Israel's goal might be regime change in Iran: Experts
Panelists included retired Gen. Joseph L. Votel, former commander of US Central Command; retired Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, former commander of the US Navy's Fifth Fleet; and Alex Vatanka, MEI senior fellow and Iran specialist who also teaches at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.
Vatanka said it is too early to determine if Israel's main goal besides crippling Iran's nuclear program is regime change, but 'we might be going in (that) direction.'
He added: 'That's certainly what I think a majority of Iranian officials think that Israel wants. The big unknown in all of this is whether the Israelis somehow can get (US President Donald) Trump to buy into it the way he bought into the initial attack on Iran.'
Israel has launched attacks against an array of Iranian targets, including its military leadership and nuclear program. Tehran has responded by launching missiles and drones at Israel.
The panelists were in agreement in their belief that the conflict would not expand to include other countries.
Iran's leadership will define victory as being its 'survival,' Vatanka said, adding that while Israel has the backing of the US and 'most of Europe,' Tehran 'isn't getting any help from anyone.'
He said: 'I don't think they're getting help from what's left of the axis of resistance … I question what the axis of resistance members can actually do at this point.'
Its members include Hamas and Hezbollah, which have been severely weakened by Israel's military, and the Houthis in Yemen. It included Syria until the fall of President Bashar Assad in December.
Donegan said: 'I think the question is, does Iran think they've done enough in terms of lashing back that they can throw an olive branch to get some talks going again? I think it's a long shot, to be honest, that they'll come to the table in the near future.'
Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz, but 'the problem with closing Hormuz is they then don't get the economic benefit of flowing their oil out,' he added.
The end game will be defined by how far Israel intends to go with its war, the panelists said.
'The Americans are playing the good cop here. President Trump has kept the door for diplomacy open,' Vatanka said.
'The Israelis are playing the bad cop, saying, 'If you don't give Trump what he wants then we'll come after you.''
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
2 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
No special treatment for Israeli official accused of sex crime in Las Vegas: Prosecutor
The Israeli cybersecurity official recently arrested by Las Vegas-area police during an investigation into soliciting sex from a minor has received no special treatment, the prosecutor in charge of the case told local media on Tuesday. Tom Artiom Alexandrovich, a top cybersecurity official with the Israeli government, was one of eight people arrested as part of a multi-week operation by Nevada and federal authorities targeting 'child sex predators,' according to an August 15 statement from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson, whose office has jurisdiction over Las Vegas and Henderson, called the situation 'standard' in comments to the Las Vegas Review-Journal on Tuesday. Reuters was unable to reach Wolfson or a representative of his office. But during his interview with the newspaper he said that the 'standard bail for this charge was $10,000, so anybody, upon being booked on that case, can post that bail and get released with no conditions, and that's what happened in this case.' Wolfson's comments come amid a flurry of speculation that either the US or Israeli governments intervened to facilitate Alexandrovich's departure from the US after being arrested on August 6. Alexandrovich has not yet been formally charged with a crime, but faces a potential felony charge of luring a child with a computer for sex, according to the August 15 police statement. Alexandrovich, 38, posted a $10,000 surety bond the day after his arrest and prior to seeing a judge, according to a court docket. He returned to Israel two days later, according to Israeli media, who have identified him as the head of a division in Israel's National Cyber Directorate. Alexandrovich's attorney, David Z. Chesnoff, told Reuters on Tuesday by telephone, 'There's absolutely no truth to any suggestion he received special treatment. Neither federal or state prosecutors have done anything untoward in this matter.' Chesnoff did not address whether Alexandrovich would appear at an August 27 hearing scheduled for the case. In a statement provided after the phone call, Chesnoff said he and his partner, Richard A. Schonfeld, would defend their client 'within the justice system, not in the media,' and people 'should not rush to judgment,' and that Alexandrovich's 'release was consistent with normal procedures and bail was posted.' The US State Department said on Monday it played no role in Alexandrovich's release and departure from the US The FBI, which participated in the law enforcement operation, declined to comment on Tuesday. Under Nevada law, Alexandrovich was able to post bond and be released prior to seeing any judge, and no restrictions were placed on his release, according to a report from 8 News Now in Las Vegas. At least four of the eight arrestees posted bail right away and were released without conditions, Wolfson said, according to the Review-Journal. Alexandrovich was in Vegas for the Black Hat cybersecurity conference, according to an arrest report quoted by local media.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Sen. Lindsey Graham says Trump ready to ‘crush' Russian economy if Putin avoids talks with Zelensky
WASHINGTON: Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Tuesday that he believes President Donald Trump is prepared to 'crush' Russia's economy with a new wave of sanctions if Russian President Vladimir Putin refuses to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the coming weeks. Graham, who spoke with Trump on Tuesday morning, has pushed the president for months to support his sweeping bipartisan sanctions bill that would impose steep tariffs on countries that are fueling Russia's invasion of Ukraine by buying its oil, gas, uranium, and other exports. The legislation has the backing of 85 senators, but Trump has yet to endorse it. Republican leaders have said they won't move without him. 'If we don't have this thing moving in the right direction by the time we get back, then I think that plan B needs to kick in,' Graham said in a phone interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday. The Senate, now away from Washington for the August recess, is scheduled to return in September. Graham's call with Trump came less than 24 hours after high-stakes meetings at the White House with Zelensky and several European leaders. Trump and the leaders emerged from those talks sounding optimistic, with the expectation being that a Putin and Zelensky sit-down will happen soon. Still, Trump's comments to Graham, one of his top congressional allies, mark the latest sign that pressure is building — not just on Putin, but on Trump as well. 'Trump believes that if Putin doesn't do his part, that he's going to have to crush his economy. Because you've got to mean what you say,' Graham told reporters in South Carolina on Tuesday. As Congress prepares to return to session in early September, the next few weeks could become a defining test of whether lawmakers and international allies are prepared to act on their own if Trump doesn't follow through. Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the lead Democrat pushing the bill with Graham, says there is a 'lot of reason for skepticism and doubt' after the meetings with Trump, especially because Putin has not made any direct promises. He said the Russian leader has an incentive to play 'rope-a-dope' with Trump. 'The only way to bring Putin to the table is to show strength,' Blumenthal told the AP this week. 'What Putin understands is force and pressure.' Still, Republicans have shown little willingness to override Trump in his second term. They abruptly halted work on the sanctions bill before the August recess after Trump said the legislation may not be needed. Asked Tuesday in a phone interview whether the sanctions bill should be brought up even without Trump's support, Graham said, 'the best way to do it is with him.' 'There will come a point where if it's clear that Putin is not going to entertain peace, that President Trump will have to back up what he said he would do,' Graham said. 'And the best way to do it is have congressional blessing.' The legislation would impose tariffs of up to 500 percent on countries such as China and India, which together account for roughly 70 percent of Russia's energy trade. The framework has the support of many European leaders. Many of those same European leaders left the White House on Monday with a more hopeful tone. Zelensky called the meeting with Trump 'an important step toward ending this war.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that his expectations 'were not just met, they were exceeded.' Still, little concrete progress was visible on the main obstacles to peace. That deadlock likely favors Putin, whose forces continue to make steady, if slow, progress on the ground in Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters after talks at the White House that Trump believes a deal with Putin is possible. But he said sanctions remain on the table if the process fails.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Immigrants seeking lawful work and citizenship are now subject to ‘anti-Americanism' screening
Immigrants seeking a legal pathway to live and work in the United States will now be subject to screening for 'anti-Americanism',' authorities said Tuesday, raising concerns among critics that it gives officers too much leeway in rejecting foreigners based on a subjective judgment. US Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as a green card, 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused' anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' Matthew Tragesser, USCIS spokesman, said in a statement. 'Immigration benefits— including to live and work in the United States— remain a privilege, not a right.' It isn't specified what constitutes anti-Americanism and it isn't clear how and when the directive would be applied. 'The message is that the US and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions,' Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday. Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. 'The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion,' she said. Critics worry the policy update will allow for more subjective views of what is considered anti-American and allow an officer's personal bias to cloud his or her judgment. 'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome,' said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University. The policy changes follow others recently implemented since the start of the Trump administration including social media vetting and the most recent addition of assessing applicants seeking naturalization for 'good moral character'. That will not only consider 'not simply the absence of misconduct' but also factor the applicant's positive attributes and contributions. 'It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards,' Lopez said. Experts disagree on the constitutionality of the policy involving people who are not US citizens and their freedom of speech. Jacobs, of the Center for Immigration Studies, said First Amendment rights do not extend to people outside the US or who are not US citizens. Ruby Robinson, senior managing attorney with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, believes the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution protects all people in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, against government encroachment. 'A lot of this administration's activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts,' Robinson added. Attorneys are advising clients to adjust their expectations. 'People need to understand that we have a different system today and a lot more things that apply to US citizens are not going to apply to somebody who's trying to enter the United States,' said Jaime Diez, an immigration attorney based in Brownsville, Texas. Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy update was not unexpected considering how the Trump administration approaches immigration. 'This is what was elected. They're allowed to interpret the rules the way they want,' Grode said. 'The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same.'
