
Ukrainians are fearful any Trump-brokered ceasefire will be full of concessions and false promises
CNN —
Iryna Danilovich disappeared while returning from work in April 2022. It would be two weeks before Russian authorities admitted she was in their custody. The human rights activist and nurse was detained in the Russian-occupied Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, accused of illegal possession of explosives and sentenced to seven years in prison. In her trial, Danilovich testified that she was tortured during her detention.
She has since been deported to a notoriously cruel women's penal colony in Zelenokumsk, southern Russia. She suffers from constant headaches and her health continues to deteriorate – yet she is not allowed to sit or lie down during the day, according to human rights monitoring group Zmina.
Ukraine has always called its areas under Russian control 'temporarily occupied territories,' insisting it will eventually regain control over them. But that hope is being crushed now. This week, US President Donald Trump suggested it was 'unlikely' Ukraine would get back much of its occupied land in the peace negotiations he intends to hold with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Danilovich's case – and she is just one of thousands Kyiv says are detained in Russia – shows what is at stake for Ukraine.
Trump's comment came after he held a 90-minute phone call with Putin on Wednesday, and it sparked panic across the country, where few believe Putin would negotiate in good faith.
Yuliya Kazdobina, a foreign policy expert at Ukrainian Prism, a think tank, said she doesn't believe the Russian leader wants peace.
'We already had so many years of negotiations with the Russian side,' she said. Russia has a history of striking and violating agreements with Ukraine going back decades. In 1994, Ukraine agreed to give up its nuclear weapons in exchange for guarantees from the United States, United Kingdom and Russia that they would respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. In 2015, after illegally annexing Crimea and sparking the conflict in eastern Ukraine, Moscow signed a ceasefire agreement only to then repeatedly violate it and then launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine seven years later.
'We know that Russia is very duplicitous, and they can play nice, but when it comes to actually making concessions and making peace, they never… make any concessions,' Kazdobina told CNN.
The view from Kyiv
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky responded to the Trump-Putin call by saying his country would not accept a peace deal struck between the US and Russia without Kyiv's involvement.
'As an independent country we simply cannot accept any agreements without us. And I articulate this very clearly to our partners. We will not accept any bilateral negotiations on Ukraine without us,' Zelensky said, adding that the fact that Trump spoke to Putin first was 'not pleasant.'
And Ukrainians seem to agree with their leader. Speaking to CNN in Kyiv, student Nazar Voloshenko said that any talks that could lead to Ukraine losing further territory would be disastrous for the country.
'We may be left without the currently temporarily occupied territories, without parts of the Kherson region, Zaporizhzhia region and the long-suffering Crimea,' he said. 'We must take back what is rightfully ours.'
Russian forces currently occupy nearly 20% of Ukraine's territory, up from the roughly 7% it controlled before launching its unprovoked full-scale invasion nearly three years ago.
According to Ukrainian officials, some 6 million people, including 1 million children, live under Russian occupation, in what the United Nations has described as a 'bleak human rights situation.'
Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks after polling stations closed in Moscow, in the March 2024 election.
Maxim Shemetov/Reuters/File
Fears of history repeating itself
Crimea has been under Russian control since Moscow illegally annexed it in 2014. Since then, Russia has imposed a brutal and repressive regime, stomping out any sign of opposition.
Maksym Vishchyk, a lawyer at Global Rights Compliance, a non-profit that advises the Ukrainian authorities on investigating and prosecuting international crimes, said Moscow has repeated the same pattern across other occupied territories.
'When Russia occupied the Crimea peninsula, it commenced a campaign of systematic targeting of communities or individuals it perceived as those who became an obstacle in the Russification campaign … with devastating effects on the social fabric in general, but also communities, families and individuals,' he told CNN.
'And Crimea has been kind of their playbook. Policies and patterns and tactics (Russia) applied in Crimea were then applied as well in other occupied territories. So, we see essentially the same patterns in all occupied territories, both since 2014 and since 2022.'
The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine has repeatedly reported the myriad human rights violations committed by Russia in occupied Ukraine – from unlawful detentions to sexual abuse to forcing people to accept Russian citizenship and sending their children to Russian schools and training programs.
Russia has repeatedly denied accusations of human rights abuses.
A dangerous precedent
Financial consultant Oleksandr Sokhatskyi told CNN he thinks any deal would be unacceptable if Ukraine's borders are changed from what they were before the war because of the human cost of years of unnecessary battle.
'Given how many victims this war has already had, and to end it on someone else's conditions… then why did these (Ukrainian soldiers) die and why did they defend these territories?' he said.
Soldiers fighting on the frontlines were likewise skeptical that negotiations between Trump and Putin could yield a result that would be palatable to many Ukrainians.
Volodymyr Sablyn, a battalion commander in the 66th mechanized brigade, who is fighting near Lyman in the east of the country, said that having Russia take over some of Ukraine's territory could have dangerous consequences.
'It will set a precedent and show Russia that they can attack any country, take its territory and make it theirs with impunity in the future,' he said, adding that Russia could soon turn their focus on other smaller countries in its vicinity.
Putin has repeatedly made his goals clear: He wants to gain control over the entirety of Ukraine's eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions. But many in Ukraine are worried that even if he initially agrees to a ceasefire, he will ultimately instigate further fighting to achieve his endgame.
'No one and nothing will stop Putin from attacking us again and occupying another region or several more. If Europe and America don't help us, then making peace now will most likely lead to war in a few years,' Sablyn said.
Dariya Tarasova-Markina contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
2 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
US President: Iran has become more aggressive in nuclear talks
Basant Ahmed US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Iran has become more aggressive in the nuclear talks. Trump added in his remarks today that "it's surprising and disappointing to me. But we'll meet again, and we'll see what happens." He noted that the two sides remain at odds over whether the country will be allowed to continue enriching uranium on Iranian soil. Trump said the next round of talks between the United States and Iran will take place next Thursday, while a senior Iranian official and a US official said it is unlikely to take place that day. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean


Daily News Egypt
3 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal
Israel harbours deeper concerns over US President Donald Trump's potential nuclear deal with Iran than it ever did regarding the agreement negotiated under Barack Obama. According to Tel Aviv, the imminent accord would leave Iran merely months away from acquiring a nuclear weapon while severely limiting Israel's ability to deliver a decisive military strike against Tehran's nuclear infrastructure. In this scenario, Iran would preserve its controversial program, and Israel would lose what it perceives as a historic opportunity to dismantle Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Over a month ago, Trump unexpectedly announced the beginning of direct negotiations with Tehran, aiming to curtail Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the easing of economic sanctions. His declaration came in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington seeking American approval for pre-emptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Over the past two years, Israel has weakened Iran's regional influence through sustained military operations against its allies—Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon—and by the removal of its key ally, former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. At the same time, severe Western sanctions have crippled Iran's oil-dependent economy. Upon finalizing the deal, Trump is expected to assert that he has extracted greater concessions from Iran than his predecessors, Obama and Joe Biden. His claim would hinge on two major factors: the inclusion of US nuclear inspectors alongside IAEA monitors in Iran's nuclear sites and a complete halt to uranium enrichment—even at low levels—for a symbolic period that may last a year. However, Israeli officials remain deeply concerned, viewing this agreement as even riskier than the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015, which they largely dismissed as flawed. Dr. Hatem Sadek President Biden's most significant diplomatic achievement was persuading Tehran to freeze its 60% uranium enrichment—a feat achieved in 2023 through a US agreement releasing $6 billion of Iran's frozen assets. Obama, on the other hand, succeeded in reducing Iran's medium-enriched uranium stockpile to 3.67% but failed to halt enrichment entirely or secure Tehran's consent for American inspectors to participate in monitoring. There are several additional concessions Trump may secure that neither Biden nor Obama could—such as guarantees against attacks on US forces or a temporary moratorium on Iran's ballistic missile tests, which have both conventional and nuclear applications. If accomplished, why does this alarm Israeli officials? Israeli intelligence leaders, including the Mossad Director and the head of military intelligence, have spent substantial diplomatic capital lobbying the Trump administration and its envoy, Steve Witkoff, in numerous meetings across the Middle East, Europe, and the US Their objective was to push negotiations toward two extreme outcomes: Tehran's submission or a decisive military strike. However, these efforts clashed with Trump's transactional style, which prioritizes immediate gains over long-term strategy. While Israeli officials believe they made some progress, fears persist that Trump's main goal is securing a deal—regardless of whether it aligns with Israel's stringent security concerns. Additionally, if Trump pressures Israel to abandon military action, it might not only prevent overt strikes but also hinder covert operations, such as Mossad-led sabotage missions that have delayed Iran's nuclear weapons program in recent years. In 2015, Iran relied on about 20,000 aging IR-1 centrifuges, requiring roughly a year to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb. By 2025, however, Iran possesses thousands of advanced IR-4 and IR-6 centrifuges, a fraction of which could be concealed in undisclosed facilities much smaller than the known sites at Natanz and Fordow. This would allow Tehran to achieve weapons-grade uranium within months. Reports indicate Iran's current enrichment levels reach 60%—a threshold demonstrating mastery of nuclear science, making bomb acquisition more a matter of timing than technical capability. From Israel's perspective, any agreement at this stage would consolidate Iran's nuclear potential while lifting international sanctions, enabling Tehran to accelerate its program. By contrast, Israeli leadership sees the current moment as an unparalleled strategic opportunity: with Hamas and Hezbollah weakened, no time is more suitable for a pre-emptive strike. In conclusion, whatever restrictions and safeguards Trump's team negotiates, at best they would leave Iran just months from a nuclear breakout while denying Israel its clearest chance in decades to strike. Tehran may be open to a deal but remains wary of Trump's unpredictable leadership and sceptical of any non-binding agreement that a future US administration might discard. The most it would likely accept is a temporary enrichment suspension in exchange for the release of frozen funds and recognition of its right to civilian nuclear energy—an outcome Israel would see as disastrous. Meanwhile, Gulf states and regional actors, while wary of Iran's ambitions, increasingly prefer uneasy coexistence over a catastrophic war that could disrupt economies and stall development plans. The negotiation landscape remains murky and fraught with uncertainty for all involved. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University The post Opinion | Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal appeared first on Dailynewsegypt.


Al-Ahram Weekly
18 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Hopes rise as US and China hold second day of trade talks - International
The United States and China began a second day of trade talks on Tuesday, seeking to shore up a shaky tariff truce in a bitter row deepened by export curbs. The gathering of key officials from the world's two biggest economies began Monday in London, after an earlier round of talks in Geneva last month. Stock markets wavered as investors hoped the talks will bring some much-needed calm on trading floors and ease tensions between the economic superpowers. A US Treasury spokesman told AFP on Tuesday the "talks resumed earlier this" morning. One of US President Donald Trump's top advisers said he expected "a big, strong handshake" at the end of the talks in the historic Lancaster House, operated by the UK foreign ministry. Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday: "We are doing well with China. China's not easy. "I'm only getting good reports." The agenda is expected to be dominated by exports of rare earth minerals used in a wide range of things including smartphones, electric vehicle batteries and green technology. "In Geneva, we had agreed to lower tariffs on them, and they had agreed to release the magnets and rare earths that we need throughout the economy," Trump's top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, told CNBC on Monday. But even though Beijing was releasing some supplies, "it was going a lot slower than some companies believed was optimal", he added. Still, he said he expected "a big, strong handshake" at the end of the talks. "Our expectation is that after the handshake, any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume," Hassett added. He also said the Trump administration might be willing to ease some recent curbs on tech exports. Concessions? Tensions between Washington and Beijing have heightened since Trump took office in January, with both countries engaging in a tariffs war hiking duties on each other's exports to three figures -- an effective trade embargo. The Geneva pact to cool tensions temporarily brought new US tariffs on Chinese goods down from 145 percent to 30 percent, and Chinese countermeasures from 125 percent to 10 percent. But Trump recently said China had "totally violated" the deal. "Investors are willing to grab on to any positive trade headline right now, as this is keeping hopes of a rally alive," said Kathleen Brooks, research director at trading group XTB. Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at the Swissquote Bank, said that although there had been "no breakthrough" it seemed "the first day of the second round of negotiations reportedly went relatively well". "Rumours are circulating that the US may be willing to make concessions on tech exports in exchange for China easing restrictions on rare earth metal exports," she said. Rare earth shipments from China to the US have slowed since the tariff war was triggered by Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" announcements, according to Brooks. The US leader slapped sweeping levies of 10 percent on friend and foe alike, and threatened steeper rates on dozens of economies. The tariffs have already had a sharp effect, with official figures from Beijing showing Chinese exports to the United States in May plunged by 12.7 percent. China is also in talks with other trading partners -- including Japan and South Korea -- to try to build a united front to counter Trump's tariffs. Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Tuesday urged South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung to work with Beijing to uphold free trade to ensure "the stability and smooth functioning of global and regional industrial and supply chains." "A healthy, stable, and continuously deepening China-South Korea relationship aligns with the trend of the times," Xi said in a phone call, according to the Xinhua news agency. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng is heading the team in London, which included Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and China International Trade Representative Li Chenggang. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are leading the US delegation. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link: