Christchurch business keeps craft wool processing in NZ
The country's last operational woollen dye house and spinning mill has been saved from the scrap heap.
Christchurch-based Wild Earth Yarns is taking over manufacturing equipment belonging to Napier company Design Spun, which is closing.
The family-owned company is the manufacturer of high-quality hand-knitting yarn from super-fine merino wool, possum fibre and strong wool.
"What that means for us is massive expansion," Wild Earth Yarns factory manager Blair McLaughlin said.
Yarn from its factory in the Christchurch suburb of Bromley is used in textiles, knitting and merino socks.
The newly purchased machinery can also manufacture mohair and alpaca fibre. And a woollen bouclé yarn can now be made for the weaving market.
McLaughlin said if they had not bought the heavy machinery, it would have been scrapped.
"We'll be the last worsted yarn manufacturer left in New Zealand."
Most of the country's wool clip is sent overseas as greasy and clean fibre to be processed, but Wild Earth Yarns was committed to local manufacturing.
"Obviously there's a rising demand for local traceable yarn," McLaughlin said.
"We can see a worldwide trend of moving away from synthetic materials and wanting to use natural biodegradable fibres."
It will add up to 15 more staff as it scaled up its operation. He said the company was thrilled to carry on Design Spun's legacy.
Moving the machinery to the South Island would be a significant logistical operation.
McLaughlin, alongside his father Graham, had been in Hawke's Bay planning the big move. Graham had the engineering skills to keep the machinery operational.
"We'll start dismantling and preparing to ship to Christchurch at the start of next month," McLaughlin said.
"There will be a lot of moving parts over the operation to get it up and running again."
Meanwhile, the owners of Design Spun's dye plant and spinning mill in Napier were disappointed they could not find a local buyer to take over the operation, based at Onekawa.
Managing director Brendan Jackson said it was bittersweet that no one in the region was lining up to take over the firm. Around 25 workers would lose their jobs when the production moves south.
Around 60 percent of the business was in the hand-knitting sector, with the balance going into weaving and hosiery contracts.
"Design Spun as a textile company has a long commitment and support for the natural fibre industry and our preference was to sell the business and keep production here on site here in Napier," Jackson said.
"It's been an 18 month process for us. We've got retiring and exiting executive directors."
"The dye house and spinning mill are all moving to Christchurch, they have bought all the equipment."
But a silver lining was Wild Earth Yarns swooping in to use the machinery in the south.
"We've got the next best thing, which is maintaining the capability of processing but on another site."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
26 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Strong demand for apples puts T&G Global back in profit
The Envy apple variety had a strong growing season and was one of the factors behind T&G Global being back in profit for the six months to the end of June. Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. The Envy apple variety had a strong growing season and was one of the factors behind T&G Global being back in profit for the six months to the end of June. By RNZ Leading fresh produce grower and exporter T&G Global has returned to profit on the back of strong demand for apples and moves to trim costs and improve efficiency. Net profit for the six months to the end of June was $1.7 million, a turnaround from the $18.6m loss it posted in the same period a year ago. Revenue for the latest half-year came in at $920.6m versus $820.1m, and operating earnings were $18.1m as opposed to a loss of $2.6m. The German-owned company said it was getting results from its growth strategy focusing on key products such as apples and a move to expand its overseas markets, as well as reduce costs.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Long-term investment is guaranteed Lotto 'win'
Your weekly Lotto spend could add up to a windfall over time. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly The money you're putting aside for your Lotto ticket could give you an almost certain $100,000 windfall. Lotto's Powerball is rolling over for a $20 million prize on Saturday, but while statistics show we spend a combined more than $700 million a year on Lotto products, investment experts say people might be missing out on a prize that they are much more likely to achieve. The odds of winning Lotto First Division are about one-in-3.84 million per line. Powerball is even less likely - at about one-in-38 million. On the other hand, if you put money away each week, fortnight or month, the power of compounding will deliver you a solid return, given time. Hamilton Hindin Greene investment advisor Grand Davies calculated the outcome for someone investing $25 a week over 45 years at just over $58,000, without any investment returns. If they received an after-tax and after-fee return of 4.5 percent, compounding weekly, they would grow their investment to $189,785. Adjusting for inflation, both in the weekly contribution and the future value of the investment, the investor would end up with about $160,000. "The allure of Lotto is that big win and the hope that comes along with it," Davies said. "That's why people do it, but if you start to do the maths, it often doesn't stack up quite so well. "The thing about compounding interest is that it does take a long time for small amounts to build up, but once they do build up, that's when you start to see the real benefit. "Over 45 years, it's not until you get to the final 20 years that you see the real effects of compounding start to play out. "That's part of the human condition - we're maybe more tuned to the short-term dopamine hit than the long-term one." Over a long time horizon, he said most investments should perform, "but when you're only dealing with small numbers at the beginning, it's hard to see that result at the end". Hatch managing director Waimarie Marks said she knew people who spent a lot more than $25 a week on Lotto. "I think it's because it's a habit they can't break," she said. "Although there is so much literature out there about the benefits of investing and compounding growth etc, the 'hit' of potentially striking big likely draws them in. "I will say, though, an upside of Lotto is the good work this money can do in the community." Koura KiwiSaver founder Rupert Carlyon said a big win was more alluring than a slow and steady return. "Even though you know that it is a one-in-38 million chance of winning, you think maybe you will be that person. "It's the same as a capital gains tax. Most people would benefit from it, yet it still polls negatively, because people think that one day they will benefit from a capital gain that they want to have tax free. "Lotto are currently going through a process where they add an extra number. This will reduce the odds and allows them to offer bigger prizes. "Their research is showing them that bigger prizes will mean more tickets sold. Unfortunately, it is human psychology. "We love big numbers and love to believe we will be the lucky ones, despite what the logic says." Fisher Funds chief executive Ana-Marie Lockyer, said it was behavioural economics. "You only need to watch Lotto's latest TV ads to understand it isn't just about the money - it's about your dreams coming true overnight. "The prospect of winning millions offers an immediate emotional payoff that saving or investing can't match, even though the odds of a big win are extremely low. "Gambling a relatively small amount each week feels harmless and the occasional small win keeps people going back for more. "Saving or investing, on the other hand, doesn't offer the same excitement, because the payoff is usually a long way off, and it's seen as complex and only for wealthy people. "Most people don't realise investing $25 a week into a balanced KiwiSaver fund earning 3.5 percent a year for 10 years could add up to $15,500. "We need to change those perceptions, so investing is seen as the best way of achieving those same dreams." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Treasury: Previous govt spent too much during Covid despite warnings
By Giles Dexter of RNZ The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4% of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35% of the costs of the response. A further 18% came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. 'Dangers of excessive spending' - Willis Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. Labour has been approached for comment.
