Yes, you can teach yourself to forget. And here's why you should
Earlier this year, 20-year-old Vishvaa Rajakumar memorized 80 random numbers in 13.5 seconds—roughly six numbers per second. This feat helped him win the Memory League World Championship, a tournament that pushes memory to its extremes. In another challenge, participants memorized the order of an entire shuffled deck of cards.
Even if your memorization skills wouldn't win an international competition, having an above-average memory is considered a prize. Nearly three-quarters of adults say they play games like crossword puzzles not only for fun, but to improve their memory. After all, having a good memory is associated with sharpness and intelligence, while aforgetfulness is a quality linked to scatterbrains and mental decline.
But as I've learned from cognitive scientists, an outsized spotlight on memory can lead us to neglect that forgetting is an equally important skill. Without forgetting, our minds would be cluttered with unnecessary, outdated, and sometimes emotionally painful information. And while, most of the time, forgetting happens outside our awareness, scientists have learned that people can have a surprising amount of control over what we don't want to remember.
Indeed, forgetting is a skill we can foster to influence well-being, creativity, and change what we fundamentally know about ourselves. Some psychologists are now teaching forgetting as a tool to help with symptoms of depression or anxiety. And as technology like our phones or social media take on a larger role in what we remember, it may be a critical time to not only boost our memories but become better forgetters too. Why forgetting is good for us
We start to forget as soon as we begin to remember, said Jonathan Fawcett, a cognitive neuroscientist at the Memorial University of Newfoundland, and this is a good thing. Take the example of Russian journalist Solomon Shereshevsky, who had an extraordinary capacity to rapidly remember minute details, even phrases in a foreign language and meaningless mathematical formulas . But he also had trouble concentrating with so many memories swirling around in his head. At times, Shereshevsky desired to forget so badly that he would write down a memory and then light the paper ablaze in an attempt to clear his mind. It was no use. 'Not even fire could wipe out the traces he wanted to obliterate,' the neurologist A.R. Luria, who studied Shereshevsky, wrote.
Most of us don't have to resort to such destruction. Forgetting is usually mindless. We form vivid memories by paying attention to details that will prove to be useful in the future, while information we don't attend to or that we don't need to know doesn't get encoded. Even when a memory is formed, it can be later lost through forgetting processes when a memory weakens over time, or through interference—when newer memories compete with older memories, updating or replacing them. Such forgetting takes place without any effort, and sometimes without an explicit desire to forget, like when you can't find your keys because you weren't paying attention to where they were placed.
But people partake in a more intentional kind of forgetting on a daily basis, said Michael Anderson, a cognitive psychologist and neuroscientist at The University of Cambridge. Motivated forgetting, as it's also called, takes place when someone has a vested interest in not remembering something. How to forget
Researchers find a person can either stop a memory from forming in the first place, or stop an unwanted memory from surfacing, weakening it.
Fawcett has shown how to accomplish the former in 'directed forgetting' experiments. In the lab, people are shown a list of words, followed by the directions to forget or remember them. It's that easy. In the end, participants have a better memory for the words they were told to hang on to, and a worse memory of the words they were told to forget.
The 'forget' words weren't committed to memory simply because participants were told they wouldn't need them later. In our everyday lives, of course, there aren't directions telling us what to remember and what to discard. But the exercise shows that it's possible to encounter a piece of non-useful information, and intentionally let it go.
Another kind of motivated forgetting is when people selectively choose to remember certain memories over others that are similar—strengthening the chosen memory and leading to an atrophy of the less favoured one. This is called 'retrieval-induced forgetting,' and through it, people can shape their own life stories.
For example, imagine an embarrassing karaoke night where you fell off the stage during a rendition of Pink Pony Club. If you talk about that evening with your friends, but avoid talking about the stumble, over time, more positive aspects of the experience would grow into a more prominent memory. You might remember hitting the high note while belting 'I'm just having fun,' or your friends' laughter over the bruises. 'By selectively choosing what to think about and what to recall, we actually change our own internal self-narrative,' Fawcett said. People are more likely to remember information that matches what they believe about themselves. If you consider yourself to be reliable, you will remember all the times you brought your sick friend soup, and now how you forgot your mom's birthday. Those memories then reinforce your self-image as a reliable person.
Another common form of motivated forgetting occurs when older memories are suppressed after being triggered by a reminder. For example, you might see a car that looks like your ex-partner's. Normally that would trigger you to painfully remember a past romantic road trip. But instead of dwelling on the past, researchers find you can quickly push that memory out of your mind.
Anderson came up with an experiment to study this inhibitory memory process in what he called 'think, no-think experiments.' He asked people to remember pairs of words, like lawn and beef, and consider one to be a cue for the other. Then he would tell certain participants to try not to remember the word beef when they saw the word lawn. Anderson has compared this kind of forgetting to stopping a physical action; if you reach out and touch a hot pan handle, the next time you grab for it, you may catch yourself before you do. 'Stopping cognition is every bit as important as stopping action,' he said.
And in fact, when Anderson and his colleagues looked at people's brain activity during 'think, no-think' tasks, they observed an inhibitory process that looked similar to stopping a physical movement. Stopping your hand from reaching out to touch a hot handle sends a signal going from the prefrontal cortex to the movement areas of the brain. When a person stopped a memory, a signal was sent instead to the hippocampus, the brain's memory center. Stopping a memory in this way had later consequences for forgetting. After shoving those memories away, they started to diminish.
In a study from 2023, Anderson and his colleagues successfully trained participants to stop thinking about worries—past and future— about the COVID-19 pandemic. In more 'think, no-think experiments,' people came up with reminder words paired with disturbing thoughts, like the memory of visiting a family member in the hospital. When people were cued with their reminders—the word breathing, for example— they were told to either think about their memory, or to not think about it. After a three-day training, the 'no-think' groups reported less detailed and less emotionally urgent memories than the 'think' group. 'It suggests that people can become better at intentional forgetting,' Fawcett said. 'They can effectively be trained to do it.' Three months later, the participants' memories were still less upsetting, and 80 percent of them said they were still practicing thought suppression techniques. Yes, forgetting can be that easy
If it seems too easy to just tell yourself not to remember something, some of Anderson's study participants certainly thought so too. 'I couldn't believe how effective it was,' one told the researchers three months after the study ended. 'I always thought that just dismissing thoughts would make things worse.'
The social psychologist Daniel Wegner suggested that asking people not to think of something—like a white bear—would make them think about it more. But Anderson's work has shown that this isn't always the case. Still, Anderson said that motivated forgetting is a kind of skill, one that takes effort and practice, and comes more naturally to some people. Taking the time to master it could be worth it for mental health benefits, he says. In his COVID study, people who began the study with higher levels of anxiety reported larger improvements in measurements of anxiety, negative emotions, and depression after it was over. And past studies have found that those who performed better on 'think, no-think' tasks had less distressing intrusive memories after watching a violent movie. In 2020, a study found that the survivors of the 2015 terrorist attack in Paris who did not have PTSD tended to be better at memory suppression than those who did.
'We all have experiences that are negative,' Fawcett said, like embarrassing yourself at karaoke, or calling someone by the wrong name. 'The brain has mechanisms which are capable of pushing those thoughts out of mind.' Is technology changing how we forget?
The brain can push thoughts out, but increasingly, technology is letting some slide back in.
One recent afternoon, my iPhone lit up with a notification: 'You have a new memory.' A few seconds later, I was watching a slideshow titled 'Back in the Day' of me smiling in front of taxidermied animals at the Philadelphia Natural History Museum while instrumental music played. Before the notification, if you asked me if I've ever visited the museum, I would have recalled and said 'yes.' But the details of the dioramas, and how many I had posed with, had slipped my mind. I felt annoyed that my phone had been right: it was like a new memory, because I had forgotten it.
When our phones surface an old photo, it likely makes the memory of the event stronger, says University of California Irvine psychologist Benjamin Storm. Perhaps after years of pushing the stumble off the karaoke stage out of your mind, your iPhone goes ahead and reminds you right about it! On the other hand, a phone memory may dull similar memories associated with that event, which you did not photograph.
Storm wondered what aspects of my Philadelphia trip I may have forgotten since I engaged with the photo album my phone made for me. The impact of this was probably benign, but other curatorial choices could have bigger ripple effects on a person's memory. In 2022, journalists at the tech website 9to5Mac reported that iPhone 'memories' were not including photos from sensitive locations, like Holocaust memorial sites. 'It's uncomfortable to think about how much power technologies have to potentially shape how we remember ourselves,' Storm said. As our phones bombard us with 'new' memories we would have forgotten, while keeping other memories concealed, it's even more important to sharpen our forgetting skills.
People will probably always want to improve their memories, Fawcett said. But in the midst of practicing memory palace exercises, embrace being a good forgetter too. Outside of easing anxiety and shaping our sense of self, forgetting makes our memories flexible. In turn, this mental fuzziness might be what makes us creative, suggests Steve Ramirez, a National Geographic Explorer and neuroscientist at Boston University. 'We can begin to use memories as building blocks, to combine and recombine them in new ways, to predict an uncertain future,' he said. How could we ever come up with new ideas, if our brains were full of rigid unforgettable old ones?
You shouldn't try to forget every negative experience you've ever had, Anderson warned, but recognize that you are capable of, and likely already doing, a lot of motivated forgetting. It may not win you any impressive memory championships, but what you've forgotten is just as much a part of your life's story as what you're proud to remember.
This article is part of Your Memory, Rewired, a National Geographic exploration into the fuzzy, fascinating frontiers of memory science—including advice on how to make your own memory more powerful. Learn more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Greenpeace concerned as oil tankers on fire in Gulf of Oman
Following a suspected collision between two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman, Greenpeace is warning of devastating consequences for the environment. "An oil spill like the one now threatening the Gulf of Oman affects not only individual animal species, but the entire marine ecosystem," Thilo Maack, marine biologist at Greenpeace Germany, told dpa on Tuesday. According to the expert, dolphins, sea turtles and coastal birds are particularly sensitive to the toxic oil. "Fish larvae and other plankton - the basis of the marine food chain - are also at risk of mass extinction," said Maack. According to the environmental organization, the tanker Adalynn involved in the collision is part of the so-called Russian shadow fleet. The 23-year-old ship is on the list of the world's most dangerous tankers published by Greenpeace last year under a previous name. Iranian media reported a security incident in the Gulf of Oman on Tuesday morning. Several oil tankers are said to have caught fire not far from the coast of the United Arab Emirates, Iranian state radio reported. A connection with the war between Israel and Iran was not initially confirmed. According to later reports, the ships collided.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why is the International Space Station leaking? What to know after Axiom mission delayed
A leak on a remote outpost orbiting about 250 miles above Earth may sound alarming, but not to worry: The seven astronauts aboard the International Space Station are not in harm's way. But until the air leak detected on the laboratory's Russian segment is resolved, NASA has opted not to send any other people to dock at the station. That means an indefinite delay for a four-person commercial spaceflight. The postponement is nothing new for Axiom Mission 4, which has already experienced previous delays due to bad weather and issues with the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket selected to get it off the ground. Axiom Space, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is the company behind the private mission – its latest in a series of human spaceflights in partnership with both NASA and SpaceX. While the astronauts aboard the station are not in danger, small cracks on the ISS in recent years, particularly on the aging Russian segment, have contributed to the decision to retire the station by 2030. Here's what to know about the latest leak on the space station, and how it will effect the launch of Axiom Mission 4. The International Space Station has been stationed in low-Earth orbit for more than 25 years, typically about 250 miles high, where it has been home to astronauts from all over the world. The orbital laboratory is operated through a global partnership of space agencies, including NASA, Roscosmos, the European Space Agency, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). More than 280 spacefarers from 23 countries have visited the International Space Station, including 169 from the United States alone, according to NASA. Bigger than a six-bedroom house, the outpost has six sleeping quarters, two bathrooms, a gym and a 360-degree view bay window. The launch of the Axiom mission had already been delayed to allow SpaceX to repair a liquid oxygen leak found on the Falcon 9 rocket, NASA has said. Now, the mission is being delayed indefinitely after a "new pressure signature" was found on the station's Zvezda service module, a more than 2-decade-old core compartment, according to NASA. The discovery came after cosmonauts aboard the space station recently performed inspections of the pressurized module's interior surfaces, sealed some area and measured the current leak rate. The segment now is holding pressure, but NASA said the Axiom Mission 4 delay will provide additional time for the U.S. space agency to evaluate the leak with Roscosmos and determine next steps. NASA deferred additional questions about the leak to Roscosmos. A new launch date for Ax-4 has not yet been announced as of Friday, June 13. Axiom Mission 4, also known as Ax-4, is a commercial spaceflight venture that aims to send four private astronauts on a two-week trip to the International Space Station. Among the mission's crew are astronauts from India, Poland and Hungary who would be the first from their respective nations to ever reach the station. Under the command of former NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, the crew members are due to undertake about 60 scientific experiments during their time aboard the orbital laboratory. The research was developed specifically to take place in microgravity on behalf of organizations around the world, according to Axiom Space. But the launch of the mission has undergone a slew of delays since Axiom Space was originally working toward a May 29 launch. When the crew does get off the ground, they'll be aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule that will be propelled to orbit atop a Falcon 9 rocket launching from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The Axiom missions are also aimed at advancing the company's goals of building a space station that will attach to the ISS before its planned 2030 retirement. The missions began in 2022, with the most recent, Axiom Mission 3, taking place in January 2024. This isn't the first time the International Space Station has experienced a leak. In February 2024, an air leak in the Russian segment of the orbital laboratory known as the PrK module caused disagreement between Roscosmos and NASA about not only the cause, but how serious it was. By November, the leak was still unresolved while the two space agencies were monitoring it. The area has also been sealed from the rest of the station when crew members did not need to access the spacecraft docked at the module. Leaks of air from the cracks have been minor and posed no immediate safety threats to the station's astronauts, who patch the leaks with tape, glue and other solutions. But issues on the ISS are increasingly worrisome signs of aging. In late-2024, a NASA Office of Inspector General report even raised concerns about whether it would be safe or even affordable to operate past the station's 2030 retirement date. Seven members of Expedition 73, including three Americans, are living aboard the ISS – conducting scientific research and working to maintain the station. That includes NASA astronauts Nichole Ayers and Anne McClain, who in May made headlines for completing a rare all-female spacewalk. The women both arrived in March 2025 with JAXA astronaut Takuya Onishi and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov as part of a NASA mission known as Crew-10. That mission also made headlines due to its role in paving the way for the NASA astronauts who crewed the doomed Boeing Starliner to depart with the Crew-9 mission. Also at the station is NASA astronaut Jonny Kim, who reached the outpost in April 2025 with cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Alexey Zubritsky. Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: A portion of the space station is 'leaking.' Here's what that means.

National Geographic
20 hours ago
- National Geographic
Yes, you can teach yourself to forget. And here's why you should
Earlier this year, 20-year-old Vishvaa Rajakumar memorized 80 random numbers in 13.5 seconds—roughly six numbers per second. This feat helped him win the Memory League World Championship, a tournament that pushes memory to its extremes. In another challenge, participants memorized the order of an entire shuffled deck of cards. Even if your memorization skills wouldn't win an international competition, having an above-average memory is considered a prize. Nearly three-quarters of adults say they play games like crossword puzzles not only for fun, but to improve their memory. After all, having a good memory is associated with sharpness and intelligence, while aforgetfulness is a quality linked to scatterbrains and mental decline. But as I've learned from cognitive scientists, an outsized spotlight on memory can lead us to neglect that forgetting is an equally important skill. Without forgetting, our minds would be cluttered with unnecessary, outdated, and sometimes emotionally painful information. And while, most of the time, forgetting happens outside our awareness, scientists have learned that people can have a surprising amount of control over what we don't want to remember. Indeed, forgetting is a skill we can foster to influence well-being, creativity, and change what we fundamentally know about ourselves. Some psychologists are now teaching forgetting as a tool to help with symptoms of depression or anxiety. And as technology like our phones or social media take on a larger role in what we remember, it may be a critical time to not only boost our memories but become better forgetters too. Why forgetting is good for us We start to forget as soon as we begin to remember, said Jonathan Fawcett, a cognitive neuroscientist at the Memorial University of Newfoundland, and this is a good thing. Take the example of Russian journalist Solomon Shereshevsky, who had an extraordinary capacity to rapidly remember minute details, even phrases in a foreign language and meaningless mathematical formulas . But he also had trouble concentrating with so many memories swirling around in his head. At times, Shereshevsky desired to forget so badly that he would write down a memory and then light the paper ablaze in an attempt to clear his mind. It was no use. 'Not even fire could wipe out the traces he wanted to obliterate,' the neurologist A.R. Luria, who studied Shereshevsky, wrote. Most of us don't have to resort to such destruction. Forgetting is usually mindless. We form vivid memories by paying attention to details that will prove to be useful in the future, while information we don't attend to or that we don't need to know doesn't get encoded. Even when a memory is formed, it can be later lost through forgetting processes when a memory weakens over time, or through interference—when newer memories compete with older memories, updating or replacing them. Such forgetting takes place without any effort, and sometimes without an explicit desire to forget, like when you can't find your keys because you weren't paying attention to where they were placed. But people partake in a more intentional kind of forgetting on a daily basis, said Michael Anderson, a cognitive psychologist and neuroscientist at The University of Cambridge. Motivated forgetting, as it's also called, takes place when someone has a vested interest in not remembering something. How to forget Researchers find a person can either stop a memory from forming in the first place, or stop an unwanted memory from surfacing, weakening it. Fawcett has shown how to accomplish the former in 'directed forgetting' experiments. In the lab, people are shown a list of words, followed by the directions to forget or remember them. It's that easy. In the end, participants have a better memory for the words they were told to hang on to, and a worse memory of the words they were told to forget. The 'forget' words weren't committed to memory simply because participants were told they wouldn't need them later. In our everyday lives, of course, there aren't directions telling us what to remember and what to discard. But the exercise shows that it's possible to encounter a piece of non-useful information, and intentionally let it go. Another kind of motivated forgetting is when people selectively choose to remember certain memories over others that are similar—strengthening the chosen memory and leading to an atrophy of the less favoured one. This is called 'retrieval-induced forgetting,' and through it, people can shape their own life stories. For example, imagine an embarrassing karaoke night where you fell off the stage during a rendition of Pink Pony Club. If you talk about that evening with your friends, but avoid talking about the stumble, over time, more positive aspects of the experience would grow into a more prominent memory. You might remember hitting the high note while belting 'I'm just having fun,' or your friends' laughter over the bruises. 'By selectively choosing what to think about and what to recall, we actually change our own internal self-narrative,' Fawcett said. People are more likely to remember information that matches what they believe about themselves. If you consider yourself to be reliable, you will remember all the times you brought your sick friend soup, and now how you forgot your mom's birthday. Those memories then reinforce your self-image as a reliable person. Another common form of motivated forgetting occurs when older memories are suppressed after being triggered by a reminder. For example, you might see a car that looks like your ex-partner's. Normally that would trigger you to painfully remember a past romantic road trip. But instead of dwelling on the past, researchers find you can quickly push that memory out of your mind. Anderson came up with an experiment to study this inhibitory memory process in what he called 'think, no-think experiments.' He asked people to remember pairs of words, like lawn and beef, and consider one to be a cue for the other. Then he would tell certain participants to try not to remember the word beef when they saw the word lawn. Anderson has compared this kind of forgetting to stopping a physical action; if you reach out and touch a hot pan handle, the next time you grab for it, you may catch yourself before you do. 'Stopping cognition is every bit as important as stopping action,' he said. And in fact, when Anderson and his colleagues looked at people's brain activity during 'think, no-think' tasks, they observed an inhibitory process that looked similar to stopping a physical movement. Stopping your hand from reaching out to touch a hot handle sends a signal going from the prefrontal cortex to the movement areas of the brain. When a person stopped a memory, a signal was sent instead to the hippocampus, the brain's memory center. Stopping a memory in this way had later consequences for forgetting. After shoving those memories away, they started to diminish. In a study from 2023, Anderson and his colleagues successfully trained participants to stop thinking about worries—past and future— about the COVID-19 pandemic. In more 'think, no-think experiments,' people came up with reminder words paired with disturbing thoughts, like the memory of visiting a family member in the hospital. When people were cued with their reminders—the word breathing, for example— they were told to either think about their memory, or to not think about it. After a three-day training, the 'no-think' groups reported less detailed and less emotionally urgent memories than the 'think' group. 'It suggests that people can become better at intentional forgetting,' Fawcett said. 'They can effectively be trained to do it.' Three months later, the participants' memories were still less upsetting, and 80 percent of them said they were still practicing thought suppression techniques. Yes, forgetting can be that easy If it seems too easy to just tell yourself not to remember something, some of Anderson's study participants certainly thought so too. 'I couldn't believe how effective it was,' one told the researchers three months after the study ended. 'I always thought that just dismissing thoughts would make things worse.' The social psychologist Daniel Wegner suggested that asking people not to think of something—like a white bear—would make them think about it more. But Anderson's work has shown that this isn't always the case. Still, Anderson said that motivated forgetting is a kind of skill, one that takes effort and practice, and comes more naturally to some people. Taking the time to master it could be worth it for mental health benefits, he says. In his COVID study, people who began the study with higher levels of anxiety reported larger improvements in measurements of anxiety, negative emotions, and depression after it was over. And past studies have found that those who performed better on 'think, no-think' tasks had less distressing intrusive memories after watching a violent movie. In 2020, a study found that the survivors of the 2015 terrorist attack in Paris who did not have PTSD tended to be better at memory suppression than those who did. 'We all have experiences that are negative,' Fawcett said, like embarrassing yourself at karaoke, or calling someone by the wrong name. 'The brain has mechanisms which are capable of pushing those thoughts out of mind.' Is technology changing how we forget? The brain can push thoughts out, but increasingly, technology is letting some slide back in. One recent afternoon, my iPhone lit up with a notification: 'You have a new memory.' A few seconds later, I was watching a slideshow titled 'Back in the Day' of me smiling in front of taxidermied animals at the Philadelphia Natural History Museum while instrumental music played. Before the notification, if you asked me if I've ever visited the museum, I would have recalled and said 'yes.' But the details of the dioramas, and how many I had posed with, had slipped my mind. I felt annoyed that my phone had been right: it was like a new memory, because I had forgotten it. When our phones surface an old photo, it likely makes the memory of the event stronger, says University of California Irvine psychologist Benjamin Storm. Perhaps after years of pushing the stumble off the karaoke stage out of your mind, your iPhone goes ahead and reminds you right about it! On the other hand, a phone memory may dull similar memories associated with that event, which you did not photograph. Storm wondered what aspects of my Philadelphia trip I may have forgotten since I engaged with the photo album my phone made for me. The impact of this was probably benign, but other curatorial choices could have bigger ripple effects on a person's memory. In 2022, journalists at the tech website 9to5Mac reported that iPhone 'memories' were not including photos from sensitive locations, like Holocaust memorial sites. 'It's uncomfortable to think about how much power technologies have to potentially shape how we remember ourselves,' Storm said. As our phones bombard us with 'new' memories we would have forgotten, while keeping other memories concealed, it's even more important to sharpen our forgetting skills. People will probably always want to improve their memories, Fawcett said. But in the midst of practicing memory palace exercises, embrace being a good forgetter too. Outside of easing anxiety and shaping our sense of self, forgetting makes our memories flexible. In turn, this mental fuzziness might be what makes us creative, suggests Steve Ramirez, a National Geographic Explorer and neuroscientist at Boston University. 'We can begin to use memories as building blocks, to combine and recombine them in new ways, to predict an uncertain future,' he said. How could we ever come up with new ideas, if our brains were full of rigid unforgettable old ones? You shouldn't try to forget every negative experience you've ever had, Anderson warned, but recognize that you are capable of, and likely already doing, a lot of motivated forgetting. It may not win you any impressive memory championships, but what you've forgotten is just as much a part of your life's story as what you're proud to remember. This article is part of Your Memory, Rewired, a National Geographic exploration into the fuzzy, fascinating frontiers of memory science—including advice on how to make your own memory more powerful. Learn more.