
Employees Or Independent Contractors? How To Classify Workers
A business' tax and benefit obligations are limited when a worker is a contractor. But misclassification can be costly.
getty
When you're a small business, you may not have the resources (nor the need) for a full-time staff. You might choose to have one or two employees who work part-time, one or two who work full-time, or, depending on your circumstances, you might fill in the gaps seasonally by hiring temporary employees. From a tax and employment law perspective, all of them could potentially be your employees.
Sometimes employers assume that only full-time, permanent workers are employees. This is not true. Employees can be full-time or part-time, seasonal or year-round, temporary or permanent. The question of how to classify workers as employees versus independent contractors depends on many factors, but the length of employment is not one of them.
What distinguishes an employee from an independent contractor? If a worker is an employee, the employer has certain tax obligations on behalf of the worker. In contrast, an employer does not withhold any payroll taxes, including Social Security and Medicare taxes, nor does it pay the employer portion of those taxes for an independent contractor.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) says that the general rule is that an individual is considered an independent contractor if the person paying for the work has the right to control or direct only the result of the work, not the manner in which it is done. Or, to put it simply, it's a question of control: The more you control the terms of the employment, the more likely it is that you are an employer.
Obviously, control is relevant and cases are fact-specific. In an effort to clarify this, in 1987, the IRS developed a list of 20 factors to be considered. Those were memorialized in Revenue Ruling 87-41. (A revenue ruling is an official interpretation by the IRS of the Internal Revenue Code, related statutes, tax treaties, and regulations, and indicates how the IRS believes the law should be applied to a specific set of facts.)
The 20 factors identified by the IRS in Revenue Ruling 87-41 are listed below. The more the answer to each question is yes, the more likely it is that the worker is an employee and not an independent contractor.
Of course, that list isn't written in stone, just in a Revenue Ruling. Some of this is subjective, and there's no magic number of times you can answer yes that conclusively determines the outcome.
Since that time, the IRS has updated its checklist to three categories of factors to be used alongside the 20 questions.
For IRS purposes, as an employer, you must weigh all these factors to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The IRS also has a helpful section on its website that provides examples and definitions.
So is this just about a paycheck? Not at all. Employers have different obligations towards employees than they do towards independent contractors—and that extends beyond tax obligations. For example, an employer is not responsible for providing the same benefits and tax-favored opportunities, such as health care insurance and retirement plans, to an independent contractor that they provide to those workers who are considered employees. An employer is not required to offer stock options or other incentive plans to an independent contractor. And when an independent contractor leaves, for whatever reason, there is generally no severance or unemployment compensation payable. In short, an independent contractor is, well, independent.
Worker classification can also impact wages and overtime pay. That's why, as part of its efforts to address worker misclassification, the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor (DOL) published a final rule, effective March 11, 2024, revising its guidance on how to analyze whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Additional information is available on the DOL website.
Worker misclassification issues aren't limited to small businesses. Several high-profile companies, including Microsoft, Time Warner, and Lyft, have faced court cases over allegations of worker misclassification. Perhaps the most famous case involved FedEx, which was accused of classifying and paying its drivers as independent contractors for years (when they should have been classified as employees). After extensive litigation in multiple states, FedEx paid nearly half a billion dollars in settlement payments for misclassification.
What happens if you do it wrong? As court cases around the country have demonstrated, if you erroneously classify an employee as an independent contractor and you have no reasonable basis for doing so, you may be held liable for employment taxes for that worker. Depending on circumstances, you may be required to retroactively apply benefits.
If you have concerns, you can get out in front of the problem. If you want the IRS to make a determination, you can file Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding. (The form may be filed by either the business or the worker.) The IRS will review the facts and circumstances and officially determine the worker's status. But it's not quick: it can take at least six months to get a determination.
If you've misclassified a worker as an independent contractor, but you have a reasonable basis for doing so, you may qualify under a safe harbor for tax relief. The relief, sometimes referred to as section 530 relief, requires you to meet certain criteria, including treating the worker consistently for filing obligations (for example, you filed Form 1099-NEC for a worker you considered an independent contractor). You must also have treated similar workers as independent contractors.
The IRS also offers a Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP) that allows employers to reclassify workers as employees for future tax periods and obtain some tax relief. To participate, a business owner must meet certain eligibility requirements (similar to those for section 530 relief).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
31 minutes ago
- Associated Press
NBA's talks about new league in Europe are continuing, though the process remains in early stages
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — The NBA's talks with FIBA and other entities about the process of adding a new league in Europe are continuing, Commissioner Adam Silver said, though he noted that it may take at least a couple more years to turn the ideas into reality. Silver spoke at a league event to unveil a refurbished Boys & Girls Club in Oklahoma City on Friday — an off day for the NBA Finals — and said it's difficult to put a specific timeline on the Europe plans. 'I will say it's measured in years, not months,' Silver said. 'So, we're at least a couple years away from launching. It would be an enormous undertaking. And while we want to move forward at a deliberate pace, we also want to make sure that we're consulting with all the appropriate stakeholders, meaning the existing league, its teams, European players, media companies, marketing partners. There's a lot of work to be done.' Silver and FIBA secretary general Andreas Zagklis announced in March that the league and the game's governing body are finally taking long-awaited steps to form a new league, with an initial target of 16 teams. It had been talked about for years, and decades even on some levels. And since the NBA and FIBA went public with their idea to move forward, talks have gotten more constructive, Silver said. Silver said the NBA has been talking directly with the EuroLeague and with some member clubs about a partnership. It's his preference that the NBA work with the existing league on some level, though it's still too early to say exactly what that means. 'Either way, we continue to feel there are an enormous number of underserved basketball fans in Europe and that there's a strong opportunity to have another league styled after the NBA,' Silver said. About one in every six current NBA players hails from Europe, including Denver's Nikola Jokic (Serbia) and Milwaukee's Giannis Antetokounmpo (Greece) — who have combined for five of the last seven MVP awards — along with the Los Angeles Lakers' Luka Doncic (Slovenia) and San Antonio's Victor Wembanyama (France). The NBA's board of governors will talk more about next steps with the European plans in July at their scheduled meeting in Las Vegas, Silver said. It's possible that the European venture could be unveiled in some way — or possibly start — around the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, just given how much attention will be on international basketball at that time. 'That might be a good launching pad for an announcement around a new competition,' Silver said. Some of the cities that are expected to have interest in being part of the new venture include London, Manchester, Rome and Munich. There will be others, of course. 'We haven't had direct conversations yet,' Silver said. 'But there have been several organizations that have come forward and said they would be interested and potential owners in operating in those major markets in Europe.' ___ AP NBA:


TechCrunch
34 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Trump fast-tracks supersonic travel, amid spate of flight-related executive orders
In Brief President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday that directs the Federal Aviation Administration to lift the 52-year ban on supersonic flight over U.S. soil, marking a major policy shift that occurred just weeks after lawmakers introduced bipartisan legislation with the same aim. The order instructs the FAA to end the overland supersonic ban and create noise-based certification standards, allowing faster-than-sound travel as long as no audible sonic boom reaches the ground. 'The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours,' Michael Kratsios, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told reporters Friday. The move could help accelerate commercial supersonic flight development, including efforts by Boom Supersonic. In January, Boom's XB-1 demonstrator became the first privately developed civil aircraft to break the sound barrier over the continental U.S. Asked for comment Friday, Boom CEO Blake Scholl wrote 'Booooom!' in an email to TechCrunch. Added Scholl, 'The sound barrier was never physical — it was regulatory. With supersonic legalized, the return of supersonic passenger air travel is just a matter of time.' Trump also signed two other future-of-flight executive orders Friday: one to speed up drone commercialization and electric vertical takeoff vehicle development, and another to establish a federal task force on drone flight restrictions.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Republican at the Center of the War Between Trump and Musk
Caught in the middle of President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk's spectacular fallout is a Republican operative with close ties to both men. Katie Miller, 33, is a former Trump White House staffer married to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. Over the last year, she became a top adviser to Musk and worked at his side as he slashed and reshaped the federal government from his position as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency.