logo
Most Europeans see Trump's US as more a necessary partner than ally, poll finds

Most Europeans see Trump's US as more a necessary partner than ally, poll finds

The Guardian12-02-2025

Donald Trump's return to the White House has sparked a 'remarkable shift' in Europeans' view of the US, according to a survey, with even the most America-friendly no longer seeing Washington primarily as an ally.
The polling, of 11 EU member states plus Ukraine, Switzerland and the UK, found most people now regard the US as merely a 'necessary partner' – even in countries such as Poland and Denmark that barely 18 months ago had considered the US an ally.
An average of 50% of Europeans across the member states surveyed view the US this way, the study revealed, with an average of only 21% seeing it as an ally, leading the report's authors to urge a more 'realistic, transactional' EU approach.
The figures 'speak to a collapse of trust in Washington's foreign policy agenda' and heralded 'the potential death knell of the transatlantic alliance' said Arturo Varvelli, co-author of the report, by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
'This finding alone should really sharpen minds about the need for Europe to embrace greater pragmatism and autonomy in its global dealings, as a means of protecting its citizens and its values in the coming period,' Varvelli added.
Those seeing the US as a 'necessary partner' rather than an ally were most numerous in Ukraine (67%-27%), Spain (57%-14%) and Estonia (55%-28%). But even in the UK, which boasts of a 'special relationship' with the US, the ratio was 44% to 37%.
But while Europeans were essentially aligned on their view of US foreign policy, there were significant differences on other issues, suggesting scope for Trump's 'America First' administration to play member states off against each other.
While on average EU citizens thought Trump's return as US president was a 'bad thing' for Americans, for their own country and for world peace, Hungarians, Bulgarians and Romanians were considerably more positive than Danes and Germans.
Far-right supporters across Europe proved Trump's biggest fans, with fewer than one-fifth of voters for Fidesz in Hungary, Law and Justice (PiS) and Konfederacja in Poland and Brothers of Italy believing his re-election was a 'bad thing' on all three counts.
Respondents who voted for Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and the National Rally (RN) in France stood out, nonetheless, in having a plurality (37% and 35%, respectively) who believed Trump's return to power was a bad thing for their own countries.
There was disagreement, too, over Ukraine. Majorities or pluralities in all countries, including 55% in Denmark, 49% in the UK and 44% in Poland, said a 'compromise settlement' was the likeliest outcome of Russia's war on Ukraine.
Some, however, including Estonia, Denmark, the UK and Portugal, felt considerably more strongly than others that continuing support for Kyiv, rather than pushing for peace, must nonetheless remain the EU's priority.
And views on what should happen after the war varied widely: 47% of French and 50% of Italians said they struggled to see Ukraine as European, and in Bulgaria and Hungary, many saw Russia as an EU ally or necessary partner, not a rival or adversary.
The EU's engagement with China was another topic of divergence. Half or more of respondents in southern and south-eastern Europe, including Spain, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, said they saw Beijing as a 'necessary partner' or ally.
However, in countries in northern and western Europe, roughly similar percentages – 55% in Germany, 52% in Denmark, and 45% in the UK and France – held the opposing view, seeing China instead as a rival or adversary.
The report's authors argued there was no reason to believe Trump had changed his opinion of the EU from his first term in office, during which he called the bloc a 'foe' for the US and referred to Brussels as being 'like a hellhole'.
With the new president opposed to Europe's green transition, alleged 'wokeism' and social media regulation, the bloc must expect 'strategic, economic and political challenges' and understand that US and European interests are diverging, they said.
European leaders will need to work across the bloc's faultlines, entertain new forms of flexible cooperation among member states and, above all, resist establishing privileged bilateral relations with Trump at the expense of other European allies.
'The Atlantic community is no longer underpinned by shared values,' said the ECFR's Jana Puglierin. 'In a world of Trump 2.0, transactionality reigns. For EU leaders, this will require a positional shift away from the Washington-led status quo.'
Paweł Zerka, another co-author, said the 'Trumpisation of Europe' was evident in rising support for far-right parties, a growing readiness to adopt a transactional approach and acceptance of the need for peace negotiations in Ukraine.
But there were still 'opportunities for the EU to learn pragmatism in foreign policy; for its leaders to clarify the stakes to their voters; and for pro-European parties to differentiate themselves from the Trumpian far right', he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AP PHOTOS: Indian Premier League cricket reaches the final
AP PHOTOS: Indian Premier League cricket reaches the final

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

AP PHOTOS: Indian Premier League cricket reaches the final

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

Ryanair travel rules for Brits visiting Spain, Greece, France or Portugal
Ryanair travel rules for Brits visiting Spain, Greece, France or Portugal

Daily Mirror

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Ryanair travel rules for Brits visiting Spain, Greece, France or Portugal

Ryanair states that there are "different rules for different destinations" when it comes to travel documents. That said, we've outlined the travel guidance for the most popular summer destinations. Each summer, thousands of Brits board Ryanair flights seeking sun and surf in nearby countries. While many travellers are determined as ever to enjoy a European holiday, there are a few travel rules that should be kept top of mind to ensure a smooth journey. Ryanair has outlined the travel dos and don'ts for holiday hotspots like France, Portugal, Spain, and Greece. Under the travel documents portion of its FAQs, Ryanair reminds passengers: 'There are different rules for different destinations, so please be sure to check these before you travel. ‌ 'To streamline your travel experience and maintain a record of the necessary visa documentation, we are introducing an optional feature to upload the required visa documentation during the check-in process via our app. This will demonstrate that you carried the correct documents at the time of departure, to avoid fines or criminal penalties for travelling without the required documents.' ‌ Spain Ryanair confirmed on its website that: 'depending on your nationality and flight destination, a visa may be required to travel.' That said, according to the UK government's latest guidance, those with a full British citizen passport from the UK can travel without a visa to the Schengen area, which includes Spain, for up to 90 days in any 180-day period. Greece When it comes to travel to Greece, Ryanair's statement about visas still applies - it depends on your nationality and flight destination. But given that Greece is also part of the Schengen area, those with a full British passport will also be able to travel without a visa for up to 90 days in any 180-day period. That said, even if you are visiting multiple countries, the UK government website advises that: 'your total stay in the Schengen area must be no more than 90 days in every 180 days. 'It does not matter how many countries you visit. The 180-day period keeps 'rolling',' the website confirms. Additionally, if you are considering adding on a trip to Cyprus on your Greece journey, remember that Cyprus is not in the Schengen area. ‌ That said, the UK government confirms that British passport holders can stay up to 90 days in a 180-day period in Cyprus without a visa. More importantly, any time you spend in the Schengen area does not affect the number of days you can spend in Cyprus. France France, also being part of the Schengen region, does not require British passport holders to travel with a visa for stays under 90 days. Though keep in mind that non-EU passport holders travelling to the Schengen area are obliged to ensure that their passport is valid for at least 3 months from the date of their departure from the Schengen member country, according to the UK government website. Though this requirement does not apply to holders of a Schengen issued residence permit or long-term visas. The 'date of issue' on your passport must also be less than 10 years before the date you arrive. These three-month and 10-year rules apply for all travel to the Schengen area. Portugal Those flying to Portugal this summer via Ryanair are reminded again that entry is permitted for a maximum stay of 90 days in a 180-day period without a visa. Portugal follows Schengen area rules. Your passport must have a 'date of issue' less than 10 years before the date you arrive and have an 'expiry date' at least 3 months after the day you plan to leave the Schengen area (the expiry date does not need to be within 10 years of the date of issue). How to work out if your stay is within the 90-day limit Check the date you plan to leave the Schengen area on your next trip. Count back 180 days from that date to get the start of the 180-day period. Add up the number of days you have already spent in the Schengen area in that 180-day period (you can use the dates stamped in your passport showing when you entered and left a country). Work out how many days you will spend in the Schengen area on your next trip. Add this number to the number of days you worked out in step 3. Check that the total number of days is not more than 90.

Lee Jae-myung: South Korea's new president has a Trump-shaped crisis to avert
Lee Jae-myung: South Korea's new president has a Trump-shaped crisis to avert

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Lee Jae-myung: South Korea's new president has a Trump-shaped crisis to avert

South Korea's new president, Lee Jae-myung, has secured a storming victory, but his honeymoon will barely last the former opposition leader is not getting to enjoy the two-month transition period usually afforded to new leaders, so they can build their team and nail down their vision for the country. Instead he is entering office immediately, to fill the hole left by the impeachment of the former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, who last December tried and failed to bring the country under martial electing Lee, with almost 50% of the vote , South Koreans have vehemently rejected the military dictatorship that was almost forced upon them. Lee campaigned on the promise that he would strengthen South Korea's democracy and unite the country, after a divisive and tumultuous six that will have to wait. First, he has a Donald Trump shaped crisis to avert. In the coming months, Trump has the power to destabilise South Korea's economy, its security, and its volatile relationship with North Koreans were dismayed when Trump slapped 25% tariffs on all Korean imports in April, after already hitting the country with aggressive tariffs on its core industries – steel and cars. They had assumed that being longstanding military allies from the days of the Korean War, and having a free-trade agreement with the US, would spare these tariffs take effect "they could trigger an economic crisis", a seasoned advisor to Lee's Democratic Party, Moon Chung-in, said. Before Trump's announcements, South Korea's economy was already slowing down. The martial law chaos constricted it further. Then, in the first quarter of this year, it contracted. Fixing this has been voters' number one demand, even above fixing their beleaguered democracy. But without a president, talks with Trump have been on hold. They cannot be put off any there is much more than South Korea's economy at stake in these US currently guarantees South Korea's security, by promising to come to its defence with both conventional and nuclear weapons, were it to be attacked by its nuclear-armed neighbour, North Korea. As part of this deal there are 28,500 US troops stationed in the Trump has made clear he does not plan to differentiate between trade and security when negotiating with South Korea, signalling that Seoul is not pulling its weight in either a post on his Truth Social platform in April, Trump said that during initial tariff talks with South Korea he had "discussed payment for the big time military protection we provide", calling it "beautiful and efficient one-stop shopping".This approach makes Seoul uniquely vulnerable. Evans Revere, a former senior US diplomat based in Seoul, fears a crisis is coming. "For the first time in our lifetime we have a US president who does not feel a moral and strategic obligation towards Korea".In his first term as president, Trump questioned the value of having US forces stationed in Korea and threatened to withdraw them unless Seoul paid more to have them. It seems likely he will demand more money this time may not want to pay more, but it can afford to. A bigger problem is that Trump's calculations, and that of his defence department, seem to have changed. This is no longer just about the money. Washington's top priority now in Asia is not just stopping North Korea attacking the South, it is also to contain China's military ambitions in the region and against Taiwan. Last year, a now senior US defence official, Elbridge Colby, said that South Korea was going to have to take "overwhelming responsibility for its own self-defence against North Korea", so the US could be ready to fight option is that the troops stationed here would switch their focus to constraining China. Another, touted by a couple of US defence officials last month, is that thousands of soldiers would be removed from the peninsula altogether and redeployed, and that Seoul's military would also have to play a role in deterring only could this put South Korea in a dangerous military predicament, but it would also create a diplomatically difficult Lee, who historically has been sceptical of Korea's alliance with the US, wants to use his presidency to improve relations with China, South Korea's powerful neighbour and trading partner. He has stated several times that South Korea should stay out of a conflict between China and Taiwan."We must keep our distance from a China-Taiwan contingency. We can get along with both", he said during a televised debate last month. The political advisor Mr Moon, who once served as national security advisor, reiterated Lee's concerns. "We are worried about America abandoning us, but at the same time we are worried about being entrapped in American strategy to contain and encircle China", he said. "If the US threatens us, we can let [the forces] go", he Mr Revere, the former US diplomat, this combination of Lee, Trump and China threatens to create "the perfect storm". "The two leaders may find themselves on very different pages and that could be a recipe for a problematic relationship. If this plays out, it would undermine peace and stability in North East Asia".In Pyongyang, Kim Jong Un will no doubt be watching closely, keen to exploit the shifting ground. His nuclear weapons programme is more dangerous than ever, and nothing or no-one has been able to convince him to wind it down - including Donald Trump who, during his first term, was the first US president to ever meet a North Korean returning to office Trump has indicated he would like to resume talks with Kim, which ended without agreement in 2019. In Seoul, there is real concern that this time the pair could strike a deal that is very bad for South fear is that Trump would take an "America first" approach, and ask Kim to stop producing his intercontinental ballistic missiles that threaten the US mainland, without addressing the multiple short-range nuclear weapons pointed at Seoul. And in return, Kim could demand a high price. Kim has far more leverage than he did in 2019. He has more nuclear warheads, his weapons are more advanced, and the sanctions that were supposed to put pressure on his regime have all but collapsed, thanks largely to Vladimir Putin. The Russian leader is providing Kim with economic and military support in return for North Korea's help fighting the war in therefore gives Kim the cover to make more audacious requests of the US. He could ask Trump to accept North Korea as a nuclear weapons state, and agree to a deal that would reduce Pyongyang's weapons count rather than get rid of them altogether. Another of his requests could likely be for the US to remove some the security it provides South Korea, including the troops."North Korea is in the driver's seat now. The only curveball is how much risk President Trump will take", said Sydney Seiler, who was involved in the 2019 negotiations on the US side. "The idea there might be some sort of troop withdrawal [included in a deal] is really not that far-fetched".Mr Seiler stressed that the US would "not leave South Korea in the dust," but advised South Korea's new president to "establish a relationship with Trump early on", and be clear they expect to be part of any process, if talks new president must move quickly on all fronts, added Mr Revere, arguing that Lee's first homework assignment should be to come up with a list of 10 reasons why South Korea is an indispensable partner and why American dollars are being well spent; reasons that can convince a sceptical and transactional Trump. One Ace card South Korea is hoping to play is its shipbuilding prowess. It builds more vessels than any other country bar China, which is now the world's dominant ship builder and home to the largest naval fleet. This is a frightening prospect for the US whose own industry and navy are in month I visited South Korea's flagship shipyard in Ulsan on the south coast - the largest in the world – where Hyundai Heavy Industries builds 40-50 new ships a year, including naval destroyers. Sturdy cranes slotted together sheets of metal, creating vessels the size of small is hoping it can use this expertise to build, repair and maintain warships for the US, and in the process convince Washington it is a valuable partner."US shipbuilding difficulties are affecting their national security", said Jeong Woo Maan, head of strategy for Hyundai's naval and ship unit. "This is one of the strongest cards we have to negotiate with".In his campaign for president, Lee Jae-myung declared he did not want to rush into any agreements with Trump. Now in office, he could quickly find himself without this luxury.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store