Geographic price gap for shopping 'unacceptable'
Photo:
123rf.com
Fair prices for groceries should not depend on a shopper's postcode, a consumer advocacy group says
The Commerce Commission's Grocery Report -
released yesterday
- highlighted the fact that areas like Auckland enjoyed more competition and cheaper prices.
The Grocery Action Group said the commission's report had no good news for consumers.
Chair Sue Chetwin said the lack of competition in smaller centres meant the markups were much higher, even though overheads such as rent were much lower.
"In rural areas and smaller towns where New Zealand's supermarket choices are narrow or non-existent, the report confirms what those living there already know - that consumers pay a premium for the lack of competition," she said.
"This kind of geographic price gap is unacceptable. Fair prices shouldn't depend on your postcode."
Chetwin said on top of the 4.6 percent increase in grocery prices for the year to May, there were other findings in the report that were thoroughly alarming.
"For instance it notes we are paying higher than the OECD average for groceries even though we earn well below the average OECD wage.
"Another disturbing fact is the prices that the supermarket chains pay their suppliers are subsidised by around $5b in rebates, discounts and promotional payments paid by suppliers," Chetwin said.
She said the report confirmed Kiwi consumers were paying way over the odds for their groceries.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Matakana imitation scam store rebrands as Australian boutique
The scammers who hijacked the identity of a Matakana business to run an imitation online clothing store have quickly changed their outfit following media exposure — this time rebranding as an Australian boutique. The original site, Matakana Boutique, copied the name of the legitimate accommodation and catering business owned by Amy and Simon Hope in the north Auckland town. First registered in April, the scam website aggressively marketed itself on social media claiming to be a New Zealand-based clothing retailer. Earlier this week, Amy Hope told 1News she was receiving multiple calls a day from women chasing up late packages, asking for refunds, and complaining about poor-quality clothing they believed were purchased from her business. "It's soul-destroying," she said, describing the emotional toll of being wrongly associated with the scam. ADVERTISEMENT Within 24 hours of that coverage, the domain stopped displaying the fake store, and by Friday evening it was redirecting to Canberra Muse, which billed itself as "brand built in and for" the Australian capital city. The Canberra Muse website uses the same layout, pricing, and stock clothing images as its predecessor, only its name, location and branding have changed. Domain registration data showed it was purchased on August 8 and is hosted overseas. Its ownership details were not readily accessible. Speaking to 1News today, Hope said the website changing was a "great result" for her business. "It's still getting redirected, but hopefully that website will just go soon." How to spot a fake e-store The Commerce Commission has previously urged consumers to take extra care when shopping online, especially when dealing with unfamiliar websites. ADVERTISEMENT Before making a purchase, the commission recommended researching the business by checking independent reviews and feedback on external platforms. "Don't rely solely on testimonials displayed on the company's own website," a spokesperson said. "These can be selectively curated or even fabricated." Consumers were also encouraged to look for clear and accessible contact details, such as a local address and phone number. "Legitimate online businesses typically provide transparent information about delivery, returns, and payment security," the commission said. Red flags included vague or missing contact information, overly positive reviews with no detail, and websites that mimicked the branding of known businesses. "Taking a few minutes to verify a site before you buy can save you from being misled or losing money," the commission added.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Regional Wrap goes to Hikurangi
Hikurangi, 20 minutes north of Whangarei, is an old dairy and mining town known for some of the most specular limestone formations in the region. It's a "one coffee one pub" kind of town, says Craig Cooper, who with his partner runs a surprising retail and culture enterprise in the town called Hiku . As the t-shirts they've produced says, they specialise in "Art music and cool shit."
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: 'Surprise' rise in Trump's trade tariff?
One of many headlines calling the 15 percent tariff rate imposed by the US 'a surprise'. Photo: The Post "If the name of New Zealand is seriously so threatened, why didn't New Zealand First introduce this bill 12 months ago? Why not six years ago? Why not negotiate it into the coalition agreement when they formed a government?" Jack Tame asked on his Newstalk ZB show last weekend . He was talking about the New Zealand (Name of State) Bill freshly proposed by NZ First MP Andy Foster, which would legislate New Zealand as the official name of the country. "Could it possibly be that a few hours before ... Australia and the UK achieved lower trade tariffs with the United States, while our government's top officials were apparently surprised to learn that our tariff had been increased?" he asked. Party leader Winston Peters didn't like it. On social media, he pointed out that on the same show five years ago, Jack Tame had backed 'Aotearoa New Zealand' as the official name for our nation. In a long interview about the Bill on the alternative news platform The Platform, Peters said he was delighted his "counter-attack" on Jack Tame was getting good online engagement. The hike in US trade tariffs didn't come up until Peters himself mentioned it at the very end. "Before you go, you know, we've got this thing with the United States and everybody's alarmed. I've seen all the headlines on Radio New Zealand and all the newspapers today. We'll turn this thing around. You watch," the foreign minister said. Since 5 April, US importers of New Zealand products have been paying a 10 percent tariff on all goods - and 25 percent on steel and aluminium. While Tame said the 15 percent tariff the US confirmed late last week seemed to be a surprise to our government and trade officials, the media seemed surprised too. Many news stories - and many headlines - called it a 'surprise' rise . But ahead of that, Trade Minister Todd McClay himself said the tariff could rise to 15 percent. At a media conference earlier, President Trump himself told reporters that the universal tariff could increase to 15 or 20 percent for countries that had not struck deals with the US. Todd McClay also told reporters last week, if the tariff rate goes to 15 percent our exporters have already adjusted and will be able to deal with it. If so, they adjusted a bit better than the surprised media this past week. On Newstalk ZB, Mike Hosking told his listeners the lower rate charged across the Tasman was the real shock. "Australia can land their beef and their wine at 10 percent, we land ours at 15," he complained. But to those surprised by that, Scoop's Gordon Campbell said they shouldn't have been. "We sell them more than they buy from us. In Trumpland, any country that runs a trade surplus with the US is a bad country that is ripping the US off. How bad have we been? Pretty bad, in Trumpian terms," New Zealand is a victim of its own export success, Gordon Campbell said - a bit like butter buyers in our duopolistic supermarkets. Trade Minister Todd McClay also confirmed that 15 percent was no surprise on NZME's rural show The Country . "If we had run a trade deficit with the US like Australia, would we have got 10 percent?," host Jamie McKay asked McClay on Wednesday, in Bangkok en route to Washington to plead our case. "It is as simple as that," the trade minister replied, confirming he had been told as much previously by US trade representative Jamieson Greer. "He said it didn't matter if you had camped out here in Washington, if you'd had a trade deal or you're negotiating one. For any country that had a trade surplus against the US last year - it is 15 percent or more," McClay said. Todd MaClay dodged the next question, about whether we would agree to buy more stuff from the US to reduce our trade deficit. This week McClay and columnist Gordon Campbell both pointed out that the trade surplus has in previous years been flipped by one-off purchases of big-ticket items like aircraft. The deal Trump struck with the EU earlier this month included billions of dollars-worth of energy and military equipment. Many people in many industries are now watching this space, including the media - surely not so surprised by now. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
