
They seek her here, they seek her there
When I was a child, I was homeschooled for some time under the auspices of an American fundamentalism programme called "Accelerated Christian Education".
The curriculum was a mess — it was deeply unscientific, homophobic, sexist, racist and Islamophobic for starters. But one thing that really struck me, at the tender age of 10, was a passage in my science booklet that cited the existence of the Loch Ness monster as evidence against evolution.
"Nessie", apparently, was a plesiosaur, and was living proof of creationism being the only possible explanation for life on earth. Understandably, I was confused — and entertained. Surely the writers of this passage were taking the mick. No-one actually believed the Loch Ness monster was real, right?
It turns out that quite a few people believe in the existence of "Nessie". Indeed, only a few weeks ago, an article in the Mirror breathlessly claimed that a Loch Ness monster hunter had caught "two monsters" in a mating dance. Nessie is getting it on, apparently.
The Loch Ness monster, for those who have been living under a rock for the past century, is a mythical creature believed to inhabit Loch Ness in the Highlands of Scotland. "Nessie", as she is fondly known, is large, long-necked, and serpentine, with one or more humps protruding from the water on occasion (allegedly, that is).
Nessie was brought to worldwide attention in May 1933 after a local couple, Mr and Mrs John Mackay of Drumnadrochit, claimed to have seen a beast of hideous proportions cavorting around in the loch. This incident was breathlessly reported in the Inverness Courier : "The creature disported itself, rolling and plunging for fully a minute, its body resembling that of a whale, and the water cascading and churning like a simmering cauldron."
A few months later, a couple of tourists spotted a "dragon or prehistoric monster", which ambled about in front of their car before plopping into the water and swimming away. Naturally, this sighting only fanned the flames of the "monster" hysteria, and soon London newspapers were sending correspondents to Scotland.
In December 1933, for example, the Daily Mail hired celebrity big-game hunter Marmaduke Wetherell to track down Nessie. Marmaduke purported to have found a series of gargantuan footprints along the shoreline, which he argued obviously belonged to "a very powerful soft-footed animal about 20 feet long."
Unfortunately for Marmaduke and the editors at the Daily Mail , the Natural History Museum soon revealed that the prints had been faked, likely created using a prop such as an umbrella stand or ashtray fashioned from a hippopotamus leg. Whether Wetherell was the architect of the hoax or an unwitting victim of some local tomfoolery remains a mystery to this day.
Nessie was allegedly first photographed on November 12 1933 by Hugh Gray, who was walking his dog along the east shore of Loch Ness. (In the 1960s, it was revealed that Gray's photo depicted nothing more than a joyful otter rolling around in the water.) Then in April 1934, an English physician called Robert Kenneth Wilson allegedly photographed Nessie while on a fishing holiday with his pal Maurice Chambers.
Wilson sold the print to the Daily Mail (which apparently had learned nothing from the Marmaduke debacle) for £100 and the snap, depicting the monster's small head and neck, soon became known as "the surgeon's photograph". Wilson clearly felt a bit embarrassed and tried to exclude his name from the inevitable media-storm, but to no avail; he was fined by the British Medical Association for breaching professional ethics.
The legend of the Loch Ness monster can be traced back to ancient times. There are local Pictish stone carvings depicting a curious beast with large flippers, and the first written account of a monster may be found in a 7th-century biography of St Columba. Apparently, Nessie took a chunk out of a swimmer in the loch and was readying herself to attack another hapless swimmer when the Irish monk intervened, telling the "water beast" sternly to "go back". It obeyed him, and over the centuries Nessie mellowed into a more calm, gentle creature.
In the 1960s several British universities conducted solar examinations of the lake, finding nothing conclusive save for some mysterious, large, moving underwater objects. In 1975, another expedition produced a photograph that appeared to show a giant flipper. There were several other sonar expeditions throughout the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, all with inconclusive readings.
Nessie, apparently, just doesn't want to be found.
So if Nessie doesn't exist, what exactly are all these people "seeing" in the water? Various theories have been put forward, including floating logs, birds, unusual wave patterns, otters, deer, boat wakes and seismic gas. It's also likely that the "monster-hunters" are seeing what they want to see — influenced by Scottish legends of kelpies and other fearsome creatures, they interpret their sightings of eels and the like as proof of the monster. In 2018, our own Professor Neil Gemmell from the University of Otago led a major scientific investigation into the environmental DNA (eDNA) of Loch Ness, analysing 250 water samples to catalogue the life present in the loch. Gemmell and his colleagues found no evidence for mythical creatures like plesiosaurs or large fish such as sharks or sturgeon, but they did detect a significant amount of eel DNA.
I can't quite put my finger on what makes Nessie so delightfully entertaining. Perhaps it's the fact that she's a gentle creature, posing no threat to those who encounter her.
It's as if the Loch Ness Monster is some sort of collective "in-joke", a bit like Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. She's a beloved symbol of Scottish mythology and the wild, prehistoric nature of the Highlands.
Nessie is also a tourist boon, bringing in about £1 million ($NZ2.23m) to the area each year. There are Nessie boat-rides across the loch, Nessie exhibitions, cafes and gift shops. I've bought several plushie Nessies for my niece and nephew, and you can also find her on T-shirts, teacups, badges, road signs and even bin lorries.
Staff at the Loch Ness Centre have even hired a team of digital specialists to weed out all the dodgy AI-generated images of Nessie that have been flooding in recently. In an article with the Scottish Sun , general manager Nagina Ishaq implored: "Please don't send us AI pictures. Those pictures won't be entertained ... It's our duty to ensure we keep some integrity, instead of promoting anything that's AI generated to get attention." Nessie is the gift that keeps on giving.
I don't believe a prehistoric monster haunts Loch Ness's depths. But I love the idea of Nessie — the creativity inherent in her sightings, the doctored photographs, elaborate and wildly sensational historic accounts. The Loch Ness monster taps into our love of mystery and wonder; in a sense Nessie represents the "unknown" as something benign and comforting, instead of ominous and threatening.
Whether fact or folklore, Nessie's serpentine grip on the public imagination is unlikely to loosen anytime soon. I like to think of her, frolicking around in the murky depths of Loch Ness, deciding on a whim to thrill a boatload of tourists or show off her flips to a few locals.
I like to imagine Nessie knows what a celebrity she is — she knows the sense of mystery is what makes her legend so enduring, and she'll continue to tantalise us with brief glimpses of her glorious self for centuries to come.
• Jean Balchin is an ODT columnist who has started a new life in Edinburgh.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Kiwiblog
a day ago
- Kiwiblog
Why economists should like booze
The Economist writes: Consider the economics of the restaurant industry. Alcohol offers higher profit margins than food as it requires less labour to prepare. Indeed, using official American data, your columnist estimates that booze accounts for all the profits of the restaurant industry. Drinkers subsidise non-drinkers. Those who order sparkling water can feel sanctimonious in the short run. But if no one orders a bottle of Bordeaux, many restaurants will go under. Be interesting if this data is the same for New Zealand. Second, abstinence makes people lonelier. For centuries alcohol has served a social function. It helps people relax. Taking a drink also signals to others that you are happy to be slower and more vulnerable—that you have left your weapon at the door—which puts them at ease. A study from 2012 in Psychological Science found that alcohol increases social bonding. Robin Dunbar of Oxford University and colleagues find that frequenting a pub improves how engaged people feel with their community, in turn raising life satisfaction. It is not a stretch to say that alcohol has played a big evolutionary role in fostering human connection. Many couples credit alcohol, at least in part, for bringing them together. So it may not be a coincidence that the alcohol-shunning young are lonely. People do drink to relax and socialise. For centuries creative folk, from Aeschylus to Coleridge to Dickens, have relied on alcohol for inspiration. In the 1960s, when productivity was soaring, everyone was drunk all the time. No other drug has played such a consistent role in human innovation. Being intoxicated opens up the possibility of accidents of insight. Purely rational, linear minds have fewer of the flashes of brilliance that can turn an art form or an industry upside-down. It allows brains to disconnect. A study of American painters in 1946 by Ann Roe of Yale University noted that 'a nightly cocktail before dinner may contribute to the avoidance of a state of chronic tension, especially…when creative activity is at its height.' Studies suggest that alcohol, deployed judiciously, can aid the creative process. Andrew Jarosz of Mississippi State University and colleagues have found that intoxicated people solved problems faster and 'were more likely to perceive their solutions as the result of a sudden insight'. Fascinating.


Otago Daily Times
5 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mass evacuation after wartime bombs found
An area was cordoned off opposite Cologne Cathedral after the discovery of World War 2-era bombs. Photo: Reuters TV Thousands of people have been evacuated from central Cologne in western Germany following the discovery of three wartime bombs, in what the city authority called the largest such operation since the end of World War 2. An evacuation zone with a radius of 1000 metres was cleared from 8am on Wednesday (local time), affecting about 20,500 residents along with many workers and hotel guests in the city's old town and Deutz district. Three American bombs, each with impact fuses, were found during construction work on Monday in Deutz, a bustling area on the bank of the River Rhine. Bomb disposal experts planned to disarm the ordnance. Unexploded bombs are often found in Germany, where many major cities sustained heavy damage during the war. The evacuation area includes one hospital, two retirement homes, nine schools, and many hotels and museums. "Everyone involved hopes that the defusing can be completed in the course of Wednesday. This is only possible if all those affected leave their homes or workplaces early and stay outside the evacuation area from the outset on that day," the city authority said in a statement. The measures caused major transport disruptions in the city of over 1 million people, with Germany's national rail operator warning that many trains would be diverted or cancelled. A stretch of the Rhine would be blocked off before the bomb disposal operation begins. The Rhine, which runs from the Swiss Alps to the North Sea via Cologne, is one of Europe's key waterways for the transportation of commodities such as grain and coal. Private television station RTL, whose main office is located in the evacuation zone, interrupted its morning news programme. "We have to leave," the news anchor said, grabbing his bag as the lights were turned off.


Scoop
7 days ago
- Scoop
In Her Memoir, Jacinda Ardern Shows A ‘Different Kind Of Power' Is Possible – But Also Has Its Limits
Article – The Conversation Imagine getting a positive pregnancy test and then – just a few days later – learning you'll be prime minister. In hindsight, being willing and able to deal with the unexpected would become the hallmark of former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern's political career. She had always stood out as a leader, but her tumultuous political journey followed none of the predictable pathways. Readers of her memoir will relive what this was like, from her feelings about motherhood through to meeting world leaders. Review: A Different Kind of Power – Jacinda Ardern (Penguin Random House) The title of her book promises more than just that, however. Many people hope for a different kind of leader, but what personal qualities or strengths do such leaders need? More generally, can the personal qualities that contribute to great leadership be learned and applied by others? The answer seems to be a qualified yes. Since leaving office, Ardern has become something of a global influencer. But as her career pivots towards celebrity appearances and international agencies, her memoir also serves as a leadership manifesto – especially for women, or aspirants of any gender, who suffer self-doubt. The limits of empathy In her formative years, working as an assistant to Labour leader Helen Clark, Ardern relates how she let political opponents get under her skin. Was she 'too thin-skinned' for politics? She soon learned 'you could be sensitive and survive'. Better still, she could use her sensitivity as a strength. But 'it is different for women in the public eye', she writes. Derogatory terms were used against her, such as the ' show pony ' epithet coined by a senior woman journalist. There were questions about whether she had 'substance'. These things could undermine people's belief in her competence – perhaps even her own self-belief. What she did about this is instructive. Lashing out at jibes and cartoon images would make her look 'humourless and too sensitive'. The 'trick' was to respond in a way that would 'take the story nowhere'. She became adept at that, deflecting comments aimed at putting her down. This also meant being a feminist but not using feminism as her ideological platform. Other than admonishing a TV presenter that it was 'unacceptable' for him to ask whether a sitting prime minister could take maternity leave, she generally let others do the outrage and avoided becoming an even bigger target for culture warriors. But A Different Kind of Power asks the question: different from what? Ardern's political career has been a challenge, if not a rebuke, to leaders who indulge in egotistical, competitive, always-be-winning behaviour. Need one even mention Donald Trump? Instead, Ardern offers kindness and empathy. The approach showed its true strength in the days following the terrorist atrocity in Christchurch in 2019. At a time when anti-immigrant and Islamophobic sentiments were growing, Ardern embraced the victims. 'They are us', she declared. Emotions that could have generated a cycle of blame were guided by her towards sharing of grief and aroha. Like any political virtue, though, empathy has limitations: it touches those whose suffering commands our attention, but it is partial. Effective social policy also requires an impartial administration and redistribution of resources. Leaders must ensure public goods are delivered equitably to those in need, which calls for rational planning. And sometimes a national emergency may call for actions that feel unfair or insensitive to some. Pandemic politics COVID-19 was that emergency. It created deep uncertainty for governments, and there was no 'kind' pathway forward. The Ardern government did an exemplary job, saving many lives, and the Labour Party was rewarded at the 2020 election with an unprecedented 50% of the party vote. But Ardern's retelling of that time is surprisingly brief, especially given her pivotal role. She put herself daily at the centre of it all, patiently explaining the public health responses. During this battle with a virus, however, she couldn't inoculate against the political consequences and shifts in public opinion. As the pandemic wore on, many New Zealanders whose businesses had been shut down, who had been isolated in their homes, who had difficulty returning home from abroad or who'd been ostracised for not getting vaccinated, weren't feeling much empathy or kindness from their government. And they felt they were being silenced. This sentiment grew far beyond the activists who had made themselves heard on parliament grounds in early 2022. Ardern refused to meet with those protestors. 'How could I send a message that if you disagree with something, you can illegally occupy the grounds of parliament and then have your demands met?' But she (or a senior minister) could have heard their demands and explained why they couldn't be met. Her refusal to listen left the field open to veteran populist Winston Peters, who exploited the opportunity, launching his campaign to return to parliament – in which he now sits and Ardern doesn't. While vaccine mandates were a key concern for protestors, it's disappointing that, to this day, Ardern blames the dissenters, as if they were 'not us' – kicked out of the 'team of five million'. She attributes the dissent solely to their 'mistrust'. Refusing to listen – not just to protestors, but to deeper shifts in public opinion – would cost Labour dearly. Induced by the pandemic fiscal stimulus, inflation peaked at 7.3% in June 2022. By that time, two switches had occurred: the National Party was ahead in polls and a majority were saying the country was heading in the wrong direction. In January 2023, then, Ardern resigned as prime minister. She believed, probably correctly, that it would be 'good for my party and perhaps it would be good for the election'. The toll of leadership But she also reveals in her memoir that a cancer scare influenced the decision – a false alarm, but a sign perhaps that the job was taking its toll. Her leaving could 'take the heat out of the politics', she reasoned. And anyway, she was tired, stressed and losing her patience. The leadership change to Chris Hipkins – and a devastating cyclone – boosted Labour's polling for a while. But their 1,443,545 party votes in 2020 fell to 767,540 in the October 2023 election. Hundreds of thousands of voters had turned their backs on the Labour Party, and the COVID response wasn't solely to blame. There were also controversial or failed policies – such as restructuring water services, a proposed unemployment insurance scheme, and Māori co-governance initiatives – that were ruthlessly exploited by the political opposition. These were all initiated under Ardern, although unmentioned in her memoir. Her book is more about subjective self-doubt and empathy. She doesn't critically examine her own policies. Nor does she express empathy for those who felt disadvantaged or excluded by them – granting as always that emergency measures had been necessary. And, as she heads further into an international career, there's no expression of empathy for those who now need it most, be they children in Gaza or refugees in South Sudan. It's disappointing Ardern doesn't define key words: empathy, leadership or power, for example. There are different ways to understand them, and definitions carry assumptions. But she's not addressing academics or political analysts. Her audience is primarily American – a much larger and more lucrative market than her home country. With the Democrats struggling to find direction and leadership after last year's losses, Ardern – who poses no threat to anyone's political ambitions there – offers some inspiration. Some may fault it for avoiding those harder questions about her time at the top, but Ardern's memoir interweaves an authentically retold personal story with high political drama. It tells of one woman's struggle with morning sickness, childbirth, breastfeeding and motherhood, even while taking on extraordinary public responsibilities and media exposure. It's still amazing how she managed to do all that. I was a personal acquaintance of Jacinda, when she was a list MP in Auckland Central.