Fermanagh shooting: Vigil remembers ‘devoted mother' Vanessa Whyte and her ‘gifted' children
shooting incident
in Co
Fermanagh
this week.
Just over a mile from the scene where the terrible events unfolded, crowds assembled at Maguiresbridge Primary School on Friday evening to pay their respects to the late Vanessa Whyte (45) and her teenage children, James (14) and Sara (13).
All three tragically died just two days earlier in an incident that has plunged this quiet rural community into profound grief.
Vanessa Whyte pictured with her daughter Sara Rutledge and son James Rutledge. All three died following a shooting in Co Fermanagh. Photograph: PSNI/PA Wire
A murder investigation has since been launched, while an adult male remains in a 'serious' condition in hospital.
READ MORE
Heartbreak, sadness, and shock were written large on the faces of those who turned out for the vigil. Among them were local residents, members of the sporting community, and high-profile political figures, including First Minister
Michelle O'Neill
.
[
'I am gutted for the family': Fermanagh and Clare communities remember shooting victims
Opens in new window
]
A book of condolence was opened at the primary school earlier that day.
Local clergy offered prayers and readings, and a two-minute silence was then observed. In that quiet moment, the enormity of what has befallen this community came into full focus.
The vigil offered a chance for those who knew Vanessa, James, and Sara to reflect on happier times.
Innes Redmond, a former employer of Vanessa, expressed his disbelief.
'She was a lovely person, truly lovely,' he said. 'A hard worker, down-to-earth, no-nonsense. She was effective and accomplished a great deal in her career.
'She was a devoted mother to her children. She loved her cattle too. She adored her Simmental cows. I have such great memories of her.'
Former colleague, Julie Wood, also paid a warm tribute.
'There's a real sense of disbelief,' she said. 'We just can't believe this has happened to Vanessa, a strong, vibrant woman with so much life in advance of her. She was a wonderful mum, and her clients adored her.
'People are in shock. It's so tragic.'
Honor Irvine, principal of Maguiresbridge Primary School, took the opportunity to reflect on the profound impact James and Sara had during their time at the school.
'James and Sara both attended Maguiresbridge Primary School. They were only a year apart – Irish twins, you could say.
[
Fermanagh village in shock after woman and two children killed in house
Opens in new window
]
'For eight years, the children and their family were very much a part of our school community.
'James and Sara were great fun, very gifted in their schoolwork, but they also excelled at every sport they tried. They had a background in GAA and hurling, loved cricket, netball -anything like that.
'They were very outdoorsy children. They loved farming, and their mum had them involved from a young age.'
Like so many in the community, Ms Irvine is struggling to come to terms with the events of Wednesday morning. However, in some small way, the vigil has provided solace to a stricken community.
'It has been comforting today,' she said. 'The vigil has given people the chance to come together in grief, to mourn, and to comfort one another.'
The vigil drew to a close, marking the first tentative steps by this community to move forward amid the darkness. Just down the road, the scene at Drummeer Road remains closed off by the PSNI, as detectives continue to work to establish the full circumstances.
Ms Whyte, originally from Barefield, Co Clare, attended secondary school in Coláiste Muire in Ennis and moved to
Fermanagh
several years ago.
The Village Rural Development Association which has organised the book of condolence, said the vigil provided an opportunity for people to come together and support each other.
The impact of this tragedy will stay with this close-knit community for years to come.
– Additional reporting PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
6 hours ago
- Agriland
Fermanagh farmer convicted over animals in 'poor condition'
A Co. Fermanagh farmer has been convicted in court over the condition of animals on his farm. 78-year-old Wesley Lee of Cleenish Road, Cleenish, Bellanaleck, Enniskillen was today (Wednesday, August 6) convicted at Enniskillen Court on two charges under the Welfare of Animals Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 and one under the Veterinary Medicines Regulations 2013. Lee was convicted on: Two charges of failure to ensure the needs of animals were met; One charge of failure to produce a medicine record when required. The farmer was convicted and fined £600 plus £15 offender levy and £72 summons fee. The case arose following numerous welfare inspections carried out by Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) Veterinary Service officials between April 13, 2023 and September 4, 2023. During these inspections, one sheep was found to be caught on briars and was euthanised by a DAERA veterinary officer as, in their opinion, it was suffering unnecessarily. There were a number of lame animals and animals in poor condition on the premises being kept in dirty conditions without access to clean drinking water. There was no evidence of suitable pens for calving or suitable isolation pens for sick or injured animals and young calves had no access to dry lying areas. During one of the inspections, one of the sick animals died. Lee was asked to provide medicine records to demonstrate treatment of the lame and sick animals seen, but was unable to provide such. DAERA has stated that it gives high priority to the welfare of animals and operates a vigorous enforcement policy to ensure full compliance of regulatory requirements. Any breaches are investigated thoroughly and offenders prosecuted as necessary, it added. The improper use of medicines in animals presents a risk to human health, DAERA has stressed. This is of particular relevance when it comes to observing withdrawal times of medicines administered to animals which are subsequently slaughtered for human consumption. The main areas for concern are: The slaughter for human consumption of an animal before the recommended withdrawal period has been observed for drugs which may themselves have direct side effects in humans; The slaughter of animals entering the food chain containing a drug to which human pathogens are capable of developing a resistance which may reduce the effectiveness with which human diseases can be controlled by a drug. If proper medicine records are not kept, there is a risk of animals which have been treated, but whose withdrawal periods have not been observed, being slaughtered for human consumption, or sold on to another herd from which they will be slaughtered for human consumption without withdrawal times being observed.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Refusing to see the links between domestic violence and wider society amount to reckless denial
The revelation that four in 10 of those arrested for last summer's UK riots had been reported for prior domestic abuse was useful but hardly surprising. Useful in drawing an indisputable link between public violent disorder and domestic violence. Not at all surprising in that people who try to set fire to human beings in buildings while roaring 'burn it down' are unlikely to be paragons of domestic harmony back home. This is well-documented territory. Among the rioters arrested at the US Capitol in January 2021, NPR identified dozens of defendants with prior convictions or pending charges for crimes including rape, sexual abuse of a minor, domestic violence, manslaughter, production of child sexual abuse material and drug trafficking. Among prominent Capitol rioters included in Donald Trump 's blanket pardon was Peter Schwartz who had 38 prior convictions including domestic assault. A 2020 charge against Schwartz of assaulting his wife included details of biting her forehead and punching her multiple times. Another is serving 19 years for raping a seven-year-old child. Though societies are taking a while to work it out, domestic violence is not just a private assault on intimate partners and children. It serves as a red flag for potential violence in the public space from crime to war and terrorism. READ MORE This is why the jubilant New York street scenes with much spraying of baby oil following the verdicts in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial were among the most depressing features of the case. They were claiming exoneration following his acquittal of racketeering and sex trafficking, though he was found guilty of 'transportation to engage in prostitution'. More than that, they knew precisely what his own defence team had conceded in court; that Combs was a violent domestic abuser. 'We own the domestic violence. We own it. I hope you guys know this,' his lawyer Marc Agnifilo told the jury in a perverse case of humblebrag. They had to own it. There was video evidence of Combs knocking his girlfriend to the ground and kicking her where she lay. Afterwards Agnifilo declared: 'It's a great victory for Sean Combs; it's a great victory for the jury system.' Here was a top-flight lawyer, who rather than fade out with a semblance of humility and dignity, chose bullish triumphalism and half-truths to celebrate a domestic abuser. When asked if he might pardon Combs, Trump replied: 'Well, he was essentially, I guess, sort of half innocent. Probably, you know I was friendly with him. I got along with him very well ...' For those of us not in the megarich politician/lawyer/celebrity bracket, it's a simple equation: people who want to persuade themselves that the accusers of Combs or Trump or Conor McGregor – the wannabe president who tweeted during the Dublin riots: 'Do not let any Irish property be took over unannounced. Evaporate said property. It's a war' – are gold-diggers and liars and may carry on with the non-conflicted fandom. But refusing to see the links between attacks on women and children and the wider eruptions in society amount to reckless denial of a kind that rebounds on society at large. Women's Aid received the highest number of disclosures of domestic violence and abuse in its 50-year history last year. In the past week or so, Irish headlines have served up some potent reminders of what such intimate violence looks like: Ian Rutledge who murdered his wife Vanessa Whyte and their two children Sara and James in Maguiresbridge, Fermanagh, had tried to strangle her a week before the shootings, according to a Sunday Life article published on the Belfast Telegraph's website. He had a legally-held shotgun. A woman who was raped and choked by her partner Christopher Ryan while he told her, 'I will f**k you up once you pass out', told the Central Criminal Court that she would 'never trust again'. A 21 year old called Jack Cummins was sentenced to six years in prison for organising a four-man assault on a then-17 year old girl, which left her permanently blind in one eye. Alanna Quinn Idris said she had been harassed for years. A man who told his wife she should remain inside the home, restricted her food, limited the heating and had a security system with cameras that fed back to an app on his phone was given a suspended sentence for coercive control and assault. A 24-year-old carpet fitter John Hoey pleaded guilty to assault causing harm to his pregnant partner after accusing her of cheating. He pushed her head under the water while she was having a bath, threatened her with a knife and grabbed her by the throat causing her to pass out. Pedro Cifali tracked and followed his former partner's car around Dublin while he disguised himself before attempting to murder her by stabbing her in the neck, back and abdomen. Lucia Nezbalove survived only because a doctor nearby heard her screams and kept her alive. A man attacked his partner, dragged her by the hair, punched and kicked her before she ran into her child's bedroom, where he followed her with a knife, attempted to slit her throat and sliced her cheek before stabbing her twice near-fatally in the chest before attempting to stab his stepdaughter. He has not accepted the jury verdicts. A 28-year-old father of three was jailed for 18 months for asking a mother on Snapchat if he could have sex with – or 'feek' as he put it – her two-year-old daughter. 'Domestic' violence may be the most stupidly damaging misnomer of the era. It's time to start drawing the connection in our own society too. The 24/7 freephone helpline for Women's Aid is 1800 341 900. There is an instant-messaging service on lists 37 domestic abuse services across Ireland
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Sarah Harte: Are we living in the age of rage?
It feels like we've gotten angrier. It's the age of rage. Anger often masks other emotions, such as powerlessness or fear. I feel this a lot at the moment. The trip switch goes up—too many personal worries against a background of global carnage and economic turmoil. However, a specific brand of misogynistic rage is directed against women and girls because of their gender. It's not new. Our mothers, grandmothers and great-grandmothers lived with it. Last week, my article went viral. Essentially, I debunked the idea that men just snap and lose control in a domestic homicide when the murder of a woman is the endgame of a long road of abuse and coercive control and will have a premeditated element. Countless experts, including psychologists, academics and criminologists, confirm this. The article hit a nerve with women who reposted it many times. The feminist writer Caroline Madden said: 'Women are sharing articles like yours with each other because they're horrified by these family murder-suicide and femicide cases, and they're also appalled at the thought of what the victims in these cases most likely went through in the lead-up to the murders. "Almost every woman I spoke with last week, including a stranger I got into conversation with, brought up the Vanessa Whyte case or issues relating to it. Women are heartbroken by it to the point of barely being able to continue speaking after mentioning the case. "But women are continuing to speak, continuing to share, continuing to raise their voices despite the abuse that speaking out about gendered violence and femicide can attract. Because this feels like a tipping point: women have had enough." Caroline kindly called me because she saw misogynistic comments that last week's article attracted. I'm talking about men who went for the 'fuck you bitch' line (this one was mild, compared to many others) and who felt that I had overstepped some invisible mark they had laid down. Family members told me not to read the comments, but I did. What I took from some of the more problematic ones was a need to control, mixed with a sense of humiliation, deep-seated entitlement and rage. As the Gen Z male who volunteers to manage my social media accounts commented: Do these guys not understand that ironically their misogynistic comments literally prove the thesis of your article? To the Twitter user who said: "Sarah Harte doesn't have a medical degree to analyse these things". You're correct, I don't. It's a fair comment. But I do work as a strategist in domestic, sexual and gender-based violence for an organisation called Haven Horizons. Our work focuses on changing the attitudes and beliefs that drive domestic abuse supportive behaviours, and it is based on engaged academic research and experiential knowledge. I wonder if misogyny is so embedded that some men - and women - struggle to recognise it? As it happened, just as the article blew up, I was coincidentally researching how media reporting on male violence against women should be framed to educate people and challenge stereotypical attitudes about male violence against women. I came across a quote from a Scottish journalist, Anna Burnside: 'How we frame stories about violence against women is so important. Violence against women is not caused by drink, drugs, provocative outfits, mental health issues, stress, money problems or infidelity. It is caused by men. "That is the story that we need to tell.' Breaking for lunch, I said to an older male relative in a rare moment of defeat (we all have them) that it felt futile to work in this area if an article like the one I wrote attracted those kinds of comments. He pointed out, logically, that it was more reason than ever to keep going. Manosphere A UN report in March sounded the alarm on how the online manosphere is moving misogyny to the mainstream. What was once fringe has transmuted into an organised resistance to the wins made in terms of gender equality. Some males do not like the gains women have made in being recognised in the public sphere. It sits badly with them, and so there is a backlash. Hence, the kind of comments that women attract online are amplified by social media, fuelling a growing rage. Laura Turquet, the deputy head of the research and data team at UN Women, pinpoints two main reasons for the backlash against women and gender equality. One is that some men hanker after 'an imagined past where men and women had much more traditional roles'. They were top dog, essentially. The second is the growth of economic inequality. 'When people feel that they can't access a decent job or a basic standard of living, they look for scapegoats, whether it's migrants, LGBT+ people, or women who are speaking up.' Another factor in the rampant misogyny towards women is porn, especially pernicious among younger men. Garda Commissioner Drew Harris (due to retire in August) again warned last week in the Irish Examiner how online pornography is 'corrupting' young men, motivating them into inflicting serious sexual violence on women. He said this was seen in relationships and was driving the rising levels of domestic violence. Meanwhile, the tech companies make 'billions' from this trade. This cannot be attributed to cultural noise generated for the sake of column inches. Instead, it's an explicit, well-informed warning coming from the horse's mouth—another alarm bell in a series of warnings. I thought what was especially interesting was that Commissioner Harris said domestic violence remained a 'taboo subject.' He said we need to be more aware of the problem. There is a denial of the extent of the problem of male violence against women. Traditionalists will probably claim that what we are seeing is the result of liberalism. I disagree. I instinctively mistrust people who denigrate Catholicism willy-nilly (at its core, it is a great philosophy with much to offer). Still, the monopoly of the hierarchical Catholic Church was hugely damaging, particularly around so-called morality. So much unhappiness sprang from the suppression and denial of women's rights and other marginalised groups. There was massive violence against women and queer people under the Catholic regime. Societies change tack. The cultural map of Ireland has changed beyond belief over several decades, and in many ways for the better. Yet now technology has changed the way our young people are being socialised into beliefs, values and practices. To not grasp this nettle is not only damaging to women who, as Caroline Madden said, are despairing. But it's bad for young men, too. As Drew Harris said, they are being corrupted. They must be confused and adrift. This is ultimately terrible for social cohesion. We are at a clear societal turning point, when collectively at a familial, community, and national level, we have to fight back against misogyny, social media, the degradation of public discourse and porn. There are lots of things we can do, none of them a perfect or easy solution. Various measures must be executed on several levels simultaneously, from banning smartphones under the age of 16 to publicly educating people about the dangers of porn and domestic and sexual abuse. We have to create a different web of meaning for young people so they can maintain positive bonds together. We badly need a national summit with actors from different sectors of the community to discuss this and frame solutions. Educators, parents, frontline domestic, sexual and gender-based violence professionals, gardaí, survivors of abuse, policy makers, legislators and politicians, liberals and yes, conservatives too. We need to set aside our differences as good people who ultimately want the same thing, the best for our children. And we must figure out in good faith how to combat the tech billionaires who are corrupting young people. We've changed before and stood up against a harmful system. We can do it again. The time is now.
