logo
Understanding the surge in SA kidnappings

Understanding the surge in SA kidnappings

IOL News19-05-2025

From the eerie disappearance of journalist Sibusiso Aserie Ndlovu and his partner Zodwa Mdhluli to the action-packed abduction of US pastor Josh Sullivan, there seems to be vulnerability in our society that is being sorely exploited, says the writer
Tswelopele Makoe
SOUTH Africa, our society, is being consumed by a mounting and deeply unsettling crisis - one that is easy to overlook, until it reaches your doorstep. Every day, two people are kidnapped in our society. In the last year alone, over 17,000 kidnapping cases were reported by Statista. This amounts to a harrowing 260% increase over the last decade.
These astonishing figures do not even encapsulate the whole picture. Rather, they are part of a larger, far more disturbing trend: the rise of disappearances in our society. From the bravest of men to the most delicate children, women, professionals, and so many other ordinary citizens everywhere are being snatched from our streets, never to be seen again.
From the eerie disappearance of journalist Sibusiso Aserie Ndlovu and his partner Zodwa Mdhluli to the action-packed abduction of US pastor Josh Sullivan, there seems to be vulnerability in our society that is being sorely exploited.
Very recently, the kidnapping of a Gqeberha shop owner has not only spotlighted the brazenness with which ransom kidnappings are taking place, but also the recurrent threat that they represent to the growth of our economy. Not even a year ago, Gqeberha businessman Calvin Naidoo was abducted in the very same way.
This disturbing trend seems to extend beyond ages and locations, with defenceless children being amongst the most affected. This past Tuesday, 11-year-old Jayden Lee's body was traumatically discovered on a staircase at his home. Concurrently, the heart-wrenching case of 6-year-old Joshlin Smith came to a head as the High Court's Western Cape Division officially convicted her mother, Jacquen Rowhan Appollis (alongside Steveno Dumaizio van Rhyn and Racquel Chantel Smith), for the Trafficking and ultimate slavery of the young girl.
According to the South African Government, the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) revealed that kidnappings reported to the police in South Africa have almost quadrupled over the last decade, amounting to a whopping 260%. A concerning majority of kidnappings involved ransom and extortion tactics, showing an inclination to organised crime. These distressing statistics do not even consider many more of those who remain unreported.
Over and above this, the rampant rate of disappearances in our society is not only attested to armed robberies and organized crime syndicates; it is exacerbated by extremely stringent economic conditions that perpetuate crimes such as these. Poverty, crime, joblessness, unequal access, unstable human rights, and many other factors, directly perpetuate this disturbing plague in our society. This is even further compounded by cultural practices that worsen the vulnerability faced by men, women and children at various stages, and that seek to protect necromancers and malicious spiritual healers.
Additionally, the role of culture and indigenous heritage was especially spotlighted during the Joshlin Smith trial, where the State's accused-turned-witness, Laurentia Lombard, detailed the horrific details in the hours leading up to the six-year-old's disappearance, admittedly selling the child to a sangoma for R20 000. Hers is not a unique story, as merely a year ago, sangoma Ntombentsha Limbo was apprehended during the kidnapping of a minor child from a mall in Thabong, Free State. Yet as recently as this past Wednesday, a son and mother were snatched from the street and promptly robbed in the Northmead community of Benoni, Gauteng province.
Although our post-apartheid democratic society is plagued by rampant economic inequality, institutional instability, political corruptions, and so much more, the increasing precariousness of our society will only seek to cripple our already-fragile back. The increasing spate of disappearances of people from our society, of all ages and ranges, highlights a deplorable trend indeed.
The disappearance of people from our society is indicative of an overarching problem of human trafficking and human smuggling. South Africa, facing an unprecedented crisis with its precarious borders, is especially susceptible to exploitation by human trafficking syndicates. This is an even greater concern for young children, many of whom travel extensive distances daily, and who cannot be tracked as easily as adults with digital footprints.
What's worse is that human trafficking disproportionately affects women and young girls, at a rate of approximately 70%. A major factor driving human trafficking cases is the job market, where unemployed people everywhere are being lured in for job interviews and then being subsequently human trafficked.
Whether it is a young couple getting hijacked on a sunny Sunday afternoon or a group of young school children crossing the park to their respective homes, our society is fast becoming a breeding ground for evil, nefarious deeds. The rate at which people are vanishing in our society is not just a chilling statistic; it is a sobering realisation that everywhere, our daughters, sons, sisters, and mothers' lives are being swallowed by a shadowy underworld thriving on exploitation and silence.
This crisis cannot be tackled with reactive policing or short-term campaigns. It demands a serious, coordinated response rooted in swift, effective justice and our constitutional human rights. We need proper mechanisms and training that will allow our law enforcement to tackle missing persons cases seriously from the outset. We need a centralised, transparent, national database that tracks these past and ongoing cases, and utilises the public as a resource to tackle these cases. This will require the collective efforts of all of our communities, schools, institutions, legislative bodies, and civil society. Tackling disappearances across our society will require us to prevent abductions before they occur, and to support the families who are left behind when they do.
Above all, we need to confront the conditions that make people easy targets: poverty, inequality, lack of opportunity, and broken trust in public institutions. These are not abstract issues; they are the breeding ground for the crisis we now face.
There is something fundamentally wrong when so many people can vanish in a democratic society. It points to a breakdown, not just in public safety, but in the basic fabric of trust and care that holds a nation together. We are watching a crisis unfold in real time, and the danger is not just to individuals or isolated communities. This is a national problem, one that threatens the shared future we've been trying to build since the dawn of democracy in 1994.
South Africa is teetering on the edge of a crisis that's expanding at an alarming rate. Our democracy was born from Struggle, with the promise of dignity, safety, and equality for all. If we allow this crisis to continue in silence, we fail that promise. We must take this seriously before we become the kidnapping capital of the world. Because when disappearances become the norm, and when justice becomes rare, we lose more than individuals - we lose faith in the society we're trying to build.
* Tswelopele Makoe is a Gender and Social Justice Activist and the Editor at Global South Media Network. She is also an Andrew W. Mellon scholar at the Desmond Tutu Centre for Religion and Social Justice, UWC. The views expressed are her own.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Joslin Smith state witness get indemnity or face JAIL?
Will Joslin Smith state witness get indemnity or face JAIL?

timean hour ago

Will Joslin Smith state witness get indemnity or face JAIL?

The state witness in the Joslin Smith trafficking trial, Laurentia Lombaard, is awaiting her fate of indemnity or a prison sentence in a special hearing under the Western Cape High Court. The woman – a former accused who turned State 204 witness – has previously stated under oath that the missing girl's mother, Kelly Smith, allegedly sold her daughter to a sangoma for R20 000. Last week, Kelly, her boyfriend Jacquin 'Boeta' Appollis, and pal Steveno van Rhyn were sentenced to life in prison for trafficking and kidnapping. The trio has 14 days to apply for leave to appeal the sentence. Joslin went missing from her home in Saldanha Bay on 19 February 2024. She has not been found. Speaking to the SABC, National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) prosecutor Zelda Swanepoel revealed Western Cape High Court Judge Nathan Erasmus would hear evidence and arguments from both the prosecution and the defense pertaining to state witness, Laurentia Lombaard. He would impose her sentence in a separate hearing. Swanepoel said: 'We will be called upon to argue and indicate why we say she should or should not be granted indemnity. 'Our argument is that she should be granted indemnity.' State witness Lourentia Lombaard testified that Kelly Smith sold her daughter Joslin to a sangoma. Will she be granted indemnity for her testimony? Images via YouTube screenshot: SABC News. Laurentia Lombaard – a State 204 witness – previously stated under oath that Joslin Smith's mother, Kelly Smith, allegedly sold her to a sangoma for R20 000. Lombaard also claimed in her testimony that Kelly had offered her R1 000 in 'hush money'. She added that she had not received the money, even after confronting Kelly about it. Late last year, charges were withdrawn against Lombaard, who was granted provisional indemnity from criminal prosecution. However, her credibility was questioned when she admitted to lying to police in a recorded statement after Joslin Smith's disappearance. Her version of events from her March 2024 statement differs from her confession to police in October, when she agreed to turn state witness. In court, she admitted to being under the influence of drugs when making the initial statement. According to the Criminal Procedure Act, a Section 204 witness can receive indemnity from criminal charges, provided that their testimony and evidence help incriminate the accused. In the case of Joslin Smith, the NPA offered Lombaard witness protection in exchange for her testimony against Kelly Smith, Boeta Appollis, and Steveno van Rhyn, who have since been convicted and sentenced. If the court does find that Lombaard did not testify truthfully, she could face prosecution for perjury and related charges. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

‘Intention is to break us': Magashule says Free State asbestos trial delay disrupts 2026 election plans
‘Intention is to break us': Magashule says Free State asbestos trial delay disrupts 2026 election plans

The Citizen

time5 hours ago

  • The Citizen

‘Intention is to break us': Magashule says Free State asbestos trial delay disrupts 2026 election plans

The former Free State premier maintained that the case was politically motivated. Former Free State premier Ace Magashule appears in the Bloemfontein High Court on 15 April 2024. Picture: Gallo Images/Mlungisi Louw Former ANC secretary-general Ace Magashule has voiced his frustration over further delays in his R255 million Free State asbestos corruption trial. The Free State High Court in Bloemfontein has postponed the case to next year, citing scheduling conflicts involving Judge Philip Loubser and members of the defence team. When proceedings resume on 26 January 2026, Magashule will be tried alongside 16 others, excluding his former personal assistant, Moroadi Cholota. Loubser ruled on Tuesday that the court lacked jurisdiction to prosecute Cholota on corruption charges due to her unlawful extradition from the United States (US). Her removal from the case will stand unless the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) successfully overturns the judgment on appeal. Magashule reacts to Free State asbestos trial delay Speaking to the media afterwards, Magashule criticised the state for contributing to repeated delays. 'We want to show that we are innocent. We want to show that we have cooperated with the state. So they can't always come here and waste our time and postpone.' He maintained that there was no legitimate case against him or his co-accused. 'They are trying to cook, but we will ultimately expose them, that's what I know, and that's why we are ready.' Magashule also pointed out the financial burden of the prolonged legal battle, which has persisted since his arrest in 2020. 'It's costly for us.' ALSO READ: NPA 'taken aback' over Moroadi Cholota extradition ruling, hints at appeal He added that the ongoing trial conflicts with his political commitments, especially with the 2026 local government elections approaching. 'Next year is election year; campaigns must actually start.' Magashule reiterated his belief that the charges are politically driven. 'The intention is to break us. The intention is to demoralise people about us. The intention was to deal with our political careers. The intention is to disrupt us all the time, and unfortunately, we are standing resolute. 'We have fought against apartheid; we will continue fighting against injustices. And we are ready to do so. They can't break us, we are not going to be cowards.' NPA to appeal Moroadi Cholota ruling Commenting on Cholota's removal from the case, Magashule questioned why he was still facing prosecution. 'I don't know why I am still in this box,' he said, adding that anyone who testified at the State Capture Commission should appear in the witness stand during the trial. 'It is their time to come here and prove that I am corrupt and received money from whoever. I deny all those things because this case was political.' Magashule also warned that the trial would backfire on the state. 'The state is playing games here. It is playing games. They know that they don't have a case, and they are still going to be embarrassed. They are going to be embarrassed. You will see.' READ MORE: 'Nothing I can do about it,' Judge tells Magashule as Free State asbestos trial postponed again NPA spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga said the state intends to appeal the Cholota judgment, describing it as a case with 'far-reaching implications'. 'The state believes that there is evidence that implicates Ms Cholota and therefore would want to see her stand trial. 'Unfortunately, the judge is yet to provide us with a full written judgment upon which a decisive determination will be made on the grounds of appeal and a final decision will be made whether to apply for leave to appeal.' The appeal is scheduled to be heard on Friday, 13 June. In addition, the Democratic Alliance (DA) intends to call on the Department of Justice and the NPA to appear before Parliament to explain what it describes as 'yet another unacceptable failure in prosecuting state capture cases'. Magashule's co-accused in Free State asbestos trial Alongside Magashule, the accused include businessman Edwin Sodi, former Mangaung mayor Olly Mlamleli, former national Department of Human Settlements director-general Thabane Zulu, former Free State Human Settlements head Nthimotse Mokhesi, and the department's former supply chain director Mahlomola Matlakala. They face a range of charges, including fraud, corruption, money laundering, and violations of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). The charges relate to a 2014 R255 million asbestos removal tender awarded to the joint venture between Diamond Hill Trading and Blackhead Consulting by the Free State Department of Human Settlements, during Magashule's tenure as premier. It is alleged that R27 million in bribes were paid to government officials in connection with the contract. Cholota was accused of facilitating illicit financial transactions on Magashule's behalf. NOW READ: Free State asbestos trial: Sodi challenges state capture evidence as Magashule complains about witness list

Bushiris argue Malawian magistrate committed legal errors when ordering their extradition to SA
Bushiris argue Malawian magistrate committed legal errors when ordering their extradition to SA

Eyewitness News

time5 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Bushiris argue Malawian magistrate committed legal errors when ordering their extradition to SA

JOHANNESBURG - Wanted fugitives, Shepherd and Mary Bushiri, have argued that the chief resident magistrate in Malawi committed legal errors when she ordered their extradition. The pair launched a review application before the High Court in Lilongwe to review the judgment of the court, which ordered that they face the music in South Africa. This was after the South African government applied for their extradition to answer to a string of charges after they fled the country in 2020, contravening their bail conditions. But the couple is challenging that judgment on 15 grounds. Section 140 subsection 1 of Malawi's Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code provides that every judgment must have the points that must be determined, the decision of the court and the reasons for it. The Bushiris argue that the magistrate's court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter as their arrest was not in compliance with the Extradition Act. They submit that this was not just a mere technicality but constitutes non-compliance with the law, which effectively barred their arrest and the proceedings that continued before the court were a miscarriage of justice. The fugitives want the judgment of the magistrate's court reviewed and set aside.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store