Zelenskyy: Ukraine won't cede land for peace amid US-Russia summit
National security advisers from Kyiv's allies – including the United States, EU nations and the UK – were gathering in Britain on Saturday to align their views before the Putin-Trump summit.
French President Emmanuel Macron, following phone calls with Zelenskyy, Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said 'the future of Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukrainians' and that Europe also had to be involved in the negotiations.
Later Saturday, in his evening address, Zelenskyy added: 'There must be an honest end to this war, and it is up to Russia to end the war it started.'
A 'dignified peace'
Three rounds of talks between Russia and Ukraine this year have failed to bear fruit, and it remains unclear whether a summit could bring peace any closer as the warring sides' positions are still far apart.
Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes.
Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire.
Putin, a former KGB officer in power in Russia for over 25 years, has ruled out holding talks with Zelenskyy at this stage.
Ukraine's leader has been pushing for a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace.
Far from the war
The summit in Alaska, the far-north territory which Russia sold to the United States in 1867, would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021.
Nine months later, Moscow sent troops into Ukraine.
Zelenskyy said of the location that it was 'very far away from this war, which is raging on our land, against our people'.
The Kremlin said the choice was 'logical' because the state close to the Arctic is on the border between the two countries, and this is where their 'economic interests intersect'.
Moscow has also invited Trump to pay a reciprocal visit to Russia later.
Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January with Trump trying to broker peace in Ukraine without making a breakthrough.
On Friday, Putin held a round of calls with allies, including Brazil, China and India, in a diplomatic flurry before the Alaska summit.
In a 40-minute phone conversation Saturday between Putin and President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the Brazilian leader reiterated his support for dialogue 'and the pursuit of a peaceful solution', his office said.
The US President had earlier imposed an additional tariff on India for buying Russia's oil in a bid to nudge Moscow into talks. He also threatened to impose a similar tax on China, but so far has refrained from doing so.
Fighting goes on
Russia and Ukraine continued pouring dozens of drones on to each other's positions in an exchange of attacks in the early hours of Saturday.
A bus carrying civilians was hit in Ukraine's frontline city of Kherson, killing two people and wounding 16.
The Russian army claimed to have taken Yablonovka, another village in the Donetsk region, the site of the most intense fighting in the east and one of the five regions Putin says is part of Russia.
Four people were killed as of Saturday morning in Donetsk after Russian shelling, Ukrainian authorities said.
In 2022, the Kremlin announced the annexation of four Ukrainian regions – Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson – despite not having full control over them.
Russia had previously annexed the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine in 2014.
As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining Nato.
Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.
- Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
FBI moves to dispatch 120 agents to streets of US capital as Trump vows crackdown on crime
And it comes as Trump is publicly portraying the city as rampant with violent crime - even as the mayor refutes that characterisation, pointing to police data showing a drop in violent crime. Last week, Trump ordered federal law enforcement agents from several agencies to be deployed on city streets and called for more juveniles to be charged in the adult justice system. Staffing assignments this weekend reveal for the first time how many new FBI resources the Trump Administration could divert to local crime and the frustration it has caused within the bureau. In recent days, the Administration has authorised up to 120 agents, largely from the FBI's Washington field office, to work overnight shifts for at least one week alongside DC police and other federal law enforcement officers in the capital, according to the people familiar with those efforts. FBI agents generally do not have authority to make traffic stops, and the people said the agents' roles could include supporting the other agencies during traffic stops. The FBI also is dispatching agents from outside DC, including Philadelphia, to help with the surge of federal law enforcement in the district, according to multiple people familiar with the plans. Federal land is scattered across Washington, and local enforcement often works alongside federal law enforcement to patrol these and surrounding areas. The US Park Police and Secret Service - which have more experience patrolling streets - typically do this work, not the FBI. The Secret Service and the US Secret Service Uniformed Division have also been directed to launch special patrols in DC, according to a White House official. The Trump Administration has not asked the DC police department - the chief law enforcement agency responsible for policing local crime - on how best to deploy these federal resources, according to a senior official with the department. Because DC is not a state, the federal government has unique authority to exert control over the city - even amid objections from the residents and locally elected government. The Home Rule Act of 1973 gave DC residents the ability to elect their own mayor and council members. A federal takeover of the DC police force would be an extraordinary assertion of power in a place where local leaders have few avenues to resist federal encroachment. 'Agents from the FBI Washington field office continue to participate in the increased federal law enforcement presence in DC, which includes assisting our law enforcement partners,' the FBI said. Trump has been ramping up his criticisms on the capital in recent days. Last week, the President posted on social media a photo of a former US Doge Service staffer who was injured in an attempted carjacking. Soon after the attack, DC police arrested a 15-year-old boy and girl from Maryland and charged them with unarmed carjacking. 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'It's all going to happen very fast, just like the Border.' In a different social media post, Trump said the White House news conference tomorrow NZT will be about the city's cleanliness, its physical renovation, and its general condition. 'The Mayor of DC, Muriel Bowser, is a good person who has tried, but she has been given many chances, and the Crime Numbers get worse, and the City only gets dirtier and less attractive,' Trump said in the post. Bowser (Democrat) has been pushing back against Trump's characterisation of the city she leads, pointing out on MSNBC that crime rates have been dropping. In DC, violent crime is down by 26% compared with this time in 2024, according to DC police data. Homicides are down by 12%. DC police have made about 900 juvenile arrests this year - almost 20% fewer than during the same time frame last year. About 200 of those charges are for violent crimes and at least four dozen are for carjacking. 'If the priority is to show force in an American city, we know he can do that here,' Bowser, who said she last spoke to Trump a few weeks ago, said on MSNBC. 'But it won't be because there's a spike in crime.' The reassignment of FBI agents has further demoralised some agents in the Washington field office, who believe they have little expertise or training in thwarting carjackers and were already angered by a spate of firings inside the agency that they deemed were unwarranted. Last week, the Trump Administration ousted with no explanation FBI personnel across the country, including the head of the Washington field office. In 2020, the first Trump Administration dispatched FBI agents, mostly from the Washington field office, to respond to the racial justice protests that June in the city. The Trump Administration had wanted a federal presence in the streets as a deterrent to rioters or protesters who might try to vandalise federal property. Several agents were captured in a photograph taking a knee in what was viewed as a gesture of solidarity to protesters marching against racial injustice - an image that went viral and fuelled accusations from conservatives that the bureau harbours a liberal agenda. People familiar with the FBI have said agents are not trained for riot control and were placed in an untenable position as they knelt down, trying to defuse a tense situation. In the first months of the current Trump Administration, officials reassigned several of those agents who were captured in that photo from nearly five years ago. 'If DC doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore,' Trump wrote on social media last week in a post that included a bloody image of the injured former Doge staffer. This northern spring, Trump ordered the creation of the 'DC Safe and Beautiful Task Force', a vehicle for his long-held fixations on quality-of-life issues in the city, including homeless encampments and graffiti. Today, homeless advocates and DC residents criticised Trump's threats to remove homeless people from DC as inhumane, costly, and impractical. 'That money could be better spent getting folks housing and support' Jesse Rabinowitz, campaign and communications director at the National Homelessness Law Centre, said of the federal law enforcement presence in the district. Deborah Goosby, a 67-year-old homeless woman, sat in her usual spot greeting shoppers outside a DC grocery store. 'That's never going to happen,' she said after hearing that Trump wanted to send people experiencing homelessness far from the nation's capital. 'They can't make me leave.'
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
‘Too woke for them' - Trump's Truth Social AI challenges his claims on key issues
'Their own AI is now being too 'woke' for them,' said David Karpf, a professor at George Washington University who studies political communication, using a term commonly employed on the right to describe liberal viewpoints. Trump Media and Technology Group, Truth Social's owner and parent company, unveiled the tool last week, calling it a 'public beta test'. The company cited an executive at the search engine's developer, Perplexity, as saying the tool offered 'direct, reliable answers' and would 'bring powerful AI to an audience with important questions'. The chatbot is free for all Truth Social users. AI search engines and chatbots are trained by being fed large amounts of information from across the internet. But the 'black box' nature of AI tools makes it challenging for developers to fully control what they say. Many of Truth Search AI's answers to questions posed by the Washington Post linked to sources based on conservative news outlets, such as Fox News, Newsmax, and the Washington Times. The tool did not say specifically which sources it had drawn from. Jesse Dwyer, a Perplexity spokesman, said that Truth Social had used a 'source selection' feature to limit the websites the AI tool relied on but that Perplexity did not know which websites those were. 'This is their choice for their audience, and we are committed to developer and consumer choice. Our focus is simply building accurate AI,' he said. Dwyer later clarified that Truth Social probably had used source selection but that he could not be sure because Perplexity does not see or control what any developer is doing with the company's application programming interface, or API. The White House declined to comment. Trump Media spokeswoman Shannon Devine said: 'With transparently asinine stories like this, Washington Post reporters indict themselves as irrelevant partisan hacks who will probably soon join the growing exodus of left-wing shills from the paper'. Trump Media sued the Washington Post alleging defamation in 2023, saying the news organisation had reported incorrectly on allegations relating to its early financing. The case is ongoing. The tool's politically inconvenient answers, Karpf said, show the limits of any attempt to recast or contest the prevalent view of a past event. 'There are things they can do to actively assert that what was true yesterday is no longer true, and they can put a lot of power behind that,' Karpf said. 'But they can't change the things that were actually said in previous years that are archived somewhere.' The tool is promoted high on the sidebar of the social media network's website. That can make for a slightly awkward pairing, given that Trump uses his account there as his main online sounding board. When asked if crime in Washington is 'totally out of control', as Trump posted there last week, Truth Search AI said it wasn't and noted that the FBI and Justice Department had reported 'substantial declines in violent crime' through 2024, italicising the word 'declines'. When asked if tariffs were having a huge positive impact on the stock market, as Trump had posted last week, the tool said 'the evidence does not support the claim'. 'Recent market gains have occurred alongside new tariffs due to other factors,' such as higher corporate earnings, it wrote, adding that analysts had warned that the tariffs' economic risks 'remain substantial' and that the American economy was 'at risk of gradual erosion'. Trump last month signed an executive order attacking 'woke AI', saying generative AI tools should be 'truth-seeking', 'neutral' and not encoded with 'partisan or ideological judgments'. And many conservatives have complained that AI developers with liberal biases could warp chatbots' answers – and, more broadly, public understanding – in insidious and undetectable ways. But companies that have sought to bend the chatbots' thinking along ideological lines, either in pursuit of pure neutrality or political point-scoring, have faced their own disasters. After billionaire Elon Musk pushed his company xAI to make its Grok chatbot more 'politically incorrect', the AI tool began blasting out Nazi messaging and calling itself 'MechaHitler'. Grok officials last month said the tool had inadvertently been made too vulnerable to parroting 'extremist views' and blamed a code update, which had instructed the chatbot to not 'blindly defer to mainstream authority or media' or be too 'afraid to offend'. The Truth Search AI answers do not always contradict Trump. Asked if AI is one of the most important technological revolutions in history, as the President said last month, the tool agreed by saying it's 'widely recognised' that the impact of AI would surpass or rival 'major historical milestones like the Industrial Revolution'. But the size of their disagreements suggests that, if the tool were a person, it may not last long as a Trump employee. Asked to name the best president, Truth Search AI said: 'recent public opinion polls show that Barack Obama holds the highest favourability among living US presidents', listing as its source a Fox News article from shortly after Trump's second inauguration. The tool did note, however, that 'conservative commentators' had often named Trump as the best. 'Different groups and surveys prioritise different qualities,' it said.
NZ Herald
8 hours ago
- NZ Herald
In a Trump-Putin summit, Ukraine fears losing say over its future
Zelenskyy himself invited such comparisons in a speech to his people hours after Trump raised the spectre of deciding Ukraine's fate in a one-on-one meeting in Alaska, territory that was once part of the Russian empire. While Putin has made clear that he regards Ukraine as rightful Russian territory dating back to the days of Peter the Great, the Russian leader has not called for the reversal of the US$7.2 million sale of Alaska to the US in 1867, during a period of financial distress for the empire. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Zelenskyy said, noting that the Ukrainian constitution prohibits such a deal. Then, in what sounded like a direct warning to Trump, he added: 'Any solutions that are against us, any solutions that are without Ukraine, are simultaneously solutions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead solutions.' Zelenskyy is the one with the most on the line in the summit. After his bitter Oval Office encounter with Trump in February, which ended in Trump's declaration that 'you don't have the cards right now', he has every reason to fear that Trump is at best an unreliable partner. At worst, Trump is susceptible to being flattered and played by Putin, for whom he has often expressed admiration. However, there are also considerable political risks for Trump. Those would be especially acute if he is viewed as forcing millions of Ukrainians into territorial concessions, with few compensating guarantees that Putin would not, after taking a breather of a few years, seize the rest of the country. 'President Trump still seems to be going into this conversation as if Putin is negotiating as a partner or friend,' said Tressa Guenov, the director for programmes and operations at the Scowcroft Centre for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. 'That will continue to make these discussions difficult if Ukraine isn't involved.' Trump's personal envoy, Steve Witkoff, raised the possibility of a meeting of Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin, and in the past week, it looked like that might be a precondition for the session in Alaska. But Trump waved away the notion when asked about it by reporters. A senior Administration official said yesterday that the President remained open to a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelenskyy, but that the meeting between Trump and Putin was set to go ahead as scheduled. Yet the gap in how Trump approaches these negotiations and how the America's allies in Europe approach them became all the more vivid at the weekend. After a meeting of European national security advisers and Ukrainian officials with Vice- President JD Vance, who is on a visit to Britain, leaders of the European Union's executive branch and nations including France, Britain, Italy and Germany called in a statement for 'active diplomacy, support to Ukraine, and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war'. They added that any agreement needed to include 'robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity', phrases Trump has avoided. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' the leaders said. Trump has long sought a direct meeting with Putin, declaring publicly that a problem like Ukraine could only be resolved with a meeting between the two top leaders. He also said last week that he expects to see President Xi Jinping of China before the end of the year. And he seems reluctant to impose more tariffs or sanctions ahead of those meetings. In fact, his deadline for Putin to declare a ceasefire or face crushing 'secondary sanctions' melted away on Friday without a mention from Trump, other than that people should wait for his meeting with Putin. The fact that Trump is even meeting with Putin represents a small victory for the Russian President, Guenov said. 'Trump still has given Putin the benefit of the doubt, and that dynamic is one Putin will attempt to exploit even beyond this meeting,' she added. While Trump has insisted that an understanding between himself and the Russian President is crucial to a broader peace, Putin, Guenov said, would certainly welcome any land concessions Trump is willing to grant. Already the President has signalled that is where these talks are headed. Trump suggested that a peace deal between the two countries could include 'some swapping of territories', signalling that the US may join Russia in trying to compel Ukraine to permanently cede some of its land — the suggestion flatly rejected by Zelenskyy. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' said Trump, leaving unclear who the 'we' in that statement was. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both, but we'll be talking about that either later, or tomorrow.' Russian officials have demanded that Ukraine cede the four regions that Moscow claimed to have 'annexed' from Ukraine in late 2022, even as some of that land remains under Ukrainian control. And Russia is seeking a formal declaration that the Crimean Peninsula is once again its territory. Yalta, where the meeting of three great powers was held 80 years ago, is a resort city on the southern coast of Crimea. Until late last week, it appeared likely that the meeting between Trump and Putin would be held on the traditional neutral grounds of the old Cold War, perhaps in Geneva or Vienna. Putin's willingness to venture into American territory was striking, not least because his arrival in the US will signal the end of his political and legal isolation from the country. In the past few months, Trump has terminated efforts at the Justice Department and the State Department to collect evidence of war crimes committed by Russia during its invasion of Ukraine. Inviting Putin to meet in the United States seemed to extinguish any threat that the US would provide evidence to the prosecution. 'It's bewildering how we could bring in somebody the International Criminal Court has classified as a war criminal,' said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, the president of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute, who has tracked many of the Russian violations. But he emphasised that Putin is entering the meeting with Trump in an extraordinarily weak position economically, and that it would benefit US negotiators to realise how few cards Russia holds. 'The mystical illusion of power that Putin creates is as real as the Wizard of Oz,' Sonnenfeld said. 'The Russian economy has been imploding. Trump doesn't seem to realise that.' Sonnenfeld cautioned Trump against any deal in which Ukraine would give up rights to the Donbas region, particularly given the agreement that the Trump Administration negotiated for the US to share in future revenues from Ukraine's mineral reserves through a joint investment fund. 'Giving up the Donbas would be disastrous,' he said. 'That is where a lot of these valuable minerals are.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: David E. Sanger and Luke Broadwater ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
