
Philly judge faces ethics complaint over role in wife's cheesesteak shop
The Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board on Tuesday filed a complaint against Common Pleas Judge Scott DiClaudio over Shay's Steaks, a high-end cheesesteak restaurant that opened more than a year ago a few blocks from city hall.
'This complaint is such a farce,' DiClaudio, who is acting as his own lawyer, said in a phone interview Tuesday evening. 'People do not come to Shay's because a judge may make their cheesesteak.'
'I have a support role, which I'm permitted to have,' he said. In a podcast interview cited by the board, DiClaudio discussed decisions about pricing, ingredients, salary levels for employees and competing restaurants.
'I don't mind charging $19, because I'm giving you a better quality steak,' DiClaudio said on the podcast.
Lately, he said, health issues and the demands of having a young child have limited his time in the business. As a criminal court judge, his focus these days is on court actions filed by defendants after they have been convicted.
The Judicial Conduct Board investigates and prosecutes possible instances of judge misconduct in Pennsylvania. The case will be heard by the Court of Judicial Discipline.
The board complaint notes that news coverage of the restaurant in Philadelphia, where cheesesteaks are the subject of perpetual public interest, has noted he is a judge. One story referred to him as 'whiz honor' — a reference to the use of Cheez Whiz on some cheesesteaks.
If anything, DiClaudio said, his role in the restaurant may be improving the image of judges in the minds of his fellow Philadelphians, giving them 'confidence in the judiciary — that we're not all robots.'
Shay's Steaks is named for his late mother and the luncheonette his parents ran for more than two decades in South Philly.
The complaint references several news stories about the restaurant that describe him as a judge.
'I had no idea what they were going to write," DiClaudio said. "I had no say in the editing process until I saw it myself.'
He noted a sign at the restaurant states Jackee DiClaudio is the owner — the couple lives in the same building as the restaurant. He said Shay's Steaks has never used an image of him in judicial robes or described him as a judge in advertising materials. He says he's never been paid for his work there, and that the profits go to his wife.
DiClaudio is accused of falling short of a requirement that judges always act in a way that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Another allegation is that he violated a rule that judges 'not abuse the prestige of judicial office to advance the personal or economic interests of the judge or others, or allow others to do so.'
County judges such as DiClaudio may not have other employment that would in any way interfere with their judicial duties and responsibilities, said Sam Stretton, a prominent judicial ethics lawyer. He has represented DiClaudio in the past, and may again in the current matter.
'He's very proud of his wife and what she's doing there,' Stretton said. 'Sure, he gives input but I don't see that as being prohibited. The issue he's got to deal with is: Is there self-promotion here?'
Complicating the case is that DiClaudio is currently on probation under a decision by the Court of Judicial Discipline that involved tax liens and an unpaid bill. He was found to have not acknowledged debt on his financial disclosure forms and did not obey court orders, leading to repeated contempt citations against him, the court said.
He was suspended without pay for two weeks, so in order to qualify for a pension and retiree health care he needs to serve two additional weeks after his term expires in January 2026. A Democrat, he is seeking retention to another 10-year term. If he wins retention he says he is considering retiring early next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12-07-2025
- Yahoo
Judge expected to decide if Aliza Sherman murder suspect should be placed on GPS
CLEVELAND (WJW) – A Cuyahoga County Common Pleas judge will be asked Wednesday to place an accused killer, who is now out on a $2 million bond, on a GPS monitoring device. Judge Kira Krivosh is expected to hear arguments on the matter during a pretrial for Gregory Moore. Moore, a former divorce attorney, is accused of killing his client Aliza Sherman in March of 2013. Her case had gone unsolved for 12 years. Local doctor indicted on ethnic intimidation in threats against Jewish-American congressman Max Miller A grand jury secretly indicted Moore in May on several charges including aggravated murder. He was arraigned May 28. At that time, Judge Deborah Turner set his bond at $2 million and the only restriction she placed on him was that he stay away from Sherman's family. Moore posted the bond July 3 and walked out of the Cuyahoga County jail. A short time later, prosecutors filed a motion asking he be placed on an electronic monitoring device. Moore's attorney, Jon Paul Rion, however, objects. Rion said he does not believe it is necessary to place any additional restrictions on Moore.'Moreover, for 13 years, Moore has been in plain sight, not hiding and not on the run,' Moore's attorney wrote in a motion opposing the GPS monitoring device. 'Moore is prepared to face these false allegations against him.' Tornado confirmed in Medina County on Monday The prosecution, however, disagrees. 'This case is not weak by any means,' prosecutors wrote in their motion. 'The fact that Gregory Moore thinks it is, is even more reason for his whereabouts to be monitored by this court until the trial in this matter.' Moore's trial is set for March. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Axios
17-06-2025
- Axios
More agencies are helping ICE in Pennsylvania
More law enforcement agencies in Pennsylvania are assisting federal efforts to arrest and remove undocumented immigrants this month, according to an Axios analysis. The big picture: The removal of unauthorized immigrants has accelerated in Pennsylvania since the start of the year, per the latest data from the nonpartisan Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). This comes as President Trump ordered U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over the weekend to " expand efforts to detain and deport" undocumented immigrants in Democratic-run cities. By the numbers: Nearly 860 removal orders were issued to Pennsylvanians in April, about 28% of which were for Philadelphians, the TRAC data shows. The number of Pennsylvania removal orders has been steadily ticking up each month from 567 in January. In April 2024, Pennsylvanians received about 440 removal orders. Zoom out: Roughly 46,800 removal orders were issued nationwide in April, per TRAC. And now, Trump's team is demanding that agents arrest 3,000 undocumented immigrants a day — an unprecedented pace ICE is still trying to reach. Immigration advocates have warned that these wide sweeps could lead to citizens and legal immigrants being wrongfully detained or deported. State of play: Roughly 700 local law enforcement agencies are cooperating with ICE through deals known as 287(g) agreements, per federal data as of Monday. The agreements allow such agencies to carry out immigration enforcement and supplement federal officers, who have limited resources, according to Trump border czar Tom Homan. Virginia, Texas, Florida, Georgia and North Carolina have been most cooperative with immigration enforcement. Zoom in: As of Monday, ICE had 14 deals in place with local law enforcement agencies in Pennsylvania, which include the Bucks County Sheriff's Office and the Lancaster County Sheriff's Office. That's three more than last week. Another three agreements with agencies in the state are pending. Between the lines: In Philly, local police don't enforce immigration law but can cooperate with federal enforcement if an individual is being released for certain violent crimes and a detainer request is backed up by a warrant.

Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Murder trial for 'El Diablo' begins with opening statements
Jun. 11—Antonio Riano does not deny he shot Benjamin Becarra outside a Hamilton bar 20 years ago. But his defense attorneys this week will try to prove he did it in self defense. The murder trial for Riano, also known as 'El Diablo,' began today with opening statements after jurors were chosen Tuesday in a Butler County Common Pleas courtroom. The prosecution said the 63-year-old Mexican national said he ruthlessly shot the 25-year-old Becarra in the face on Dec. 19, 2024, with a .38 Smith & Wesson. The defense said Riano was at a breaking point, claiming he and his family were terrorized by the man he shot. Assistant prosecutor Michael Hon led the proceedings Wednesday with his opening statement before a jury of 12 and two alternates. The facts show that the two men were at the Round House Bar on East Avenue and Long Street. Riano was inside when Becarra walked through a door off Long Street. An argument ensued, which had continued outside the bar. Hon said Riano fired a shot into the ground, and Becarra told a cousin to call 911. Then Riano walked away, but turned back, and they continued arguing. A bystander from the bar stood between the two men, but Hon said Riano pulled out his gun, stretched his arm over that bystander, and shot Becarra in the face. Defense attorney Kara Blackney said the shooting was in self-defense, and told the jury her client had "enough." She said Becarra and his friends terrorized him and his family — he had a wife and three children under 10 at the time — and allegedly attacked his younger brother. "Antonio wasn't going to the Round House Bar looking for a fight," Blackney said, adding his "El Diablo" nickname stems from volunteer work for his church as a teenager. "The fight found him." Blackney said the shooting happened mid-afternoon on Dec. 19, 2004, and Becarra said his blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit and tested positive for cocaine. She was also told he was not permitted in that bar, as well as others, due to a fight the day prior. Hon told the jurors that the evidence presented and the witnesses called "may seem out of order to you," mostly in part due to navigating schedules and travel of witnesses, "it will all come together at the end." Butler County authorities worked the case for two decades with federal authorities to bring Riano back to Hamilton on the murder charge. According to Blackney, Riano fled Hamilton, going to New Jersey before heading to Mexico, where he had lived for the past 20 years, including working as a police officer in his hometown. Riano was indicted on the murder charge in February 2005. He was extradited back to the United States with the help of the U.S. Marshals Office and other authorities on Aug. 1.