Transnet faces standstill on Thursday as Untu demands revised offer
The United National Transport Union (Untu) is all ears for a revised offer from the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), following yet another unsuccessful round of wage negotiations with Transnet.
The union had requested a 10% wage increase, as well as housing and medical subsidies, from the struggling state-owned logistics company. However, Transnet had only offered 6% this year, 6% next year, and 5.5% in 2027.
Untu has been threatening Transnet with a strike that could cost the company billions in rail operations. The union represents more than half of its 46 000-strong workforce.
ALSO READ: Untu makes one last attempt to reach a wage deal with Transnet before major strike
Untu gives Transnet several options
The CCMA sent two senior commissioners to intervene in the section 150 (S150) conciliation process between Untu and Transnet.
The Untu spokesperson, Atenkosi Plaatjie, stated that the union presented various wage proposals during this round of negotiations for Transnet's consideration. It believes these proposals were in line with the economic and financial pressures facing its members, with a high emphasis on job security, while at the same time taking due cognisance of the challenges Transnet faces.
At the moment, the union cannot disclose further details of the proposals due to the confidential nature of the S150 CCMA-facilitated process.
'These proposals however prioritised labour stability, job security and the sustainability of Transnet, we had hoped that Transnet and its mandate-givers would seriously consider these proposals, particularly given the potential economic impact of industrial action and the value of securing a longer – term agreement securing labour peace during this critical time in Transnet's turnaround into a sustainable self-funded entity,' she added.
Untu waiting for CCMA
Plaatjie said the union participated in the S150 process in good faith, fully committed to securing a fair and sustainable outcome amid the rising cost of living and the ongoing operational and structural challenges facing Transnet.
'The resolution of the deadlock now rests with the CCMA, which has committed to present a revised salary/wage offer by close of business on Monday, 19 May 2025.
She added that, should no revised offer be forthcoming, the union will issue Transnet with a 48-hour notice of industrial action.
ALSO READ: Transnet and trade unions square up over wage demands
Strike on Thursday
She said after issuing Transnet with a notice, the strike could commence on Thursday, with overwhelming support from its members.
'Untu has made the necessary logistical preparations to ensure our readiness for industrial action.'
However, should a revised offer be received by close of business Monday, the union said it will initiate a structured process to determine whether our members accept or reject the tabled revised salary and wage offer.
'Untu will announce the way forward to the media in due course.'
CCMA intervention
'The CCMA Section 150 (S150) process is a legal framework within the South African Labour Relations Act (LRA) that allows the CCMA to appoint a commissioner to assist in resolving industrial disputes, potentially in the public interest.
'This intervention can be initiated when the parties to a dispute agree to it and understand that it suspends any right to strike.'
Untu is the only union that has not accepted the proposed offer by Transnet. Whereas, the South African Transport and Allied Workers' Union (Satawu) has accepted the offer.
Transnet, which is already struggling, previously said it is unable to legally extend the increase to Untu members. Satawu members were eligible for the increase effective 1 April 2025.
'Until Untu and Transnet conclude a collective agreement on wages and conditions of employment, Untu members will not receive a wage increase or any increase to medical subsidy, the housing allowance, pension fund contributions and other associated benefits.'
NOW READ: Transnet executives to repay millions in irregular contract payments
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Want to reform South Africa's ports? We need to make room for rivalry
South Africa's ports are crucial for trade and economic growth, yet they lag in efficiency. As the National Ports Authority pursues long-term concessions, experts warn that without fostering competition, the country risks high costs and lost opportunities. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers South Africa's ports play a vital role in supporting trade, investment, and economic growth. Yet despite their strategic importance, they remain among the least efficient in the world – a situation that contributes to high costs, delays, and declining competitiveness. As the National Ports Authority (NPA) moves forward with long-term terminal concessions – often awarded to a single operator in joint ventures with other Transnet divisions – there's growing concern that the current approach may do little to resolve the systemic issues facing the country's port sector. One of the most prominent voices raising the alarm is Dr Ryan Hawthorne, director at Acacia Economics and a leading expert in competition and regulatory policy. In a paper presented at the 43rd Southern African Transport Conference*, Hawthorne argues that building rivalry into port operations is essential. 'If we're simply replacing public monopolies with private ones,' he says, 'we're missing the opportunity to build a more competitive, efficient port system that truly serves the country's interests.' Monopoly concessions: A risky strategy The core issue lies in how terminal concessions are structured. The NPA, still legally part of Transnet, has awarded a number of 25-year leases to single terminal operators, often involving Transnet Port Terminals as a joint venture partner. According to Hawthorne, this approach entrenches monopoly control and limits the potential for service improvement. 'Monopolies tend to charge more, deliver less, and innovate slowly,' he notes. 'We're seeing a pattern of partial privatisation rather than real reform.' There is an emerging pattern of monopolies being partially privatised by Transnet, with little consideration for rivalry and the benefits this might bring to consumers and port users. Rather than breaking up dominant positions, the current model risks reinforcing them – just with new stakeholders. These concerns are echoed by global benchmarking. The World Bank recently ranked Cape Town's container terminal dead last out of 405 ports globally in 2024, with Durban and Port Elizabeth also performing poorly. 'While private-sector participation is a welcome step, it risks becoming a missed opportunity if it doesn't introduce genuine competition,' warns Hawthorne. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The case for competition But can so-called 'genuine competition' actually work? Hawthorne believes there is ample scope for rivalry within South Africa's port system. Durban alone is expected to expand its container-handling capacity to more than 11 million TEUs – enough for multiple competing operators. 'Ports of similar size internationally to Durban's current capacity host four or more terminal operators competing on quality and cost,' he explains. 'There's no reason South Africa can't follow suit.' Legal framework already in place The Ports Act of 2005 provides the basis for introducing competition by separating the NPA from Transnet and mandating that port access be granted in a transparent and competitive manner. However, the key step of structurally separating the NPA has not been completed. 'If the NPA were truly independent,' says Hawthorne, 'it would have an incentive to lease space to multiple terminal operators – not preserve the dominance of its sister company.' What can be done now In the short term, Hawthorne proposes a number of practical reforms. 'We need to complete the structural separation of the NPA from Transnet, as envisioned in the Ports Act. This would allow the NPA to operate independently and invest in expanding port capacity and enabling rival terminal operators, rather than protecting Transnet's downstream interests,' he notes. Furthermore, the Minister of Transport should issue a policy directive requiring competition assessments in all future concession processes. The new Transport Economic Regulator (TER) should be given the authority to review and, if necessary, amend monopoly concession agreements. 'The Competition Commission could also be called upon to investigate exclusionary practices in port operations, including abuse of dominance or refusal to grant access to essential infrastructure,' he proposes. Long-term vision: Foster inter-port competition Beyond immediate fixes, Hawthorne encourages a return to inter-port rivalry, as seen prior to the 1910 formation of South African Railways and Harbours. At that time, ports like Cape Town and Durban competed actively for shipping traffic, spurring innovation and improved service delivery. Today, similar systems exist in countries such as Brazil, Canada, and Australia, where individual port authorities operate independently under national regulatory oversight. 'We need to stop thinking of South Africa's ports as a single block,' says Hawthorne. 'Independent port authorities promoting competition within and between ports could drive the efficiency gains we desperately need. 'Competition is the missing piece in South Africa's port reform puzzle. Without it, we risk pouring money into concessions that do little for users. With it, we unlock the real potential of our ports – for traders, for consumers, and for the economy as a whole.'
eNCA
4 days ago
- eNCA
Government backs Transnet again
JOHANNESBURG - Transnet has secured almost R95-billion in government guarantees as part of efforts to revive its failing operations. Is it a worthwhile investment or a waste of money? READ: Government approves additional guarantees for Transnet Mark Evans a partner at Oliver Wyman, a management consulting firm discussed the value of this investment with eNCA.
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
FlySafair strike over – Here's what pilots finally agreed to
Passengers queue at check-in counters during strike-related delays as FlySafair worked with reduced pilot staffing. Image: Jonisayi Maromo/IOL FlySafair pilots have returned to duty after what was regarded as the longest pilot strike and lockout in South African history, following a 12-day dispute over scheduling and working conditions. The breakthrough came as the airline and Solidarity, the union representing its striking pilots, signed a formal agreement facilitated by the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). 'After 12 days of lockout and strike action by FlySafair pilots, an agreement has finally been reached through the CCMA's proposed settlement,' said Gideon du Plessis, general secretary of Solidarity. The resolution ends weeks of tension that saw grounded flights, public confusion, and growing criticism from both sides. 'There are no winners in this process,' said Helgard Cronjé, deputy general secretary of Solidarity, who confirmed that both parties accepted the CCMA-led proposal as the closest possible middle ground. A key point of contention was FlySafair's rostering system, which pilots argued allowed management to arbitrarily adjust schedules using vague 'soft rules.' The new agreement introduces fixed scheduling rules, removing this discretion. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ IOL News previously reported that the FlySafair had initially resisted the fixed rules, pointing out the need for flexibility to ensure operational efficiency. The airline's system, it said, was aligned with international standards and allowed pilots to receive full rosters by the 20th of the preceding month, with a marketplace to facilitate duty swaps. However, Solidarity contended that the lack of predictability in scheduling disrupted pilots' personal lives, denied them leave due to staff shortages, and raised safety concerns. However, the final deal now guarantees pilots at least one 60-hour weekend off every six weeks, totaling a minimum of nine weekends off per year. They will also receive at least 10 days off per month. Pilots required to work on scheduled days off will be allowed to reclaim that time the following month. Cronjé said that under the agreement, pilots will receive salary increases of 6%, 6.5%, 6.8%, and 6.9% over the next four years. These increases will also apply to annual adjustments of travel, accommodation, and medical allowances. In addition, pilots will be paid extra for any hours flown beyond 65 hours per month. To help offset losses from the strike under the 'no work, no pay' rule, FlySafair will make a one-time ex gratia payment equal to 15% of pilots' monthly salaries. Pilots can also cash in up to five days of leave. Earlier in the week, with the strike stretching into its second week and no resolution in sight, Solidarity released an open letter to the public, defending the pilots against accusations of greed. 'Let us be clear: this strike is not about greed. It is about dignity. It is about safety. It is about fairness. It is about being heard,' the statement read. The union highlighted what it described as a 'growing culture of silence and fear' at the airline, where safety concerns, fatigue, and staff attrition were routinely dismissed or met with intimidation. Solidarity also pushed back on claims that pilots earned between R1.8 million and R2.4 million annually, clarifying that only a small group of senior captains earned at that level. Most pilots, it said, earn significantly less and have not seen salaries return to pre-COVID levels, despite earlier promises. The union disputed FlySafair's claim that pilots fly an average of 63 hours per month, stating that many fly between 85 and over 100 hours per month, excluding standby and training duties. The union further claimed the total duty time often exceeds 180 hours monthly, close to the legal limit of 200. Solidarity also raised concerns about a legal exemption FlySafair obtained to fly pilots up to 120 hours a month, calling it unsafe in a high-risk industry. Cronjé criticised FlySafair management for what he called unnecessary delays in negotiations. 'This agreement could already have been reached in February,' he said. 'Had FlySafair management made the same concessions regarding the roster at that time, the strike and lockout could have been avoided. Management's obstinance in response to the reasonable appeals of their pilots led to conflict and losses for all parties. It also caused severe disruption for passengers and the public.' He said Solidarity has never encountered such a difficult negotiation process in its history. 'The pilots' input during the finalisation of the agreement only confirmed how little trust they have in FlySafair's management,' he said. 'If drastic change does not take place, this settlement will not prevent an outflow of pilots - something that will be to the great detriment of the company and the country.' Meanwhile, FlySafair, welcomed the conclusion of the strike. 'We are pleased to confirm that the strike action by a portion of our pilot workforce has officially come to an end,' said Kirby Gordon, FlySafair's chief marketing officer.
