
How did we become so scared of colour in our own homes?
My sons and I have this rhetorical banter… One of us will ask: 'Who is the most difficult person to know?" To which, one of us responds: 'Myself". When people ask me what I do, I often say I write about design, but what I actually write about, is homes. What makes a home the way it is? Why do we shape it the way we do? How do we think about it more deeply? As my mind sifts through the many spaces I've seen these past few weeks and conversations I've had about the topic of home, the conclusion that I've come to is that many folks are unaware of themselves as they begin making homes. It is a performance, our home. So many different types of performance. Performative authenticity. Performative minimalism.
My sons and I have this rhetorical banter… One of us will ask: 'Who is the most difficult person to know?" To which, one of us responds: 'Myself". When people ask me what I do, I often say I write about design, but what I actually write about, is homes. What makes a home the way it is? Why do we shape it the way we do? How do we think about it more deeply? As my mind sifts through the many spaces I've seen these past few weeks and conversations I've had about the topic of home, the conclusion that I've come to is that many folks are unaware of themselves as they begin making homes. It is a performance, our home. So many different types of performance. Performative authenticity. Performative minimalism.
I just sat through two days of research on the subject of Indian homes. A cascade of information about consumer segments and the sorts of homes people are making across various income groups and cities in the country. In the case of the vast majority of probably 100-plus residences surveyed, I'd say people had done far too much to their dwellings and mostly, and maybe unintentionally, as an act of exhibition. If you don't know yourself, at a very fundamental level, then it's very difficult to make a home that is more than just an illusion.
But then we live in a culture that almost demands a performance, because people living authentically is often just inconvenient. Performance of loyalty, of spirituality, of decorum, of cultured-ness, of piety, of filial adoration. Since the group is considered more important than the individual, most of us are forced into some form of acting, even in our own homes. I come from a conservative Christian background but my home is filled with the iconography of other spiritual and religious inclinations, because some of our best craft capabilities are representations of religion, whether its terracotta figurines, Kalighat paintings or Islamic mirror etchings. Several of my family members would not approve of the imbalance of religious representation or the aesthetics of some of my artworks. And if I were so inclined to be sensitive to their feelings then I'd have to remove at least some of my most precious collectibles, particularly a fierce wall-mounted sculpture Aflame, a fiercely red, gold-ornamented tantric representation of the 14th century Kashmiri mystic Lal Ded, by the art collective WOLF Jaipur. So I understand the diplomatic urge for theatricality. I am only beginning to comprehend and accept my own design, decor and art urges, and if I now live without pretension it is because I find it easier to withstand others' disapproval than decorate my own home on someone else's terms.
When I see prevalent trends in decor, the place that particularly stands emblematic of our discomfort with ourselves is the living room. That space which people create very specifically for symbolic if quiet communication to their guests. Across a vast spectrum of Indian homes, people are covering up their living room walls with PVC wall panels, wallpaper stickers, tiles, faux wooden fluted panels, veneers, wainscotting, even stone. To paint, it seems, is no longer enough.
Though the act of decorating this way is meant to be another tool of personalisation, what such exaggerations achieve is something more complicated. For one thing, these types of additions reduce the size and scale of a space. It also makes for extraordinary complications if there's any water damage or other problems behind the cladding. Many of these off-the-shelf, online-available decor accessories promise to protect your walls, and help people express some level of individualisation. The only problem is, if a lot of people are doing the same exaggerated thing, then everything quickly becomes tired facsimiles mimicking one another.
If you're sitting in a space that's been clad with plywood and veneers wall to wall, and perhaps very little furniture in the room, it doesn't make it a minimalist room, it is the performance of minimalism.
Living rooms that look like they're stages, allegorical settings for domestic theatre. I've been trying to understand the mindset that gives rise to this feeling that a portion of the room needs to be covered with more material—particularly with unsustainable material. I use words like theatrics and performative-ness quite deliberately. Because with these over-material filled spaces that only convey that we have the resources to use them, we're either performing to the market, which has convinced us we need them, or to the trendsetters, who make us believe this level of customisation is necessary or beautiful. If you're sitting in a space that's been clad with plywood and veneers wall to wall, and perhaps very little furniture in the room, it doesn't make it a minimalist room, it is the performance of minimalism. The alternative, when we're picky with the nature of the materials we use, the economic use of materials itself—that frugality is more meaningful than performing minimalism by using an industrial and unsustainable material.
How did we become so scared of walls and paint colour? There's a simplicity and basic-ness to colour and its rendering as a painted material. It is ubiquitous, it is uncomplicated, a fundamental element even, but it is also a frightening, culturally loaded, creative material. To go beyond neutrals is difficult; few do it well. Kerala, the capital of colour-drenched homes, is now largely a neutral hue-loving state. Peruse the pages of the Malayalam design weekly Veedu, and you'll see a surfeit of gabled roofs over white-painted quiet walls. The hegemony of neutrals is complete. Colour is a political and classist tool; we've succumbed to Western readings about colour, without even realising it. I was reminded of these structures and its teachings when I saw the coverage of the video where New York mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani is doing the most banal thing: eating biryani with his hands. In a lot of the world, including places such as Indonesia, people eat with their hands. Yet, that simple dining etiquette evokes a discussion. Colour is as unusual a political tool as food. We imbibe learnings that we're not even aware of. Traditional Indian aesthetics used colour in the most ingenious ways. One of the chief reasons I love south Indian clay figurines is because of their radical, confident use of colour. The colour-blocking is crazy and brilliantly contemporary. Few designers today are able to achieve that sort of range and hue-partnership in a space. Also read: Workspace evolution: Gen Z inspires new office design trends
The reliance on new-tech products that pretend to look like various types of wood, is meant to save us from difficult choices. But the conditions of most Indian cities are such that the more complicated the home becomes, the more difficult its long-term survival. Say with cladding, there's moisture and the evil that it will unleash, the visible traces of dust, and it becomes that much more complicated to change your mind—unlike a wall with colour; if you want to change it then you change it. We change with time, with homes, with experiences, the people we are today are not the same as the ones we'll see in the mirror in a few years. Our homes have to be able to imbibe that. But that means we need to understand who we are at any point in time, to understand also what we are doing to the overall landscape, to our environment.
What are your essentials? What do you need? Where do you want to begin? How will your space accommodate the many versions of you? These are the most important questions to begin with, when you're starting the work on a home. If you don't attempt to answer those then you'll end up helming yourself in with elements you don't actually need.
Manju Sara Rajan is an editor, arts manager and author who divides her time between Kottayam and Bengaluru. Topics You May Be Interested In

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
SGPC to hold pan-India events to mark 350th martyrdom anniversary of Guru Teg Bahadar
1 2 Amritsar: Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) president Harjinder Singh Dhami on Tuesday announced a series of nationwide programmes to commemorate the 350th Martyrdom anniversary of the ninth Sikh Guru, Sri Guru Teg Bahadar. A grand Panthic Nagar Kirtan will begin on Aug 21 from Gurdwara Dhobri Sahib in Assam, a site closely associated with the Guru. Addressing media persons, Dhami said the Martyrdom Nagar Kirtan, themed 'Dharam Het Saaka Jini Keeya' (One Who Made Supreme Sacrifice for Faith), will travel through 20 Indian states before culminating at Sri Anandpur Sahib on Nov 23. He emphasised that the anniversary is being observed in accordance with Khalsa traditions, with support from the Sikh Sangat. In addition to the main procession, major Gurmat programmes will be held in prominent cities across the country, and special Nagar Kirtans will be organised to honour the Guru's legacy and sacrifice. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Rishtas vs Red Flags: How Indian Love Differs From The West
Love and marriage in India are not just between two people; it's between two families. It is safe to call it a community event; an amalgamation of hearts, horoscopes, good food, and some inevitable chaos. Very contrasting is the Western culture, where romance is private and there's individualistic freedom in finding a life partner. While Indians might be too nosy, there's a certain warmth to how everyone wants to be super involved, and almost all are rooting for your happy love life. Ravi Mittal, Founder & CEO of QuackQuack shares how Indian love differs from the West. Rishtas vs Red Flags. Keeping in mind the polar opposite dating cultures, desi daters are slowly getting accustomed to the prying eyes of their mothers and turning the disapproval of their fathers into approvals, one good match at a time. Westerners might only have to worry about the two of their vibes matching, but Indians have a lot more to think about: "Will Papa think his qualifications are good enough?" or "What if Mummy thinks she's all sass and no sanskar?" Indian daters are built differently; not better or worse, just different. Your love life might be personal, but never private: There was a time, not too long ago, when Indian daters hated the idea of parents interfering with their love lives. But with enough trial and error, 3 out of 7 daters say in the Indian dating scenario, parental guidance is much appreciated. Blindly following the West's privacy factors won't cut it in India, where parents' approval on the matter of 'settling down' is ultimately an important factor for most people. It might seem like a red flag, involving your family, but for Indian daters, it's a stamp of approval and a reassurance that "I am serious about this relationship." Yes, it has its cons; overly curious neighbours and their constant, "So, when are you getting married?" or "Who is that girl?" can be annoying, but you also get caring people who will verify the claims of an alliance, whether you met them online or IRL. While it sounds overwhelming, Indians are used to this level of involvement, and surveys show that it brings the comfort of familiarity to most daters. The chronology is not the same: Western dating follows a certain way; usually attraction, dating, declaring love, dating again, possibly getting engaged, and then getting married, if that's the goal. The Indian dating sequence goes a bit differently. In the modern dating scenario, it is more like liking the dating profile, matching, dating, things get serious, informing the family, waiting for partner to inform the family, waiting for everyone's approval to propose, a lot of drama and chaos, and finally, shadi fixed. Indian daters come with a different set of priorities; it is more focused on long-term commitment over short-term attraction, and it demands every family member's nod. Love and stability go hand-in-hand in the desi dating world, and nothing is stable in an Indian household till mummy pre-checks it. Some trends are less severe and some take a different route- It would be wrong to say there's no ghosting or people don't break up as much in India, but the intensity can be, in some cases, lower than in the West. Why? Because Indian daters are answerable to too many people, not just their partner. If you have been dating someone, even casually, and your parents get a whiff of it, it would immediately get more difficult to abruptly break things off. It can be a boon or a bane; on one hand, people are less indecisive; on the other, some can forcefully stay in an unhappy relationship out of that same pressure of being answerable to not one, but many. Commitment phobia is less severe among desi daters because of the ingrained culture of committing to values and sticking to one thing till it's perfect since their very childhood. Ghosting exists, but in many cases, it stems from deeply rooted societal values rather than a personal choice; for instance, two people have been connecting really nicely, until one reveals something about their past that just doesn't sit well with the other's family values or doesn't match societal expectations. Emotional vulnerability in Desi dating: While in the West, it is an already established factor, in India, it is still developing. There's more awareness around mental health in Western dating, but India is still catching up, though the young generations of daters have been doing great work to bring the focus on emotional intelligence and availability, open communication, and a healthy amount of emotional vulnerability. It is more prevalent in the online dating world, as compared to a traditional matchmaking setup, but it has to begin somewhere. In traditional settings, men are still expected to be more emotionally suppressed, strong, and provider-type, and women meek, more emotional, and needing protection. But, countless studies have shown that the story is quite different in the online dating setup; online daters are embracing emotional honesty, regardless of gender. Men cry, women plan dates, and both comfort each other. Therapy is no longer taboo; in fact, a person in therapy is more desirable today. They are expected to be more emotionally sorted and mature. Boundaries, speaking about anxiety, depression, and focusing on one's mental health as much as physical health are slowly becoming green flags. And once the younger generation starts addressing the trauma, the older ones will heal too.


News18
4 hours ago
- News18
'Mutual Verbal Consent Sufficient': Gujarat HC's Nod To Islamic Law On Dissolution Of Muslim Marriage
The Gujarat High Court ruled that Muslim marriages can be verbally dissolved if both parties consent, and there is no need for a written document under 'mubaraat' In a nod to Islamic law, the Gujarat High Court recently observed that a Muslim marriage can be dissolved through mutual verbal consent, or mubaraat. Mubaraat, or mutual consent divorce, is based on mutual verbal consent and does not need a written agreement as both spouses agree to separate. This is permissible under Islamic personal law and the ruling aligns with the principles of the Quran and Hadith cited by the court. In doing so, the court set aside a family court order that rejected the divorce plea based on the absence of a written agreement for mutual consent. A bench of Justices AY Kogje and NS Sanjay Gowda made the observation while overturning the family court order, which stated that a written agreement was necessary in mubaraat. 'The court does not find that recording of an agreement between the parties to the nikah in any written format is essential for recording the fact of dissolution of marriage. For the purpose of mubaraat, the expression of a mutual consent to dissolution of nikah is sufficient to dissolve the nikah in itself," the bench said, as per Bar and Bench. mubaraat nikah or a Muslim marriage does not mean that it is an essential requirement under Muslim personal law. ' Nikahnama only recognises the agreement entered into by the parties to the marriage by uttering the words qabool in presence of the witness that does not make a nikahnama or registration of a nikah part of an essential process of nikah. Similarly, there is no process by which the written agreement is an essential requirement for mubaraat," the court was quoted in its ruling. The HC was hearing a joint appeal filed by an estranged couple, whose divorce plea was dismissed by the family court in April. The two parties married in 2021, but had been living separately for more than a year due to irreconcilable differences. They mutually agreed to dissolve the marriage and opted for mubaraat. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.