
Najib did not exercise reasonable diligence to obtain purported house arrest addendum, Federal Court hears
Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar argued Najib had failed to demonstrate the supposed addendum could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before a judicial review hearing at the High Court in July last year.
Today's hearing pertains to the Attorney General Chambers' (AGC) appeal against the Court of Appeal's majority decision to grant Najib leave to continue his court case to get house arrest.
Mohd Dusuki said Najib had, as early as February 12, 2024, received credible information, in addition to the Early Release Order (pardon order) dated January 29, 2024, from the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong, which included an 'addendum' permitting him to serve the remainder of his six-year prison sentence at home instead of the Kajang Prison.
Yet, no efforts were shown as to whether Najib tried to communicate with Istana Negara or Istana Pahang on the matter, Mohd Dusuki explained to a three-judge panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim
The other Federal Court judges on the panel were Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah.
Datuk Muhammad Nizar, Najib's son and a Pahang state exco member, only managed to obtain an original unsigned copy from the Pahang palace with strict instructions that the same should not be used without the consent of the Sultan — days before the Court of Appeal was schedule to hear Najib's appeal over the High Court's dismissal of his judicial review application.
In Nizar's affidavit, he claimed the comptroller of the Sultan of Pahang's royal household Datuk Ahmad Khirrizal Ab Rahman had confirmed the existence of the addendum order and verified its authenticity.
Mohd Dusuki said the new evidence only came about after the High Court had dismissed Najib's leave application for judicial review to ascertain the existence of the addendum and to compel its subsequent execution.
'The minority judgment was correct in finding that reasonable diligence was lacking,' he said.
The AG's appeal at the Federal Court is important as it will determine whether Najib's court bid to ultimately be placed under house arrest can continue or not.
On January 6, in a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal remitted the case on Najib's claim of the existence of an additional document purportedly allowing him to serve the remainder of his six-year prison sentence under house arrest, to the High Court to be heard on its merits.
Court of Appeal judge Datuk Azizah Nawawi, who dissented, said there was no appealable error in the High Court judge's findings, noting that there had been a delay since Muhammad Nizar only obtained the addendum many months after the High Court ruling.
In April 2024, Najib filed a judicial review at the High Court seeking an order for the federal government and the Pardons Board to confirm that the house arrest addendum actually exists.
In his leave application, Najib claimed Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah issued the order during the January 29, 2024 meeting of the board, for the former to serve the remainder of his reduced sentence under house arrest.
Najib also alleged that he received confirmation on February 12, 2024, about the issuance of the 'supplementary order' or Addendum Order, which would allow him to serve a reduced prison sentence at home instead of the Kajang Prison where he is currently housed.
He also wanted the High Court to order the Malaysian government to carry out the addendum by removing him from the Kajang Prison and allow him to serve out the remainder of his jail sentence at his Kuala Lumpur house.
With the judicial review application, Najib needed to get the court's permission for his challenge to be heard, which was denied last year.
On February 2, 2024, the Pardon's Board halved Najib's sentence to six years for misappropriating funds amounting to RM42 million, which means he could be released as early as August 23, 2028.
Najib has been imprisoned since August 23, 2022, after the Federal Court upheld his conviction for criminal breach of trust, power abuse, and money laundering over the misappropriation of SRC International Sdn Bhd's funds.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
40 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Cyberjaya murder: Suspects remanded for seven more days
SEPANG, July 3 — The remand order against three suspects linked to the murder of a private university student in Cyberjaya has been extended for another seven days. Magistrate Khairatul Animah Jelani allowed the extension of the remand against the suspects, comprising a man and two women, until this Thursday. The earlier remand order, which was issued on June 27, expired today. According to police, the three suspects were known to the victim, who was found dead in her condominium unit by a friend at about 10 am on June 24. She was staying in the room with five other students, but her housemates had reportedly returned to their hometowns for the holidays on June 21. — Bernama


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah, now temporarily carrying out Chief Justice's duties, will herself retire in four months' time
KUALA LUMPUR, July 3 — Chief Judge of Malaya (CJM) Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim, who is now temporarily performing the Chief Justice's duties until a new one is appointed, will herself retire by mid-November this year. Malaysia's judiciary has four top judges: Chief Justice (CJ) — now vacant President of the Court of Appeal (PCA) — now vacant Chief Judge of Malaya (CJM) — held by Hasnah, who will retire this November Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak (CJSS) — held by Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli, who will retire this month The CJ post became vacant when Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's six-year tenure ended on July 1, while the second-highest post PCA fell vacant when Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim's tenure of more than two years and five months ended on July 2. Both Tengku Maimun and Abang Iskandar had retired as they had reached the mandatory retirement age for judges of 66 on July 2 (yesterday) and July 3 (today) respectively, and had not been offered a six-month extension. Hasnah herself turned 66 on May 15 this year, but is currently serving as CJM on a six-month extension until November 14 this year. Abdul Rahman turned 66 on January 25, and will continue serving as CJSS until July 24 this year, which is the day before he reaches the age of 66 years and six months. Under the Federal Constitution's Article 125, Federal Court judges' tenures shall be until 66 years old, but their tenures can be extended by six months if the Yang di-Pertuan Agong approves it. The top four judges in the judiciary regularly sit as Federal Court judges when deciding on cases at the Federal Court level, besides carrying out their administrative duties in ensuring the smooth running of the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court. At the time of writing, there has been no announcements of who will be the next CJ and the next PCA, which are the two top posts in the judiciary. Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil was yesterday reported saying that the Cabinet had in its weekly meeting yesterday had only briefly mentioned the matter of the next CJ and that the issue was not discussed in depth While waiting for the next CJ to be selected and appointed, the judiciary today announced that Hasnah will be performing the CJ's duties until then. Hasnah will be doing the CJ's duties while also handling the CJM's administration duties involving the High Courts throughout Peninsular Malaysia.

Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Thailand political crisis: Phumtham becomes acting PM as Paetongtarn suspended in ethics probe
BANGKOK, July 3 — Thailand's king is scheduled on Thursday to swear in a new cabinet in a reshuffle that will see a third person in a week take on the role of the country's prime minister. The Southeast Asian nation's top office was plunged into turmoil on Tuesday when the Constitutional Court suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra pending an ethics probe, which could take months. Power passed to Transport Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Jungrungreangkit, who held the role for only one full day, as the bombshell ruling landed during an awkward interim before the reshuffle. When former Defence Minister Phumtham Wechayachai is sworn into his new position as Interior Minister, he will also take on a deputy prime minister role outranking Suriya's — thus becoming the acting premier. Before Paetongtarn was ousted, she had assigned herself the role of Culture Minister in the new cabinet, meaning she is set to retain a perch in the upper echelons of power. The revolving door of leadership comes as the kingdom is battling to revive a faltering economy and secure a US trade deal to avert Donald Trump's looming threat of a 36 per cent tariff. Phumtham is considered a loyal lieutenant to the suspended Paetongtarn and her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, the powerful patriarch of a dynasty that has dominated Thai politics in the 21st century. Thaksin-linked parties have been jousting with the pro-military, pro-conservative establishment since the early 2000s, but analysts say the family's political brand is now in decline. The 71-year-old Phumtham earned the nickname 'Big Comrade' for his association with a left-wing youth movement of the 1970s, but transitioned to politics through a role in Thaksin's telecoms empire. In previous cabinets, he held the defence and commerce portfolios, and briefly served as acting prime minister after a crisis engulfed the top office last year. Paetongtarn has been hobbled by a longstanding territorial dispute between Thailand and Cambodia, which flared into cross-border clashes in May, killing one Cambodian soldier. When she made a diplomatic call to Cambodian ex-leader Hun Sen, she reportedly called him 'uncle' and referred to a Thai military commander as her 'opponent', according to a leaked recording that caused widespread backlash. A conservative party later abandoned her ruling coalition — triggering the cabinet reshuffle — accusing her of kowtowing to Cambodia and undermining the military. The Constitutional Court said there was 'sufficient cause to suspect' Paetongtarn breached ministerial ethics in the diplomatic row. — AFP