countries similar to the additional 25% duty he announced earlier on India over its purchase of Russian oil, Reuters reported. While talking about possible imposition of secondary sanctions on Russia by Friday in order to pressure Moscow to end its war in Ukraine, Trump told reporters that it 'could happen' that the US imposes additional tariffs on China and other countries for purchasing Russian oil but didn't provide any further information. 'It may happen…I can't tell you yet. We did it with India. We're probably doing it with a couple of others. One of them could be China,' Trump said. Trump was asked why India was being singled out for importing Russian oil, the US president responded saying 'It's only been eight hours… you're gonna see a lot more, you're going to see so much secondary sanctions,' Reuters reported. Trump on Wednesday announced an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, on top of the 25% tariff he earlier announced for the country, citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. Statement by Official Spokesperson⬇️ 🔗 — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) August 6, 2025 However, while imposing the additional 25% tariff on India, the White House order did not mention China, which is also a big Russian oil importer. The US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had earlier warned China that it could face new tariffs if it continues to purchase Russian oil. India hit back at the United States for doubling the tariff on Indian goods to 50%, stating that the action was 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. The Government of India said it would take 'all actions necessary' to 'protect its national interests'. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) official spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal, in a statement said, 'The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India.'

UCLA faces uncertainty as Trump suspends $584 million in federal grants over civil rights probe
UCLA faces uncertainty as Trump suspends $584 million in federal grants over civil rights probe

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

UCLA faces uncertainty as Trump suspends $584 million in federal grants over civil rights probe

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) is facing a major funding crisis after the Trump administration formally suspended $584 million in federal research grants, nearly twice the previously estimated amount. The move follows findings by the US Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division that UCLA violated civil rights laws by failing to address alleged antisemitic incidents on campus. This marks the first time a public university has had its federal research funding halted under the administration's growing scrutiny of higher education institutions. The implications are far-reaching, potentially disrupting scientific research, faculty-led projects, and student programs across multiple departments. Allegations tied to campus protests and civil rights protections According to the Justice Department, the suspension follows a civil rights probe that concluded UCLA acted with 'deliberate indifference' in allowing a hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students. The investigation cited incidents during the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests, when demonstrators allegedly blocked access to classes and other facilities. The federal government said UCLA's handling of these events violated both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo The university has denied wrongdoing but agreed to a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and one Jewish professor who filed a lawsuit claiming their civil rights were violated. Chancellor Julio Frenk described the situation as a critical moment for the university. 'If these funds remain suspended, it will be devastating for UCLA and for Americans across the nation,' he said in a statement, highlighting the university's role in conducting 'groundbreaking research.' Funding cuts impact major research bodies The suspended grants span several federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy. These funds play a central role in supporting advanced research, scientific innovation, and faculty development. James B. Milliken, the newly appointed president of the University of California system, criticised the funding cuts, arguing that they do not serve the stated purpose of addressing antisemitism. 'The extensive work that UCLA and the entire University of California have taken to combat antisemitism has apparently been ignored,' he said, adding that the loss of funding threatens research that 'saves lives, grows our economy, and fortifies our national security. ' The university has agreed to enter talks with the administration in an effort to resolve the matter. As part of the lawsuit settlement, UCLA will contribute $2.3 million to eight organisations focused on combating antisemitism and supporting Jewish students. It has also established an Office of Campus and Community Safety and introduced new policies for managing on-campus protests. A pattern emerging across universities The administration's action against UCLA follows a similar approach taken with Columbia University. Last month, Columbia agreed to pay $200 million to settle allegations of violating federal antidiscrimination laws. That agreement restored more than $400 million in research grants. Officials have indicated that the Columbia settlement may serve as a model for how the federal government addresses comparable issues at other universities. The Trump administration's strategy appears to tie institutional accountability directly to research funding, using financial pressure to enforce compliance with federal civil rights standards. What this means for students and campus life While the legal and administrative outcomes continue to unfold, the immediate consequences for students are less abstract. The suspended funds support a range of university functions, including student fellowships, lab work, faculty-led research opportunities, and programs that many students rely on for academic and career development. A prolonged freeze could limit student access to research roles, delay ongoing projects, and reduce campus resources in the coming academic terms. For those in fields tied to federally funded research, particularly STEM and public health — the uncertainty introduces new challenges in an already competitive environment. UCLA has said it remains committed to maintaining a safe and inclusive campus for all students. As negotiations with the federal government proceed, the university community, especially its student body, is bracing for further clarity on how the situation will affect academic programs in the months ahead. (with AP inputs) TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store